Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 14
——_— ca #E-IM PORTANT QUESTION S- —_ (MidStuns CiA 2) te between Jug ilation 6 pueceotent . {LS mates e —T iced] (Sal rl Tusrishundonw Ou Theouy ob tna] heqgilation is the dedlauation eu eudriakion Op. a patucible ly me adequate authouity dun die Jueduy politic 3 whéuras _puseedont is the 4 iis hom Sh a puudnciple £0 ity apprpiatorte G)| haw wlrich hos its sounce dn degilation is called Atatute, cracticd ou utter Jaw, PLrecenclo plveduvceg case Lawy, Ui |hegictation wouk with. eqral facility dn_Lath Craig Oa nt ee a way! ound i Ui this peoulauity whic maker wt 58 efictenk_ a. wuthed OH, dugal s4Sdum 3 Puccudunrt, dy conulitubive , Miva quite destitute of alurogatiine pee | Wroun Dre . aud iis Ad Udy oburcdy die judges bauw wo austhouity 60% than te oluty and adminiitu Jt, Their pow. oH making nid Lous diay judicial daition aes tO th se_vac: Apacs ulrue tok iy ads yok we Other Law wlio Hay Cam apply. . Gl hequlation san annountment to all the would phot in futur, voutain puriwoiples waibl lu obplitd im dhe, adminizkuotion of qusbien . fouth- J etn ie cxpediabions, dealtug wok combats Ten concemned, air thoreds upOrr piuivctbdes 9/9 “Jectarud, awd distugatid of Marin tay tee judi, —— Jataue Laduldl ste a Lictacls Of faith aird. an iy ——~ Treuuice to the cause of, jUoiies Puc comdend: y.- ~~ Jou not, onl men expect thak dike decighons wis) pou the pubis Le gitaver din dike casts. OA statute (tgitlation) da an atkunpt made ~ the Lalatue S2 puumwlate Jailed Of dai [you alae we dud dinection 9}, tive fudicoturre. ig Lutlen durice hat ten didouerid ark Lhe cout, accept Wy tules 49 ouutoteol a auth ouitatin and. fival; Tr vote of Pasctdurt oro One Gt supeuion cout: of Low hat, aber soluvun Onn nk awd ball conricurodion daic dau a. cuitatn buindple as Ove tit £0 ue applied, de the caye ini hand, there io a treasdnalule umption tho this dedirion ig OUrcect andl Ahi puineiple 4 tik to de applied tol othe Milos cases in pute as well ood sateen : permanent Lecognition ag a nid L Le of dew. Epa Rayplpnou Good. Hates Theotuy. (Auticls) — Wil doting de Ratio Decidundi a a Case — Artie. |. gapdiatt Tn discusivg de watuue 6) a P — fete aa i Ten let eee al gL, dats judicial deeisign, yale. Wonk vite eg Paltthle The uundebyting pesincl oe See Eby | Optan Aeerunid kee cabin decidendt. The concubs [ecicior dy dading Lutwoen da pout 40 aby Lad hit M6 the alukuadk ode dridiemds, utfrida alome | has re 4peuce Op bars | ou agave dla would ph ft “|The ne Suuiles pouring ste purinciple of a case Com, _ Fitness Ate SUMIMawniZ cd _ ad follous a (The pune op a cole dy mot yuma, in dhe fe eas ous Given ion te opduion i- The may iy Luks 64, Low din the opinion Ou thre ute - | dkaked. Jue 499 wide ou tOD nations, A Case may be a pucordunt : induing an dnp dua ‘rote Lay abtivough tx Shu Yount has gianir A (edguaunt lino a apa fA ae expunuion dt jun tae pool att Apealecblag eae En heat Fenton" the ipde way cpusiedk abtnough tie spalowavet soa ng ay 04 hol in “Regn Faspaakdidn * Arvtine cawple Gas Queptoteuont yf a poritacile tr "Riggs v- Pabenea Ow ctlae Obie amd , the Lule of, Laws skated wow Len Jin a vitay marwarhd {Erinn “Jay Jim * Baseusich— Vv. English. Teint St0ck Bow". Tue | Howe of, houd on Woy v. Gta Guace, Smith & to." helt unnak ddu. pucircipple utd Audi. waco. Fu aie dAiphorat Wuld.thiok, “Nob dle judges” opinion, Bast fui. pay Ady dace coset wall, by athe: dovetail fri ofa My 18 icAtudy of Lowe. —— | ) Maked ack south vin the opiwdow The oulsep Je oe en due da. a, wateecour (Basuvice v- English faint y Eicd | ga Aan Stock Bak.) Ou. ouenlatea +4 “porn un ( Kiggs v ve Pree Whur we condide Uae appellate COs «ie beceny, awn mou olusious tral the princijole Ob any, , Case comnot necedeily Lit. lind di Ah te —|Mawo enunclatid,, pode i Wel dnblequint ig" pid. drat auton ee judy e WADI, OMe dy, He Lees att dy wail, tide stot ‘how. Case with daclude j- Homligok tok Bugs. 5 “Hoge eat Ww. Vv. Me 5 Gai fe 5 “hits v Flee. “ban y. La Gi i) Tre padvciple dy not weceasily 4d. Log a courdinoti or Sp od tlre . abctutatralle hacky Sp Ale. Case: anal te, judge's Seti Gi Tet ak 8} dcade ate ou, Stink tig $y Condurion Js ated pow. prrernise of « ari Ako} tacts. The Jamu sek Oo} pack, Waly Lock eutivuly dif beet: to 2 eorewt pectsous. Tae age ths peat Sadi a conclusion. oft pads as be Accs them. TF i On tise URBAN Or EDGI [tn we mut assume drat all te pack adr wokuriak Cocupt Jnese whic Ou thei OL wot. ALL tin ack! uhids tthe count Specibically sobs ote Luamoteniol wu Lue consi dened 16, AL ects which the Out dmpliedly tua oA dmottuial wut le Wwsideued so. Decision of, fhe judge iu Suackudvpou uy Ja Jiuclusion Ob woateuial +aots & exch ow Oh, dmmatiutal facts. Tn finding dhe puincifle it iv alse wecerd asey 49 utollish what tacts woue buld 49 lu dmmottuial tina judge , pou dhe puinci le dpund oid reniteg apa it dee Qu inclusion - Tt in under these ceoumtaw cs dhok the ULas ous glue Loy the fudge Jn bis inion Ou his utokunent® Of tine wute of, Low) wali be da polouciug OLUL Of prorliate dp but - ance, Ou may punish us with Ogi 4m motouial whic Lmatutal. Hid oeasOud wey de Snrcoutrect au Wy statemunt of the Lard t99 wide . uut they will dudicate tO w on wlrat foots te Lueaditd Wi vncuion. tis “al Eooplain P Wambang Eugenia Tupi. Ql Explain Rusterwon g Eaguneis [(Autive- Jepanote TB) Comapay, 1982, dn He bo “The Study 6}, Cases [Boston : Kite, vows Eugune hlambioug bas 4ugg id. an” Tari Tent” dn oudeu Jo make che deck, Jet. bite 4d at Be Bi ueetut 4 din _fuspesition a woud sumunring ike ng. bik Win die Lnqine perepssition te ue gos awd £9 he dre pont wpa 4 The rules for finding what facts are material and what facts are immaterial as seen by the judge are as follows. (1) All facts of person, time, place, kind and. amount are immaterial unless stated to be material. (2) If there is no opinion, or the opinion gives no facts, then all other facts in the record must be treated as material. (3) If there is an opinion, then the facts as stated in the opinion are conclusive and cannot be contradicted from the record. (4) If the opinion omits a fact which appears in the record this may be due either to (a) oversight, or (b) an implied finding that the fact is immaterial. The second will be assumed to be the case in the absence of other evidence. (5) All facts which the judge specifically states are immate- rial must be considered immaterial. (6) All facts which the judge impliedly treats as immaterial must be considered immaterial. (7) All facts which the judge specifically states to be mate- rial must be considered material. (8) If the opinion does not distinguish between material and immaterial facts then all the facts set forth must be considered material. (9) If in a case there are several opinions which agree as to the result but differ as to the material facts, then the prin- ciple of the case is limited so as to fit the sum of all the facts held material by the various judges. (10) A conclusion based on a hypothetical fact is a dictum. By hypothetical fact is meant any fact the existence of which has not been determined or accepted by the judge. ahi We case. Sagal AB