Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Econ 464
Econ 464
0 on
* ☒4"
0113112022
-
Lecture note -
L ,
K X ,
Y
3
factors 2 goods
L ,
K ,
T X ,
Y
1 2 Linear
factor goods :
L X ,
Y
⑧reduction
functions :
(a) Cobb -
Douglas :
~
constant returns to scale l CRS )
-45 ( 06 (1)
con-syt-nan.tl
l l LL K
)
q =
f ,
=
(2) Linear : 1
factor
ql ) f = LL ) = =
1a . ( a > 0)
28
Notice : APL =
Mph =
LY ) =
yh
=
ta where a is unit labor
coefficient
Tools :
(I PPF : Production -
Example 1 : I
factors ( L , K) ,
2
goods (X ,
Y)
Possibility Frontier
Definition : Combinations of XP , Y
"
( Production amount ) such that
Max XP ( ) =
fx ( Lx .
Kx )
subject to
XP ( ) =
fy ( Ly Ky ) ,
I
-
Kx n Ky a
> ↳ > Ly
"
. . .
then PPF is
"
nice
Ya
>
✗
I
Define PPF
figure out the shape of PPF , ,
K
#-) K -
intensive Assume : Y is L
-
intensive ; ✗ is K -
intensive
L -
intensive Ky
^
Kx T
¥ > Ly
IF > ↳
For
any wl
wage ) ,
r ( rental price of capital )
Kx Ky Ly Lx
Ky "
ensure
trade this
p* >
✗ 1K -
intensive ) -
✗ 1K -
intensive )
#-) .
1
factor ( L ) Assume the production functions are
"
nice
"
.
Production function with IMPL
2
goods ( X Y ) ,
f× a
fy
^
2=8×11×7 y
=
fylly )
> ↳ > Ly
y
^
Ly <
r
µ a • >
✗
|
,
"
4- ×
, i
- - - -.
Lx
(E) .
Linear production Example 3 : A factor ( L)
Qs Textiles
function 2
goods :
Soy =
,
=
QT
Linear production function
Assume : I 100 =
Qs =L ↳ ; Qt =L, 4-
labor 2
Unit
coefficients :
as =
, at = 4
I
PPF equation : NQS 5- as
* Option 1 : I =
↳ +
↳ 100 =
↳+ LT 50 -
↳ Qs
}
2
=
100 IQs 4Q+
Replacing :
= +
4- = 4 QT
I
50 as as
/ Slope / = = = %
£5
>
25 , AT
( const ) .
at
=
La ,
<
"
"
Qg = 0 QTM =
14 I =
100.41 = 25
total Value ( i. e. )
" "
Revenue
Remark Px Py taken
:
good prices ,
are as
given a constant
Example :
Px = 1
, Py = 2
20 =
4 =
Px XP .
+ Py XP.
14 = 20 = 1. XP -12 YP
↳ fixed I
30 =
Vg =
Px XP .
+
Py YP .
11J = 30 = 1 .
XP -12 YP
:
10 = Vio = Px XP .
+
Py YP .
a Y
"
1 Slope I PY Px
( of
=
4
-
py
=L
10 -
all
of them )
J, Px
=
py
✗
¥-1
=p:
LI) Profit
.
Max .
& Idea of firm with
ability to
produce both
goods
Revenue Maximization Max Px XP .
+
Py .
YP W . ( ↳ + Ly ) RK ( Kx + Ky ) .
Constraints :
XP
-
f-✗ ( Lx Kx )
}
=
,
=
↳ +
LY Trade models
YP I
fy Ky Ky ) Kxtky
=
=
,
Profit max .
coincides with Max .
lines .
yn Ky ^
Consumer Cost
Utility ☒
Minimization
C W.LY Rk Ky
utility
= + .
y*
_yyma× > ✗
ky*_qy
•
I =
>
( 100 )
constant
Ly
✗
*
y*
.
Revenue Max . Revenue maximization
subject to PPF
Example "
A :
Example B :
y*P|- y
slope 7 this slope is steeper
p*
p*
y*P
-1
> ✗ *P
> ✗
*P
✗ ✗
A B
Px Px
Slope =
Slope =
Py B A Py
In this
Px p×
* case ,
Py Py
B A
*P *p
✗ ✗
(
y*P y*p
* P* :
"
production Point
"
= Combinations of ✗ ,
Y that maximize
(E) .
Linear PPF
Example :
Y Y
!→p*
a
1 2
PPF
slope is value p*
,
.
>
✗ •
>
✗
^ d
¥
PX
Slope =
Slope =
Py
In this case : Y*" 0 ,
✗
*"
= 0 y*P = 0
,
✗
*P
O
Questions : What is / are the (✗ .
Y ) combinations that max .
profit / revenue
if . . .
1 .
I slope isovaluel = I slope of PPFI
2 .
I slope isovaluel I slope of PPFI
3 .
I slope isovaluel I slope of PPFI