Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rational Designing of Porous Structured Nickel Manganese Sulfides
Rational Designing of Porous Structured Nickel Manganese Sulfides
Accepted Article
This manuscript has been accepted after peer review and appears as an
Accepted Article online prior to editing, proofing, and formal publication
of the final Version of Record (VoR). This work is currently citable by
using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) given below. The VoR will be
published online in Early View as soon as possible and may be different
to this Accepted Article as a result of editing. Readers should obtain
the VoR from the journal website shown below when it is published
to ensure accuracy of information. The authors are responsible for the
content of this Accepted Article.
Supported by
Chemistry - A European Journal 10.1002/chem.201904991
Dr. Diab khalafallah1,2,*, Zongxiao Wu1, Dr. Mingjia Zhi1,*, Prof. Zhanglian
Hong1,*
Accepted Manuscript
1
State Key Laboratory of Silicon Material, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang
University, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou, 310027, China
2
Mechanical Design and Materials Department, Faculty of Energy Engineering, Aswan University, P.O.
Box 81521, Aswan, Egypt
Abstract
The design of hierarchical electrode comprising multiple components with a high electrical
conductivity and a large specific surface area has been recognized as a feasible strategy to
application to realize faster redox reactions and a lower charge transfer resistance with a
markedly enhanced specific capacitance. The hybrid was facilely prepared through a two-step
hydrothermal method. Benefiting from the synergistic effect between Ni and Mn active sites with
the improvement of both ionic and electric conductivity, the resulting Ni-Mn-S hybrid displays a
high-specific capacitance of 1664 F g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1 and a capacitance of 785 F
g−1 is maintained at a current density of 50 A g−1, revealing an outstanding capacity and rate
performance. The asymmetric supercapacitor device assembled with the Ni-Mn-S hexagonal
sheets-in-cage as the positive electrode delivers a maximum energy density of 40.4 Wh kg−1 at a
power density of 750 W kg-1. Impressively, the cycling retention of the as-fabricated device after
10,000 cycles at a current density of 10 A g−1 reaches 85.5%. Thus, the hybrid Ni-Mn-S
Accepted Manuscript
Introduction
Clean energy storage and conversion systems such as fuel cells, solar cells, batteries,
supercapacitors, and etc. have been considered as the frontier of sustainable energy research
owing to the foreseeable energy problems associated with the depletion of conventional fossil
fuels and aggravated environmental pollution [1,2]. Moreover, the increasing demand for such
portable electronic instruments to fulfill the current and future requirements of energy has
motivated a vigorous research interest in recent years due to light weight, zero emission, and
relatively high-power density of these renewable technologies. Among these energy conversion
and storage devices, supercapacitors have been regarded as a privileged technology for energy
storage, but their low power densities and inferior long-term stabilities prohibit their large
commercialized adoption [3,4]. Supercapacitors can be distinguished into two main types
layer capacitors (EDLCs). In this context, the charge transfer within the EDLCs takes place via
stored due to rapid and reversible redox reactions onto electrode surface [5]. Transition metals
and conducting polymers-based electrodes are more favourable for pseudocapacitors, whereas,
carbon counterparts like graphene, porous carbon, and carbon nanotubes are examples of
electrode materials for EDLCs, which possess low specific capacitances compared to
progress has been afforded throughout fabricating micro/nanostructured electrodes with various
compositions and surface morphologies, however current supercapacitors still need significant
enhancements to further increase their energy densities without infringing their inherent features
[9,10]. Over the past decade, nanomaterials have been commonly investigated as supercapacitor
Accepted Manuscript
electrodes because of their large specific surface area and fast electron/ion diffusion as well.
Recently, transition metals sulfides-based materials have drawn a great importance as promising
alternatives with a reasonable specific capacity and energy density originated from their unique
physical and chemical properties. Recently, metal sulfides containing transition elements
particularly, nickel, cobalt, manganese, and copper showed improved electrochemical properties
with good specific capacitances and stabilities, which are affiliated to their abundant
electrochemistry and rapid redox reactions. Sulfides possess an excellent electrochemical activity
and ionic conductivity due to the substitution of oxygen with sulfur species and large sizes of S 2‒
ions [11]. Binary or ternary transition metal sulfides are more preferable than unitary metal
sulfides and their energy storage performance outperforms the corresponding binary or ternary
transition metal oxides due to improved electronic structure and copious electroactive sites [12-
16]. Moreover, the low electric conductively of monometal sulfides can largely limited their
materials with desirable properties. The coupling of two or more metallic species to render
compounds of multiple components can provide much enhanced specific capacitances at higher
properties including chemical performance and stability as well as poisoning resistance are much
higher than those realized by individual components [19]. Furthermore, the composition control
of multicomponent sulfides can sufficiently endow a new degree of freedom to promote the
Numerous reports tend to combine various sulfides in different compositions to enhance the
charge storage properties of supercapacitors. For example, Shen et al. presented nickel cobalt
sulfide hollow spheres as an electrode material with a high specific capacitance of 1036 F g−1 at a
Accepted Manuscript
current density of 1 A g−1 [20]. Xia et al. fabricated urchin shaped NiCo2S4 nanostructures via
two-step hydrothermal approach. The as-prepared hybrid electrode exhibited a high capacitance
of 1149 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1 under three electrode configurations [21]. Similarly, Wang et al.
