Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 51

RED BOOK

V.S.
YELLOW BOOK
OBJECTIVES

 Overview of existing standards


 Comparison of GAGAS to IPPF
 Issues
 Terminology
 Ethics taken as a whole
 Risks and audit planning
 Quality assurance
 Who audits the auditors? (Peer Review)
 Reporting Compliance
 Dirty, Rotten Scoundrels & Others (Fraud)
 Told You So (Follow -Up Audit)
 Smarty Pants (Competence)
 WOW
THE COLOR OF STANDARDS
A BRIEF HISTORY
The BLUE BOOK – GAAFR: Governmental
Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting
(by the GFOA)

The YELLOW BOOK – GAGAS: Generally Accepted


Government Audit Standards (by the GAO)

The RED BOOK – IPPF: International Professional


Practices Framework (by the IIA)

 The GREEN BOOK - Principles and Standards for


Of fices of Inspector General (by the AIG)

The GREEN BOOK - Standards For Internal


Control In The Federal Government : 2013
Exposure Draft (by the GAO)
WOW: WHICH ONE WHEN?

 When Specific Set of Standards is Mandated by Federal State


or Local Law.

 When Specific Set of Standards Is Identified in the Audit


Organization Charter.

 When the Majority of Audit Organization Resources are Used


for on Consulting, Fraud Investigations and Other Nonaudit
Services.
The IIA’s
published
guide
comparing
the two
standards

Copyright © 2012 The Institute of Internal Auditors.


WHAT’S BETWEEN THE COVERS?

YELLOW BOOK = GAGAS RED BOOK = IPPF


Contains 7 Chapters: Comprised of Three Documents:
1) Foundation & Ethical Principles 1) Definition of Internal Auditing
2) Standards for Use & Application of 2) Code of Ethics
GAGAS
3) General Standards 3) International Standards for the
Professional Practice of Internal Auditing
4) Standards for Financial Audits
5) Standards for Attestation
Engagements
6) Field Work Standards for Categories of Authoritative Guidance:
Performance Audits Practice Advisories
7) Reporting Standards for Position Papers, & Practice Guides
Performance Audits
Appendices of Supplemental Guidance
Easy steps to

WHAT ARE THE ISSUES ? comply with


both sets of
standards…
Issue
TERMINOLOGY
#1
RELATIONSHIP OF COMMON TERMS
THE DEFINITION OF “CONSULTING”

Red Book Yellow Book


Includes “consulting” in the Intertwines “consulting
definition of internal services” with nonaudit
auditing: services and impairment of
independence.
“Internal auditing is an
independent, objective assurance
and consulting activity designed Taken from the Index:
to add value to an organization’s
operations” consulting services (see
nonaudit services)
Consulting Services are:
nonaudit services 2.12-2.13
“advisor y and related client independence, see
ser vices…without the internal “independence, nonaudit
auditor assuming management services”
responsibility”
THE DEFINITION OF “OBJECTIVIT Y”

 Red Book  Yellow Book


 Code of Ethics:  1 .1 9 , , , O b j e c t i v i t y i n c l ud e s
i n d e p e n d e nc e o f m i n d a n d a p p e a r anc e
2 . O b j ec t i v i t y – w h e n p r o v i d in g a u d i t s , m a i n t ai n i n g a n
a t t i t ud e o f i m p a r t i a l it y, h av i n g
I n te r n a l a u d i to r s : i n te l l e c t ual h o n e s t y, a n d b e i n g f r e e o f
c o n f l ic t s o f i n te r e s t .
2 .1 S h a l l n o t p a r t i c i p a te i n a ny a c t i v i t y
o r r e l a t i o n s hi p t h a t m ay i m p a ir o r b e
p r e s um e d t o i m p a ir t h e i r u n b i a s e d  M a i n t a i ni n g o b j e c t i v i t y i n c l ud e s a
a s s e s s m e n t . T h i s p a r t i ci p a t i o n i n c l ud e s c o n t i n ui n g a s s e s s m e n t o f
t h o s e a c t i v i t ie s o r r e l a t i o n s h i p s t h a t r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h a u d i te d e n t i t i e s a n d
m ay b e i n c o n fl i c t w i t h t h e i n te r e s t s o f o t h e r s t a ke h o l d e r s i n t h e c o n tex t o f
t h e o r g a ni z a t io n . t h e a u d i to r s ’ r e s p o n si bi l it y to t h e
p u b l ic . T h e c o n c e p t s o f o b je c t i v i t y a n d
i n d e p e n d e nc e a r e c l o s el y r e l a te d .
2 . 2 S h a l l n o t a c c e p t a ny t h i n g t h a t m ay I n d e p e n d e nc e i m p a i r m e n t s i m p a c t
i m p a i r o r b e p r e s um e d to i m p a i r t h e ir o b j ec t i v i t y.
p r o fe s s i o n a l j u d g m e n t .

