Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assoc Legendre
Assoc Legendre
The associated Legendre functions (these are not polynomials, as we will see below)
are solutions to the associated Legendre equation, and they appear in physics problems
whenever the Laplace equation or the Helmhotz equation is separated in spherical polar
coordinates. To study these functions we will follow a path which is in contrast to the
conventional path. We will first define the Associated Legendre Functions and then show
that they satisfy the associated Legendre equation.
It is clear from the above that the maximum value of m is ℓ. It is also clear that if m is an
odd integer, then Pℓm (x) is not a polynomial. We will determine the differential equation
for Pℓm (x) in the following.
We notice that,
D0 (1 − x2 ) = (1 − x2 ) D0 (−2x) = −2x
D1 (1 − x2 ) = −2x D1 (−2x) = −2
D2 (1 − x2 ) = −2 D2 (−2x) = 0
D3 (1 − x2 ) = 0
Although the Frobenius method can be used to find the series form of the solution, but
it is not very useful. We skip that discussion. You may refer to the book (Arfken) if you
are interested.
The upper index can be negative also. We observe that, if we replace m by −m, the
equation does not change at all! This implies that Pℓm (x) and Pℓ−m (x) are not linearly
independent, i.e. these are basically one solution. But conventional wisdom demands
that we use a multiplicative constant to differentiate between the two. So we write
where the constant Cℓ,m is a matter of convention. We will decide about this constant af-
ter we have agreed upon some normalisation factor for Pℓm (x). This we do in the following.
This equation emerges when we solve the Laplace equation or the Helmhotz equation in
spherical polar coordinates. If we change the variable to x = cos θ, then the associated
Legendre equation becomes
1 d dPℓm (cos θ) m2
sin θ + ℓ(ℓ + 1) − P m (cos θ) = 0
sin θ dθ dθ sin2 θ ℓ
We will come back to this equation later in this chapter.
1
X
ℓ+m
(ℓ + m)! h i h i
Pℓm (x) = ℓ (1 − x2 )m/2 Dp (x + 1)ℓ Dℓ+m−p (x − 1)ℓ
2 ℓ! p! (ℓ + m − p)!
p=0
Finally we get,
(−1)m/2 (ℓ + m)! ℓ!
X
ℓ
(x + 1)ℓ−p+m/2 (x − 1)p−m/2
Pℓm (x) =
2ℓ p! (ℓ + m − p)! (ℓ − p)! (p − m)!
p=m
1
X
ℓ−m
(ℓ − m)! h i h i
Pℓ−m (x) = ℓ (1 − x2 )−m/2 Dp (x + 1)ℓ Dℓ−m−p (x − 1)ℓ
2 ℓ! p! (ℓ − m − p)!
p=0
(−1)−m/2 (ℓ − m)! ℓ!
X
ℓ−m
(x + 1)ℓ−p−m/2 (x − 1)p+m/2
Pℓ−m (x) =
2ℓ p! (ℓ − m − p)! (ℓ − p)! (p + m)!
p=0
For a comparison with Pℓm (x), we change the summation index to r = p + m, to get
(−1)−m/2 (ℓ − m)! ℓ!
X
ℓ
(x + 1)ℓ−r+m/2 (x − 1)r−m/2
−m
Pℓ (x) =
2ℓ p! (ℓ + m − r)! (ℓ − r)! (r − m)!
r=m
Now comparing the expressions for Pℓm (x) and Pℓ−m (x), we get
(−1)m (ℓ − m)! m
Pℓ−m (x) = Pℓ (x)
(ℓ + m)!
So for a fixed ℓ, the range of m is −ℓ ≤ m ≤ ℓ.
m
h i−m− 12 ∞
X ∞
X
2 2 ℓ−m
Φm (x, t) = (2m − 1)!! (1 − x ) 2 1 − 2xt + t = t Pℓm (x) = tℓ Pℓ+m
m
(x)
ℓ=m ℓ=0
for |t| < 1. This is very useful in evaluating Pℓm (x) for special values of x and in obtaining
the Recursion relations as well as in determining the normalisation for Pℓm (x).
