Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The 1987 Constitution Reaction Paper
The 1987 Constitution Reaction Paper
A REACTION PAPER
In the Subject
To be Submitted to
Submitted by
Many of the rules from the Marcos administration that had long oppressed the populace were
repealed when Aquino became administration. She unilaterally proclaimed the creation of a provisional
constitution in March. Despite the fact that this constitution gave the President considerable power and
responsibility, Aquino pledged to only use it to establish democracy again under a new constitution. A 48-
member appointed Constitutional Commission produced this new constitution in 133 days, and on
February 2, 1987, a popular election was held to implement it. The 1935 Constitution was heavily
modeled after the American Constitution, but it also included elements of Roman, Spanish, and Anglo
law.
Then, as President Corazon "Cory" Aquino was in her term The 1987 Constitution was approved
by the 1986 Constitutional Commission on October 12, 1986, and the 1987 Constitution of the Republic of
the Philippines was presented to her on October 15, 1986. It was ratified on February 2, 1987, by a
plebiscite. It was proclaimed in force on February 11, 1987. Wherein, the 1987 Constitution established a
representative democracy with the executive, a bicameral legislature, and the judiciary as the three
distinct and independent parts of government. The Commission on Audit, the Civil Service Commission,
and the Commission on Elections were three more independent constitutional commissions. Wherein, the
Civil Service Commission oversees government personnel as a central agency. To guarantee that
elections are fair and free for all participants, the Commission on Elections oversees and enforces all
election laws and rules. All finances, transactions, and property accounts of the government and its
agencies are lastly examined by the Commission on Audit. To ensure impartial decision-making, each of
these commissions is granted governance and budgetary independence from the other parts of
government. The Supreme Court has the authority to examine each decision made by these
commissions. In addition, the Constitution also establishes an Office of the Ombudsman to investigate
complaints of public corruption, improper conduct by public officials, and other forms of public
misconduct, further ensuring the moral and legal operation of the government. In this, can then charge
such misbehaving public officials before a special court called the Sandiganbayan.
But under this Constitution of 1987, problems and difficulties appeared. And these are the
problems: spreading growth, de-concentration of power, minority rights, economic progress. The
difficulties that our organization face as a result of these problems included the following: corruption,
unsatisfactory law enforcement, a broken justice system, a lack of transparency and accountability in
public office, polarization between the wealthy and the poor, a lack of real protection for the human rights
of vulnerable groups (women, children, minorities, journalists, political activists), military involvement in
In addition, The 1987 Constitution, according to Robert Aura Smith, emphasizes Article III—the
Bill of Rights, which establishes the connection between the individual and the state and defines the
individual's rights by restricting the legal authority of the state. It is among the most important political
accomplishments of the Filipino people. The main idea behind the Bill of Rights is that the rights of every
human being must be protected, preserved, and safeguarded through the recognized procedures for
establishing constitutional law, not through the authority of an individual, membership in a particular group
I've discovered that as time and administration pass, the 1987 Constitution develops its own
undesirable act. This constitution is thought to be the pinnacle of Philippine democracy. The development
of a country into a democratic-republican state is significantly influenced by its relationship to its charter.
And a nation will be at a high level of democratic maturity if it sincerely regards its constitution as a
guiding principle and as an existential manual for political life. Furthermore, even if the Consultative
Committee completes its proposal on time, the constitutional reform may not be implemented this year.
Constitutional obstacles may cause the process to stall, even with the support of both chambers of
Congress.
But my perspective as a student now focuses on the Bill of Rights' contributions to protecting
each person's right to freedom, including the opportunity to practice one's own religion, freely express
one's ideas and opinions, have a jury trial, and, most significantly, uphold the rights of individuals and
states. This is a crucial protection for us as humans because there are many who have been mistreated
and ignored due to a lack of fundamental human rights. To be good citizens, or even members of a
community, and to fully grasp our rights, we should exercise our rights while also carrying out our
obligations. These two can never be apart from one another and must always be together. You have a
responsibility to protect yourself from harm and danger if you have the right to life.
In conclusion, I learned that, despite the preamble being essentially an introduction to the
objective of the constitution, it is dominant, not only for those students who wish to study law but also for
a non-law student. Because that is where our government should function, it is crucial to recognize that it
also plays a significant part in our constitution. They base their choice on this principle: if a constitution's
story is unclear, they look to the preamble for clarification. I also notice that each phrase or clause in the
Preamble has a distinct meaning. Finally, by enforcing this constitutional right for present as well as future
generations, we can effectively support one another's development without feeling constrained by the
existence of fundamental rights or by the notion that these rights exist merely to preserve and protect us.
We must also keep in mind that, for us as Filipino citizens, rights are accompanied by obligations, as if
they were the two halves of a coin. The reason for this is that whereas obligations without rights would
https://constitutionnet.org/country/philippines
Yusingco, M.H. (2018). What’s wrong with the 1987 Constitution? INQUIRER.NET. Retrieved from:
https://opinion.inquirer.net/112867/whats-wrong-1987-constitution
CDAsia (Ratified from 1987). The Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. Official Gazette.
Retrieved from:
https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/