Davidnelson 2

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 26

THE EXTENT OF HEALTHCARE FRAUD, CORRUPTION AND

WASTE, A US PERSPECTIVE
European Healthcare Fraud & Corruption Network Conference

David L. Nelson, M.S., Director, Healthcare and Science


TABLE OF CONTENTS
• Thomson Reuters
• Waste and Fraud in The United States:
The staggering numbers
• Why is it so hard to measure?
• Technologies
• Results
©2010 Thomson Reuters

2
THOMSON REUTERS BUSINESSES & MARKETS

MEDIA FINANCIAL LEGAL TAX & HEALTHCARE


ACCOUNTING & SCIENCE
Reuters News Half a million 98% of world’s 99% of top US More than 20
reaches a billion professional major law firms accounting firms million research
people every day users globally use Westlaw use Checkpoint users worldwide
©2010 Thomson Reuters

3
GLOBAL FOOTPRINT
300 CITIES 103 COUNTRIES
©2010 Thomson Reuters

4 4
200+ 25+ State
Employers Governments
GE, FedEx, 11 state employers
GM, Boeing, 28 Medicaid agencies
8 HHS agencies
AT&T

3000+
Hospitals Federal
Triad, Tenet, Government
HFHS, Cedars- CMS, AHRQ,
Sinai CDC, SAMHSA,
VA, DoD

Unparalleled Expertise Across


Healthcare
100+
Pharmaceuticals Health Plans
©2010 Thomson Reuters

All major U.S.


HCSC, Cigna,
pharma companies
CareFirst

5
THOMSON REUTERS
U.S. GOVERNMENT HEALTHCARE EXPERIENCE

NH ME
WA VT ME
AK ND
MT
MN MA
OR
WI NY
ID SD RI
MI
WY PA CT
NJ
IA
NE OH DE
NV IL IN
WV DC
HI UT VA
CA CO
KS MO KY MD
NC
TN
OK SC
AZ NM AR
MS GA
AL
LA
TX

FL

State Medicaid Customers


©2010 Thomson Reuters

6 of 8 Federal Programs
6
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF SPENDING ON
HEALTH, 1980–2007
Average spending on health Total expenditures on health
per capita ($US PPP) as percent of GDP
16%
$7,290

8%

$2,454
©2010 Thomson Reuters

Note: $US PPP = purchasing power parity.


Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Health Data, 2009 (Paris: OECD, Nov. 2009).
WHAT IS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM WASTE?

•The New England Healthcare Institute


(NEHI) has defined waste in healthcare
as “Healthcare spending that can be
eliminated without reducing the
quality of care.”
©2010 Thomson Reuters

8
1. Preventable Conditions $25-50
2. Lack of Care Coordination $25-50
3. Provider Inefficiency and Errors $75-100
4. Administrative Inefficiencies $100-150
5. Fraud and Abuse $125-175
6. Unwarranted Use $250-325
$600-850 Bn
©2010 Thomson Reuters

9
HEALTH CARE FRAUD RATE U.S.
“In FY 2009, the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association
estimates conservatively that at least 3 percent of health care
3% spending is lost to fraud.”
Daniel R. Levinson, Inspector General, Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services on Health Care Reform: Opportunities to Address Waste, Fraud and Abuse before The House Energy
and Commerce Committee, Subcommittee on Health, United States House of Representatives, June 25, 2009

“In 2008, government-wide “improper payments” cost the U.S.


Treasury $72 billion, or about 4 percent, of total outlays for
4% the related programs.”
Iglehart, J. Finding Money for Healthcare Reform — Rooting Out Waste, Fraud, and Abuse. New England Journal
of Medicine. 2009 Jul 16; 361(3): 229-31. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) place the loss due


to health care fraud as high as 10 percent of the nation’s
10 % annual health care expenditure - or a staggering $226 billion
©2010 Thomson Reuters

each year.

10
FRAUD RATES SUPPORTED BY FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT RESULTS
• 94 defendants arrested in ―Largest federal health care fraud takedown‖ in history
– Health and Human Services and Department of Justice combined to arrest 94 defendants in
Brooklyn, Baton Rouge, Detroit, and Miami for false billing for AIDS treatment, DME, physical
and occupational therapy, and home health care - July 2010

• $2.3 billion settlement with Pfizer for illegal promotion of several drugs, including
the anti-inflammatory drug Bextra.
– The illegal promotion resulted in false claims submitted to Medicare and Medicaid for non-
medically accepted uses of the drugs.

• $17 million settlement by a Florida physician


– Settled allegations that he billed the Medicare program for higher levels of services than were
actually provided, and for services that were never provided.

• $9.9 million paid by a Texas hospital to resolve allegations


– For more than two years, the hospital inflated charges for patient care in order to receive higher
Medicare reimbursements.
©2010 Thomson Reuters

―Estimates of the total cost of health care fraud are difficult to obtain.‖
Source: Health Subcommittee Staff, Health Subcommittee, Committee on Energy and Commerce, Congress of the
United States, Sept. 20, 2010 , Hearing ―Cutting Waste, Fraud and Abuse in Medicare and Medicaid‖
11
HEALTH REFORM: INCREASING EFFORTS
• AntiFraud Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control
(HCFAC) Funding has increased
– FY 2008: $1.13 billion
– FY 2009: $1.36 billion
– FY 2010: $1.49 billion
• New enrollment requirements for all providers
• Focus on durable medical equipment and home health
care
• New and enhanced penalties for fraudulent providers
• New data sharing and data-collection provisions
• New funding to fight Medicare and Medicaid fraud FY
©2010 Thomson Reuters