deposited NiCo2S4 nanotube arrays directly onto a carbon fiber paper by hydrothermal treatment
with an excellent capacitance of 0.87 F cm−2 at 4 mA cm−2 [22]. Sahoo and coworkers reported
specific capacitance of 2717 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 [15]. In another work, Peng et al. synthesized
hydrothermal method. The binder free electrode revealed a high capacity of 0.53 mA h cm−2 at 2
mA cm−2 with a good rate performance after 1500 cycles [23]. By taking advantage of tunable
composition and promoted carrier mobility, binary and trimetallic sulfides often give rise to
compounds through a delicate integration of capacitive and faradic components conforms to the
hydrothermal route as an advanced charge storage material with expect to improve the active
sites density, electron transfer kinetics, and as well as ion diffusion capability. The collaborative
contribution from both components guided the hierarchically porous Ni-Mn-S electrode to
achieve high specific capacitances of 1664 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 and 785 F g−1 at 50 F g−1 with a good
cyclic stability (90.7% capacity retention after 3000 cycles) due to the substantial enhancement
in specific surface area, electron transport, and electroactive sites for redox reactions. Moreover,
the hexagonal nanosheets could prevent the cages from breakage during redox reactions,
Accepted Manuscript
therefore a high utilization of the active components might attained. An asymmetric
showed a high energy at a high power density, proving its promising potential for next-
The ion exchange reaction has been considered as an effective pathway to transform
the usage of toxic sulfur precursors and high temperatures, while maintaining a high
reproducibility and affording scalable production rates. Therefore, this mechanism holds a great
significant in developing novel materials with favourable features by utilizing the purposeful
insertion of corresponding ions [Table S1]. Even the transformation of a single crystal-to-single
To the best of our knowledge, this method has not been applied for the preparation of hexagonal
for sulfurization. The interior components were etched out and as a result, Ni-Mn-S with novel
nano/microarchitectures circumvents the dead volume of the reactive matrix. The fabrication of
hierarchically porous Ni-Mn-S hexagonal sheets-in-cage composite was achieved via a facile
hydrothermal treatment of metallic salts and a subsequent anion exchange (e.g. sulfidation
process) (Scheme 1). The hydrothermal hydrolysis of Ni2+and Mn2+ cations in an alkaline
environment can lead to extended chains due to coordination with H+ ions and subsequently
interlinked to generate two dimensional (2D) hexagonal nanosheets. The effect of urea could be
Accepted Manuscript
understood as a self-template or a structure directing agent to induce the growth of Ni-Mn-
precursor through the in-situ reaction between Ni2+/Mn2+ and hydrolysis products (CO32─ and
OH─ anions) [25b,26]. Meanwhile, the NH4F anions play a role in two ways: (i) as another kind
of structure directing agent for the assembly 2D hexagonal sheets into a three-dimensional (3D)
cage structure by providing more active centers for nucleation and growth of mesocrystals during
the hydrothermal reaction; (ii) as a complexing agent to link the Ni2+ and Mn2+ cations and hence
facilitates the formation of bimetallic composition for self-seed establishment [27]. The Ni and
Because of Ostwald ripening reaction, the newly generated nuclei tended to integrate with the
neighboring nuclei in order to reduce the interfacial energy, leading to an oriented agglomeration
of saturated nuclei. At last, stable hexagonal sheets were constructed due to fast crystal growth.
Further interplay of components makes the self-assembling behaviour and re-growth processes
happen till the formation of 3D cage superstructures with hexagonal sheets as the building
Accepted Manuscript
blocks. In the present reaction system, it can be suggested that the formation of OH─ is
predominant at low content of urea within the reaction, leading to the existence of Ni-Mn-
(OH)x(SO4)y. The generation of HCO3 might be prohibited because of insufficient CO2 and
CO32─ species [28]. Thereafter, a subsequent hydrothermal sulfidation process was conducted to
convert the obtained Ni-Mn-(OH)x(SO4)y precursor into Ni-Mn-S through etching the interior
components with Na2S while retaining their intrinsic structure. In such reaction, the H2S and HS‒
species were produced as a result of Na2S dissociation inside the solvent into S2‒ and these
species act as a sulfur source during the vulcanization reaction [29]. Interestingly, the interior
mesocrystals and created void spaces provide much more active sites for ease diffusion reactions
between the electrochemically active Ni-Mn-S and electrolyte ions, which represents key points
Fig. 1A shows the XRD patterns of the as-synthesized products. The observed diffraction peaks
at about 21.6o, 31.7o, 50.1o, and 55.2o can be identified as (101), (110), (113), and (122) planes,
respectively of Ni3S2 (JCPDS No. 44-1418) [30]. Besides, the peaks located at 30.2o, 34.6o,
45.8o, 53.5o, 61o, 65.4o, and 73.1o are belonging to [100], [101], [102], [110], [103], [201], and
[202] planes, respectively of hexagonal NiS phase (PDF#75-0613) [31]. Moreover, the
characteristics existed at ~25.8o, 27.6o, 31.7o, 38.2o, 49.9o, and 55.2o agree well with the [100],
[002], [111], [102], [103], and [201] planes, respectively of γ-MnS phase (JCPDS no. 65-3413)
[32]. The absence of other peaks suggests the high purity of the prepared materials. Thus, it is
reasonable to conclude that the Ni-Mn-S composite can fabricated using our developed synthesis
route.
Accepted Manuscript
Fig. 1 (A) XRD patterns of the as-fabricated Ni-Mn-S composite (a) and pristine Ni-S (b). High
The chemical composition of the hybrid Ni-Mn-S hexagonal sheets-in-cage was further verified
by XPS analyses. The full survey scan of the hybrid shown in Fig. S1 displays the existence of
Ni, Mn, S, O, and C elements. The observed C and oxygen signals are mainly scribed to the
reference carbon and partial surface oxidation, respectively. However, the near surface of the
hybrid comprises Ni, Mn, and S elements. The Gaussian fitting of the Mn 2p emission spectra
shows two major spin-orbit doublets located at binding energies of 641.6 eV and 653.5 eV
corresponding to Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2 of Mn2+, respectively [33,34]. The weak satellite peak
deconvolution of complex Ni 2p features two main spin–orbit lines with two shakeup satellites at
Accepted Manuscript
855.7 eV and 873.7 eV assigned to Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 bands Ni2+, respectively [35]. In the S 2p
spectral region, two main peaks are found at 160.8 eV and 162 eV attributed to the coordination
of sulfur with metal ions and identified as S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2, respectively. Meanwhile the
characteristic peak at 168.8 eV represents the metal sulfate originated from the surface S atoms
oxidation. Thus, the near surface composition of the hybrid Ni-Mn-S hexagonal sheets-in-cage is
Ni2+, Mn2+, and S2-, which matches well with the XRD results.
