Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

lOMoARcPSD|19658276

(1) Lesson 1 (Rizal Law)

BS Civil Engineering (Batangas State University)

Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university


Downloaded by Mirajoy Tardio (miranggtardio@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|19658276

THE CONTEXT OF RIZAL BILL OPPOSITIONS

• Sen. Claro M. Recto – the main proponent of • Catholic Action of the PH


the Rizal Bill. • Congregation of the Mission
• Sen. Jose P. Laurel – the head of the Senate • Knights of Columbus
committee on education. • Catholic Teachers Guild
• The Church accused Recto of being a
communist and anti-Catholic. They believed WHAT DID THEY DO TO OPPOSE?
that mandating students to read Rizal’s novels
Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, would • Notable action taken by the Catholic Church to
violate the freedom of conscience and religion. oppose the passing of the bill into law:
In an attempt to block the passing of the bill into o Publishing a pastoral letter written by
law, the Church urged their supporters to write then Archbishop of Manila, Rufino
to their congressmen and senators to show Santos.
their opposition to the bill. Fortifying their o Stated that Catholic students would be
opposition, the Church organized symposiums affected if compulsory reading of the
and fora to denounce the approval of the said unexpurgated version would push
bill. through. It was read in all the masses
• Fr. Jesus Cavanna – a staunch oppositionist that were celebrated in the Diocese of
of the bill, argued that the novels belonged to Manila.
the past and that teaching them would • One oppositionist to the bill said that Rizal
misinterpret the current conditions of the PH. attacked dogmas, beliefs, and practices of the
• Jesus Paredes – Radio Veritas commentator, Church.
said that Catholics had the right to refuse to • Cuenco, another staunch oppositionist,
read the novels as it would endanger their highlighted Rizal’s denial of the existence of
salvation. purgatory, as it was not found in the bible, and
that Moses and Jesus Christ did not mention its
NOTABLE PERSONS WHO SUPPORT ITS existence. These, among other reasons, were
APPROVAL BILL emphasized in debates inside the Senate.
• Outside the Senate, a rumor had spread that
• Veteranos de la Revolucion the Catholic Schools threatened to close down
• (Spirit of 1896) if the bill was passed. Recto refused to believe
• Alagad ni Rizal the possibility of such threat because schools
• The Freemasons would lose profit if they closed.
• Knights of Rizal

INTENTIONS/REASONS FOR PUSHING ITS COMPROMISATIONS


APPROVAL
• Given these debated, whether to pass the bill or
not, it was suggested that a compromise be
✓ There is a need for rededication to the ideals of made to appease those who opposed the bill. It
freedom and nationalism for which our heroes was then agreed that the expurgated versions
lived and died. of Rizal’s novel would be used.
✓ There is a need to remember with special
fondness and devotion the lives and works of • Recto, who had supported the required reading
our heroes who shaped the national character. of the unexpurgated versions, declared: “The
✓ The life, works and writings of Dr. Jose Rizal, people who would eliminate the books of Rizal
particularly, his novels Noli me Tangere and El from the schools would blot out from our minds
Filibusterismo are constant and inspiring the memory of the national hero. This is not a
source of patriotism with which the minds of the fight against Recto but a fight against Rizal”,
youth, especially during their formative years in adding that since Rizal is dead, they are
school, should be suffused. attempting to suppress his memory.
✓ There is a need to develop moral character,
personal discipline, civic conscience and to
teach the duties of citizenship.

Downloaded by Mirajoy Tardio (miranggtardio@gmail.com)


lOMoARcPSD|19658276

PASSING INTO LAW

• June 12, 1956 – is when the Congress passed


Rizal Bill (SB 438) and was signed into Rizal
Law (RA 1425) by President Ramon
Magsaysay.
• May 17, 1956 – the bill, with the compromise
inserted by Laurel, was approved unanimously.
The bill specified that only college students
would have the option to read the unexpurgated
versions of the clerically-contested reading
materials. There was also an amendment made
to the original bill that included the teaching of
Rizal’s other works, aside from the two novels.
Despite all the controversies, arguments, and
opposition against the Rizal Bill, it was finally
enacted on June 12, 1956.

SALIENT POINTS OF RIZAL LAW

• Courses on the life, works and writings of Dr,


Jose Rizal, particularly, his novels Noli me
Tangere and El Filibusterismo, shall be
included in the curricula of all schools, colleges
and universities, public and private
• It obliged all schools, colleges, and universities
to keep in their libraries adequate number of
copies of the original or unexpurgated editions
of the Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo as
well as Rizal’s other works and biography
• It authorized and directed the Board of National
Education to work for the translation of Noli me
Tangere and El Filibusterismo as well as other
writings of Dr. Jose Rizal into English, Tagalog,
and other principal dialects and their printing in
cheap or popular editions and their circulation.

TEACHING OF RIZAL COURSE IN COLLEGE

• Scholars and academicians are one in saying


that a mandated course on Rizal is as helpful
as any other course that teaches values that a
student may carry for the rest of his/ her life.
• Studying Rizal in the 21st century helps student
make sense of the present by looking back at
the past.
o For instance, Rizal’s illustrations of 19th
century PH may aid today’s generation
in recognizing the ills of present-day
PH.
• With students exposed to many foreign
influences, studying Rizal may remind and urge
them to understand the real essence of being a
Filipino. Significant historical figures like Rizal
help the younger generation navigate Philippine
History and understand why being aware of
social issues are important in the formation of
one’s national identity.

Downloaded by Mirajoy Tardio (miranggtardio@gmail.com)

You might also like