uta A dij a “Teoutcl Ware tugtan the same T the Uywey lag —labfitundtlie sttren Wace Ccillevutly diye” _suigival buspsriuiar may le the cae i et > frmcertwtt” $94 that’ Juss ction, heat i dg Quiwte le negative tle ove a. KEELE Jo sala. Seip ihad pucporiliae ad posiilly Joe ye + __ | pusbssitigu als. cama Ts gubdut lion. a cate dts Gu Suly Que! fire | the _feusposition, Su dscltine of the Tae athe SHUM Ste cade,‘ tire UAt® deci Lert’ acct | Bea guitwatl ube urithout uric Be care | ate devidid othe’ eee (This tet has en Applied jn tte caie Gtate g Guiasat oud Othe v. Util Ugeers' Wellacu | Asdsciotion and Otheus, " (P5- 2 3 Pasa “at).t (Pyne Pasa “gD. The Judas hau induded dn thet, | fud9 Vest that As ben the 1 pauiblowlad bush é 1A the “Latte ducicundi “ Seu a. ctically | appt ple pune that the uctip dtcttent ty wal da als ecey Ou the ducivion of, Ae cose — Okeotuation 2 orangeoes Ltd.” Soe See 53. [Taugesco itt. v. Pon Poon, Gensatlis co.(P) kta] Ratio Decideidi_as peu “Wilkinson v. Douurton “ A pape ob alotuactation Jy ices tivddig tu“ atio. ducidendi” Bp a case: Alstuactahon die _wiewtal Opeuation op pidetng owt ceutain qualitier ond Luslations Jno the a expeusence, Ir coms _ dn. bh the MOM of dhnrilaLrt es Salou dncboidaal pac and. all. dang uage Awol. all, inking depending upor it. Thiv pusecas he Dumed te i bighou Plighhsis"Te abit of packs drat Gccuumid dan ity the Wigheu the > ~ abstiactoti ou di widen the Matte decidurde. We cay On this pobre wudeng ab tre particulate dbase Jud Aiminatid except the pack of He dang of nant thot dt. didtadad. de — plainti4, adits Ad COE, t se ead 0, a odiusaucr fash hal Te tindivg o Sue uotio decidendi wot om automatic pubs, it call jou. tausycety All owt. emoudled ge. : The case Sumuwmanuy . Dowwten calli Mus. Wilkingo RH ted bow that Wet buted was smashed ap Jim oun acidunt and wal Lytle with bath Legs beden aud. tie hod 18 Jota aca. & gut 2 pillows — yalee V ° ry ey VW ‘puncticol fet — plant, deep Loti 0 wiglut ik te ee neurons Sy (ton vowuitling Le, = 19) _putou bet ous Oh * Gdl- health": , <=, feo eogg- * oudhandas Kes a Te eepascaln Auk, (960) Mt a ~ ft 8 _ (AIR 1962, Gujauot | 23) | New _apptyiny pis Ke es opucial de ea a 7 die pvepositin (y suucuscd Les Hay a 7 oti te eo feito Malt ha Jack age) — that i it would haw wo dupack Ov tes dasiyie - {av that cose, which way vublatid. to Jntur afi _. he nterputhation of Section 6 of, Lhe Jail A This, sina Jot ig what iy leld opousiald ya He obpcletnat 6 a. cape ate — eh Sudges fe - (Rewceduut in English Liwitotion, of the Tet > haw - Rupect Cosy) | Veuy fay cas hawe a uatio didderdi kuecani | a a ere tal pinta seoute thom that cashew ay *| By oudling 48 so kal atbletiny Beat ie 2 2K Orn t8 cass tu Wawrborg pated 49 wake ae Wo cf aie jectie nahatee thee duke He peat dickdendi 89 dup dw udiou . alan fae haw - Rupeut Cue). (Paco. E M hint adlond of baa Tear = Cedewit din English dere, Foun tubes Bh CASES tre teu in Jumopplicalds Gul Lyi cage it Wi Cases with 2 Luahigs Gi) Cafe dn _walricl the : a cau i st a el uate os dsl — aii) coed (cose > a) Ryland: v. Filet _____ Dfeuth lo ppedistisee_ ti Water to. v. 8 1 aw) Cases im unaicl the duck @ deals with ts, Law witheut detewuini ail tne (ears >"Gecat Wetter Railway Gor : . b) Malik, v. Nawedin’, Botha Ces ert pak ay, Wamlrares failed ty sutalize ubhat hgud H wacoquized to Le the core, da ducidiow wag domotim Lie lased oun Gs urued facts, Cas im _wdhich the judge deals with dhe baud dutpous mabe ctuliadn pindivge of -fack. (cases —> 2) buy nn v. Bawnbtor ») centual hendon Piusp ety Tow btd. v. High Turco