The surface configuration, shape, and porous nature of electroactive material are critical issues
influencing its charge storage capability. The SEM image of monometallic Ni-S is illustrated in
Fig. S3. As shown the sulfurized product exhibits 2D hexagonal plate structure. The panoramic
product (Figs. 2D-F&S4C-D) demonstrate that both samples show 2D hexagonal sheets
assembled into 3D microcage architectures. The hexagonal sheets are firmly attached and
hosting numerous void spaces, forming a highly open heterostructures, which investigated the
These results indicate that hexagonal sheets could be easily produced in presence of urea and
integrate into giant microcages due to inherent crystal tendency [36]. Such reaction conditions
created an appropriate interlayer H-bonding and subsequently hexagonal sheets were bundled
into a unique hutch-like structure due to possible interfacial tension [37]. However, the most
influential parameter on the final morphology is the change in growth rates of the corresponding
crystal faces as the sulfate ions favors to incorporate into the Ni-Mn-(OH)x(SO4)y interlayers
[38,39]. In fact, the growth of hexagonal sheets was controlled by the gradual consumption of
reactants concentrations within the solution, and this can explain the formation of incomplete
crystals at the surfaces of fully-grown building blocks and final formation of cage structures. The
Accepted Manuscript
existence of enough spaces among the adjoining sheets within the hierarchical heterostructures
verifies the inhibition of agglomeration phenomenon. The sheets still remain their homogeneous
hexagonal structure after anion-exchange reactions with Na2S as presented in Figs. 2D-F&S4C-
D. However, the surface morphology of the final product changed slightly. The magnified SEM
images of the Ni-Mn-S hexagonal sheets-in-cage reveal the formation of randomly distributed
nanoparticles and anchored onto the top surfaces and vacant spaces between the sheets
(Fig.2F&S4D). These nanoparticle subunits are attributed to secondary growth and nucleation at
the surface of existing sheets [40a]. The SEM observation illustrates that the hexagonal sheets
were thermally stable and revealed no noticeable morphology collapse (Figs. 2F&S4D). Fig.
2C&F shows the top-view SEM image of sheet-like surface and edges of precursor and final
product with a sheet thickness ranging from 80 to 130 nm. Such flexible sheet-in-cage-like
morphologies with open windows not only provide large contact regions with the electrolyte
during electrochemical redox reactions but also shorten the diffusion pathways of ions, and
hence facilitating the electrochemical reactions within the overall heterostructured material.
Apparently, the formation of a large range of tiny particles with hollow voids during the
vulcanization reaction (as indicated by yellow arrows-Fig. 2F) ensure more reactive sites
participating in redox reactions, guaranteeing a high specific capacity and a good cycling
stability. Most important, the hexagonal sheet matrices-like building blocks might serve as a
robust mechanical support to stabilize the entire particles, favoring the superior preservation of
capacitance, particularly at higher current densities. In general, such flexible hexagonal sheets-
in-cage frameworks can adequately enhance the cycling stability of the electrode over an
Fig. 2 SEM images of the as-prepared materials with different magnifications. (A-C) Ni-Mn-
Accepted Manuscript
(OH)x(SO4)y precursor and (D-F) Ni-Mn-S final product. The outcomes confirm the formation of
hexagonal sheets building blocks assembled into 3D cage structures (yellow lines in panels-
B&D-F). The surface roughness of the sheets increases after vulcanization reaction.
sheets-in-cage frameworks are obtained by TEM. The observations demonstrate the high
flexibility, transparency, and as well as porosity features of the constructed building blocks
which coincide well with the SEM analysis (Fig. 3A-F). For both composites, we can see that the
pronounced sheets internally possess a well-defined hexagonal structure and are robustly
Accepted Manuscript
interconnected by electrostatic interactions such as hydrogen bonding, forming a porous 3D
mechanism analogous to the Kirkendall reaction, in which the vacancies are generated as a result
of unbalanced counter diffusion inside the reaction interface [41]. In the HR-TEM image of
precursor presented in Fig. 3C, the well-resolved lattice fringes separated by distances of 0.445
nm and 0.385 nm are attributed to [100] and [010] lattice parameters of β-Ni(OH)2, respectively.
As it can be seen from Fig. 3D-E, the vulcanization reaction has no obvious effect upon the
shape of the grown sheets, but the in-situ anion exchange reactions direct the crystallization
towards larger particles. It is reasonably that the S2‒ ions’ reaction at the surface improved the
porous features of the Ni-Mn-S composite due to relatively rapid anion-exchange reactions at the
surfaces.
Accepted Manuscript
Fig. 3 (A-C) Low and HR-TEM images of Ni-Mn-(OH)x(SO4)y precursor. The sample shows a
the yellow lines (panel-A). The HR-TEM images presents the resolved lattice fringes as
illustrated by the yellow parallel lines. (D-E) Low resolution-TEM analysis and (F) HR-TEM
image of the composite Ni-Mn-S hexagonal sheets-in-cage (G) STEM image of the Ni-Mn-S
hybrid and the mapping results of Ni (G-a), Mn (G-b), and S (G-c) components.
The dosage of Na2S triggered the formation of numerous tiny particles anchored onto the
surfaces of the sheets as indicated by the contrast difference (Fig. 3D&E) because of additional
nucleation. This implies that the surfaces of hexagonal sheets were used as firm scaffolds for
further nucleation during the anion exchange processes. These nucleation centers accelerated the
growth at planar and vertical directions, forming a sandwich-like architecture (Fig.3 D-E), which
Accepted Manuscript
is very favourable for charge storage because of establishing a large electroactive area, an
excellent porosity, and much accessible electrolyte at the top and core active sites. The HR-TEM
image of the Ni-Mn-S hybrid depicted in Fig. 3F shows well-resolved lattice fringes with
interplanar spacings of 0.334 nm and 0.392 nm, corresponding to [101] and [102] planes of
hexagonal NiS and γ-MnS, respectively. In addition, the EDS mappings (Fig. 3Ga-c) clearly
reveal a sustained homogeneous distribution of Ni, Mn, and S elements in the hybrid. The
distribution area of each component is highly overlapped, confirming the possible incorporation
of sulfur species in the whole matrix. No obvious elemental segregation was detected in the
formed heterostructure. The high doping of sulfur element can improve the cycle life of the
electrode material in an alkaline electrolyte [24a]. Moreover, the analysis demonstrates that the
molecular ratio of the Ni/Mn is around 1.32. This finding verifies that the hybrid Ni-Mn-S
sheets-in-cage can be successfully prepared when substitutional sulfur species integrated during
sulfurized product is mainly accredited to the crystallized and consolidated structure of the
layered precursor. Also, the adherence properties between the adjacent sheets are well preserved
without any detectable scattering. In spite of different reaction kinetics at both surface and core
whereas the anion exchange process is mostly accomplished on the outer surfaces, a unique
crystalline structure was achieved and thereby we can conclude that most of Ni and Mn occupies
the adequate position. Along the line, a self-doping conceptual can be speculated to well address
Additionally, the fabrics of Ni-S and Ni-Mn-S based materials were further characterized by
BET technique as displayed in Fig. 4A-B. As we expected, the SBET and pore volume of the Ni-
Mn-S hybrid (86.8 m2 g–1 and 0.087 cm3 g–1, respectively) are much larger than those of
Accepted Manuscript
monometallic Ni-S (~50 m2 g–1 and 0.068 cm3 g–1, respectively). The larger surface area can
endow the hybrid with a higher electrochemical active surface area and a sufficient number of
electroactive sites at heterointerfaces during redox reactions. Moreover, the binary Ni-Mn-S
possesses abundant mesoporosity with a relatively high intense peaks between 2 and 25 nm,
which favors the diffusion of ions inside the open mesopores at low resistance. The possible
crystal defects occurred due to the coexistence of Ni-S and MnS phases might have a positive
Fig. 4 (A) Nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms of the prepared materials and (B) the
Electrocapacitive performances
as electrode material for supercapacitors compared to individual component Ni-S and MnS,
Accepted Manuscript
spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were conducted in a 6 M KOH solution with a three-electrode
assembly. The typical CV curves of the electrodes at a scan rate of 10 mVs‒1 over a potential
window from ‒0.05 to 0.45 V are shown in Fig. 5A. Apparently the integrated area of the hybrid
Ni-Mn-S is extremely larger, which ascribed to the enhanced electrical conductivity and richer
electroactive sites of the fascinating electrode material. This implies an improved capacitive
activity and proves the fundamental roles of Ni and Mn species in a pseudocapacitive activity.
