Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 2 RPH Who Is The Filipino
Chapter 2 RPH Who Is The Filipino
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
This chapter emphasizes the relevance of Philippine Heritage and Culture. It focuses on
appreciating the cultural way of life of the Filipinos in Ancient Times and its growth through time.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1. Express appreciation of the legacy of Philippine heritage
2. Compare and contrast the cultural way of life of the Philippines in Ancient Times and today’s modern
times
Lesson Outline
“NingasKugon”
“Ningas” is a Filipino term for flame and “Kugon” is a Filipino term for cogon grass that easily
burns out after it is put into flames. Ningaskugon refers to the attitude of eagerly starting things but quickly
losing eagerness soon after experiencing difficulty, just like how fast the fire of a cogon grass burns out
moments after being ignited. Laziness is a common problem among Filipinos; that is why Filipinos
regarded as “Juan Tamad” or lazy Juan.
Pride
Most Filipinos hold on to their pride as if they are more precious than keeping a good relationship
with family and loved ones. When two parties are not in good terms, they find it so hard to apologize and
wait until the other partyasks for an apology first.
Crab Mentality
This is a toxic trait among Filipinos where one resents the achievements of another, instead of
feeling happy for that person. Just like crabs in a container they pull each other down and ruin each
other’s reputation rather than bringing them up, resulting to no progress. Filipino should change this
troublesome attitude and focus more on their own inadequacies to improve one’s self.
Filipino Time
Filipinos have this common attitude of arriving late at commitments, dinner, or parties especially if
they are meeting someone close to them. They tend to not observe punctuality altogether. The 7:00 pm
call time becomes adjusted to 7:30 pm, and almost everyone arrives at the same time because everyone
is using Filipino time.
LESSON 2: THE EARLY FILIPINOS
Many historians and scientists believe that the first inhabitants of the Philippine islands emerged
during the Pleistocene period. There are two theories on where the inhabitants (first Filipino) came from
namely: Beyer’s “Migration theory” and Jocano’s “Evolution theory”. Noted social scientist Henry Otley
Beyer believes that Filipinos descended from different groups that came from Southeast Asia in
successive waves of migration. Each group had a distinct culture, withits own customs and traditions.
While Jocano believes that Asians, including Filipinos are the result of a lengthy process of evolution and
migration.
Migration Theory
The first migrant were what Beyer caked the “Dawnmen” ( or cavemen” because they live in
caves). The dawnmen resembled Java Man, Peking Man and other Asian Home sapiens who existed
about 250,000 years ago. They did not have any knowledge of agriculture, and lived by hunting and
fishing. It was precisely in search of food that they came to the Philippines by way of the land bridges that
connected the Philippines and Indonesia. Owing perhaps to their migratory nature, they eventually left the
Philippines for destination unknown.
The second group of migrants was composed of dark skinned pygmies called “Aetas” or
“Negritoes”. About 30,000 years ago they crossed the land bridged from Malaya, Borneo and Australia
until they reached Palawan, Mindoro and Mindanao. They are pygmies who went around practically
naked and were good at hunting, fishing and food gathering. They used spears and small flint stones
weapons. The Aetas were already in the Philippines when the land bridges disappeared due to the
thinning of the ice glaciers and the subsequent increase in seawater level. This natural events “forced”
them to remain in the country and become its first permanent inhabitants.
Because of the disappearance of the land bridges the third wave of migrants was necessarily
skilled in seafaring. These were the Indonesianswho came to the islands in boat, they were more
advanced than the Aetas that they had tools made out of stone and steel. Which enabled them to build
sturdier houses, they engaged in farming and mining, and used materials made of brass; they wore
clothing and other body ornaments.
Last to migrate to the Philippines according to Beyer were Malays. They were believed to have
come from Java, Sumatra, Borneo and the Malay Peninsula more than 2,000 years ago. Like the
Indonesians they also traveled in boats. The Malay were brown-skinned and of medium height, with
straight black hair and flat noses. Their technology was said to be more advanced than that of their
predecessors, they engaged in pottery, weaving, jewelry making and metal smelting, and introduced the
irrigation system in rice planting.
