Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GPC5 - Thermochemical Conversion of CO2 Into Solar Fuels Using Ferrite Nanomaterials - Published - June 2015
GPC5 - Thermochemical Conversion of CO2 Into Solar Fuels Using Ferrite Nanomaterials - Published - June 2015
Abstract
This paper reports the synthesis of NixFe3-xO4 nanoparticles via sol-gel
method. For NixFe3-xO4 synthesis, the Ni and Fe precursor salts were
dissolved in ethanol and propylene oxide (PO) was added dropwise to
the well mixed solution achieve gel formation. As-prepared gels
were aged, dried and subsequently calcined upto 600oC in air. The calcined
powders were characterized by powder x-ray diffractometer (XRD), BET
surface area, as well as scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron
microscopy. The derived NixFe3-xO4 nanoparticles were further examined
towards thermochemical conversion of CO2 into solar fuels by performing
several reduction/re-oxidation cycles using a thermogravimetric analyzer
(TGA).
1. Introduction
The extensive utilization of fossil fuels led to a rapid depletion of the
easily accessible oil reserves resulting in continuously rising oil prices.
Furthermore, combustion of fossil fuels is believed to be one of the major
causes of increase in the CO2 concentration level in the environment.
The increase in CO 2 emission into the environment is of serious concern
for future because of CO 2 being a major contributor to the greenhouse
gases [1-2]. Since the atmospheric concentration of CO2 is shown to
directly affect the climate temperature [3 -4], search for carbon neutral
142 Bhosale et al.
2. Experimental
2.1 Synthesis of NixFe3-xO4
For the synthesis of NixFe3-xO4 via sol-gel method, the nitrate salts of Ni
and Fe were added in ethanol and this mixture was sonicated to dissolve the
metal salts in the solvent. To this solution obtained after sonication,
predetermined amount of propylene oxide (PO) was added dropwise and the gel
formation was achieved. For instance, a picture of a typical NixFe3-xO4 gel
prepared via sol-gel method is shown in Figure 2. As-prepared gels were aged
for 24 h, dried at 100oC, and then heated up to 600oC and cooled down
rapidly in air. Various combinations of NixFe3-xO4 were synthesized such as
Ni0.2Fe2.8O4 (NF2), Ni0.4Fe2.6O4 (NF4), Ni0.5Fe2.5O4 (NF5), Ni0.6Fe2.4O4 (NF6),
Ni0.8Fe2.2O4 (NF8), and NiFe2O4 (NF10).
144 Bhosale et al.
(mass gain) during the CO2 splitting step. Furthermore, the gases exiting the
TGA were continuously analyzed via a gas chromatograph (GC, VARIAN,
CP-4900, Micro GC 2 channel system).
NF10
NF8
NF6
NF5
NF4
NF2
2θ
Figure 3. XRD patterns of sol-gel derived Nix Fe3-x O4.
specific surface area of the sol -gel derived NixFe3-xO4 obtained after
calcination at 600oC was observed to be in the range of 35 to 40 m2/g.
Thermochemical CO production ability of the derived Ni xFe3-xO4 redox
materials was investigated by performing multiple thermal reduction and
CO2-splitting cycles using a high temperature thermogravimetric analyzer.
Befor performing the thermochemical experiments by using the derived NixFe3-xO4
materials, a baseline run was conducted under identical experimental
conditions in absence of the ferrite powder (using empty Al2O3 crucible). This
allows subtracting artifacts due to buoyancy effects or caused by changing the
gas composition.
a) b)
20 nm
Figure 4. a) SEM and b) TEM image of sol-gel derived NF10 redox material.
According to the results obtained via TGA experiments, the % mass loss
during the 1st thermal reduction step was much higher in case of NF2, NF4,
and NF5 as compared to the other Ni xFe3-xO4 materials. However, the
thermal reduction ability of NF10 (% mass loss) was observed to be the
highest and constant during the 2 nd, 3rd, and 4th thermochemical cycles.
Likewise, the re - oxidation ability (% mass gain) was again observed to be
maximum in case of NF10 material as compared to other NixFe3-xO4
materials. The average thermal reduction and CO 2-splitting ability of the
derived NixFe3-xO4 redox materials during 2 nd, 3rd, and 4th thermochemical
cycles was observed to be in the order of NF10 > NF8 > NF6 > NF5 > NF4 >
NF2. The obtained results indicate that the NF10 material performs best
when compared with the other sol-gel derived NixFe3-xO4 materials and also
with ceria based redox materials investigated previously [20-23].
