Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson No. 9 in Machine Design 1
Lesson No. 9 in Machine Design 1
The locus of the Gerber fatigue equation is a parabolic curve. Experimental results of fatigue
failures are approximated more closely by the Gerber curve. Design by this criterion is the least
conservative of all the other criteria of failures. Our assumed line of Failure for these criteria is a
combination of the Parabolic line AI (Gerber- Fatigue) and straight line IB (Langer Yield ).
Sy
n y= -------------Yield Criteria
K f σm+ K f σa
( )
2
nf K f σm nf K f σ a
1= Su
+
Se
or
( ) [ √ ( ) ]***
2 2
Su K f σa 2 Se K f σ m
nf = 1 −1+ 1+ --- Fatigue Criteria.
2 K f σm Se Su K f σ a
Note: in these formulas, remove the concentration factor applied to the mean
stress in the case of assumption of occurrence of plastic yielding.
At intersection of Langer-Yield Line and the Gerber Line I( Sm , Sa ):
Lesson No. 9 in Machine Design 1 [Pick the date]
S2u
[ √ ( )( )]
2
2 Se Sy
Sm = 1− 1− −1 ;
2 Se Su Se
Sa =S y −Sm
Step 1.
[ √
S2u
( )( )]
2
2 Se Sy
Sm = 1− 1− −1 ***
2 Se Su Se
And Sa =S y −Sm **
Step 2.
Always ascertain the assumption of plastic yielding.
Step 3.
For Sa >n y K f σ a >0 : the use of Langer-yield equation used was appropriate.
Therefore, the Factor of Safety is n y .Expected failure of the part is by
yielding.
For Se >n y K f σ a> Sa ( ¿ Sm > nf K f σ m >0 ) Use the Gerber equation instead:
( ) [ √ ( )]
2 2
Su K f σa 2 Se Kf σ m
nf = 1 −1+ 1+ -----Fatigue Criteria
2 K f σm Se Su K f σ a
- For Factor of safety less than unity, the part has Finite Life, and the state of stress
falls above the Gerber Fatigue Line.
- For Indefinite Life, state of stress n f K f σ a must fall on the Gerber fatigue
Lesson No. 9 in Machine Design 1 [Pick the date]
Solution:
* Analysis/ Evaluation:
[ √ ( )( )]
2 2
Su 2 Se Sy
Find value of Sa : Sm = 1− 1− −1
2 Se Su Se
[ √
( 620 )2
( ) ( 234 −1 )]
2
2 x 234 482
¿ 1− 1−
2(234) 620
= 304.4 MPa
And Sa = S y - Sm =482−304.4=¿ 177.6 MPa .*
Sy ( 0.85 ) 482
n y= = =1.2
Kf σm K f σa 1.42 ( 126.8+98.65 )
+
0.85 0.85
Check state of stress:
( 98.65 )
n y K f σ a=1.28 ( 1.42 )
=211 MPa> S a
0.85
Use The Gerber-fatigue criterion instead as the expected failure will not be by yielding.
.
( ) [ √ ( )]
2 2
1 Su K f σa 2 Se σ m
nf = 2 K f σ m −1+ 1+
0.85 S e Su σ a
0.85
[ ] [ √ )]
2
(
2
1 ( 0.85 ) 620 1.42 x 98.65 2 x 234 x 126.8
= −1+ 1+ = 1.19
2 1.42 x 126.8 (0.85) 234 620 x 98.65
(98.65)
And n f K f σ a=1.19(1.42) =196.1 MPa¿ Sa
0.85
( σ
)
¿= 234)¿ nf K f a =196.1 > ( Sa =177.6 ) . This satisfies the fatigue criterion as the state of
0.85
stress is on the Gerber fatigue line AI. Factor of Safety by the LY /Gerber Criteria is therefore
n f =1.19∗¿(answer)
Solution:
[ √ ( )( )]
2 2
Su 2 Se Sy
Sm = 1− 1− −1
2 Se Su Se
Lesson No. 9 in Machine Design 1 [Pick the date]
[ √
( 90,000 )2
( ) ( 7034 −1)]
2
2 x 34,000
= 1− 1−
2(34,000) 90,000
= 44,200 psi and
45,000+15,000
P m= =30,000lb
2
45,000−15,000
Pa= =15,000 lb
2
The nominal midrange and alternating stresses are:
Pm 30,000
σ m= = =10.909 psi
A 2.75
Pa 15,000
σ a= = =5,455 psi
A 2.75
Sy (0.85)70,000
n y= = =2.56(tentative )
Try yield criterion: K f σ m K f σ a 1.42(10,909+5,455)
+
0.85 0.85