2 . 3 S h a l l d i s c lo s e a l l m a te r i a l f a c t s
k n o w n to t h e m t h a t , i f n o t d i s c lo s e d ,
m ay d i s to r t t h e r e p o r t i n g o f a c t i v i t i e s
u n d e r r ev i ew.
THE DEFINITION OF “INDEPENDENCE”

Red Book Yellow Book


 May provide consulting  Provides conceptual
services relating to framework (¶3.07-3.26).
operations for which  Removed specific
they had previous references to personal,
responsibilities. external, and
(Standard 1130) organizational
impairments, and
 IIA’s Practice Guide overarching
Independence and independence principles.
Objectivity (October  However, the underlying
2011) provides further concepts related to these
guidance. categories have been
retained.
 Identifies “Threats”.
YELLOW BOOK
FRAMEWORK OF INDEPENDENCE
3.06 GAGAS’s practical consideration of independence consists of four
interrelated sections, providing:

a. a conceptual framework for making independence determinations based on


facts and circumstances that are often unique to specific environments;

b. requirements for and guidance on independence for audit organizations that are
structurally located within the entities they audit;

c. requirements for and guidance on independence for auditors performing


nonaudit services, including indication of specific nonaudit services that always
impair independence and others that would not normally impair independence;
and

d. requirements for and guidance on documentation necessary to support


adequate consideration of auditor independence.
YELLOW BOOK
FRAMEWORK OF THREATS

¶3.46 Auditors may be able to provide nonaudit services in the broad areas
indicated in paragraphs 3.49 through 3.58 without impairing independence if:

(1) The nonaudit services are not expressly prohibited,

(2) The auditor has determined that the requirements for performing nonaudit
services in paragraphs 3.34 through 3.44 have been met, and

(3) Any significant threats to independence have been eliminated or reduced to an


acceptable level through the application of safeguards.
YELLOW BOOK
7 DEADLY THREATS

1) Management Responsibilities

2) Preparing Accounting Records and Financial Statements

3) Internal Audit Assistance Services Provided by External Auditors

4) Internal Control Monitoring as a Nonaudit Service

5) Information Technology Systems Services

6) Valuation Services

7) Other Nonaudit Services


YELLOW BOOK
PROHIBITED OTHER NONAUDIT SERVICES

¶3.58 Provision of certain other nonaudit services always impairs an


external auditor’s independence with respect to an audited entity. These
activities include:

a. Non tax disbursement

b. Benefit plan administration

c. Investment — advisory or management

d. Corporate finance — consulting or advisory

e. Executive or employee personnel matters

f. Business risk consulting


YELLOW BOOK FLOW CHART FOR
INDEPENDENCE
ALGA’S GUIDANCE FOR COMPLYING WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
RELATED TO NONAUDIT SERVICES
ALGA’S GUIDANCE FOR COMPLYING WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
RELATED TO NONAUDIT SERVICES
ALGA’S GUIDANCE FOR COMPLYING WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
RELATED TO NONAUDIT SERVICES
BUT WHAT ABOUT…

