Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Barangay Chapter 4 and 5
Barangay Chapter 4 and 5
Barangay Residents 52
IT Experts 5
Total Respondents 57
4 3.51-4.50 Agree
3 2.51-3.50 Neutral
2 1.51-2.50 Disagree
W = weighted average
n = number of terms to be averaged
wi = weights applied to x values
Xi = data values to be averaged
The interpretation of the scale was adopted from the study of Joshi, A., Kale, S.,
Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). entitled Likert scale: Explored and explained. British
journal of applied science & technology.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The result of evaluation from the participants based on ISO 25010 Standards in terms of
Functionality, Efficiency, Usability, Reliability, Security, Maintainability, and Portability;
Qualitative
Functionality Mean
Description
Table 3 shows that the users of the system agree with the functionality
the participants have shown agreement that the system can perform the required task,
deliver expected results, can interact with another system and prevents unauthorized
access as indicated by the mean of 4.60, 4.13, 4.23, and 4.10 respectively.
Table 4. Mean Response and Qualitative Description of the residents in
Evaluating the Developed Barangay Health Center Records and Monitoring
System.
Descriptive
Efficiency Mean
Interpretation
The analysis above shows that the participants agree on the 3.96 -4.10.
efficiency of the developed system as indicated by the category mean of 4.02. Further
analysis shows that the system responds quickly in all its functionality and operation,
utilizes all its resources efficiently, has the choice of going directly to desired
demonstrably effective with the intended audience, including people of varying abilities
and experiences with mean ranging from 3.96 -4.10which is qualitatively described as
strongly agree that the program creates a permanent record for a user, that record is
secure and confidential. There is provision for erasing the record when the information
participants strongly believed that the software was capable of handling errors, and
most of the faults in the software have been eliminated over time with a mean of 3.90
Results further show that the participants agree with reliability characteristics of
Descriptive
Usability Mean
Interpretation
3.94
The user easily understand/comprehend Agree
how to use the system.
3.90
The user learn to use the system easily. Agree
4.19
The user use the system without much Agree
effort.
3.92
The interface looked good and attractive. Agree
3.92
The organization is clear, logical, and Agree
effective, making it easy for the intended
audience to understand .
4.17
The individual can operate the system Agree
independently.
It is reflected in table 6 that the participants have strong agreement regarding the
usability of the developed system as shown by the category mean of 4.01. However, all
of the sub-characteristics of usability rated agree by the users. This involves the
characteristic that the individual can operate the system independents (4.17), the user
learn to use the system easily (3.90), and the user use the system without much effort
(4.19), The user easily understand/comprehend how to use the system (3.94), the
organization is clear, logical, and effective, making it easy for the intended audience to
understand (3.92), and the interface looked good and attractive (3.92).
Descriptive
Maintainability Mean
Interpretation
In terms of the maintainability of the system, the participants strongly agree that
the Software continue functioning when modifications/changes are made, faults and
errors can be easily diagnosed, the Software can be easily modified in accordance to
what user needs, and the Software can be tested easily with means ranging from 3.85 -
4.13.
Qualitative
Portability Mean
Description
Table 8 reflects the mean of the responses of the participants regarding the
portability of the developed system. The users have shown strong agreement regarding
the portability characteristics as gleaned on the category mean of 4.34. The users
specifically believed that the software can be installed easily, the software comply with
the portability standards, the software can be easily moved from one to another
environment, and the software can replace other software as indicated by the mean
Qualitative
Functionality Mean
Description
Table 3 shows that the users of the system strongly agree with the functionality
the participants have shown agreement that the system can perform the required task,
deliver expected results, can interact with another system and prevents unauthorized
Descriptive
Efficiency Mean
Interpretation
The analysis above shows that the participants agree on the 4.20 -4.60.
efficiency of the developed system as indicated by the category mean of 4.40. Further
analysis shows that the system responds quickly in all its functionality and operation,
utilizes all its resources efficiently, has the choice of going directly to desired
demonstrably effective with the intended audience, including people of varying abilities
and experiences with mean ranging from 4.20 -4.60which is qualitatively described as
strongly agree that the program creates a permanent record for a user, that record is
secure and confidential. There is provision for erasing the record when the information
is no longer valuable in providing services, the participants strongly believed that the
software was capable of handling errors, and most of the faults in the software have
Descriptive
Usability Mean
Interpretation
usability of the developed system as shown by the category mean of 4.17. However, all
of the sub-characteristics of usability rated agree by the users. This involves the
characteristic that the individual can operate the system independents (4.20), the user
learn to use the system easily (3.90), and the user use the system without much effort
(4.20), The user easily understand/comprehend how to use the system (4.00), the
organization is clear, logical, and effective, making it easy for the intended audience to
understand (4.20), and the interface looked good and attractive (4.20).
Descriptive
Maintainability Mean
Interpretation
In terms of the maintainability of the system, the participants strongly agree that
the Software continue functioning when modifications/changes are made, faults and
errors can be easily diagnosed, the Software can be easily modified in accordance to
what user needs, and the Software can be tested easily with means ranging from 4.00 -
4.40.
Qualitative
Portability Mean
Description
Table 8 reflects the mean of the responses of the participants regarding the
portability of the developed system. The users have shown agreement regarding the
specifically believed that the software can be installed easily, the software comply with
the portability standards, the software can be easily moved from one to another
environment, and the software can replace other software as indicated by the mean of
4.40.
Table 15. Summary of Category Mean and Qualitative Description of Both
the Residents and IT Experts According to the Functionality of the Developed
Barangay Health Center Records and Monitoring System.
System’s Quality Indicators Weighted Qualitative Description
Mean
FUNCTIONALITY 4.33 Agree
EFFICIENCY 4.21 Agree
USABILITY 4.08 Agree
RELIABILITY 4.09 Agree
MAINTAINABILITY 4.17 Agree
PORTABILITY 4.37 Agree
General Mean 4.208 Agree
The results show that the respondents firmly agreed that the established system
based on ISO 25010 is of good quality, as indicated by the general mean of 4.208.
Furthermore, the functionality characteristics of the system has the highest mean rating
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The data gathered was analyzed using the weighted mean and descriptive
The following are the results of the study which was presented in detail in the
previous chapter:
each barangay resident, and (4) resident barangay Health ID Card does not
exist.
can use the system, (3) Auto generated reports like, infants individual vaccine
inventory is monitored, stock in and stock out of medicines that are given to
each barangay resident are recorded and can be monitored and (5) Live
dashboard graph and counters will give the barangay of the current health
related information.
In addition, the IT experts " Agree" that the proposed system is acceptable in
(4.3) maintainability (4.3), and portability (4.4), with a general mean of 4.3311.
consultation records. the system was developed to help the barangay health
Therefore, the software quality compliance of the developed system can serve as
RECOMMENDATIONS
system.
2. The Developed system can only process resident’s information, infants