Furthermore, the redox current peaks through the anodic and cathodic scans observed for each
electrode are attributed to reversible reactions of Ni2+/Ni3+ and Mn2+/Mn3+ in an alkaline media
with the OH− assistance, suggesting an optimal battery-type Faradaic mode with respect to redox
reactions. The anodic and cathodic peaks of the Ni-Mn-S composite are found at similar
potentials compared to the literature [42]. Accordingly, the redox reactions can be addressed as
A series of CV profiles (Figs. 5B&S5A-B) were recorded for the Ni-Mn-S, Ni-S, and MnS based
electrodes with various scan rates from 2 to 100 mVs−1. As shown, the peaks currents increase
with the increase of scanning rate and the redox peaks are observed clearly even at a high scan
rate of 100 mVs−1. Despite the shift of both anodic and cathodic peaks towards the higher
positive potential and lower negative potential directions, respectively, the features of the CV
curves demonstrates that the electrodes are preferable for rapid charge/discharge operations.
Impressively, the shape of the CV curves of the composite (Fig. 5B) was well maintained, while
the peaks currents improve, implying that the electrode has excellent rate performance that can
result in fast redox reactions. To figure out the advantages of hierarchical Ni-Mn-S composite,
Accepted Manuscript
we also tested the GCD responses compared with those of monometallic Ni-S (Fig. S5C) and
MnS (Fig. S5D). Fig. 5C displays the GCD curves of binary Ni-Mn-S and single component Ni-
S and MnS modified electrodes at a current density of 1 A g−1 over a potential range from ‒0.05
to 0.45 V. Apparently, the composite Ni-Mn-S electrode exhibits the largest discharge time and
achieves a high specific capacitance of 1664 F g −1 at 1 A g−1 compared to Ni-S (842 F g −1) and
MnS (584 F g −1). The specific capacitances of all electrodes at various current densities from 0.5
to 50 A g−1 are presented in Figs. 5D&E. The plateaus in the GCD curves are mainly originated
from the redox reactions. Moreover, the GCD curves of the electrodes are almost symmetrical,
demonstrating a good reversibility of the process and high-rate charge/discharge capacity [43],
which is accord with the CV spectra. As can be seen, the specific capacitances of binary Ni-Mn-
S and, bare Ni-S, and MnS based electrodes at a higher current density of 50 A g−1 are 785 F g−1,
307 F g−1, and 178.4 F g−1, respectively, corresponding to a capacitance retention of about
47.2%, 36.5%, and 30.5% respectively, compared to their specific capacitances at 1 A g−1. This
proves that the hybrid Ni-Mn-S delivers not only a large specific capacitance but also an
excellent capacitance retention at a high rate because of the firm combination of active materials.
The improvement in specific capacity of the hybrid electrode may be caused by the introduction
of the Mn ions, which promoted the number of valid ions from the Ni-S and bring the
complementary advantages between Ni and Mn species in the resulting composite. In fact, the
decrease in specific capacitance with increasing the current density might largely come from the
diffusion limitation and migration of electrolyte ions, which elevates the insufficiency of inner
The specific capacitances of the as-prepared electrodes are plotted as a function of current
density as displayed in Fig. 5E. Evidently, the capacitive behavior of the Ni-Mn-S electrode
Accepted Manuscript
outperforms that of pristine Ni-S and MnS based electrodes at all current densities. We speculate
that the enlarged surface area and pore volume of the composite can play a role contributing to
the improved capacitive activity. Besides, the synergy between the Ni and Mn species is more
beneficial to boost the capacitive performance and the specific capacitance of the composite is
EIS measurements of the electrodes were carried out to reveal the intrinsic electrical conductivity
and convenient ion transfer/diffusion of the hybrid Ni-Mn-S. As presented in Fig. 5F, the
intersection with the x-axis at the high frequency region reflects the resistance to electrolyte (RS),
while the diameter of the semicircle denotes the charge transfer resistance (RCT). Additionally,
the straight line in the low frequency region illustrates the diffusion resistance of electrolyte ions
and carriers with the hierarchical electrode material. The adopted equivalent circuit model for the
fitted Nyquist plots is shown in Fig. S6. Obviously, the Ni-Mn-S composite displays a smaller
RCT value (2.88 Ω) than single component Ni-S (4.5 Ω) and MnS (6.29 Ω), indicating a more
intrinsic resistance of the active pseudocapacitive composite and small contact resistance of the
developed electrode. Interestingly, considering the reduction of RCT from Ni-Mn-S to Ni-S, it is
proved that Mn species could facilitate the charge transfer process. In addition, the solution
resistances of the Ni-Mn-S, Ni-S, and MnS were 0.37, 0.52, and 0.65 Ω, respectively. The
relatively larger slope of the low frequency line for the Ni-Mn-S electrode, manifesting a lower
Accepted Manuscript
Fig. 5 (A) Comparison of the CV curves of the fabricated electrodes in a 6 M KOH solution at
10 mV s-1 scan rate. (B) CV curves of the mixed Ni-Mn-S electrode in a 6 M KOH at different
scanning rates. (C) Comparative GCD curves of the electrode at a current density of 1 A g−1. (D)
GCD curves of the hybrid Ni-Mn-S electrode at various current densities. (E) Plots of specific
capacitance as a function of current density. (F) Nyquist plots for the developed electrodes.
