Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hospital Impact Emergency Department
Hospital Impact Emergency Department
HOSPITAL IMPACT :
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
Margaret M. McMahon
OBJECTIVES:
ã
ã
Understand the role of the ED during a disaster;
Understand the principles of the Hospital Incident Command System and its application to
ã
ED staff and activities during a disaster; and
Describe the immediate priorities of the ED during a disaster.
81
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
82
HOSPITAL IMPACT: EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
VICTIM ARRIVAL
The timing of casualty arrival after an event is variable, depending upon a vari-
ety of factors, including the nature of the event, the number and types of casu-
alties, the hospital services available, the proximity of the hospital to the scene,
the community casualty distribution plan, transportation resources, terrain,
weather, and whether or not decontamination is performed or required. Disaster
casualties often arrive at the ED by EMS ambulance; however, a large number of
victims self-evacuate or are evacuated by volunteers and have not benefited from
the early organization and prioritization of field triage, treatment, and transport.
When casualties arrive by means other than the EMS system, the hospital clos-
est to the scene, regardless of its capabilities, typically receives the largest num-
ber of casualties.4,5 For example, a terrorist attack using an improvised explosive
device (IED) in a popular marketplace may result in a number of seriously
injured victims who arrive at the hospital by all available transportation means.
An analysis of the train bombing in Madrid, Spain, in 2004 revealed that the hos-
pital closest to the bombing site received hundreds of victims within the first few
hours of the event.6 In addition, 67% of the bombing victims that were admit-
ted to area hospitals were transported in non-medical vehicles without triage,
treatment, or being under any medical control.6 In a bombing event, the major-
ity of the victims will arrive at the hospital within the first hour.5 In contrast, a
plane crash in a remote area generally will be associated with a phased arrival of
casualties that are transported by the EMS.
In an incident in which all casualties are equally accessible, the field Incident
Command System (ICS) calls for treatment and transport of the most critically
injured victims first. However, casualties tend to arrive at the hospital in waves,
with the less seriously injured victims arriving first, as they are capable of leav-
ing the scene without waiting for EMS assistance, while more critical patients are
extricated and stabilized prior to EMS transport. Thus, it is important for the
ED staff to utilize resources judiciously, given that the most seriously injured are
likely to arrive later. A third wave of patients may present even later as rescue
workers become ill or injured during the rescue operation.7 In disasters from
natural events, with widespread disruption of services and lack of access to rou-
tine health care, a potential fourth wave of casualty presentations may occur
days later due to exacerbation of chronic diseases related to a lack of necessary
medications or environmental changes,8 a lack of dialysis services, psychological
and psychiatric disorders, pulmonary and skin infections, and gastrointestinal
disorders due to inadequate water supply and hygiene facilities.9–11
83
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
ACTIVATION OF THE
HOSPITAL DISASTER PLAN
Generally, the decision to activate the hospital’s disaster plan is made by the
most senior administrative individual on duty, in consultation with the ED
senior physician and charge nurse. The decision is based on the estimated
number of casualties, their clinical care needs, and the resources immediately
available. The disaster plan also may be activated solely by the ED leadership
on duty upon the sudden arrival of a large number of self-evacuated or unan-
nounced casualties. Activation of the disaster plan mobilizes additional staff
and resources to cope with the increased clinical workload, and also alerts
hospital personnel to curtail routine operations. Facility disaster plans should
define the threshold for activating the plan. Small-scale, multiple-casualty
incidents (MCI) may be managed completely by the ED, without the need to
involve the rest of the hospital. Some facilities have two potential levels of dis-
aster plan activation: standby, and implementation.
Activation of the disaster plan typically is announced through the hospital’s
overhead communications system, and augmented by telephone calls or run-
ners to areas that may not be connected to the
CODE RED — FIRE
overhead paging system, such as the Opera-
ting Room. The code used to announce a dis-
CODE BLUE — ADULT aster is not standardized, and varies from one
Medical Emergency
institution to another, even within the same
CODE WHITE — PEDIATRIC community. Because of this variability, it is
Medical Emergency important that all staff, especially agency or
CODE AMBER — ABDUCTION temporary staff, have ready access to the facil-
Infant/Child ity’s emergency code names and definitions.
