The document summarizes the context and passage of the Rizal Law in the Philippines in 1956. It describes the opposition from the Catholic Church who believed requiring students to read Rizal's novels would violate freedom of conscience. A compromise was reached to use expurgated versions. On June 12, 1956 the bill was passed into law, requiring teachings about Rizal in all schools and universities. Scholars say studying Rizal helps students understand Philippine history and form their national identity.
Original Description:
Original Title
Different Perspective on the Study of Rizal's Life (Reference)
The document summarizes the context and passage of the Rizal Law in the Philippines in 1956. It describes the opposition from the Catholic Church who believed requiring students to read Rizal's novels would violate freedom of conscience. A compromise was reached to use expurgated versions. On June 12, 1956 the bill was passed into law, requiring teachings about Rizal in all schools and universities. Scholars say studying Rizal helps students understand Philippine history and form their national identity.
The document summarizes the context and passage of the Rizal Law in the Philippines in 1956. It describes the opposition from the Catholic Church who believed requiring students to read Rizal's novels would violate freedom of conscience. A compromise was reached to use expurgated versions. On June 12, 1956 the bill was passed into law, requiring teachings about Rizal in all schools and universities. Scholars say studying Rizal helps students understand Philippine history and form their national identity.
Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by Mirajoy Tardio (miranggtardio@gmail.com) lOMoARcPSD|19658276
THE CONTEXT OF RIZAL BILL OPPOSITIONS
• Sen. Claro M. Recto – the main proponent of • Catholic Action of the PH
the Rizal Bill. • Congregation of the Mission • Sen. Jose P. Laurel – the head of the Senate • Knights of Columbus committee on education. • Catholic Teachers Guild • The Church accused Recto of being a communist and anti-Catholic. They believed WHAT DID THEY DO TO OPPOSE? that mandating students to read Rizal’s novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, would • Notable action taken by the Catholic Church to violate the freedom of conscience and religion. oppose the passing of the bill into law: In an attempt to block the passing of the bill into o Publishing a pastoral letter written by law, the Church urged their supporters to write then Archbishop of Manila, Rufino to their congressmen and senators to show Santos. their opposition to the bill. Fortifying their o Stated that Catholic students would be opposition, the Church organized symposiums affected if compulsory reading of the and fora to denounce the approval of the said unexpurgated version would push bill. through. It was read in all the masses • Fr. Jesus Cavanna – a staunch oppositionist that were celebrated in the Diocese of of the bill, argued that the novels belonged to Manila. the past and that teaching them would • One oppositionist to the bill said that Rizal misinterpret the current conditions of the PH. attacked dogmas, beliefs, and practices of the • Jesus Paredes – Radio Veritas commentator, Church. said that Catholics had the right to refuse to • Cuenco, another staunch oppositionist, read the novels as it would endanger their highlighted Rizal’s denial of the existence of salvation. purgatory, as it was not found in the bible, and that Moses and Jesus Christ did not mention its NOTABLE PERSONS WHO SUPPORT ITS existence. These, among other reasons, were APPROVAL BILL emphasized in debates inside the Senate. • Outside the Senate, a rumor had spread that • Veteranos de la Revolucion the Catholic Schools threatened to close down • (Spirit of 1896) if the bill was passed. Recto refused to believe • Alagad ni Rizal the possibility of such threat because schools • The Freemasons would lose profit if they closed. • Knights of Rizal
INTENTIONS/REASONS FOR PUSHING ITS COMPROMISATIONS
APPROVAL • Given these debated, whether to pass the bill or not, it was suggested that a compromise be ✓ There is a need for rededication to the ideals of made to appease those who opposed the bill. It freedom and nationalism for which our heroes was then agreed that the expurgated versions lived and died. of Rizal’s novel would be used. ✓ There is a need to remember with special fondness and devotion the lives and works of • Recto, who had supported the required reading our heroes who shaped the national character. of the unexpurgated versions, declared: “The ✓ The life, works and writings of Dr. Jose Rizal, people who would eliminate the books of Rizal particularly, his novels Noli me Tangere and El from the schools would blot out from our minds Filibusterismo are constant and inspiring the memory of the national hero. This is not a source of patriotism with which the minds of the fight against Recto but a fight against Rizal”, youth, especially during their formative years in adding that since Rizal is dead, they are school, should be suffused. attempting to suppress his memory. ✓ There is a need to develop moral character, personal discipline, civic conscience and to teach the duties of citizenship.
Downloaded by Mirajoy Tardio (miranggtardio@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|19658276
PASSING INTO LAW
• June 12, 1956 – is when the Congress passed
Rizal Bill (SB 438) and was signed into Rizal Law (RA 1425) by President Ramon Magsaysay. • May 17, 1956 – the bill, with the compromise inserted by Laurel, was approved unanimously. The bill specified that only college students would have the option to read the unexpurgated versions of the clerically-contested reading materials. There was also an amendment made to the original bill that included the teaching of Rizal’s other works, aside from the two novels. Despite all the controversies, arguments, and opposition against the Rizal Bill, it was finally enacted on June 12, 1956.
SALIENT POINTS OF RIZAL LAW
• Courses on the life, works and writings of Dr,
Jose Rizal, particularly, his novels Noli me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, shall be included in the curricula of all schools, colleges and universities, public and private • It obliged all schools, colleges, and universities to keep in their libraries adequate number of copies of the original or unexpurgated editions of the Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo as well as Rizal’s other works and biography • It authorized and directed the Board of National Education to work for the translation of Noli me Tangere and El Filibusterismo as well as other writings of Dr. Jose Rizal into English, Tagalog, and other principal dialects and their printing in cheap or popular editions and their circulation.
TEACHING OF RIZAL COURSE IN COLLEGE
• Scholars and academicians are one in saying
that a mandated course on Rizal is as helpful as any other course that teaches values that a student may carry for the rest of his/ her life. • Studying Rizal in the 21st century helps student make sense of the present by looking back at the past. o For instance, Rizal’s illustrations of 19th century PH may aid today’s generation in recognizing the ills of present-day PH. • With students exposed to many foreign influences, studying Rizal may remind and urge them to understand the real essence of being a Filipino. Significant historical figures like Rizal help the younger generation navigate Philippine History and understand why being aware of social issues are important in the formation of one’s national identity.
Downloaded by Mirajoy Tardio (miranggtardio@gmail.com)