Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(2018) What Does Sleep Hygiene Have To Offer Children's Sleep Problems
(2018) What Does Sleep Hygiene Have To Offer Children's Sleep Problems
(2018) What Does Sleep Hygiene Have To Offer Children's Sleep Problems
Review
PII: S1526-0542(18)30137-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2018.10.005
Reference: YPRRV 1294
Please cite this article as: W.A. Hall, E. Nethery, What does Sleep Hygiene have to offer Children’s Sleep Problems?,
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2018.10.005
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
a
School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, T. 206, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver,
b
School of Population and Public Health, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Abstract
Sleep hygiene practices have been described extensively in the literature. There is considerably
less clarity about relationships between particular elements of sleep hygiene and particular sleep
outcomes, and which intervention approaches using sleep hygiene principles are effective. In this
review, we describe themes extracted from a systematic review of the sleep hygiene literature.
We systematically searched Psycinfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Web of
Science Search Engines up to August, 2017. We included all studies that associated sleep
hygiene (behaviors adjacent to bedtime and during the night) with sleep duration and/or sleep
onset latency and/or night waking or that used sleep-hygiene based interventions to improve
sleep duration and/or sleep onset latency and/or night waking (n=44). We organized our findings
2
into themes by age group, sleep hygiene factors, and interventions. We provide evidence-based
recommendations about areas of sleep hygiene that have significant empirical support and those
Educational aims
- Sleep hygiene practices have some similarities across age groups (infancy to
- Although there is a large body of literature on sleep hygiene the quality of studies is
generally low
- Many studies lack clarity about the components of sleep problems that serve as
- Reducing negative sleep associations across age groups has potential to improve
children’s sleep
Studies are needed that clearly specify particular sleep outcomes, e.g. sleep duration, sleep onset
latency, and night waking. The paucity of intervention studies aimed at improving sleep for
school-aged children and adolescents indicates a need for studies with these populations. Studies
developing consistent, reliable, and valid sleep measures that precisely identify indicators of
sleep quality and duration are needed. Rather than continuing to study relationships between
3
electronic device use and sleep, attention to interventions aimed at reducing effects of electronic
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public,
1.0 Introduction
Behavioral sleep problems are prevalent, affecting about 30% of infants and children [1] .
Insomnia has been defined as repeated difficulty with sleep duration, quality, initiation, and
consolidation occurring despite age-appropriate time and opportunity for sleep resulting in
daytime functional impairment for children and/or families [2]. There is substantial evidence that
children’s insufficient sleep and poor sleep quality are associated with numerous problems, such
difficulties with daily functioning [8,9], risky behaviors [10,11], and increased risk of obesity
conditions for initiating sleep that the child cannot reproduce without assistance, including limit
setting from caregivers [16], and to environmental factors that interfere with sleep. Although
adolescents typically have delayed sleep-phase syndrome they are also affected by
The literature makes multiple references to sleep hygiene, which has been defined as behaviors
conducive to proper sleep, including appropriate sleep schedules, healthy sleep habits, an
environment that supports sleep, and physiological practices that aid sleep, e.g. relaxation
exercises [18]. Sleep hygiene is intended to manage the conditions (negative and positive sleep
associations) that influence children’s sleep, including interventions to promote sleep hygiene
[1,19].
Although recent reviews of empirical evidence supporting sleep hygiene have been undertaken
they are generally confined to particular age groups, e.g. children aged 1 -12 [20] or adolescents
aged 13 to 19 [21] and have examined only individual/family level variables affecting sleep
5
hygiene [20,21] or parents’ knowledge about healthy sleep practices and changes in parental
knowledge following interventions for children between 1 month and 17 years of age [22].
The effects of behavioral sleep problems support the importance of identifying empirically-
supported elements of sleep hygiene and sleep hygiene education interventions. In this review we
pose the question: what elements of sleep hygiene and/or sleep hygiene education have been
linked to improved sleep duration and quality (night waking and sleep onset latency) for healthy
children between ages 6 months and 18 years? It is important to identify particular elements of
sleep hygiene that influence specific elements of sleep duration and quality so that effective
interventions to improve sleep duration and quality can be designed. We present results of a
systematic review on sleep hygiene/sleep and hygiene education, discuss the results in the
context of other relevant literature, and conclude with evidence-based recommendations for sleep
hygiene components to improve sleep duration, night waking, and sleep onset latency.
Six key electronic databases (Psycinfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Web of
Science) were searched between June and August, 2017. We used search terms targeted at sleep
OR sleep deprivation OR sleep hygiene OR insomnia OR nap AND child* OR infant OR baby
OR toddler OR preschooler OR adolesc* OR teen OR youth (for detailed information about the
search strategy see Appendix A for CINAHL search terms) to identify relevant published
articles.
Studies were included if they met particular criteria: 1) written in English, 2) published in peer-
reviewed journals, 3) used samples of healthy, typically-developing children between the ages of
6 months and 18 years, 4) included measures of sleep duration or quality (night waking or sleep
onset latency), and 5) published between 2010 and 2017. We excluded case studies, qualitative
6
studies, and systematic reviews combining children’s ages and weekend and weekday sleep
patterns. We also excluded studies linking any day-time (e.g. exercise over the course of the day
or amount of daily screen time) or longer term factors (i.e. external environmental pollutants or
social/structural-level issues) to sleep duration and quality. In particular, our review included
articles that examined positive and negative sleep associations adjacent to bedtime or during the
night rather than activities occurring at any time over the course of the day.