1.4 Special Values and Parity
It can be shown that, for even (odd) values of the sum (ℓ + m), Pℓm (x) have even (odd)
parity. The values of Pℓm (x) at the special values of x are given below.
ℓ+m m ℓ−m+1 m
RR-1 x Pℓm (x) = Pℓ−1 (x) + Pℓ+1 (x)
2ℓ + 1 2ℓ + 1
2mx h i
RR-2 Pℓm+1 (x) = P m
(x) − ℓ(ℓ + 1) − m(m + 1) Pℓm−1 (x)
(1 − x2 )1/2 ℓ
1
m+1 m+1
RR-3 Pℓ+1 (x) − Pℓ−1 (x) = (2ℓ + 1) (1 − x2 ) 2 Pℓm (x)
m+1 m+1
RR-4 Pℓ+1 (x) − Pℓ−1 (x)
m−1 m−1
= (ℓ + m)(ℓ + m − 1) Pℓ−1 (x) − (ℓ − m + 1)(ℓ − m + 2) Pℓ+1 (x)
1 dPℓm (x) 1 1
RR-5 (1 − x2 ) 2 = Pℓm+1 (x) − (ℓ + m)(ℓ − m + 1) Pℓm−1 (x)
dx 2 2
1 dPℓm (x) mx
RR-6 (1 − x2 ) 2 = m m−1
1 Pℓ (x) − (ℓ + m)(ℓ − m + 1) Pℓ (x)
dx 2
(1 − x ) 2
dPℓm (x) 1
RR-7 (1 − x2 ) = (1 − x2 ) 2 Pℓm+1 (x) − mx Pℓm (x)
dx
dPℓm (x)
RR-8 (1 − x2 ) m
= (ℓ + m) Pℓ−1 (x) − ℓx Pℓm (x)
dx
1
m
RR-9 (ℓ + m) Pℓ−1 (x) − (ℓ − m)x Pℓm (x) = (1 − x2 ) 2 Pℓm+1 (x)
Because of two indices, there are many possibilities. We have mentioned only a few of
them.
However, if we choose,
1
p(x) = (1 − x2 ), q(x) = ℓ(ℓ + 1), λ = −m2 , and w(x) =
1 − x2
we get another orthogonality equation, which is
Z 1
1
Pℓm (x) Pℓn (x) dx = Bℓm δmn
−1 1 − x2
In physics problems, as we will see later, only the first condition is useful. The second
orthogonality condition is just for mathematical curiosity. We will find the normalisation
constant only for the first condition. We proceed as follows.
1 h im− 12 X ∞
(n − 2m)! m
2 −m 2
(1 − x ) 2 1 − 2xt + t = tn Pn−m (x) (C)
(2m − 1)!! n=0
n!
XX ∞ ∞
1 (n − 2m)! m
2
= tℓ+n m
Pℓ+m (x) Pn−m (x)
1 − 2xt + t ℓ=0 n=0
n!
Integrating from −1 to 1 and using the orthogonality, one sum vanishes and ℓ + m =
n − m =⇒ n = ℓ + 2m. So we get
Z 1 X ∞ Z 1
dx ℓ!
2
= t2ℓ+2m m
Pℓ+m m
(x) Pℓ+m (x) dx
−1 1 − 2xt + t ℓ=0
(ℓ + 2m)! −1
The left-hand side can be evaluated in terms of the Legendre polynomials. After that,
expanding the left-hand-side in an infinite series, we have
∞
X X ∞ Z 1
2ℓ 2 ℓ!
t = t2ℓ+2m m
Pℓ+m m
(x) Pℓ+m (x) dx
ℓ=0
2ℓ + 1 ℓ=0
(ℓ + 2m)! −1
and comparing the two sides we can get the value of the integral. Finally
Z 1
2 (ℓ + m)!
Pℓm (x) Pℓm′ (x) dx = δℓ,ℓ′
−1 2ℓ + 1 (ℓ − m)!