CODE YELLOW — BOMB/ An example of a state-wide standardized
Bomb Threat Emergency Codes card used in one of the
CODE GREY — SECURITY
United States is illustrated in Figure 6.1. In
Emergency/Patient Elopement addition to the in-hospital alert, telephonic or
pager notification of off-site and off-duty
CODE SILVER — HOSTAGE
Situation individuals is performed. Redundant commu-
nication systems should be in place, as land-
CODE ORANGE — HAZMAT line and cellular telephone systems may be
Situation/Decon Needed
inoperable. E-mail and the media may be uti-
CODE TRIAGE — DISASTER lized to alert off-duty personnel. In disasters
Situation
occurring in remote areas, or those with a
CODE CLEAR — the Situation large number of casualties with conditions
has been CLEARED that require expert consultation, e.g., burns or
Figure 6.1: New Jersey Hospital Association
radiation exposure, satellite communications
Emergency Codes with distant centers may be employed.11
84
HOSPITAL IMPACT: EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
85
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
86
HOSPITAL IMPACT: EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
quets in a blast or explosive event. Many institutions have a disaster supply cart
stored in the ED or delivered to the ED upon activation of the disaster plan. The
contents of the cart should be evaluated in consideration of the anticipated casu-
alties, such as the need for additional age-specific supplies/equipment. Additional
crash carts or resuscitation supplies for adults and children may be required.
Supplemental pharmaceuticals (such as antibiotics, pain medications, and
tetanus prophylaxis) also may be needed. It is prudent to have a predetermined
list of medications and dosages that will be delivered to the ED and other casu-
CATEGORY DRUG/AGENT
Analgesics Oral hydrocodone/acetaminophen (5/500)*
IV Morphine*
IV/IM ketoralac (Toradol)
IV/IM Ketamine
Antipsychotics Oral and IV haloperidol (Haldol)*
Anxiolytics Oral and IV lorazepam (Ativan)*
Antibiotics Oral and IV Ciprofloxacin*
Antiemetics Zofran
Bronchodilators Albuterol
Epinephrine 1:1,000
Intravenous fluids Normal saline*
5% dextrose/water*
Albumin
Hetastarch
Drugs for intubation Etomidate*
Succinylcholine*
Vecuronium*
Ketamine
Drugs for managing patients IV drip diprovan (Propofal)
on ventilators IV drip diazepam (Valium)
Agents for burn/wound care Silver sulfadiazine (Silvadene)*
Antibiotic ointment — Bacitracin*
Normal saline for irrigation
Local anesthetic — lidocaine (plain and with epinephrine)
Wound/skin glue
Antibacterial cleansers — Povidone-iodine
Ear preparations for Cortisporin otic suspension*
ruptured TM
Eye medications Proparacaine*
Erythromycin ophthalmic ointment*
Tetanus prophylaxis Tetanus toxoid*, diphtheria tetanus toxoid or tetanus-diphtheria–
pertussis (t-dAP)
Hyperimmune tetanus globulin
Table 6.1: Potential ED disaster pharmaceuticals (IV= intravenous, IM = intramuscular; TM = tympanic
membrane* Items identified in CDC: In a Moment’s Notice: Surge Capacity in Terrorist Bombings:
Managing Surge Needs for Injuries: Drugs and Pharmaceutical Supplies. Available at
http://emergency.cdc.gov/masscasualties/pdf/Surge Emergency-Department/pdf.
87
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
alty treatment areas upon disaster plan activation. A list of potential necessary
pharmaceuticals is provided in Table 6.1. The US Strategic National Stockpile
(SNS) also contains medications and medical devices that may be available upon
declaration of a disaster.
Assuring an adequate supply of blood products is the responsibility of the
hospital laboratory. Emergency blood supplies may be stored in a special
refrigerator in the ED as well. Using standardized formulas for determining
blood product requirements during a disaster, the American Association of
Blood Banks recommends planning for three units of whole blood/casualty.13
Bombing casualties typically require more blood products than do other
trauma patients.14 Clearly, the Blood Bank must be kept informed regarding
casualty projections as well as their types of injuries.
Identifying the supplies and equipment needed for a disaster is challenging,
and highly dependent upon the nature of the disaster and the number of antici-
pated casualties. The US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
has developed a software program that can assist hospitals in determining sup-
ply and equipment needs for a number of disaster scenarios (http://hospital
surgemodel. ahrq.gov/). A formulary of core medical-surgical supplies needed in
a disaster has been developed by the Association for Healthcare Resource and
Materials Management along with two health industry distributing and purchas-
ing groups in the United States, and is available at www.ahrmm.org. In addition,
the formulary lists needed supplies unique to chemical, biological, radiological,
nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) events. It is helpful to know pre-established
usual levels of usage, including the minimum number of items that must be
maintained for each scenario, so that the needs can be quickly identified and
addressed should an event occur. In a protracted or widespread disaster with
severe supply shortages, nurses and other healthcare personnel may need to
become quite creative in improvisation and even reuse some disposable supplies.