Figure 1 provides an overview of the article review process. For the Cochrane database the only
two papers located had both been withdrawn. After the final search was run the articles were
ported into Refworks™, a reference management system. Across the other five databases 5261
articles were identified. After duplicates were removed 4267 unique records remained. The
records were reviewed and the authors removed conference abstracts, books or book sections,
opinions and editorials, lay journals (e.g., Parents and Good Housekeeping), dissertations, and
any duplicates that were missed in the de-duping process. After excluding those elements 742
records remained. The two authors reviewed the titles and abstracts independently against the
inclusion and exclusion criteria. We retained titles and abstracts indicating elements of sleep
hygiene that were related to sleep duration, sleep onset latency, or night waking. We did not
include daytime sleepiness as a component of sleep quality because it is not equally germane to
If the two authors could not determine the appropriateness of the paper for the review, full article
screening was carried out. Our weighted Kappa was 0.42. In total, the authors reviewed 294
articles using full article screening with consensus reached on any disagreement through
discussion and a number excluded after closer examination based on criteria; after screening 94
We used a data extraction form that included the reference ID, first author, year of publication,
study design, sample size, labels of contextual factors or behavioral sleep problem intervention
and subcategories for context or intervention types, children’s age group and mean age (when
reported), key sleep outcomes, country of origin, and form of sleep assessment (e.g. diary,
actigraphy, and questionnaires). Table 1 summarizes the articles included in the study.
The two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of the articles. We used the
Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health
Practice Project [23]. The quality items included were: selection bias, study design, confounders,
data collection methods, withdrawals and dropouts, and analysis appropriate to question. For
randomized controlled trials we also used intervention integrity. We did not use the blinding
quality item because most trials involved interventions that did not permit blinding. We resolved
any disagreement through discussion. We excluded 31 studies based on ‘weak’ quality scores
from the review. Following review of the remaining 63 articles in detail, we identified a number
that did not adequately specify sleep quality; after they were omitted 44 papers remained
(n=282,613 children).
9
3.0 Results
Our search strategy yielded 44 articles that were considered relevant to the research question and
of moderate to strong quality (Table 1). Because the articles demonstrated considerable clinical
and statistical heterogeneity we did not attempt quantitative data extraction or meta-analysis. We
present the results of our review qualitatively. The papers are divided by developmental stage
(i.e., infants (6 months to 1 year) and toddlers (1 to 2.9 years); preschoolers (3 to 5.9 years);
school-aged children (6 to 12.9 years); and adolescents (13 to 18 years). A number of studies
incorporated samples that overlapped our age groupings. In those cases, we either referenced the
sub-analysis for the appropriate age group or included the studies, with no sub-analyses, in the
age-group section that fit with the largest proportion of the sample. The themes are divided by
exploratory studies examining sleep hygiene elements associated with sleep duration and/or
sleep quality (night waking and/or sleep onset latency) and intervention studies. Sleep outcomes
Five cross-sectional studies examined factors that enhance infant and toddler sleep duration and
reduce night waking, with a focus on parental behaviors [24–28]. The studies originated in the
United States and the Asia-Pacific region but three had recruited participants from many nations
[26–28]. Most of the studies were of moderate quality, used large sample sizes, and controlled
for some key variables, e.g. infant age and gender, and maternal education. A cross-sectional
study associated English toddlers’ short sleep duration (< 11 hours per night) with watching >
one hour of TV in the evening, after adjusting for age and regular night waking [29]. All studies
used the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire (BISQ) to determine sleep duration and quality. Two
10
longitudinal studies were located [30,31]. Their sample sizes were moderate to large, predicted
sleep duration and night waking from 3 or 6 months of age to 12 to 18 months, and used locally-
designed measures. The most consistent findings across studies were the benefits of bedtime
routines and independently falling asleep (self-soothing) for significantly increased sleep
duration, decreased sleep onset latency, and reduced night waking [25–27,31]. Co-sleeping, and
feeding during the night [24,27,28,30], and breastfeeding predicted more night waking in some
studies [24,27,28]; but breastfeeding significantly reduced night-waking risk in one study, with
We located 4 randomized controlled trials aimed at reducing infant /toddler night waking and/or
increasing infant/toddler sleep duration [32–35]. They originated in Australia, Canada, China,
and the United States. Two had small sample sizes, n=43 and n=82 [32,34]. Only one study used
intent-to-treat analysis [33]. Two studies used graduated extinction, camping out, or bedtime
fading [32,33] and one study used a mix of routines and customized sleep advice [35,36].
Another study compared cloth and disposable diapers, with groups stratified by sex [34]. Three
studies used actigraphy, in addition to sleep diaries, to determine sleep outcomes [32–34]. One
study used the BISQ [35,36]. Consistent findings were significant decreases in night waking
when comparing intervention and control groups [32–34]. Sleep duration was not significantly
improved in any studies. In one study significant improvements in sleep onset latency, night
wakes, and sleep duration were based only on within-group comparisons [35].