 Mandated Nonaudit Services:


GAGAS paragraph 3.44 recognizes that an auditor in a
government entity may be required to perform a nonaudit
service that could impair the auditor’s independence with
respect to a required audit. If the auditor cannot, as a
consequence of constitutional or statutory requirements
over which the auditor has no control, implement
safeguards to reduce the resulting threat to an acceptable
level, or decline to perform or terminate a nonaudit service
that is incompatible with audit responsibilities, the auditor
should:
(1) Disclose the nature of the threat that could not be
eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level .
(2) Modify the GAGAS compliance statement.
ETHICS: Issue
TAKEN AS A WHOLE #2
REVIEW OF ORGANIZATION’S
ETHICS PROGRAM
 Red Book  Yellow Book
 I I A S t a n d a r d 21 1 0 . A 1 : “ … t h e i n te r n al  GAGAS §1.12 Conducting audit work in
a u d i t a c t i v i t y m u s t ev a l ua te t h e accordance with ethical principles is a matter
d e s i g n , i m p l e m e n t a t io n , a n d of personal and organizational responsibility.
e f f e c t i ve n e s s o f t h e o r g a n i z a t i o n ’ s Ethical principles apply in preserving auditor
et h i c s - r el a te d o b j e c t iv e s , p r o g r a m s , independence, taking on only work that the
audit organization is competent to perform,
a n d a c t i v i t i e s. ” performing high-quality work, and following
the applicable standards cited in the auditors’
report. Integrity and objectivity are
 M o r e d et a i l e d t h a n Ye l l ow B o o k maintained when auditors perform their work
r e q u i r in g p e r i o d ic ev a l ua t i o n o f t h e and make decisions that are consistent with
o r g a n i z a t i o n ’s p r o g r a m t a ke n a s a the broader interest of those relying on the
auditors’ report, including the public.
whole.
 §1.13 Other ethical requirements or codes of
professional conduct may also be applicable
to auditors who conduct audits in accordance
with GAGAS. For example, individual auditors
who are members of professional
organizations or are licensed or certified
professionals may also be subject to ethical
requirements of those professional
organizations or licensing bodies . Auditors
employed by government entities may also be
subject to government ethics laws and
regulations.
REVIEW OF ORGANIZATION’S
ETHICS PROGRAM
Suggestion:

To comply with the additional


requirements of The IIA Standards, a
periodic evaluation should be made of
the organization’s ethics program, and
that evaluation should be documented
through a note or memos to the file or
through an audit on the subject matter
RISKS & Issue
AUDIT PLANNING #3
RISK ASSESSMENT FOR
OVERALL AUDIT PLANNING
The Red Book requires The Yellow Book
risk assessments and Standards do not
establishment of risk require a risk based
based plans to approach to annual
determine the priorities audit plans but focus
of the internal audit on the planning of
activity. (Standard individual audits.
2010 & IIA Practice
Guide Assessing the
Adequacy of Risk
Management – Dec
2010)
RISK ASSESSMENT FOR
OVERALL AUDIT PLANNING

Suggestion:

Comply with the additional requirements of the


Red Book by completing an annual plan of
engagements that is based on a documented
risk assessment.
Issue
QUALITY ASSURANCE
#4
QUALIT Y ASSURANCE SYSTEMS

The Yellow Book requires a


The Red Book requires Quality Assurance Program
maintaining a Quality that collectively address:
Assurance and Improvement Leader ship
Program (QAIP). See Standard responsibilities
1300 Independence, legal and
Internal assessments ethical requirements
On-going Monitoring of Performance Initiation, acceptance, &
Periodic Self-assessments continuance of audits
External assessments Human resources
Periodic assessments Audit per formance,
IIA’s Practice Guide documentation and
Measuring Internal Audit repor ting
Effectiveness and Efficiency – Monitoring of quality
Dec 2010 Annual assessment but
specific instructions on
elements and repor ting
See ¶3.82-3.107, A3.10-
A3.12
QUALIT Y ASSURANCE SYSTEMS