2011-2020

12
WHY IT IS SO HARD TO MEASURE LOSS DUE TO FRAUD?

Sorting Fraud, Waste, Abuse & Overpayment

Criminal Commendable

Waste Quality Best


Fraud Abuse Overpayment
Non-compliance Improvement Practices
errors
©2010 Thomson Reuters

13
WHY IT IS SO HARD TO MEASURE LOSS DUE TO FRAUD?

Incredible Amounts of Data To Evaluate


©2010 Thomson Reuters

14
WHY IT IS SO HARD TO IDENTIFY FRAUD?
DATA AND TECHNOLOGY ISSUE
• Sorting Fraud, Waste, Abuse & Overpayment
• Integrating many large data sets
• Integrating efforts across multiple payers
• Disparate systems
– most fraud found by comparing claim types (e.g. drugs, inpatient, outpatient,
professional, multi-payer)

• Old complex systems can’t be modified fast enough


• Pre-payment solutions will not catch all fraud
• Prompt payment pressure
• Claim lag and adjustments
• Complexity of the data elements
©2010 Thomson Reuters

• Fraudsters constantly innovating

15
WHERE CAN FRAUD BE IDENTIFIED?

• Provider Enrollment
• Beneficiary Eligibility Check

Claims Payment
• Pre-Payment
• Post-Payment
©2010 Thomson Reuters

16
TECHNOLOGIES BEING USED TO IDENTIFY FRAUD
Pre-Payment Post-Payment
Evaluation before a claim is paid Evaluation after a claim is paid

Providers
Submit
Claims

• Clinical editing • Data management and


• e.g. National Correct Coding warehousing
Initiative, AMA guidelines • Specialized surveillance and
• Predictive modeling utilization review tools
• New innovations • Data mining
• Integrity edits • Reporting
• Risk scoring • Predictive analytics
• Case management systems
• Public Records systems
©2010 Thomson Reuters

• Audit and recovery tools


• New innovations

17
INTEGRATED DATA MINING
STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3 STAGE 4 STAGE 5

! 
Data Building Application Knowledge
Data Collection Transformation Intelligence Delivery Management

Eligibility Privacy Protection Proven Methods Payment Integrity

Medical Inpatient Standardization Episodes of Care Data Mining

Mental Health Customization Performance Measures Provider Profiles

Rx Drug Enhancement Disease Staging Beneficiary Profiles Actionable Analytics

Outpatient Quality Assurance Norms / Benchmarks Reporting Frameworks Consulting

Professional Quality Improvement Market Scan Algorithms Training

Home Health Integration Referential Content Edits Research

Durable Medical Program Development Algorithm Library


Equipment
Clinical Measurement
Dental

Vision
Data
Lab Results Data Repository
Other

18 18
RESULTS OF POST-PAYMENT EFFORTS

$1.00 $3.00 - $12.00


Investment Return

Actual recovery versus cost avoidance

• Additional cost avoidance savings


©2010 Thomson Reuters

19
72 HOUR READMISSIONS
Identified providers with higher readmit
rates within 72 hours for same
Diagnosis - indicates prematurely
discharging patients in order to
maximize reimbursement.

State Agency Policy: Readmission for


the same or related problem within 3
days of discharge is considered the
same admission. (and not eligible for
separate reimbursement)

State identified 150


providers and recovered
©2010 Thomson Reuters

$1,100,000
20
ONE STATE EXPERIENCE: DASHBOARDS
• Personal Care/Homemaker Chore
– 909 providers identified for potential fraud
– 10 algorithms run
– Identified over $17 million in suspicious claims
• Adult Day Care
– 91 providers identified for potential fraud
– 7 algorithms run, 2 with 8 iterations
– Identified over $15 million in suspicious claims
• Outpatient Hospital
– 270 providers identified for potential fraud
– 10 algorithms run, 2 with multiple iterations
– Over $17 million in suspicious claims
• Dental
– 550 providers identified for potential fraud
– 25+ algorithms run
– Over $9 million in suspicious claims identified
– Over $850,000 in solid overpayments identified
©2010 Thomson Reuters

21
TIME BANDITS
Psychiatrists had claims for more than 12
hours of ―face time‖ with patients in a day

Provider #1 already indicted for Medicaid


fraud; pled guilty to 10 counts of causing
false Medicaid claims to be filed.

Provider #2 Owner of the counseling center


pled guilty to Medicaid fraud.

Additional providers:
5 new cases opened, Agency reimbursed
$165,000

1 new case referred for to the Medicaid


©2010 Thomson Reuters

Fraud Control Unit (MFCU)

22
MORE EXAMPLES
Fraud Type Results (ROI)
Lab Services with No Episode of Care $18.8 million
Non-required Power Wheelchairs $50 million

Collusive Fraud Networks $32.5 million

Provider Re-Enrollment Saved almost $8 million during the re-


enrollment process
Medically Unnecessary Transportation Recovered $1 million in waste

Multiple “New Patient” Visits Identified $3.9 million in clear


overpayments
Inappropriately Billed Admissions Recovered $1.6 million in overpayments

Dental Services and Billing Identified more than $9 million in


suspicious claims
©2010 Thomson Reuters

23
©2010 Thomson Reuters

QUESTIONS

24
CONTACT:
David Nelson
Director

Healthcare & Science

Thomson Reuters
(734) 913-3432 Direct
(734) 913-3338 Fax

David.L.Nelson@ThomsonReuters.com
©2010 Thomson Reuters

25
©2010 Thomson Reuters

You might also like