3.2 Preschoolers
At the preschool stage of development 6 cross-sectional studies included a mix of parenting and
child behaviors attributed to sleep hygiene and examined sleep hygiene, sleep duration, night
waking, and sleep onset latency [26,37–41]. Countries of origin for the work included the United
States, Italy, and Britain. Two studies had small sample sizes, n=62 and n=84 [39,41]. One study
incorporated participants from multiple countries and used child age and maternal education as
co-variates [26]. Measures in the studies varied from questionnaires (BISQ, Children’s Sleep
Habits Questionnaire [CHSQ]) with some evidence for reliability and validity [38,41], to
interview data [37,39] and investigator-developed questionnaires [40]. Bedtime routines were
associated with significantly shorter sleep onset latency, fewer night wakes and longer sleep
duration for children [26]; exposure to electronic devices was associated with significantly
shorter sleep duration for Italian children, after including age, BMI, TV in bedroom, and
drinking fluids before sleep [37]. American children’s exposure to electronic devices was
associated with longer sleep onset latency, after controlling for gender, household income, and
family structure [38]. Reading at bedtime significantly extended English and American
children’s sleep duration [39,41], with one study co-varying co-sleeping, napping, and maternal
education [41]. One study linked American children’s suboptimal sleep environments (too hot,
cold, bright, and loud) to significantly shorter sleep duration, after controlling for age, race,
Three studies examined interventions for preschoolers [42–44]. Two American trials compared
sleep outcomes following educational interventions for preschoolers [43,44] and one Australian
study provided parents with gradual withdrawal of assistance for children’ settling [42]. The
Australian sample size was small, n=33 and used a pre and post-treatment design [42]. The two
12
American studies randomized parents and children to sleep education to increase sleep duration
(three messages to promote sleep [no caffeine or bedroom electronics and bed before 9 pm]) [43]
and information for parents and children about sleep hygiene [44]. Outcome measures were sleep
diaries or parental report. Two studies reported a significant increase in sleep duration [42,44],
with only one study adjusting for child ethnicity and maternal education [40]. One study found
Seven cross-sectional studies were located that examined effects of school-aged children’s
behaviors on sleep duration [37,45–50]. Studies originated in Italy, Canada, China, Korea, and
Germany; all studies had large sample sizes. An 8th study examined effects of German
children’s home exposure to mould and dampness on sleep duration and night waking [51].
Measures were parental reports on children’s sleep time [37,46,47,50,51] or children’s report on
Consistent findings across studies were effects of electronic device use before sleeping and
during the night on significantly decreased sleep duration [37,45,47,49,50]. The Italian study
adjusted for age, BMI, TV in bedroom, and drinking fluids before sleep [37]. The Canadian
study adjusted for gender, household income, parent education, and area of residence and
reported a dose-response for device exposure [50]. Other evening behaviors significantly
reducing sleep duration were children’s school commuting time [45,49] and homework time
[45–48]. Generally the Chinese studies adjusted for age, parent education [47,48], BMI, siblings,
and academic pressure [45,46]. One Chinese study adjusted for sleep arrangements, school grade
13
and start time, household income, screen time, and physical activity [46] but only one Chinese
study adjusted for ethnicity and family structure when accounting for short sleep duration [47]. A
study of Korean children adjusted for age when examining nighttime sleep duration [49]. Two
studies of Chinese children controlled for gender [47,48]. Only one study analyzed boys and girls
separately and found no difference on contributors to reduced nighttime sleep [45]. German
children’s exposure to home mould and dampness increased risk of short sleep duration; effects
were adjusted for gender [51]. Caffeine intake was not consistently associated with sleep
outcomes.
Four studies focused on sleep education programs for school-aged children [43,52–54], two
studies evaluated interventions aimed at dyads (parents and children) to treat sleep problems
[55,56], and one examined differing exposures to milk-based drinks to promote sleep [57]. The
sleep education programs incorporated differing levels of stakeholder (student, parent, teacher,
school) involvement: a Canadian study included all stakeholders [53]; an Australian study
included students, parents, and teachers [52]; one American study targeted only parents who
received educational messages on three occasions [43]; and a second American study provided
children with a sleep education video [54]. In one study German children and parents each
received 3 components of sleep hygiene education, cognitive therapy, and stimulus control in a
clinic setting [56]. In the Australian study 3 private consultations, with information about sleep
were provided [55]. The Indonesian controlled double-blind parallel study provided children
with different morning and evening milk drinks (standard, satiety, and relax) over 6 weeks to
Two studies had small sample sizes n= 38 [56], n=71 [53]. Five studies were randomized
controlled trials [43,52,53,55,56]; one was a pre-test, post-test design [54]. Sleep outcomes were
measured via actigraphy and diaries [52,53,57], the CSHQ [54–56], and questions from the
National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America poll [26]. One study had an intent-to-treat analysis
and controlled for gender, family structure, and socio-economic status [55]. Educational
interventions significantly improved sleep duration [52], or sleep duration and sleep onset
latency, using age as a co-variate [53], or night wakes [54]. Private consultations significantly
improved sleep duration at 12 months follow-up [55]. Three studies reported no between-group
differences [43,56,57].
3.4 Adolescents
behaviors and sleep duration or sleep latency [45,58–63]. Studies were undertaken in Australia,
China, Iran, Japan, New Zealand, Turkey, and the United States of America. Most studies had
moderate [60] to large sample sizes [45,58,59,61–63]. Sleep measures included the Pittsburgh
Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [58,59], actigraphy [60], and student reports of sleep and wake time
[45,61–63]. Electronic technology exposure before bed or during the night significantly
increased the risk of short sleep duration for New Zealand adolescents after adjusting for age,
gender, ethnicity, BMI, and caffeine intake [59]. For Japanese adolescents electronic technology
exposure after lights out increased the risk for shorter sleep duration after co-varying sex, grade,
alcohol use, smoking, breakfast consumption, extracurricular activities, and mental health [61].