Examples include using perineal pads for dressings, Foley catheters for chest
tubes, and single lumen nasogastric tubes for vascular access via a cutdown. In
the United States, existing legislation allows the atypical use of supplies during
disaster situations.15 It is prudent to establish, in advance, potential alternatives
for each critical patient care item using Auf der Heide’s recommendation of a
minimum of 120 potential disaster casualties per hospital.4
If the ED is affected by an interruption in electrical power, water, wall oxy-
gen, or suction, additional supply and equipment needs must be identified.
Requirements for disposable and non-disposable linen and instruments, addi-
tional ventilators, and portable oxygen sources should be assessed as well.
Patient transportation resources also require attention; the plan may direct each
clinical area to bring stretchers and wheelchairs to a pre-established area in
proximity to the disaster triage area.
88
HOSPITAL IMPACT: EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
STAFFING REQUIREMENTS
Disaster staffing requirements depend upon the nature and timing of the disaster,
as well as the facility’s casualty treatment plan. It is important that the ED be used
primarily for patients requiring complex assessments and interventions, and that
care for patients with less complex problems be provided elsewhere in the facility
or off-site. In general, particularly in a short-duration disaster, it is most effective
to utilize staff who routinely work in the ED, rather than involve staff unfamiliar
with the physical environment and clinical care procedures. However, if victim
care needs exceed the abilities of existing ED staff, personnel with similar compe-
tencies and skills may be assigned to the ED, working under the supervision of
regular ED staff. The ED staff responsibilities then shift from providing care to
coordinating care. Criteria to be used for assigning non-ED staff to care for
patients in the ED include the individual’s expertise in: (1) rapid assessment; (2)
Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS); (3) airway management; (4) intravenous
access; (5) resuscitation and stabilization; (6) managing several critically injured/ill
patients simultaneously; (7) critical thinking; (8) knowledge of disaster principles
and Incident Command; and (9) ability to function independently. It is helpful to
provide responding non-ED staff with a concise card or Job Action Sheet (dis-
cussed in the Incident Command System, Chapter 10) outlining the activities to be
performed, as well as any standing orders or protocols that are to be followed.
While many care activities can be delegated to non-ED personnel, casualty triage
should be performed only by ED staff or an individual who is both expert in triage
and knowledgeable of the facility’s casualty distribution plan.
In incidents that require off-duty ED staff to be called in to work, it may be
useful for the disaster call plan to be organized such that staff members living clos-
est to the hospital are called to duty first. In a short-duration, multiple-casualty
disaster that can be resolved reasonably in a few hours, having all available ED
staff respond immediately may be appropriate. However, in a prolonged disas-
ter, a percentage of the staff should be requested to respond later; and all should
be prepared for extended working hours. ED staff also may be requested to
bring personal bedding, additional clothing, and nourishment for themselves for
a number of days. Staffing plans also must take into account the fact that some
percentage of staff will be unable to report to work because of family issues, pet
care concerns, and other commitments. In disasters from natural events, staff
may be unable to report to duty for hours or days because of damage to their
homes or impediments to travel, such as impassible roads and bridges. In certain
types of events (such as chemical, biological, or radiological agent release), staff
may not report for work because of concern for their own personal safety or
that of their family.16,17
Staffing considerations also must take into account any special charac-
teristics of the victims, such as children, individuals who are physically or
89
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
90
HOSPITAL IMPACT: EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
A study of six hospital EDs in the affected area found that patient census was down by 46% on the day the
hurricane struck land.18 This was followed by a 25% increase above normal census levels over the next five
days. The EDs had excess staff on the day of the landfall, when they anticipated an increase in patient vol-
ume, and were understaffed the subsequent five days, when patient volume increased. In particular, there
was a noticeable increase in patients with minor trauma on the first day after landfall.
Robert Powers
DISASTER TRIAGE
Once the situation has been assessed, the disaster plan has been activated, and
actions are underway to clear the ED and other treatment area beds for the
anticipated patients, establishing a Triage Area and assigning a Triage Officer
and other staff are high priorities. The process of performing disaster triage is
discussed in detail in Chapter 5; discussion here is limited to the logistical and
operational aspects of disaster triage in the ED.
