As the impacts of issues like global warming and water contamination become palpable,

environmental protection is now one of humanity’s chief objectives in the 21 st century.

However, people are still divided on whether this responsibility rests with state officials or
ordinary citizens. In this essay, I will look at the unique roles that both parties play in this
endeavor before drawing a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, reversing the damage done to the planet is a massive undertaking that seems
impossible without government intervention. Most of the ongoing environmental problems are
the direct result of energy production and consumption – something that can be regulated with
legislation. In addition to this, the funds they have at their disposal and their ability to mobilize
resources make governments indispensable in tackling environmental issues. For example, tax
revenue can be ploughed back into researching innovative ways to make green technologies
more commonplace and affordable.
On the other hand, whilst the participation of governments in alleviating environmental
problems is wholly warranted, it would be imprudent to downplay the contribution of ordinary
citizens. People can make a huge difference with simple changes in lifestyle like taking mass
transit or classifying trash. Another way in which individual can help conserve the environment
is through their consumption. Patronizing stores that champion sustainable business practices
and boycotting companies that are reluctant to reduce waste are practical steps that
consumers can take to push for a greener future. By the same token, the electorate can use
their votes to make an impact by electing officials that care deeply about the deteriorating state
of the planet and committed to changing the status quo.
In conclusion, environmental conservation is a colossal responsibility that must be borne with
both the state and the people.