Exposure to electronic technology also predicted shorter sleep duration for Australian
15
adolescents after controlling for chronotype [60] and for American adolescents, after entering
age and gender as covariates [62]. In particular American females with higher exposure to
electronic technology experienced significantly shorter sleep duration [62]. Chinese boys and
girls with more school commuting time and homework reported significantly shorter sleep
duration, after adjusting for age, BMI, parent education, sibling presence, and academic pressure
[45]. Turkish adolescents drinking caffeinated drinks and exposed to passive smoking reported
shorter sleep duration, after adjusting for age and gender [63]. Iranian adolescents, avoiding
exposure to cell phones after 9 pm, had lower risk for longer sleep onset latency, after adjusting
for gender, age, grade-point average, health status, and physical activity [58]. For Australian
adolescents evening family time significantly lengthened sleep duration [60]. For Chinese girls
Three intervention studies focused on adolescents’ school sleep education programs [64–66]. A
4th study examined the effects of blocking adolescents’ exposure to blue light from screens [67].
Studies were conducted in Hong Kong [66], India [64], Japan [65], and Switzerland [67].
Intervention studies had very small, n=13 [67], moderate [65], and large sample sizes [64,66],
with gender stratified in one study [64]. Educational interventions included: an educational
module, video training, and time management [64]; an educational module and practice of sleep
promoting behaviors [65]; and large and small group seminars about sleep, printed material, and
a website [66]. Two studies used intent-to-treat analyses [65,66], with one study using age and
design with blue-blocker versus clear glasses during screen exposure [67]. The Indian
experimental group demonstrated significant improvement in sleep onset latency but not sleep
16
duration [64] and a Japanese experimental group demonstrated significant improvement in sleep
onset latency and sleep duration [65]. In two studies (Chinese students and Swiss students)
The studies examining sleep hygiene variables and sleep outcomes (duration, night waking, and
sleep onset latency) varied significantly in quality. In many studies clearly stated sleep hygiene
elements were not provided and sleep problems were measured using subjective impressions of
sleep quality or a mix of sleep quality elements that were dichotomized into poor or good sleep
quality or presence or absence of insomnia [61]. In one study sleep elements were combined
asleep, having difficulty staying asleep, and daytime tiredness) into a dichotomous sleep problem
versus no sleep problem measure [45]. Simplifying data by combining items indicating different
sleep. Partial findings could only be used from some studies because total scores on measures
like the CSHQ were used rather than specifically examining sleep onset latency or night waking
[38]. Lack of clarity about relationships between sleep hygiene components and particular sleep
outcomes creates difficulties in identifying targets for sleep interventions and hypothesizing
about effects. We excluded many studies from our analysis because independent variables
included any exposure to screens or physical activity or caffeine at any time during the day as
opposed to positive and negative sleep associations adjacent to bedtime or during the night.
A challenge with undertaking this systematic review was the lack of consistency in sleep
outcomes and comparable measures. In four infant and toddler cross-sectional studies, the BISQ
17
measure, permitted some comparison of sleep hygiene factors influencing sleep duration, sleep
onset latency, and night waking [25–29]. In two studies local measures or interview data were
used [30,31]. The intervention studies for infants and toddlers used actigraphy and sleep diaries
[32–34] or the BISQ [35]. In preschoolers’ cross-sectional studies the BISQ was used in one
study [26], sleep diary/actigraphy in one study [39], the CHSQ in two studies [38,41], and parent
interview/report in two studies [37,44]. Intervention studies used the BISQ [43] or sleep diaries
[42,44]. In school-age and adolescent groups there was virtually no consistency in how sleep was
[50] student report [45,62,63], actigraphy [60]; the CHSQ [47], the PSQI [58,59], or locally
developed questionnaires [48,49,51]. In intervention studies actigraphy and sleep logs/diaries for
all children [53,57] or a subset of the sample [52], the PSQI [64], investigator-designed
questionnaires [65,66], polysomnography [67], and the CHSQ [56] were used. Across all
developmental phases only two studies examined bedroom environmental factors influencing
sleep, specifically bright, hot, noisy, or cold sleep environments [40], and exposure to mould and
4.0 Discussion
Our findings are similar to those reported in a number of systematic reviews. For young children
our findings clearly demonstrated an association between bedtime routines and increased sleep
duration, decreased sleep onset latency, and reduced night waking. Allen et al.’s [20] systematic
review of articles published between 1983 and 2014 examined common pediatric sleep
recommendations for children aged 1 to 12 years and identified 10 studies exploring associations
between bedtime routines and sleep outcomes, with 7 studies providing support for improving
sleep onset latency and night waking. They also linked reading at bedtime to improved sleep
18
outcomes. Similarly to the one study we located about bedroom conditions and shorter sleep
duration [40], a number of studies were identified by Allen et al. [20] that linked light and noise
to poorer sleep outcomes. Our systematic review clearly associated independently falling asleep
(self-soothing) with significantly increased sleep duration, decreased sleep onset latency, and
reduced night waking. Allen et al. [20] identified 9 cross-sectional surveys that supported the
importance of falling asleep independently (self-soothing versus parental presence) for improved
We found extensive evidence for the association between electronic technology use directly
before settling and during the night with short sleep duration, as early as toddlerhood [29].
