Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Order Id - BDE2746
Order Id - BDE2746
Name
Course
University
Date
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM LAW AND TRIBUNALS 2
Introduction
In the United Kingdom, the concept of immigration and asylum system is very complex
because it presents challenging hurdles when one is navigating through it. The system has been
subject to relatively frequent changes. The system is comprised of lengthy and many appeal
phases, where there has been a highly allowed rate of appeals against the involved agency, the
Home Office (Clayton, 2016). In recent times, the elimination of the appeal rights has put the
tribunal and the judicial system in the UK under considerable pressure. Therefore, the
consequence of personal decisions in this domain has been huge. Nevertheless, to counter the
related problems the legislative arm in the country enacted a law that has been used to make a
crucial decision on hearings involving immigration and asylum (Clayton, 2016). The legislature
enacted the Tribunals, Courts, and Enforcement Act 2007, which has been a fundamental
element in making critical judgments on immigration and asylum related cases. It is against this
backdrop that this paper seeks to explore and analyze the immigration and asylum law and
To evaluate the changes in the immigration and asylum laws in the United Kingdom
Courts, and Enforcement Act 2007 in making decisions about immigration and asylum
laws.
Body
Initially, the Home Office has the roles in nearly all the issues concerning immigration,
especially those pertaining the border control regulations, asylum, and nationality. Since the late
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM LAW AND TRIBUNALS 3
19th century, the common law in the United Kingdom had offered a provision that nonalien had
any right to get into the country except by leave of the Crown (Craig & Fletcher, 2012). This led
to the enactment of the Aliens Restriction Act 1914, and subsequently to the Aliens Restriction
(Amendment) Act 1919, where the orders and rules under these laws offered the common law
the statutory foundation (Clayton, 2016). As a result, they later made a limitation on the aspect of
immigration.
Therefore, the statutory regime regulating immigration in the United Kingdom is at the
moment captured in the Immigration Act 1971, where there are additional immigration rules
generated under it. The Immigration Regulations are a fluid set of regulations that are subject to
frequent changes. To make changes to them, the Statement of Changes to the immigration
regulations was laid before the UK Parliament. Therefore, the required changes entered into law
within 40 days unless there is an objection from the Parliament. The Immigration Act
necessitates people who are not British or citizens of the commonwealth with the right of abode
in the United Kingdom or members of the European Economic Area to get permission to get into
Over time, there has been a series of transformations. One of the recent laws is the
Immigration, Asylum, and Nationality Act 2006 that offered several more additional measures
that made it easier for the administration to deport people for reasons of national security. This
restricted the grounds of appeal in issues of national security to those only based on human rights
concerns.
On the tribunal and courts aspect, there is Tribunal, Courts, and Enforcement Act 2007
that makes a provision about tribunal and inquiries. The law introduced an Administrative Justice
and Tribunals Council for amending the law associated with judicial appointments and Law
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM LAW AND TRIBUNALS 4
Commission’s appointments (Brown, 2004). The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal is contained
in this law and deals with cases relating to asylum and immigration.
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM LAW AND TRIBUNALS 5
References
Brown, C. (2004). Social work, immigration, and asylum: Debates, dilemmas, and ethical issues
for social work and social care practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Craig, S., & Fletcher, M. (2012). The supervision of immigration and asylum appeals in the UK–
Journal, 12(2), 152-161.
Thomas, R. (2008). Consistency in asylum adjudication: Country Guidance and the asylum