4. Conclusions
In this investigation, Ni x Fe3-xO4 (where, x = 0.2 to 1) redox
materials were successfully synthesized via sol -gel method by using
nitrate salts of Ni, and Fe, ethanol as solvent, and PO as gelation
agent. The XRD analysis confirms the phase pure formation of Ni xFe3-
x O4 materials with high degree of dopant incorporation in the ferrite
spinel structure and with no impurities. Quantitative XRD and SEM/TEM
analysis reveal nanocrystalline morphology of the derived Ni xFe3-xO4. As-
synthesized ferrite powders were further investigated for their use in
thermochemical CO2 -splitting and thermal reduction cycles in the
temperature range 1000 oC to 1400oC using a Thermogravimetricv
analyzer. The results obtained indicate that the stoichiometric NiFe 2 O4
(NF10) generates the highest amounts of O 2 and CO when compared to
the other ferrites examined in this study and other nonvolatile redox
materials such as ceria based oxides investigated previously.
148 Bhosale et al.
5. Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the
Qatar University Internal Grant (QUUG-CENG-CHE-13/14-4), Indo-Swiss
Joint Research Program (ISJRP, grant #138852), and the Swiss Federal
Office of Energy (SFOE).
References
(1) Bhosale, R., Mahajani, V., Sep. Sci. Technol., 48 (2013) 2324.
(2) Bhosale, R., Mahajani, V., J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 5 (2013) 063110-1.
(3) Woods Hole Research Center, http://www.whrc.org/resources/primer.html
(2014) last accessed May 16, 2014.
(4) US Environment Protection Agency, http://epa.gov/climatechange (2014) last
accessed May 16, 2014.
(5) Steinfeld, A. Sol. Energy, 78 (2005) 603.
(6) Kodama, T., Gokon, N., Yamamoto, R., Sol. Energy, 82 (2008) 73.
(7) Scheffe, J., Li, J., Weimer, A., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010) 3333.
(8) Roeb, M., Gathmann, N., Neises, M., Sattler, C., Pitz-Paal, R., Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 33 (2009) 893.
(9) Lorentzou, S., Agrafiotis, C., Konstandopoulos, A., Granular Matter 10 (2008)
113.
(10) Varsano, F., Padella, F., Alvani, C., Bellusci, M., La Barbera, A., Int.
J. Hydrogen Energy 37 (2012) 11595.
(11) Bhosale, R., Shende, R., Puszynski, J., J. Energy Power Eng. 4 (2010) 27.
(12) Bhosale, R., Shende, R., Puszynski, J., Int. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2 (2010) 852.
(13) Bhosale, R., Shende, R., Puszynski, J., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2 (2012) 2924.
(14) Bhosale, R., Khadka, R., Shende, R., Puszynski, J., J. Renewable Sustainable
Energy 3 (2011) 063104 – 1.
(15) Bhosale, R., Shende, R., Puszynski, J., J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 3
(2011) 063104 – 1.
(16) Shende, R., Puszynski, J., Opoku, M., Bhosale, R., NSTI-Nanotech Conference
& Expo. Proc. ISBN 978-1-4398-1782-7 (2009).
(17) Stenger, S., Neises, M., Roeb, M., Sattler, C., Energy Techol. TMS (2011).
(18) Allen. K., Auyeung, N., Rahmatian, N., Klausner, J., Coker, E., JOM 65 (2013)
1682.
(19) Allen. K., Coker, E., Auyeung, N., Klausner, J., JOM 65 (2013) 1670.
(20) Kang, M., Wu, X., Zhang, J., Zhao, N., Wei, W., Sun, Y., RSC Advances 4
(2014) 5583.
(21) Jiang, Q., Zhou, G., Jiang, Z., Li, C., Sol. Energy 99 (2014) 55.
(22) Kang, M., Zhang, J., Wang, C., Wang, F., Zhao, N., Xiao, F., Wei, W., Sun, Y.,
RSC Advances 3 (2013) 18878.
(23) Abanades, S., Gal, A. L., Fuel 102 (2012) 180.