Suggestion:

Audit organizations should follow Yellow Book


Standards for quality assurance programs
and the recommendations in the IIA Practice
Advisory 1311-1
WHO AUDITS Issue
THE AUDITORS? #5
EXTERNAL QUALIT Y ASSURANCE REVIEW
(PEER REVIEW)
The Red Book requires that The Yellow Book
an external assessment must requires an external peer
be conducted at least once review performed by
every 5 years by a qualified, reviewers independent of
independent reviewer or
team from outside the the audit organization at
organization. (See Standard least once every 3 years.
1312)
A copy of the peer review
report must be provided
to those charged with
governance.

(See ¶ 3.96 & 3.105)


PEER REVIEW RESOURCES

IIA Peer Review Program:


IIA Quality Services, LLC provides the most appropriate
external assessment approach to enhance conformance
with Red Book Standards, either through an independent
team quality assessment, self-assessment with
independent validation or readiness assessment. Free
quote on fees upon request.

For more information go to: www.theiia.org/Quality


PEER REVIEW RESOURCES

ALGA Peer Review Program


Peer Review Program offers Yellow Book and
Red Book Reviews and can perform both for audit
organizations that comply with both set of standards.

Audit organization must be a member of ALGA and


agree to volunteer at least one staff member to
participate on another review team before the next
review. ALGA bills for the travel expense of the team
members. Team members’ salary is paid by their
respective employers.

For more information go to: www.algaonline.org


EXAMPLE OF PEER REVIEW REPORT
FOR BOTH SETS OF STANDARDS
OTHER PEER REVIEW RESOURCES

Independent Certified Public Accounting Firms


(Consider the experience of the firm in providing
Internal audit peer review.)

Red Book or Yellow Book Peer Review Guides


available for download at the ALGA website with no
charge: http://www.algaonline.org

The IIA Bookstore has resources with discounted


member or non-member prices.
REPORTING Issue
COMPLIANCE #6
REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Red Book Standards Yellow Book ¶7.30


1321 and 2430 provides specific
address the use of wording that the
wording that “may” be Report “should” use
used to report the to indicate that the
audit work was work was performed
“Conducted in in accordance with
conformance with the GAGAS and a general
International description of related
Standards for the work.
Professional Practice
of Internal Auditing”
REPORTING COMPLIANCE WITH
THE STANDARDS
Sug g e stion :
If a ppl i c able a n d t h e a udi t o rg a n iza tio n h a s m et t h e pe e r rev i ew re q ui re ment s
o f t h e Ye l low B o o k i n c lude t h e fo l low ing c l a us e i n yo ur re po r t s :

We co nd uc ted t h i s p e r fo rma nc e a ud i t i n acco rd a nc e wi t h ge n e r a l l y


acc ep te d gove rn m e n t a u d i ti n g s t a nda rd s . T ho s e s t a nda rd s re q u i re t h a t we
p la n a nd p e r form t he a ud i t to o b ta i n s u f f ici e n t , app rop ri ate ev i d e nc e to
p rovi d e a rea so na b l e ba s i s fo r o u r f i nd i n gs a nd co ncl u s ion s b a s ed o n ou r
a ud i t o b j ec t ive s . We b e l i eve t h a t t h e ev i d e nc e o b t a in e d p rov id e s a
re a so n a b l e bas i s fo r o u r f in d i n gs a n d con c l u s io n s ba s ed o n o u r a ud it
o b j e ct i ve s .

An d w h eth e r o r n ot Ye l low o r Re d B o o k s, w h e n a udi to r s do n ot co m pl y w i th a l l


a ppl i c able re q ui reme nt s , t h ey s h o uld di s c lose s uc h by i n c l uding m o di fic at ion to
a c o m plia nc e s t a te m ent i n t h e a udi t re po r t .