Howe td), | PLLOmiss- — Gober Jal mor) a Usich has its AQuae om degitation on Callid 18 ttakute, dkotube an attempt rmsd ag dhe _Legislotume te povumubotte Luh 6b Ukg ht Jou fia wud discs Ob dia dudicalud Hae Vamuoud pauts of the Matute anc as tollous = [> Communconment Cause : The gent ( piudnet ples tn disiqnivg commenumbat chauses aut tat Marvy wuk prrouide's J Contaimity atuout wun Legitation Ju dim pouves & Adequate pulidic notin eo du crn mancenacurt (oP ArqViauil ona - Uiually perouidedt dey Section 4 (2). Eqz Tu Indian Contuact Ack ®, 1842 commenrcument clause vu” Tk Catends to the udnole’ eh Lydia, (except the cttate op Tamu and Kotlnritt) avol dt Aboll come tute our on tan 4k day O4 September (942. OR Tis Ack come into efeck ou AT April 2022. * De inition clause (Inteupertabion Clause) Oudagerk Of a depinition vs 46 aunbidl He neceity Of prnquual Mepitin dan desctriluing tHe Audy ; wotken 46 whide the woud ou eapesssion eff ned dy Sunturded 5@ apply, dyfinition ALA dopinilio, coutadned. dn He, olawue, 6}, 4. puubieula 4 <_ Q) Facuuie (no voce, oddiicus (mds) — Gi)| La cLusince-( wa cisions cow. Lie mods) (Srlady ¥ tied should, tue yup! jou sy pasapose. Se hee ection tes ec oe wat yl, Casansh Lip Listed aud used ignicaiong bbe dapnbtdion, Coubaied. Jan bee —hodube Aeedpe D Oud Cam Jue > _— : : Wally pubuided dy Sectibur 2. & AW sectag 5b The Lncgluenty amo Boudupr ouy Code 2016 apt a ‘akalea ‘ Beuo Asan a “betulh of, te adjudicating ‘ath. ( Excuse) in “He Miu Wages hd aoe a Sub - =a de. Indtupuotation Uae “ales . * Fou tag psp of dig wkuy polleuits Lndustu, Jyduids die mamuackuie 6, op Bak plate auckiclsa of pot hela "(a ©) Ttnations : * Te ae nad uck: pauided ay tig degulatase Gnd alie Valuolle, Sun wadeust “ua ek antling disal scope, o ae esp a fatal oh aug Aectlion oh a paudioulon ap chucidads the papa 54 He ection. eq in dhe Dadian nto bok 112. Lubaboabiou, bane perouiced dln Seotion, ¥ (Commuuication — | wa Compre) 2- al A pup uy tll te Sed a. howe 49 Baba ee Ceoukowin Puke, fe comnunicolibr 64 He puspsoat 2 cOuplete when B ucts th, OcHelo 7 df tuwudgg + x > ee ¥) Clause Lay wiih a condition is dvkupduced Ou, [Ati palate: Cacuid oud an exc bion Ou exclu Jo Abe main puouiion. : ¥) Clam added to the Atatute Le accep h foneladig peuste Lit its applicaliliby. —_ ¥{Sualify something ou SO exclude Ovnitniig [Eq Tn the Insolugu, aid Bankuruyek cade, 2016, sdotion Ws) had « Pipes + “Pubuided thot the Cortual Goumunrwunt by + wea wotification Afcrity the Wii Quynounk Of depault ¢1, Lighen value whiter shall wot Jue bac tam One uous Lusppeed. " WH REI Td! CATA: Te ducision in dhe iacumstounces ds ival. Luindivg awa without appiale Decikions Of Sine Count ais wot only ive du the pauticy Lust ast fival , dm tHe _Aunrse thak yy Count We weppenud Ly tae pouties. KH EsTopPer: A_joauty that has acquiesed du a poutiokase dituation cauuet then foud cud to dasenge Jt. Tmpoutamu of Statutes 1. Resolution of legal problems: It enables society resolve legal problems as and when they arise by enacting new statutes or amending those in existence, 2. Dynamism: enable society keep pace with changes in other spheres e.g, economic, political etc 3. Democratic: it is made by representatives of the people and is therefore democratic. 4. General application: consists of general principles applicable at different times. 5, Uniformity: regulates the conduct and activities of all indiscriminately. 6. Superiority: it prevails over all other sources of law other than the Constitution 7. Publicity: it is the most widely published source of law.

You might also like