Malone’s [21] integrative review stressed the importance of adolescents limiting technology use
just prior to or after bedtime. Allen et al. [20] identified 3 studies that supported negative effects
of evening electronic technology exposure on sleep outcomes. Carter et al.’s [68] systematic
review of studies of school-aged children between 6 and 19 years identified 2.5 times the risk of
inadequate sleep duration for children using electronic technology (cell phones and tablets) at
We did not find extensive evidence linking evening caffeine consumption to sleep outcomes. We
only located three studies that specifically examined evening caffeine intake before bed for
school-aged children and adolescents. When Clark and Landolt [69] conducted a systematic
review of caffeine and sleep studies they examined total caffeine intake over the course of the
day and reported an association between high levels of caffeine intake and significantly
Information provided by Chinese studies and one Korean study linked school-aged children’s
and adolescents’ short sleep duration to long commute times between home and school and large
amounts of evening homework [45,46,48], with a dose-response risk in one study [46]. We were
unable to locate systematic reviews that incorporated those elements of sleep hygiene. While it
could be argued that such associations represent particular cultural practices, this is an important
area for future work because there have been general increases in school homework demands and
Similarly to our findings, in their meta-analysis of 16 controlled trials and qualitative analysis of
12 within-subject studies published between 2003 and 2013, Meltzer and Mindell [19] reported
that significant effects were found for sleep onset latency, number of night wakes, and duration
of night wakes in younger children based on behavioral interventions (n=12, infants, toddlers,
preschoolers). We located 7 intervention studies that we ranked as moderate to strong quality and
that included infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Eight studies in the Allen et al. [20] systematic
review were trials of behavioral sleep interventions designed to enhance self-soothing with
clinically significant improvements in sleep duration, sleep onset, and night waking.
In our systematic review we only identified 10 intervention trials with school-aged and
adolescent samples that explicitly examined sleep duration, sleep onset latency, and/or night
waking with only four studies demonstrating significant between group-differences. Meltzer and
Mindell [19] found only 4 studies with samples of school-aged children and adolescents, which
they ranked as very low quality. They identified no controlled trials including adolescents. We
located 5 studies with moderate to strong quality assessments that tested interventions with
school-aged children. We found only 4 studies that examined interventions specifically for
adolescents. Those studies reported on sleep duration and sleep onset latency as opposed to
20
Meltzer’s and Mindell’s studies that reported on night waking and sleep efficiency. We agree
with Meltzer’s and Mindell’s assessment that more high quality evidence is required to examine
effectiveness of treatment for insomnia for school-aged children and adolescents and that the
level of evidence is much stronger for effective interventions for younger children [19].
Chung et al.’s [70] systematic review and meta-analysis of effects of school-based sleep
education programs for adolescents found significantly longer weekday total sleep time
immediately post interventions (which usually consisted of sleep education classes) but the
effects were not maintained at follow-up. The two most efficacious studies in our review
incorporated both class time and opportunities to practice skills [65] or included multiple
stakeholders (children, family members, teachers, and decision-makers) when providing the
education program [53]. McDowall and colleagues’ [22] systematic review of parent knowledge
about children’s sleep concluded that parent knowledge was poor with greater accuracy about
healthy sleep practices at sleep onset than child sleep problems through the night. In general,
they found that small interventions only increased parents’ knowledge over the short term.
5.0 Summary
In summary, studies are necessary to link specific sleep hygiene factors to precise sleep
outcomes. More work is necessary to clarify relations between parents’ and children’s
knowledge about sleep and sleep problems. Consistent use of reliable, valid, and appropriate
tools is necessary to draw any conclusions about relationships between sleep hygiene variables
and sleep outcomes. High quality intervention studies to improve school-age children’s and
References
[1] Moore M. Behavioral Sleep Problems in Children and Adolescents. J Clin Psychol Med
[2] Mindell JA, Emslie G, Blumer J, Genel M, Glaze D, Ivanenko A, et al. Pharmacologic
2006;117:e1223. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1693.
[3] Astill RG, Van der Heijden KB, Van IJzendoorn MH, Van Someren EJW. Sleep,
[4] Perez-lloret S, Videla AJ, Richaudeau A, Vigo D, Rossi M, Cardinali DP, et al. A Multi-
[5] Horváth K, Plunkett K. Frequent daytime naps predict vocabulary growth in early
doi:10.1111/jcpp.12583.
[6] Ravid S, Afek I, Suraiya S, Shahar E, Pillar G. Kindergarten children’s failure to qualify
for first grade could result from sleep disturbances. J Child Neurol 2009;24:816–22.
doi:10.1177/0883073808330766.
[7] Armstrong JM, Ruttle PL, Klein MH, Essex MJ, Benca RM. Associations of Child
Insomnia , Sleep Movement , and Their Persistence With Mental Health Symptoms in
22
[8] Berger RH, Miller AL, Seifer R, Cares SR, Lebourgeois MK. Acute sleep restriction
46. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00962.x.
[9] Stea TH, Knutsen T, Torstveit MK. Association between short time in bed , health-risk
behaviors and poor academic achievement among Norwegian adolescents. Sleep Med
2014;15:666–71. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2014.01.019.
[10] Owens JA, Fernando S, McGuinn M. Sleep Disturbance and Injury Risk in Young
[11] Pasch KE, Laska MN, Lytle L, Moe SG. Adolescent Sleep, Risk Behaviors, and
doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01122.x.Endothelial.
[12] Fatima Y, Doi SAR, Mamun AA. Longitudinal impact of sleep on overweight and obesity
[13] Mullins EN, Miller AL, Cherian SS, Lumeng JC, Wright Jr KP, Kurth S, et al. Acute sleep
doi:10.1111/jsr.12450.
