Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Girish Kuber Writes Both Congress in Criticising Him and BJP in Owning Him Take A Partial and Blinker
Girish Kuber Writes Both Congress in Criticising Him and BJP in Owning Him Take A Partial and Blinker
Girish Kuber Writes Both Congress in Criticising Him and BJP in Owning Him Take A Partial and Blinker
1/4
behind them are Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and Keshav Baliram Hedgewar,
respectively. Though both espoused the cause of the Hindus, both these leaders were far
from being compatible with each other.
The Hindu Mahasabha was a direct reaction to the Muslim League. First it was the
partition of Bengal, followed up by the Morley-Minto reforms that Hindus feared would
pave the way for separate constituencies for Muslims. These developments expedited the
formation of an organisation to protect Hindu interests. That was the Hindu Sabha, first
set up in Punjab by Lala Lajpat Rai. In a year a number of Hindu Sabhas were formed in
Bihar, Bengal, Bombay Presidency etc. Soon the need was felt to have an umbrella
organisation to protect and further the interests of Hindus. Finally, all regional bodies
resolved to come together on the occasion of the Kumbh Mela in Haridwar in 1915. But it
took another six years to acquire the name, the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha.
Interestingly, its constitution expressed loyalty to the British. Malaviya was spearheading
a campaign to unite Hindus but the Mahasabha gained momentum only after Balakrishna
Shivaram Munje and Savarkar joined the organisation in the early ’30s. Both had serious
differences with Gandhi.
Also Read |On Savarkar, Congress and Shiv Sena ‘agree to disagree’
The book angered the British, and it was banned across its colonies. Around this time, as
part of the efforts to organise Hindus under a single organisation, Savarkar’s brother
Ganesh had organised an armed revolt against the Morley-Minto Reforms offering special
status to Muslims. He was held guilty, which alerted Savarkar in London, who moved to
Madame Cama’s home in Paris to avoid arrest. He, however, couldn’t escape since the
British police came calling on March 13, 1910. He was arrested. As he was being shipped
to India in the SS Morea, he escaped from his cell while the ship was docked in the port
of Marseille on July 8 1910. The daring act backfired and Savarkar was re-arrested. Later
he was brought to India and, following a trial, convicted and transported on July 4 1911 to
the Cellular Jail in the Andamans. He was just 28 when he was sentenced for 50 years.
This is the point from where he begins to attract criticism for a series of clemency
petitions, now being spoken of by the Congress. Savarkar’s supporters and Hindutva
acolytes claim these petitions were a “tactical retreat”. However, many historians,
including those who have refused to join the Hindutvavadi bandwagon, believe these
clemency petitions were a complete surrender to the ruling power. Finally, the British
released Savarkar after he endorsed the court verdict and British law, and “renounced
violence” to gain freedom.
2/4
His critics believe this was the end of the “revolutionary” Savarkar since after release, he
ceased to be anti-British, and accepted conditions to end the jail term and also to give up
politics. Out of jail and under house arrest in Ratnagiri, Savarkar along with Munje started
devoting more time to the Hindu Mahasabha. Both were critical of Congress’s apparent
pro-minority stance. Both were staunch Hindus and their politics was clearly majoritarian.
Both were exasperated by Gandhi’s growing influence and rapid marginalisation of pro-
Hindu leaders as this highlighted the failure of the Hindu Mahasabha. It was here that one
of Savarkar’s associates, Hedgewar, decided to find a new path to create another Hindu-
centric organisation, the RSS.
Also Read |Thackerays’ old link to Savarkar, burnishing Hindutva credentials: Why
Uddhav disapproved of Rahul’s remarks
Now, about the rationalist in Savarkar who wanted to reform Hindu religion. According to
him, the cow was nothing more than an animal with enormous utility and he always
refrained from viewing it as gau mata. He was for complete eradication of the caste
system and he was not against people eating non-vegetarian food. Savarkar even
criticised Gandhi for describing the 1934 earthquake in Bihar as “God’s curse on Indians”.
His rationalist, progressive approach may have restricted the Hindu Mahasabha’s
popularity. However, Savarkar and the Hindu Mahasabha were hardly seen as anti-British
even when the war for freedom was picking up. This makes Savarkar more vulnerable to
criticism from pro-Independence forces and also from Congress.
Weakened and ostracised, Savarkar led the rest of his life pushing for religious reform.
The BJP discovered his political utility after the Ayodhya agitation and after former Union
minister, Mani Shankar Aiyar, in an unwise act, removed Savarkar’s plaque installed in
Andaman’s Cellular Jail. Congress has been a mute spectator to the process of the BJP
appropriating its icons, one after the other. Having appropriated Gandhi, Sardar Patel,
Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, the BJP is trying to woo Maharashtra Brahmins by owning
Savarkar’s legacy.
3/4
Next Story
Ira Khan gets engaged to Nupur Shikhare in Mumbai; Aamir Khan, Reena Dutta bless
their daughter. Watch videos
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
4/4