Fo r Ye l low B o o k pe r fo rm a nc e a udi t s , a udi to r s s h o uld us e a s t a te ment t h a t


i n c lude s e i t h e r ( 1 ) t h e l a n gua ge i n 7. 3 0 , m o di fied to i n di ca te t h e re q ui re ment s
t h a t we re n ot fo l l owed o r ( 2 ) l a n g uage t h a t t h e a udi to r di d n ot fo l l ow
G AG AS.17 0
DIRTY, ROTTEN, Issue
SCOUNDRELS & OTHERS #7
FRAUD

The Red Book The Yellow Book Standards


Standards address (¶6.30- 6.32) address
evaluating potential specific audit procedures
for fraud & how the including brainstorming
organization manages with team members
fraud risk. regarding fraud risks and
IIA Practice Guide designing additional audit
Internal Auditing and procedures (tests) for any
Fraud (2009) identified fraud risks.
Reporting to Senior
Management and the Include in the audit report
Board. the finding of fraud if
significant to audit
objective
FRAUD

Suggestion:

Implement Yellow Book Standards. Although


both standards provide guidance in the area of
fraud, GAGAS has specific guidance requiring
the documentation of the consideration of
fraud and developing additional audit
procedures to address any identified risks.
Also, GAGAS has more detailed fraud reporting
requirements.
Issue
TOLD YOU SO
#8
FOLLOW-UP AUDITS

Red Book describes Yellow Book requires


greater responsibility of consideration of the
the auditor to monitor status of previous
and ensure findings &
management actions recommendations in
have been effectively the planning of future
implemented or that Sr. audits.
Management has But, doesn’t directly
accepted the risk of require the auditor to
inaction (see: IIA monitor subsequent
Standard 2500 actions by management
Monitoring Process) on the report findings.
(See Appendix 1,
¶1.08)
FOLLOW-UP AUDITS

Suggestion:

Establish a process to follow -up on previous


audit findings and recommendations that meet
the requirement of the more detailed IIA
Standards while not assuming management’s
responsibilities.
Issue
SMARTY PANTS
#9
COMPETENCE:
CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
Red Book requires the Yellow Book provides more
enhancement of knowledge, restrictive requirements as to
skills, and other competencies allowable topics and hours of
through continuing education education regardless of the
in Standard 11 20. auditor’s cer tifications. (See
 Does not specify the number ¶3.76)
of CPE hour s required for  Complete, ever y two years, at
auditor s who are not cer tified least 24 hours of CPE that
Practice Advisor y 1 230 -1 directly relates to government
suggests that internal auditor s related topics.
with professional Additional 56 hours of CPE
cer tifications are responsible within the 2 year period for a
for obtaining suf ficient CPE to total of 80 hours for anyone
satisfy related requirements. directing, planning, or >20% of
time spent on GAGAS audits.
No distinction between cer tified
or non-cer tified staf f.
COMPETENCE:
CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION

Suggestion:

Audit organizations should follow the more


detailed CPE requirements of the Yellow Book
for ALL auditors and internal specialists
performing work in accordance with Generally
Accepted Government Auditing Standards.
WHICH ONE WHEN?
IT DOESN’T HAVE GO
ORANGE!
TO BE EXCLUSIVE
RESOURCES USED IN THIS
PRESENTATION

The YELLOW BOOK – GAGAS: Generally Accepted Government Audit Standards


(by the GAO)

The RED BOOK – IPPF: International Professional Practices Framework (by the
IIA)

Supplemental Guidance: IIA International Standards for the Professional


Practice of Internal Auditing
Government Accountability Office Government Audit Standards (GAGAS)
A Comparison, 2nd Edition

Guidance for Complying with Government Auditing Standards Related to


Nonaudit Services (by the ALGA Board)
THANK YOU!

James D. Boyd Sheila M. Rober ts


Inspector General Audit Supervisor
Florida Department of Health Orange County Comptroller
4052 Bald Cypress Way P.O. Box 38
Bin #A03 Orlando, Florida 32802 -0038
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1704
(850) 245-4141 (407) 836-5775

You might also like