[14] Kihm HS, Rolling P. The Preschool Nap As a Protective Factor in the Fight Against
[15] Li L, Zhang S, Huang Y, Chen K. Sleep duration and obesity in children : A systematic
23
review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Pediatr Child Heal 2017;53:378–
85. doi:10.1111/jpc.13434.
doi:10.1378/chest.15-0605.
[17] Sadeh A, Tikotzky L, Kahn M. Sleep in infancy and childhood: Implications for emotional
2014;27:453–9. doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000109.
[18] Séguin D, Klimek V. Just five more minutes please: electronic media use, sleep and
doi:10.1080/03004430.2015.1071528.
[19] Meltzer LJ, Mindell JA. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Behavioral
doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu161.
[20] Allen SL, Howlett MD, Coulombe JA, Corkum P V. ABCs of SLEEPING: A review of
the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations. Sleep Med Rev 2016;29:1–
14. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2015.08.006.
[21] Malone SK. Early to Bed, Early to Rise? J Sch Nurs 2011;27:348–54.
doi:10.1177/1059840511410434.
[22] McDowall PS, Galland BC, Campbell AJ, Elder DE. Parent knowledge of children’s
doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2016.01.002.
24
[23] Effective Public Health Practice Project. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative
[24] Ahn Y, Williamson AA, Seo H-J, Sadeh A, Mindell JA. Sleep Patterns among South
Korean Infants and Toddlers: Global Comparison. J Korean Med Sci 2016;31:261–9.
doi:10.3346/jkms.2016.31.2.261.
[25] Butler R, Moore M, Mindell JA. Pacifier Use, Finger Sucking, and Infant Sleep. Behav
[26] Mindell JA, Li AM, Sadeh A, Kwon R, Goh DYT. Bedtime Routines for Young Children:
doi:10.5665/sleep.4662.
[27] Mindell JA, Sadeh A, Kohyama J, How TH. Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in
doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2009.11.011.
[28] Ramamurthy MB, Sekartini R, Ruangdaraganon N, Huynh DHT, Sadeh A, Mindell JA.
[29] McDonald L, Wardle J, Llewellyn CH, van Jaarsveld CHM, Fisher A. Predictors of
doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2014.01.005.
Trajectories and predictors of nocturnal awakenings and sleep duration in infants. J Dev
25
[31] Sette S, Baumgartner E, Ferri R, Bruni O. Predictors of sleep disturbances in the first year
[32] Gradisar M, Jackson K, Spurrier NJ, Gibson J. Behavioral Interventions for Infant Sleep
1486.
[33] Hall WA, Hutton E, Brant RF, Collet JP, Gregg K, Saunders R, et al. A randomized
controlled trial of an intervention for infants ’ behavioral sleep problems. BMC Pediatr
2015:1–12. doi:10.1186/s12887-015-0492-7.
[34] Lukowski AF, Liu X, Peirano P, Odio M, Bauer PJ. Disposable diaper use promotes
[35] Mindell JA, Du Mond CE, Sadeh A, Telofski LS, Kulkarni N, Gunn E. Efficacy of an
2011;34:451–458B. doi:10.1093/sleep/34.4.451.
[36] Mindell JA, Du Mond CE, Sadeh A, Telofski LS, Kulkarni N, Gunn E. Long-term
efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances: One
al. Sleep habits and pattern in 1-14 years old children and relationship with video devices
use and evening and night child activities. Ital J Pediatr 2017;43:1–11.
26
doi:10.1186/s13052-016-0324-x.
[38] Garrison MM, Liekweg K, Christakis DA. Media Use and Child Sleep: The Impact of
3304.
[39] Jones CHD, Ball H. Exploring Socioeconomic Differences in Bedtime Behaviours and
doi:10.1002/icd.
[40] Wilson KE, Miller AL, Lumeng JC, Chervin RD. Sleep environments and sleep durations
doi:10.5664/jcsm.3534.
[41] Brown SJ, Rhee KE, Gahagan S. Reading at Bedtime Associated with Longer Nighttime
doi:10.1177/0009922815593907.
doi:10.1177/1367493510397623.
[43] Mindell JA, Sedmak R, Boyle JT, Butler R, Williamson AA. Sleep Well!: A pilot study of
[44] Wilson KE, Miller AL, Bonuck K, Lumeng JC, Chervin RD. Evaluation of a Sleep
Education Program for Low-Income Preschool Children and Their Families. Sleep
27
2014;37:1117–25. doi:10.5665/sleep.3774.
[45] Jiang X, Hardy LL, Baur LA, Ding D, Wang L, Shi H. Sleep duration, schedule and
quality among urban Chinese children and adolescents: Associations with routine after-
[46] Li S, Yang Q, Chen Z, Jin X, Jiang F, Shen X. Homework Schedule: An Important Factor
Associated With Shorter Sleep Duration Among Chinese School-Aged Children. Behav
[47] Li S, Zhu S, Jin X, Yan C, Wu S, Jiang F, et al. Risk factors associated with short sleep
doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2010.03.018.
[48] Zhang J, Li AM, Fok TF, Wing YK. Roles of Parental Sleep/Wake Patterns,
[49] Seo WS, Sung HM, Lee JH, Koo BH, Kim MJ, Kim SY, et al. Sleep patterns and their
doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2010.03.011.