Location
The Triage Area should be located outside the ED in proximity to the am-
bulance off-loading zone in order to maximize the efficiency of EMS person-
nel and routine traffic patterns, funnel casualties not requiring ED services to
other treatment areas, and prevent contaminated victims from entering the
ED. Ideally, the Triage Area is protected somewhat from the elements; heaters
or fans as well as additional lighting may be needed.
Supplies/Equipment
The Triage Area is a rapid assessment area, not a treatment area. Clinical activi-
ties performed here include sorting casualties and instituting limited, life-saving
measures, such as opening an airway and stopping massive external bleeding
using tourniquets or pressure dressings. Therefore, the clinical equipment
needed in the Triage Area is limited to such items as oral or nasal airways,
dressings, tourniquets, and unsterile gloves. There is no need for a Crash Cart
in the Triage Area. Non-clinical items needed in the Triage Area include dis-
aster triage tags, pre-assembled patient charts with a pre-assigned disaster
number, pens, indelible markers, a disaster patient tracking log on a clipboard,
vests or armbands for the Triage Officer(s) to wear, and two-way radios or
cellular telephones for communication with the ED Incident Commander.
These items can be contained on a small mobile cart that can be brought to
the Triage Area during a disaster. As discussed earlier, wheelchairs and
stretchers should be staged close to the Triage Area.
91
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
92
HOSPITAL IMPACT: EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
Triage Process
Victims who are brought to the hospital by EMS usually will have a field triage
tag in place and their triage category assigned by EMS personnel. The victim
then is re-assessed by the ED Triage Officer and his/her triage category is con-
firmed or changed and a new triage tag is attached to the victim. Field triage
tags should not be removed since that is the way that patients are tracked. The
casualty typically is given a hospital disaster medical record number from a
pre-assembled list of numbers that correspond to pre-assembled patient
charts. The field triage tag number and/or the hospital triage tag number, as
well as the assigned triage category and hospital disaster medical record num-
ber, are recorded on a triage log. If available, patient name and gender can be
added to the disaster triage log. Some communities use disaster triage tags that
contain scanable, bar-coded stickers that can be placed onto the disaster triage
log. If bar-coded disaster triage tags are used, a hand-held scanner device
should be included as part of the equipment needed in the Triage Area. In
some triage systems, a sticker from a child’s triage tag is placed on a parent’s
triage tag to assist in keeping families together. The pre-assembled disaster
patient chart accompanies the patient to the appropriate treatment area.
Some specific triage considerations include:
1. Assigning only expert clinicians with superb clinical judgment as
Triage Officers;
2. Recognizing that triage decisions are based on the information
immediately available and unless there are serious flaws in clinical
decision-making, the Triage Officer’s decisions should not be
second-guessed or criticized;
3. Rotating triage staff to allow them to recover and regroup, and to
get out of the elements, if triage is being performed outside;
4. Preparing staff who will assume the Triage Officer role with
realistic training exercises involving well-moulaged and coached
victims in a chaotic setting; and
5. Including triage staff in Critical Incident Stress Management
endeavors following the crisis.
Once the triage process has been completed, transporters are advised as to
where and how the patient should be transported. Ideally, the Triage Area
staff also will notify receiving treatment areas of the patient’s impending
arrival.
As many EDs have implemented electronic documentation, the issue of
record-keeping during a disaster is a concern. Given its impracticality in the
Triage Area, the complexities of computerized systems, the reality that exter-
nal staff may not have access to the system, and the potential for power fail-
ures, it is best to utilize the same paper record-keeping used during computer
93
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
down-time. Also, utilizing a specific disaster patient chart, with which staff
will be unfamiliar due to infrequent use, is not recommended.
94
HOSPITAL IMPACT: EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
ways. With the exception of the Decontamination Room, these spaces will
require quick furniture removal and the placement of oxygen, suction, electri-
cal power, and supplies. The facility’s disaster plan should describe all of these
options, and the patient tracking board should be adjusted to include these
new treatment spaces.