The long lifespan is of a great importance for constructing energy storage devices with desirable
efficiencies. The cycling stability of the various electrodes was evaluated by GCD test as
depicted in Fig. 6. It can be seen that the specific capacity of Ni-Mn-S composite is much higher
Accepted Manuscript
than that of monometallic Ni-S and MnS all over the 3000 cycles of reiterated charge/discharge
processes. The specific capacity retentions are 90.7%, 81%, and 68.9% for the Ni-Mn-S hybrid,
Ni-S, and MnS, respectively. Thus, the Ni and Mn ions are beneficial for superior cycling
performance. The slight shift of the GCD curves of the first 10 cycles and last 10 cycles for the
hybrid Ni-Mn-S compared to monometallic Ni-S and MnS suggests a good cycling stability of
the hybrid supercapacitor. SEM images of the Ni-Mn-S electrode after 3000 cycles at 10 A g−1 are
illustrated in Fig. S7. It is apparent that the surface morphologies remain unchanged after cycling at
such a high rate, confirming the extraordinary rate performance and long cycle lifetime of the
electrode. It can be deduced that the hexagonal sheets-in-cage-like morphologies serve as strong
Accepted Manuscript
Fig. 6 Capacity retention for 3000 cycles at a current density of 10 A g−1 for Ni-Mn-S (A), Ni-S
(B), and MnS based electrode (C). The insets illustrate the GCD plots for the first 10 cycles and
To further explore the energy storage capacity of heterostructured Ni-Mn-S composite for
according to the literature [44]. The CV curves of activated carbon (AC) and Ni-Mn-S modified
electrodes with a three-electrode implementation at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 are displayed in Fig.
7A. Referring to the reported data, the AC can achieve the double-layer capacitance features in a
Accepted Manuscript
KOH solution with the potential window from 0 to ‒1 V [23,45]. The corresponding GCD
profile of AC/NF shown in Fig. S8 reveals a triangle-like shape, implying the occurrence of
g−1 at 1 A g−1. Thus, the total operating potential of the fabricated device is anticipated to reach
1.5 V. To attain an optimal electrochemical behaviour, the ratio of the positive to negative
ΔQPositive=ΔQNegative (3)
The mass ratio of the active Ni-Mn-S and the AC was adjusted to approximately be 0.21 based
on their specific capacitance and corresponding potential windows. To extend the operational
voltage window of the as-assembled Ni-Mn-S//AC asymmetric device, a total potential of 1.5 is
desirable to fully utilize the different potential ranges of both integrated electrodes. Fig. 7B
shows the typical CV curves of the Ni-Mn-S//AC asymmetric device with various scanning rates
from 5 to 100 mV s-1. Such CV responses might probably due to the dual effect of electric
double-layer capacitance and pseudocapacitance of the positive electrode within the test window.
The well-preserved shape proves the exceptional reversibility of the constructed device. Next,
the GCD curves were evaluated at various current densities as shown in Fig. 7C. The limited
plateaus in the analyzed spectra suggest that water splitting processes are not visible. On a hand,
the shape and symmetry of the GCD curves maintained similar, confirming an excellent
reversibility. Fig. 7D displays the coulombic efficiency of the device at different current
densities. The good coulombic efficiency clearly suggests the splendid rates of charge/discharge
reactions. The corresponding specific capacitances analyzed from the GCD curves are plotted in
Fig. 7E. The constructed device delivers a specific capacitance of 129.4 F g-1 at 1 A g-1 and
conserves around 48.5% (~ 62.8 F g-1) at 20 A g-1, suggesting the superior rate capability of the
Accepted Manuscript
device. Energy and power densities are significant indicators to well-assess the capability of the
device for charge storage. A Ragone plot (Fig. 7F) was performed for the Ni-Mn-S//AC
asymmetric capacitor to address the achieved energy and power densities as expressed by the
(∆𝑉)2
𝐸= ×𝐶 (4)
2
𝐸
𝑃 = ∆𝑡 (5)
Where E and P are the energy density (Wh kg−1) and power density (W kg−1), respectively,
while, C and Δt represent the cell capacity (F g-1) and discharge time (s), respectively. The power
density increases with the decrease of the energy density, since large charges can be conserved
into the cell at a slight accumulation rate. The Ni-Mn-S//AC asymmetric device shows a
maximum energy density of 40.4 Wh kg−1 and a power density of 750 W kg−1 at 1 A g−1. Even at
a high discharge current of 20 A g−1, the energy density could reach ~ 19.6 Wh kg−1 at a high-
power density of 15 kW kg−1. The energy and power densities for the proposed devise are highly
established with earth abundant elements and carbon materials as the positive and negative
electrode, respectively, such as α-MnS/N-rGO//N-rGO (27.7 W h kg‒1 at 800 W kg‒1 and 16.1 W
h kg‒1 at 20 kW kg‒1) [51a], Ni‒Mn sulfides//RGO (36 W h kg‒1 at 775 W kg‒1 and 16.9 W h
kg‒1 at 15.5 kW kg‒1) [51b], Ni0.67Co0.33MoO4//RGO (25.6 Wh kg‒1 at 775 Wkg‒1 and 13.2 Wh
kg‒1 at 7.75 kW kg‒1) [51c], NiCo2S4@NiCo2S4//rGO (24.9 Wh kg‒1 at 334 W kg‒1 and 12.6 Wh
kg‒1 at 2.44 kW kg‒1) [51d], Co2.5Mn0.5 sulfide//RGO (22.3 Wh kg‒1 at 750 W kg‒1 and 11 Wh
kg‒1 at 30 kW kg‒1) [52a], NiS2//rGO (32.76 W h kg‒1 at 954 W kg‒1 and 11.19 W h kg‒1 at 1.35
kW kg‒1) [52b], CMTs-1000/Ni2CoS4//AC (28.1 Wh kg−1 at 753 Wkg−1 and 17.7 Wh kg−1 at
Accepted Manuscript
17.2 kW kg−1) [52c], MnO2//Bi2O3 (11.3 Wh kg−1 at 352.6 Wkg−1 and 9.1 Wh kg−1 at 3.37 kW
kg−1) [53a], K0.27MnO2·0.6H2O//AC (25.3 Wh kg−1 at 140 Wkg−1 and 17.6 Wh kg−1 at 2.0 kW
kg−1) [53b], PB@MnO2//PG (16.5 Wh kg−1 at 550 Wkg−1 and 11.3 Wh kg−1 at 5.497 kW kg−1)
[53c], Ni3S2@MoS2//rGO (21.7 Wh kg−1 at 400 Wkg−1 and 12 Wh kg−1 at 2.40 kW kg−1) [54a],
and NiCo2S4//AC (27.5 Wh kg−1 at 747 Wkg−1 and 18.75 Wh kg−1 at 6.03 kW kg−1) [54b].