[50] Chahal H, Fung C, Kuhle S, Veugelers PJ. Availability and night-time use of electronic
entertainment and communication devices are associated with short sleep duration and
6T310.2012.Y00085.x.
[51] Tiesler CMT, Thiering E, Tischer C, Lehmann I, Schaaf B, von Berg A, et al. Exposure to
28
visible mould or dampness at home and sleep problems in children: Results from the
doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2015.02.534.
program improves sleep and academic performance of school-age children. Sleep Med
2016;21:93–100. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2016.01.012.
[54] Surani SR, Surani SS, Sadasiva S, Surani Z, Khimani A, Surani SS. Effect of animated
doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1130-4.
[55] Quach J, Hiscock H, Ukoumunne OC. A Brief Sleep Intervention Improves Outcomes in
doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0409.
multicomponent treatment for sleep disorders in children. Nat Sci Sleep 2011;3:1–11.
doi:10.2147/NSS.S15254.
milk drink can affect word recall in Indonesian children with decreased sleep efficiency:
doi:10.1080/1028415X.2017.1323396.
M, et al. The association of sleep and late-night cell phone use among adolescents. J
[59] Galland BC, Gray AR, Penno J, Smith C, Lobb C, Taylor RW. Gender differences in
sleep hygiene practices and sleep quality in New Zealand adolescents aged 15 to 17 years.
[60] Harbard E, Allen NB, Trinder J, Bei B. What’s Keeping Teenagers Up? Prebedtime
Behaviors and Actigraphy-Assessed Sleep over School and Vacation. J Adolesc Heal
2016;58:426–32. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.12.011.
[61] Munezawa T, Kaneita Y, Osaki Y, Kanda H, Minowa M, Suzuki K, et al. The Association
between Use of Mobile Phones after Lights Out and Sleep Disturbances among Japanese
doi:10.5665/SLEEP.1152.
[62] Polos PG, Bhat S, Gupta D, O’Malley RJ, DeBari VA, Upadhyay H, et al. The impact of
doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.002.
[63] Yilmaz K, Kilinçaslan A, Aydin N, Kul S. Understanding sleep habits and associated
factors can help to improve sleep in high school adolescents. Turk J Pediatr 2011;53:430–
6.
30
[64] John B, Bellipady SS, Bhat SU. Sleep promotion program for improving sleep behaviors
among adolescents in selected schools: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Ment Health
[65] Tamura N, Tanaka H. Effects of a sleep education program with self-help treatment on
[66] Wing YK, Chan NY, Man Yu MW, Lam SP, Zhang J, Li SX, et al. A School-Based Sleep
2015;135:e635–43. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2419.
[67] Van Der Lely S, Frey S, Garbazza C, Wirz-Justice A, Jenni OG, Steiner R, et al. Blue
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.08.002.
[68] Carter B, Rees P, Hale L, Bhattacharjee D, Paradkar MS. Association between portable
screen-based media device access or use and sleep outcomes a systematic review and
[69] Clark I, Landolt HP. Coffee, caffeine, and sleep: A systematic review of epidemiological
doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2016.01.006.
[70] Chung K-F, Chan M-S, Lam Y-Y, Lai CS-Y, Yeung W-F. School-Based Sleep Education
Programs for Short Sleep Duration in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-
31
Environment
Intervention
Context or
Co-sleeping
Interventi
Homework
Electronics
Routines
Napping
Hygiene
feeding
Infant
Drugs
Sleep
Country Age Group Sleep
Diet
on
First Author Year of origin Study Design N (Mean) Key Outcomes assessment
Ahn [24] 2016 Korea Cross-sectional survey 1032 I&T (NR) C x x x x x x SD, NW PR
Amra [58] 2017 Iran Cross-sectional survey 2257 A (15.4) C x SD, SQ, SOL SR
Blunden [42] 2011 Australia Pre-test Post-test 33 P (27m) I 0 SD, SOL, NW SD
Brambilla [37] 2017 Italy Structured interview 2030 T, P, SA, A C x x x TST, OS PR
Brown [41] 2015 USA Cross-sectional survey 62 P (53m) C x x x SD, SOL, NW PR
Butler [25] 2016 USA Cross-sectional survey 104 I (6.6m) C x NW, LSP, TST PR
Chahal [50] 2013 Canada Cross-sectional survey 3398 SA (NR) C x SD SR & PR
New
Galland [59] 2017 Zealand Cross-sectional survey 692 A (16.9) C x x SE, SOL, SD SR
Garrison [38] 2011 USA Baseline survey for RCT 617 P (51m) C x SP, SOL, NW PR & MD
Randomized controlled
Gradisar [32] 2016 Australia trial 43 I, T, (10.8m) I x SD, SOL, NW SD & ACT
ACT & SD &
Gruber [53] 2016 Canada Controlled pre and post 71 SA (8.5) I x TST, SOL, SE PR
Randomized controlled SD, NW, LNW, PR & SD &