Hospital disaster plans should identify alternative treatment areas in case
the entire ED suddenly becomes unavailable, such as from direct damage or
contamination. Key considerations in alternate treatment area selection
include: (1) access by EMS and the public; (2) proximity to ancillary services,
such as Radiology; and (3) ease of patient transport. Large areas commonly
considered include the parking lot adjacent to the ED, the hospital lobby,
large conference rooms, and the hospital cafeteria. Obviously, each alternate
site comes with a variety of logistical challenges. Timely notification of the
prehospital EMS and the public, as well as appropriate signage and traffic
routing, are crucial whenever alternate sites are implemented.
95
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
than personalized whenever possible. For example, unless contraindicated, all trauma patients would receive:
ã Age-appropriate diphtheria-tetanus or tetanus-diptheria pertussis vaccine if surface trauma
is present;
ã The same antibiotic either in a standard adult dose or weight-adjusted pediatric dose;
ã The same narcotic for pain management;
ã The same anti-emetic agent;
ã The insertion of two large-bore intravenous catheters;
ã Intravenous fluid resuscitation according to defined goals;
ã Blood drawn for the same specific laboratory studies; and
ã Supplemental oxygen to achieve a given arterial oxygen saturation.
In addition, specific criteria would be established for:
ã Obtaining arterial blood gas analyses;
ã Obtaining 12-lead electrocardiograms;
ã Obtaining x-rays/computerized tomography (CT);
ã Inserting endotracheal, nasogastric, and urinary drainage tubes;
ã Monitoring requirements; and
ã Physician notification.
Orders detailing these items can be established in advance of the disaster and be readily available to
the ED staff. Such a standardized approach is especially helpful for staff who do not normally work in
96
HOSPITAL IMPACT: EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
While a number of events may be critical incidents, a disaster has the potential to
result in critical incident stress in both novice and seasoned healthcare workers for
a variety of reasons. Triage decisions are taxing emotionally. The sheer numbers of
seriously injured or ill people can be overwhelming. Needed resources may be
limited or absent. Competing ethical issues may abound. Concern for personal
safety and liability may weigh heavily. Lack of sleep and unmet basic human needs
may alter resilience. Finally, anxiety regarding the well-being of one’s family may
contribute to the stress. The frequency of critical incident stress in emergency
nurses working in disasters may be unappreciated, perhaps because of the difficul-
ty in conducting disaster research. In a study of emergency nurses working in a
facility 40 miles away from New Orleans, the United States, during Hurricane
Katrina, Battles found that 20% of the nurses had symptoms of PTSD; none of the
nurses in this study were provided with Critical Incident Stress Management.20
Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) is a process used to prevent
and manage the stress associated with a critical incident and involves a variety
of strategies, including pre-event education and planning, individual crisis
intervention (psychological first aid), group debriefing, and referral for ongo-
ing assistance as needed.21 Given the potential that the event may interfere
with one’s ability to perform one’s job responsibilities, all team members
must be vigilant to this possibility and intervene acutely. Assigning individu-
als with expertise in crisis intervention to the ED for the primary purpose of
supporting the staff, identifying those in crisis, and intervening may be bene-
ficial. This individual also can be responsible for defusing staff members and
facilitating formal Critical Incident Stress Debriefings. Critical incident stress
may be prevented or minimized by “stress inoculation”, which includes edu-
cation and exercises on stress management strategies, crisis prevention, and
the acquisition of the necessary skills and competencies through realistic
exercises that mimic the situations that may be encountered, albeit in a con-
trolled environment. Individuals responding to the ED who do not normally
work there and, therefore, have not had the benefit of pre-event preparation
or experience in the setting, may be particularly vulnerable to critical incident
stress and require additional support.
EVALUATION
Although there is on-going evaluation of the ED’s effectiveness during a disaster, a
formal systematic evaluation of what did and did not go well is important to future
efforts and disaster plan revision. While designed to evaluate a hospital’s response
during a drill, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s tool, Evaluation
of Hospital Disaster Drills: A Module-Based Approach22 provides a useful frame-
work for evaluating the ED’s response during an actual event. Key elements to
consider, regardless of the tool that is used, include:23
97
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
CONCLUSION
On a daily basis, most hospital EDs are experiencing dramatic increases in the
number of patients seeking care, long delays in treating patients, and the need to
98
HOSPITAL IMPACT: EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
board inpatients while they await available hospital beds. It is difficult to plan
and train for disasters when every day is a crisis. However, the ED team is at the
frontlines of arriving victims of a disaster and is key to an effective hospital dis-
aster response. Both the staff and facility must be in a constant state of readiness,
capable of responding to disasters large and small.