Jocano’s Theory
Renowned Filipino anthropologist Felipe LandaJocano disputes Beyer’s belief that Filipinos
descended from Negritoes and Malays who migrated in the Philippines thousands of years ago.
According to Jocano, it is difficult to prove that Negritoes were the first inhabitants of this country. The
only thing that can positively concluded from fossil evidence, he says that the first men who came to the
Philippines also went to New Guinea, Java, Borneo and Australia.
Social, Economic and Political Life of Early Filipinos
Economic life
Early Filipinos primarily engaged in the following economic activities: farming, fishing, poultryand swine
raising, gold mining and trade agricultural activities among early Filipinos had an early beginning. The
people first used the slash-and burn method of planting rice. Later they adopted wet agriculture. The
slash-and-burn methods was common in the interior and high coastal areaswhile wet agriculture was
practiced in the lowlands. During the planting season, the early Filipinos performed certain rituals to
ensure a bountiful harvest work in the fields also followed the changes in season. The methods used in
wet agriculture are similar to what is being done in the rural areas today. Other crops being raised aside
from rice were millet, bananas, sweet potato or camote, areca nuts, oil, cotton, wine and vinegar and
coconuts. Abaca was raised and its fibers were gathered and made into ropes of fabrics.
Social Life
The family was, as it still is today, the smallest but the most significant unit of ancient society. The father
and mother were accorded complete obedience and respect by the children. The father was the head of
the family while the mother managed household affairs. The early Filipinos had close family ties. There
were four social classes in ancient Filipino society: the chiefs, nobles, freemen and the slaves. The datu
or the cheif headed a barangay or community. His family, relatives and elders belonged to the
maginooclass group of nobles. The freemen or middle class belong to the timawa o maharlika group. Men
who were born free or were freed from slavery composed the lowest social class because they had no
property and were under control of their master. A Filipino could become a slave through birth, in ability to
pay debts, purchase, punishment for crimes or being held captive in war. Slaves were on of two
kinds:alipingnamamahay at alipingsaguguilid. The alipingnamamahay enjoyed certain privileges such as
the right to own property, and the right to work for any master. The alipingsaguguilid did not enjoy right
and freedom at all. Women occupied a high position in early society. They were regarded as equals of
men and were given this same respect conferred upon the men. The mother of the family had the honor
of naming the children.
Political Life
The Barangay the weakest side of the culture of the early Fiipinos was their political and social
organization, and they were weak here in precisely the same way that the now uncivilized peoples of
Northern Luzon are still weak. Their state did not embrace the whole tribe or nation; included simply the
community there were in the Philippines no large states, nor even great rajas and sultan such as were
found in the Malay Archipelago, but instead on every island were a multitude of small communities, each
independent of the other and frequently waging war. The unit of their political order was a little cluster of
houses of from thirty to one hundred families, called a “barangay” which still exist in the Philippines as the
“barrio” at the head of each barangay was a chief known as the “dato” a word no longer used in the
northern Philippines, though it persist among the Moro of Mindanao. The power of this datos within their
small areas appear to have been great and they were treated with utmost respect by the people. The
barangay were grouped together in tiny federations including about as much territory as the present
towns, whose affairs were conducted by the chiefs or datos although sometimes the same to have all
been in obedience to single chief, known in some places as the “hari” at other times by the hindu word
“raja’ or the Mohammedan term “sultan” sometimes the power of one of these rajas seems to have
extended over the whole of a small island, but usually their “kingdoms” embraced only a few miles.
SYNTHESIS
In this chapter, you will learn that an individual’s race, ethnicity and physical characteristics are
not the only factors that make a person’s national identity. Values and traits are also important indicators
that set apart one nationality from the other. These values and traits may not always be a positive thing,
but being able to identify one’s self apart from other nationalities and point out weaknesses and mistakes
paired with unity and commitment, make progress a possibility. Through common goals, principles, and
values of its people a nation empower itself.
REFERENCES:
Agoncillo, Teodoro. History of the Filipino People, (2010). C&E Publishing, Inc. Quezon City.