Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enc1102 rr2 2
Enc1102 rr2 2
Enc1102 rr2 2
Clover Dolph
Nikolas Gardiakos
ENC1102
Reading Response #2
“All texts are interdependent: We understand a text only insofar as we understand its precursors”
(34). What I've understood from Porter’s explanation is that all text builds upon itself. No text is
completely separate from texts that have come before it or as Porter says, “no text escapes
intertext” (34). They leave what he calls “traces” behind. They are references to previous texts
not only in the form of citations but in language, style, or culture for example.
presupposition” (35). Iterability refers “to citation in its broadest sense to include not only
explicit allusions, references, and quotations within a discourse, but also unannounced sources
and influences, cliches, phrases in the air, and traditions” (35). From my understanding,
iterability can be a classic movie cliche appearing in a script or idioms like to “eat crow,” or “hit
the hay” among other things. Porter explains “Presupposition refers to assumptions a text makes
about its referent, its readers, and its context-to portions of the text which are read, but which are
not explicitly ‘there’” (35). Presuppositions are things a reader has to assume to understand the
text. An example much like Porter’s being: if I wrote the sentence “I’m going to the store to buy
chocolate milk” the reader must assume that “I” refers to someone, the store exists and sells
chocolate milk, that milk comes chocolate flavored. The reader presupposes these things to
Depending on the audience of the text, what is iterabled and presumed changes. An
example of this being different interpretations of the movie “The Matrix.” I attended a catholic
highschool where I was taught that “The Matrix” was an allegory for Christianity and that Neo,
the protagonist, was allegorically Jesus Christ. After a journey of my own self discovery I was
introduced to the idea of this movie being a transgender allegory. Discourse communities make
up these different groups of people with differing interpretations. Discourse communities are
communities of people with similar goals and ways of communicating, genres and lexis that they
use to communicate, and experts in the community (Hemstrom 186). Porter says “Authorial
intention is less significant than social context; the writer is simply a part of a discourse tradition,
of a team, and a participant in a community of discourse that creates its own collective meaning”
(35). Discourse communities create the iterability and pressumability of a text. The background
of the readers brings context to a work. The discourse communities they belong to bring context.
Community.” The infinite amount of presuppositions found in any work are also evident here.
The reader must presume that an audience and rhetor exist. They must presume that the
declaration of independence exists. More importantly, the interability is shown in his quotation
of Vygotsky, in his reference to ethos and logos, in his examples of The declaration of
independence (Porter 35). His work has “traces” of previous texts left behind in every sentence.
Porter may not be an “autonomous individual” and his work not “original” but his writing is
successful and creative. “Successful writing helps to redefine the matrix-and in that way
Porter’s ideas of intertextuality and discourse communities fall completely in line with
my experiences. Every piece of media I have consumed has been through the lenses of the
discourse communities I belong to and with “traces” of other texts within them. “The Matrix”
has references to biblical names and places. The “Percy Jackson” book series has references to
the Greek gods and goddesses. My favorite book series, “The Locked Tomb” series, references
silly tumblr jokes from ten years ago. A youtuber I like used the “unsourced” updog joke in an
old video.
Dolph 4
Works Cited
Porter, James E. “Intertextuality and the Discourse Community.” Rhetoric review 5.1 (1986):
34–47. Web.
Hemstrom, Cassie, and Kathy Anders. “Creating, Using, and Sharing Information in Research
Communities.” Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing, Edited by Dana Driscoll et al., vol. 4, 7