To the extent possible, disaster responses should be integrated into daily
work activities, such as routine mock drills or paper scenarios, or using the
hospital’s disaster triage strategy along with the day-to-day triage system to
triage patients on a given day. If the disaster response procedures become part
of daily processes, the response in an actual event will be more efficient and
less stressful. Disaster preparedness must become a way of life in our homes,
communities, and hospitals.
REFERENCES
1. Waltman S: Testimony of the Greater New York Hospital Association on Healthcare Response and
Emergency Coordination in the Event of Nuclear, Biological or Chemical Attack at a Public Hearing
Held Before the New York City Council Committee on Health and Committee on Public Safety.
Available at www.gnyha.org/testimony/2003/pt20030415.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2009.
2. Felland LE, Katz A, Liebhaber A, et al: Developing health system surge capacity: Community
efforts in jeopardy. Research Briefs 2008 Jun;(5):1–8.
3. Currance PL: Medical Response to Weapons of Mass Destruction. St Louis: Elsevier Mosby, 2005, p 12.
4. Auf der Heide E: Disaster Response. Principles of Preparation and Coordination. St. Louis: The CV
Mosby Company, 1989.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: In a Moment’s Notice: Surge Capacity for Terrorist
Bombings. Challenges and Proposed Solutions. Available at: www.emergency.cdc.gov/mass
casualties/pdf/surgecapacity.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2009.
6. Carresi AL: The 2004 Madrid train bombings: An analysis of pre-hospital management. Disasters
2008;32(1):41–65.
7. Murdoch S, Cymet TC: Treating the victims after disaster. Physical and psychological effects.
Compr Ther 2006;32(1):39–42.
8. Ogawa K, Tsuji I, Shiono K, et al: Increased acute myocardial infarction mortality following the
1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake in Japan. Int J Epidemiol 2006;29:449–455.
9. Grew D: Excess mortality in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina: A preliminary report. Abstract
4292.0 presented at the American Public Health Association Annual Meeting & Exposition, 06
November 2007. Available at http://apha.confex.com/apha/135am/techprogram/paper_164391.htm.
Accessed 16 July 2009.
10. Herbert R, Moline J, Skloot G, et al: The World Trade Center disaster and the health of workers:
Five-year assessment of a unique medical screening program. Environ Health Persp 2007;114:1–8.
11. Thomas PA, Brackbill R, Thalji L, et al: Respiratory and other health effects reported in children
exposed to the World Trade Center disaster of 11 September 2001. Environ Health Persp 2008;116:
1383–1390.
12. Cowley RA: The use of communications satellite systems in major disaster situations. In: Manni C,
Magalini SJ (eds), Emergency and Disaster Medicine. Proceedings of the Third World Congress, Rome
May 24–27, 1983. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
13. Langan JC, James DC: Preparing Nurses for Disaster Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Education, Inc, 2005.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: COCA Conference Call — Bombings: Injury
Patterns and Care. Available at www.bt.cdc.gov/coca/summaries/bombings_injury_patterns_
Care.asp. Accessed 16 July 2009.
15. US Food and Drug Administration: Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products. Available at
www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm125127.htm. Accessed 16 July 2009.
99
INTERNATIONAL DISASTER NURSING
16. Masterson L, Steffen C, Brin M, et al: Willingness to respond: Of emergency department personnel
and their predicted participation in mass casualty terrorist events. J Emerg Med 2009;36:43–49.
17 . Veenema TG, Walden B, Feinstein N, et al: Factors affecting hospital-based nurses’ willingness to
respond to radiation emergency. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2008;2:224–229.
18. Smith CM, Graffeo CS: Regional impact of Hurricane Isabel on emergency departments in
coastal Southeastern Virginia. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:1201–1205.
19. American Psychological Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(4th ed). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1994.
20. Battles ED: An exploration of post-traumatic stress disorder in emergency nurses following
Hurricane Katrina. J Emerg Nurs 2007;33(4):314–318.
21. Everly GS, Flannery RB, Mitchell JT: Critical incident stress management (CISM): A review of
the literature. Aggress Violent Beh 2000;5:23–40.
22. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Evaluation of Hospital Disater Drills: A Module-
based approach. Available at www.ahrg.gov/research/hospdrills/hospdrill.htm. Accesssed 16 July
2009.
23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Training of Hospital Staff to Respond to a Mass
Casualty Incident. Summary. Available at www.ahrg.gov/Clinic/epcsums/hospmcisum.pdf.
Accessed 16 July 2009.
100