Accepted Manuscript
Fig. 7 (A) Comparative CV curves for the hybrid Ni-Mn-S and AC based-electrode at 10 mV s-1
asymmetric device recorded with various sweep rates, (C) GCD curves for the device at different
current densities, (D) coulombic efficiency of the assembled device at different current densities,
(E) relationship of specific capacitance of the device versus the current density, and (F) Ragone
plot of the developed Ni-Mn-S//AC device compared with some existed results.
Another critical aspect to evaluate the feasibility an asymmetric device for the energy storage is
the long-term sustainability. Herein, the cycling stability of the optimized device was studied
using GCD technique at a high current density of 10 A g−1 for 10,000 successive cycles as shown
in Fig. 8. The capacity retention reaches ⁓85.5% with a near offset of the corresponding GCD
curves for the first and last cycles, benefiting from the engineered hierarchical architecture and
Accepted Manuscript
unique chemical composition. The superior stability can be credited to the smaller RCT which
allows elastic redox reactions at interfaces. It is well known that Ni-S would be transformed into
capacity [55,56a]. This implies that the Mn cations act like strong matrices and adsorbs the
supercapacitors.
To sum up, the intrinsic charge storage performance of the synthesized Ni-Mn-S hexagonal
microstructure as well.
a) The 3D interconnected sheets-in-cage structures with a relatively large surface area and a
Accepted Manuscript
heterointerfaces and stimulate the overall utilization of the electrode.
b) The formation of richer void spaces into the hierarchal heterostructures allows larger
contact areas and can directly bring the internal active surface layers into contact with
electrolyte ions and hence minimize the ion diffusion pathways [56b,56c].
c) The hexagonal sheets-like matrices are closer enough with a preferable mechanical
strength and interfacial vacancies not only facilitate the mass and electron diffusion
during electrochemical reaction process but alleviate the stress developed by sudden
volume changes.
d) The strong and solid interaction between building blocks enables an extraordinary
structure stability at higher current densities and thus resulting in a high rate capability
e) The synergetic effect of Ni-S and MnS components with multiple oxidation states also
affords a positive influence on the electrochemical properties and improves the total
conductivity for Faradaic redox reactions than monometallic sulfides due to a smaller
Conclusion
effective electrode material for supercapacitor applications. Of particular interest is the fact that
Accepted Manuscript
the rationally fabricated hybrid substantiated the advantages of collaborative effect of
through the whole structure during charge/discharge reactions. The Ni-Mn-S complex displayed
a high specific capacitance of 1664 Fg‒1 at 1 A g‒1 and it’s corresponding asymmetric
supercapacitor device with a potential window of 1.5 V exhibited a maximum energy density of
40.4 Wh kg−1 at a power density of 750 W kg−1. The assembled Ni-Mn-S//AC asymmetric device
showed an excellent cycling stability with a retention of 85.5% after 10,000 cycles of repeated
charge/discharge processes. The rational design and abundant availability of ingredients suggest
that scalable quantities of the hybrid Ni-Mn-S may be economically fabricated and applied as
efficient electrode material for renewable energy technologies in the near future.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by national key research and development program (Grant No.
2016YFB0901600), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.
LY19E020014, and NSFC (Grant No. 21303162 and Grant No. 11604295).
Experimental
Synthesis
The composite Ni-Mn-S was fabricated by a simple two‐step hydrothermal route assisted anion
fluoride (NH4F), and 1 mM urea (CH4N2O) were mixed in 27 mL double distilled water under a
vigorous magnetic stirring for 1 h. Then, the resultant mixture was loaded into a Teflon‐lined
stainless-steel autoclave with a total capacity of 40 mL, sealed, and kept in an oven at 180 °C for
12 h before cooling down to room temperature. The sample was collected by centrifugation,
Accepted Manuscript
washed thoroughly with deionized and absolute alcohol, and dried overnight at 60 °C. After that,
the as-obtained precursor was dispersed into 30 mL deionized water under stirring and thereafter
2 mM of Na2S·9H2O was added. After being stirred by 30 min, the mixture was sealed into a
Teflon-lined autoclave and treated thermally at 180 oC for 12 h. The formed black yield was
separated and rinsed several times with distilled water and ethanol before being dried at 60 oC in
a vacuum oven for 8 h. Moreover, pristine Ni-S and MnS were also prepared by same synthesis
route.
Materials characterization
microscopy (FE-TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 F20) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry
(EDS). The crystal structure of the prepared materials was examined by an X-ray diffraction
(XRD, Shimadzu-6000) with Cu Kα radiation (λ=0.15 nm) in the 2θ range from 10° to 80°. The
Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi) with an Al Kα radiation source. The specific
surface area and pore size properties were evaluated by liquid gas adsorption-desorption
isotherms, the samples were treated thermally for 6 h at 200 °C with a N2 atmosphere. The
specific surface area (SBET) was assessed according to the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)
method, while the pore size distribution investigated by using Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH).
Electrochemical measurements
Accepted Manuscript
electrochemical instrument in a 6 M KOH solution at room temperature. A platinum plate and
Hg/HgO were employed as the counter and reference electrode, respectively, while an acidic
treated Ni-substrate covered with a uniform film of the active material was employed as the
working electrode. The slurry was prepared by mixing the active material, carbon black, and
polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) with a ratio of 8:1:1 (w/w) into N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP)
solvent. The resulting slurry was carefully deposited onto the current collector (1 cm*1 cm),
pressed with a pressure of ⁓20 MPa, and then dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C to for 8 h to
achieve an active loading of ⁓1.5 mg cm‒2. The specific capacitance (C, F g-1) of the electrode
I∗t
C = ΔV∗m (6)
Where I and t are the constant discharge current (A) and discharge time (s), respectively, while
ΔV and m represent the potential window (V) and active material loading (g), respectively. An
asymmetric supercapacitor was fabricated based on the hybrid Ni-Mn-S as the positive electrode
and conventional AC as the negative electrode with a thin porous membrane of cellulose paper.
