In accordance with the social exchange theory, a relationship between two people is created

through a process of cost-benefit analysis. It is merely a statistic developed to evaluate a person's

level of commitment in a personal relationship. To determine whether someone is putting too
much effort into their relationship, data from the measurement of the pros and negatives in a
relationship may be employed. The concept stands out since it doesn't always evaluate
interpersonal connections using emotional indicators. Instead, it uses logic and mathematics to
discover/ create balance in a connection. Additionally to measuring romantic relationships, the
idea can also be used to evaluate the balance in a friendship.
George Homans, who wrote an article titled "Social Behavior as Exchange," first proposed the
hypothesis in 1958. Homans developed a theory that integrates behaviorism and fundamental
economics. One size does not fit all is one of the theory's elemental presumptions, which creates
a key factor of social exchange theory. A person's expectations are determined by their
comparison levels, which allow the theory to be rated on a sliding scale that varies depending on
the individual. If their personal relationship samples are established at that level, an individual
will typically use the caliber of their present relationships as a standard for future ones.
For instance, if someone enters a new relationship after a streak of poor friendships or
relationships, their expectations will be lower than those of someone who has a close circle of
friends. On the other side, if a person's ex-girlfriend showered him with tons of gifts and
affection, he might expect the same behaviors in his next relationship. These levels of
anticipation can frequently be used in connection with costs vs. profits, another fundamental idea
of the theory's usefulness. It offers a "give and take" measure that can be examined to gauge how
much effort one side may be putting into the connection, making this the theory's most well-
known product. In this theory component, the "costs" are things that a person would consider to
be unfavorable in a relationship. A spouse who routinely neglects his household chores or a
buddy who begs for money might add up quickly. According to this notion, "profits" are
characteristics that a person might consider to be favorable qualities. the companion who is
constantly available to listen in difficult situationsThe idea predicts that a valuable relationship
will be located as far away from the cost category as is practical. If enough beneficial features
exceed the negative traits, even if there are some costs associated with the relationship and
human behavior suggests there definitely will be then the costs have little significance.

the restoration of free behaviors that have been eliminated or are under fear of elimination. The
theory just refers to restoring a threatened or abolished freedom and makes no assumptions about
psychological reactance being sparked to acquire a freedom. Bhrem's explanation of freedom.
Therefore, psychological reaction arouses a person and spurs action for freedom restoration.
Brehm claims that reactance is reactionary to real or perceived threats to liberties rather than
being a constructive force. A variety of behavioral assumptions are made by the theory. Brehm
makes the following observations regarding how people behave: First, freedom of action is
widely practiced. It also plays a significant role in daily life and human connection. Third,
humans are goal-oriented and constantly evaluate their actions and the surrounding environment
to decide what, how, and when to engage in specific behaviors. They take into account their
needs and wants, the advantages and disadvantages of their surroundings, and the means by
which they can achieve their goals, he said. People frequently engage in acts while being
somewhat unaware of the motivations behind them. Sometimes people engage in acts even if
they are well aware of the limitations and a lack of freedom involved. Brehm's fourth premise,
however, is that most of the time, people feel relatively free to engage in a variety of actions.
Fifth, the theory makes the assumption that humans have a set of behaviors they should exhibit.
These actions have been taken in the past, they are being taken now, and they will be taken in the
future. He identifies a number of requirements to classify a conduct as a free behavior and refers
to these actions as the person's "free behaviors."These include the behaviors being attainable in
practice and the person's physical and mental capacity to persons who actively engage in these
actions while simultaneously being fully aware of their ability to Participate in such actions.
Such involvement awareness develops from social norms, cultural norms, and legislation, court
decisions, and other official and informal agreements.