Hall [33] 2015 Canada trial 235 I (6.7m) I x LSP ACT
Harbard [60] 2016 Australia Longitudinal survey 146 A (16.2) C x TST, SOL ACT
Cohort and longitudinal 5583
Hysing [30] 2014 Norway study 1 I & T (NR) C x x x SD, NW, SOL PR
A & SA
Jiang [45] 2015 China Cross-sectional survey 6247 (11.5) C x x SD, SQ PR & SR
Cluster randomized
John [64] 2017 India controlled trial 660 A (13.6) I x SQ, SOL, SE, SD SR
INT & SD,
Jones [39] 2014 UK Mixed-methods study 84 P (41m) C x SD &ACT
2077
Li [46] 2014 China Cross-sectional survey 8 SA (9) C x SD PR
1929
Li [47] 2010 China Cross-sectional survey 9 SA (9) C x x x x x x x x SD PR
Randomized controlled PR &SD &
Lukowski [34] 2015 China trial 80 I (6m) C x NW ACT
McDonald [29] 2014 UK Cross-sectional survey 1702 T (15.8m) C x SD PR
33
1008
Mindell [26] 2015 Various Cross-sectional survey 5 I, T, PS (NR) C x SOL, NW, SD PR
2928
Mindell [27] 2010 Various Cross-sectional survey 7 I & T (NR) C x x x SD, NW PR
Randomized controlled
Mindell [35] 2011 USA trial 264 I& T(19.4m) I x SOL, NW, SD PR
Randomized controlled
Mindell [36] 2011 USA trial 171 T&PS (31m) I x SOL, NW, SD PR
Randomized controlled T, PS, SA
Mindell [43] 2016 USA trial 109 (5.7) I x SD PR
Munezawa 9477
[61] 2011 Japan Cross-sectional survey 7 A (NR) C x SD, SQ SR
Polos [62] 2015 USA Cross-sectional survey 3139 A (13.3) C x SD, SQ SR
Randomized controlled
Quach [55] 2011 Australia trial 108 SA (5.7) I x TST PR
Ramamurthy 1032
[28] 2012 Various Cross-sectional survey 1 I (NR) C x NW, SD, SOL PR
Randomized controlled
Rigney [52] 2015 Australia trial 296 SA (12) I x TST SR & ACT
Randomized controlled
Schlarb [56] 2011 Germany trial 38 SA (7.8) I x NW, SD, SOL PR & SD
Randomized controlled TST, SE, WASO,
Sekartini [57] 2017 Indonesia trial. 126 PS (NR) C x NW ACT
Seo [49] 2010 Korea Cross-sectional survey 3639 SA (NR) C x x x x TNS, SOL, NW PR & SD
Sette [31] 2017 Italy Longitudinal study 704 I (NR) C x x NW, SD INT
Randomized controlled
Surani [54] 2015 USA trial 264 SA (NR) I x NW SR
A cluster randomized
Tamura [65] 2016 Japan trial. 243 A (NR) I x SOL, TST SR
Tiesler [51] 2015 Germany Cross-sectional survey 1719 SA (10) C x SD, NW PR
van der Lely Switzerla Counter-balanced cross- SR & SD &
[67] 2015 nd over 13 A (16.5) I x TST ACT
Wilson [40] 2014 USA Cross-sectional survey 133 PS (4.1) C x SD, SOL PR
Randomized controlled
Wilson [44] 2014 USA trial 152 PS (4.1) I x SD PR & SD
A Cluster Randomized
Wing [66] 2015 China Trial 3713 A (14.7) I x SD, SOL SR
Yilmaz [63] 2011 Turkey Cross-sectional survey 3441 A (16.2) C x x x TNS SR
Zhang [48] 2010 China Cross-sectional survey 4470 SA (9.2) C x x x SD SR
34
Ages: I&T-infants and toddlers, P-Preschool, SA-School Age, A-Adolescents; Outcomes: LSP-Longest sleep period, SD-sleep
duration, SE-sleep efficiency, NW-night waking, LNW- long night wakes, SQ-sleep quality, SOL-sleep onset latency, TST-total sleep
time, OS-optimal sleep, SP-sleep problem, TNS-total night sleep, WASO-wake after sleep onset; Sleep Assessment: ACT-actigraphy,
SD-sleep diaries, PR-parent report, SR-self report, MD-media diary, INT-interview
35
Appendix A
CINAHL SEARCH
"Insomnia")
S3 S1 OR S2
S6 S4 OR S5
S7 S3 AND S6
oSDB)
S10 S8 OR S9
S13 TI ("Cot Death" OR "Crib Death" OR "Infant Death, Sudden" OR SIDS OR "Sudden Baby
Death" OR "Sudden Infant Death") OR AB ("Cot Death" OR "Crib Death" OR "Infant Death,
Disorder")
S23 (MH "Adult") OR (MH "Aged") OR (MH "Aged, 80 and Over") OR (MH "Aged,
Hospitalized") OR (MH "Frail Elderly") OR (MH "Middle Age") OR (MH "Young Adult")
parasomnias OR "periodic leg movements" OR "Sleep safety" OR "sleep safe" OR "infant safe
leg movements" OR "Sleep safety" OR "sleep safe" OR "infant safe sleep" OR "infant sleep
S35 (MH "Infant, Premature") OR (MH "Infant, Very Low Birth Weight")
"diabetes mellitus" OR "diabetes type 1" OR "type 1 diabetes" OR "atopic disease" OR delirium
S39 (MH "Chronic Disease") OR (MH "Disease+") OR (MH "Obesity+") OR (MH "Arthritis+")
(MH "Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases+") OR (MH "Behavioral and Mental Disorders") OR
"Dyssomnias") OR (MH "Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm+") OR (MH "Jet Lag Syndrome")
S44 (MH "Health Facilities") OR (MH "Academic Medical Centers") OR (MH "Alternative
Centers") OR (MH "Facility Design and Construction+") OR (MH "Health Facility Closure+")
S50 S42 NOT S48 [Limiters - Published Date: 20070101-20171231; English Language]