The CV and GCD characterizations were performed in the potential window from -0.05 V to
0.45 V for the three-electrode measurements and from 0 V to 1.5 V in case of asymmetric
supercapacitor experiment. Moreover, the EIS profiles were collected with a frequency range
References
1. a) T. Lin, I.-W. Chen, F. Liu, C. Yang, H. Bi, F. Xu, F. Huang, Science 2015, 350, 1508-
1513; b) D. Khalafallah, M. Zhi, Z. Hong, Top Curr Chem. 2019, 377, 29; c) D.
Khalafallah, C. Ouyang, M. Zhi, Z. Hong, ChemElectroChem. 2019, 6, 5191–5202; e) D.
Khalafallah, N. Akhtar, O.Y. Alothman, H. Fouad, K.A. Khalil, Solid State Sci., 2017,
71, 51-60.
2. a) A. S. Arico, P. Bruce, B. Scrosati, J. M. Tarascon, W. Van Schalkwijk, Nat. Mater.
2005, 4, 366–377; b) D. Khalafallah, O. Y. Alothman, H. Fouad, K. A. Khalil, Int. J.
Hydrogn. Energy 2018, 43, 2742-2753.
Accepted Manuscript
3. S. Peng, L. Li, H.B. Wu, S. Madhavi, X.W. Lou, Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1401172.
4. Y. P. Huang, F. Cui, M. Q. Hua, L. Xu, Y. Zhao, J. B. Lian, J. Bao, H. M. Li, Chem.
Asian. J 2018, 13, 3212-3221.
5. W. Tian, X. Wang, C. Zhi, T. Zhai, D. Liu, C. Zhang, D. Golberg, Y. Bando, Nano
Energy 2013, 2, 754-763.
6. S. H. Liu, G. H. Xu, J. Li, B. Wang, Z. Y. Huang, Q. Chen, X. Qi, ChemElectrochem
2018, 5, 2250-2255.
7. K. Krishnamoorthy, P. Pazhamalai, G.K. Veerasubramani, S.J. Kim, J. Power Sources
2016, 321, 112-119.
8. K. Krishnamoorthy, S. Thangavel, J. Chelora Veetil, N. Raju, G. Venugopal, S.J. Kim,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 1672-1678.
9. C. Liu, F. Li, L.-P. Ma, H.-M. Cheng, Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, E28–E62.
10. G. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Zhang. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 797–828.
11. M. Acerce, D. Voiry, M. Chhowalla, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 313-318.
12. J. Tang, Y. Ge, J. Shen, M. Ye. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 1509–1512.
13. S. Liu, S. C. Jun. J. Power Sources 2017, 342, 629-637.
14. X. Li,Q. Li, Y. Wu, M. Rui, H. Zeng. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7,
19316−19323.
15. S. Sahoo, R. Mondal, D. J. Late, C. S. Rout. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 244,
101-108.
16. J. Xiao, L. Wan, S. Yang, F. Xiao, S. Wang. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 831–838.
17. H. Zhang, X. Yu, D. Guo, B. Qu, M. Zhang, Q. Li, T. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
2013, 5, 7335.
18. G. Yu, L. Hu, N. Liu, H. Wang, M. Vosgueritchian, Y. Yang, Y. Cui, Z. Bao, Nano Lett.
2011, 11, 4438
19. J. Cheng, H. Yan, Y. Lu, K. Qiu, X. Hou, J. Xu, L. Han, X. Liu, J.-K. Kim, Y. Luo, J.
Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 9769-9776.
20. L. Shen, L. Yu, H.B. Wu, X. Yu, X. Zhang, X.W. Lou, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6694.
21. H. Chen, J. Jiang, L. Zhang, H. Wan, T. Qi, D. Xia. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8879–8883.
22. J. Xiao, L. Wan, S Yang, F. Xiao, S. Wang. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 831–838.
23. H. Peng, G. Wei, K. Sun, G. Ma, E. Feng, X. Yang, Z. Lei, New J. Chem., 2018, 42,
18328—18334.
24. a) J. Balamurugan, C. Li, T. D. Thanh, O.-K. Park, N. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, J. Mater. Chem.
A, 2017, 5, 19760-19772; b) H. Wan, J. Liu, Y. Ruan, L. Lv, L. Peng, X. Ji, L. Miao, J.
Jiang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15840−15847; c) Z. Chen, Z. Wan, T. Yang,
M. Zhao, X. Lv, H. Wang, X. Ren, X. Mei, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 25151; d) J. Li. W. Xu. J.
Luo. D. Zhou. D. Zhang. L. Wei. P. Xu, D. Yuan, Nano-Micro Lett., 2018, 10, 6; e) W.
Li, B. Zhang, R. Lin, S. Ho-Kimura, G. He, X. Zhou, J. Hu, I. P. Parkin, Adv. Funct.
Mater. 2018, 28, 1705937.
25. a) L. Mi, W. Wei, Z. Zheng, G. Zhu, H. Hou, W. Chen, X. Guan, Nanoscale 2014, 6,
1124; b) Z.-D. Huang, K. Zhang, T.-T. Zhang, X. Li, R.-Q. Liu, X.-M. Feng, Y. Li, X.-J.
Lin, Y.-B. He, X.-S. Yang, Y.-W. Ma, J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 20886-20891.
26. Z.-D. Huang, K. Zhang, T.-T. Zhang, R.-Q. Liu, X.-J. Lin, Y. Li, T. Masese, X. Liu, X.-
M. Feng, Y.-W. Ma, Energy Storage Mater. 2016, 5, 205-213.
27. Y. Chen, B. Qu, L. Hu, Z. Xu, Q. Li, T. Wang, Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9812-9820.
28. G. Cheng, Y. Yan, R. Chen. New J. Chem., 39, 2015, 676-682.
Accepted Manuscript
29. R. Zou, Z. Zhang, M.F. Yuen, M. Sun, J. Hu, C.-S. Lee, W. Zhang, NPG Asia Mater.
2015, 7, e195.
30. a) H. Huo, Y. Zhao, C. Xu, J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 15111-15117; b) K.
Krishnamoorthy, G. K. Veerasubramani, S. Radhakrishnan, S. J. Kim, Chem. Eng. J.
2014, 251, 116-122.
31. a) B. Guan, Y. Li, B. Yin, K. Liu, D. Wang, H. Zhang, C. Cheng, Chem. Eng. J., 2017,
308, 1165–1173; b) X. Yang, L. Zhao, J. Lian, J. Power Sources, 2017, 343, 373–382.
32. a) X. Li, J. Shen, N. Li, M. Ye, J. Power Sources 2015, 282, 194–201; b) G. Li, B. He,
M. Zhou, G. Wang, N. Zhou, W. Xu, and Z. Hou. ChemElectroChem 2017, 4, 81 – 89.
33. J. Y. Liao, D. Higgins, G. Lui, V. Chabot, X. C. Xiao, Z. W. Chen, Nano Lett. 2013, 13,
5467.
34. S. D. Perera, M. Rudolph, R. G. Mariano, N. Nijem, J. P. Ferraris, Y. J Chabal, K. J.
Balkus Jr., Nano Energy 2013, 2, 966.
35. J. H. Zhong, A. L. Wang, G. R. Li, J. W. Wang, Y. N. Ou, Y. X. Tong, J. Mater. Chem.
2012, 22, 5656; b) D. Khalafallah, L. Xiaoyu, M. Zhi, Z. Hong, ChemElectroChem
doi.org/10.1002/celc.201901423; c). D. Khalafallah, M. Zhi, Z. Hong, Energy Technol.
2019, 7, 1900548.
36. X. Zhang, Z. Xing, L. L. Wang, Y. C. Zhu, Q. W. Li, J. W. Liang, Y. Yu, T. Huang, K.
B. Tang, Y. T. Qian and X. Y. Shen, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 17864–17869.
37. A. Pramanik, S. Maiti, S. Mahanty, J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18515.
38. Y. Zhang, Y. V. Lim, S. Huang, M. E. Pam, Y. Wang, L. K. Ang, Y. Shi, H. Y. Yang.
Small 2018, 14, 1800898.
39. Y. Xiang, Z. Yin, X. Li, J Solid State Electrochem., 2014, 18, 2123.
40. a) L. Pan, J. J. Zou, S. B. Wang, X. Y. Liu, X. W. Zhang, L. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces 2012, 4, 1650; b) W. Wei, L. Mi, Y. Gao, Z. Zheng, W. Chen, X. Guan, Chem.
Mater. 2014, 26, 3418−3426.
41. L. Shen, L. Yu, H. Wu, X. Yu, X. Zhang, X. W. Lou, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 6694.
42. J. Zhao, J. Chen, S. Xu, M. Shao, Q. Zhang, F. Wei, J. Ma, M. Wei, D. G. Evans, X.
Duan, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2938.
43. H. Chen, J. Jiang, L. Zhang, H. Wan, T. Qi, D. Xia, Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8879.
44. W. Wang, N. Zhang, Z. Shi, Z. Ye, Q. Gao, M. Zhi and Z. Hong, Chem. Eng. J. 2018,
338, 55.
45. P.-Y. Lee, L.-Y. Lin, J Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 538, 297–307.
46. Z. Jiang, W. Lu, Z. Li, K. H. Ho, X. Li, X. Jiao, D. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2,
8603.
47. Y. Li, L. Cao, L. Qiao, M. Zhou, Y. Yang, P. Xiao, Y. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014,
2, 6540.
48. Y. Zhu, Z. Wu, M. Jing, X. Yang, W. Song and X. Ji, J. Power Sources 2015, 273,
584−590.
49. H. Chen, J. Jiang, L. Zhang, D. Xia, Y. Zhao, D. Guo, T. Qi, H. Wan, J. Power Sources
2014, 254, 249.
50. W. Hu, R. Chen, W. Xie, L. Zou, N. Qin, D. Bao, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6,
19318.
51. a) H. Y. Quan, B. C. Cheng, D. Z. Chen, X. H. Su, Y. H. Xiao, S. J. Lei, Electrochim
Acta 2016, 210, 557–566; b) J. Cao, S. Yuan, H. Yin, Y. Zhu, C. Li, M. Fan, H. Chen. J
Solgel Sci Technol., 2018, 85, 629–637; c) H. C. Chen, S. Chen, Y. Y. Zhu, C. Li, M. Q.
Accepted Manuscript
Fan, D. Chen, G. L. Tian, K. Y. Shu, Electrochim Acta 2016, 190, 57–63; d) H. C. Chen,
S. Chen, H. Y. Shao, C. Li, M. Q. Fan, D. Chen, G. L. Tian, K. Y. Shu, Chem. Asian. J.,
2016, 11, 248–255.
52. a) S. Chen, H. C. Chen, C. Li, M. Q. Fan, C. J. Lv, G. L. Tian, K. Y. Shu, J. Mater Sci.,
2017, 52, 6687–6696; b) Y. J. Ruan, J. J. Jiang, H. Z. Wan, X. Ji, L. Miao, L. Peng, B.
Zhang, L. Lv, J. Liu, J Power Sources 2016, 301,122–130; c) K. Wang, R. Yan, X. Tian,
Y. Wang, S. Lei, X. Li, T. Yang, X. Wang, Y. Song, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, Q. Guo.
Electrochimica Acta 2019, 302, 78-91.
53. a) H. H. Xu, X. L. Hu, H. L. Yan, Y. M. Sun, Y. H. Huang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5,
201401882; b) Q.T. Qu, L. Li, S. Tian, W.L. Guo, Y.P. Wu, R. Holze, J. Power Source
2010, 195, 2789-2794; c) A. K. Das, R. Bera, A. Maitra, S. K. Karan, S. Paria, L. Halder,
S. K. Si, A. Bera, B. B. Khauta, J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 22242-22254.
54. a) L. Huang, H. Hou, B. Liu, K. Zeinu, X. Zhu, X. Yuan, X. He, L. Wu, J. Hu, J. Yang,
Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 425, 879-888; b) L. Liu, T. Chen, H. Rong, Z. Wang, J. Alloys.
Compd., 2018, 766, 149-156.
55. J. Yang, X. Duan, Q. Qin, W. Zheng, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 7880.
56. a) B. T. Zhu, Z. Wang, S. Ding, J. S. Chen, X. W. Lou, RSC Adv., 2011, 1, 397; b) L. G.
Beka, X. Li, W. Liu, Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2105; c) D. Khalafallah, O.Y. Alothman, H.
Fouad, K.A. Khalil, J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 809, 96-104.
57. a) Y. Zhao, Z. Shi, H. Li, C.-A. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 12782-12793; b) X.
Wang, Q. Zhang, J. Sun, Z. Zhou, Q. Li, B. He, J. Zhao, W. Lu, C.-p. Wong, Y. Yao, J.
Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 8030–8038.