The other orthonormality condition when the upper indices are different is not needed in
physics. Nevertheless, we write it without proof, which is
Z 1
1 (ℓ + m)!
Pℓm (x) Pℓn (x) 2
dx = δnm
−1 1−x m (ℓ − m)!
P1−1 (x) = −1
2
(1 − x2 )1/2 P1−1 (cos θ) = −1
2
sin θ
P2−1 (x) = −1
2
x(1 − x2 )1/2 P2−1 (cos θ) = −1
2
sin θ cos θ
This equation can be further separated into θ and φ dependence, with the result
1 d dΘ(θ) m2
sin θ + ℓ(ℓ + 1) − Θ(θ) = 0
sin θ dθ dθ sin2 θ
and
d2 Φ(φ)
+ m2 Φ(φ) = 0
dφ2
The solutions are
Φ(φ) = eimφ Θ(θ) = Pℓm (cos θ)
So Y(θ, φ) which is the product of Φ(φ) and Θ(θ) depends upon ℓ and m, and after
normalisation, can be written as,
s
m m 2ℓ + 1 (ℓ − m)! m imφ ℓ = 0, 1, 2, · · · ,
Yℓ (θ, φ) = (−1) Pℓ (cos θ) e ,
4π (ℓ + m)! −ℓ ≤ m ≤ ℓ
Here (−1)m is just an additional phase factor. Because of this additional factor, the parity
of Yℓm (θ, φ) is just (−1)ℓ , and more importantly,
h i∗
Yℓm (θ, φ) = (−1)m Yℓ−m (θ, φ)
These are called spherical harmonics. Since, eimφ as well as Pℓm (cos θ), both form separate
orthogonal sets, the spherical harmonics form an orthonormal set,
Z 2π Z π h i∗
dφ sin θ dθ Yℓm (θ, φ) Yℓn′ (θ, φ) = δℓ,ℓ′ δn,m
0 0
Because of their orthonormality, they can be used to expand any function of θ and φ as,
∞
X X ℓ Z 2π Z π h i∗
m
f (θ, φ) = aℓ,m Yℓ (θ, φ) with aℓ,m = dφ sin θ dθ f (θ, φ) Yℓm (θ, φ)
ℓ=0 m=−ℓ 0 0
The Laplace series for the Dirac delta function is the Closure relation for Yℓm (θ, φ),
ℓ
∞ X
X h i∗ 1
Yℓm (θ1 , φ1 ) Yℓm (θ2 , φ2 ) = δ(θ1 − θ2 ) δ(φ1 − φ2 )
ℓ=0 m=−ℓ
sin θ1
So for a particular ℓ, all the spherical harmonics can be generated from Yℓ0 (θ, φ).
1.9 Table of some lower order Yℓm (θ, φ):
r
1
Y00 (θ, φ) =
4π
r
3
Y11 (θ, φ) = − sin θ eiφ
8π
r
3
Y10 (θ, φ) = cos θ
4π
r
−1 3
Y1 (θ, φ) = + sin θ e−iφ
8π
r
15
2
Y2 (θ, φ) = + sin2 θ e2iφ
32π
r
15
Y21 (θ, φ) = − sin θ cos θ eiφ
8π
r
5
Y20 (θ, φ) = (3 cos2 θ − 1)
16π
r
15
Y2−1 (θ, φ) = + sin θ cos θ e−iφ
8π
r
15
Y2−2 (θ, φ) = + sin2 θ e−2iφ
32π
4π X m
ℓ h i∗
Yℓ (θ1 , φ1 ) Yℓm (θ2 , φ2 ) = Pℓ (cos γ)
2ℓ + 1 m=−ℓ
Here we reproduce a proof which is very simple and uses the symmetry of the spherical
harmonics under rotation. This proof is due to Prof. S.D. Joglekar.
We can expand the new set of functions Zℓm (θ′ , φ′ ) in terms of the old set of functions
Yℓm (θ, φ) because of the completeness property of the later,
ℓ
X
Zℓm (θ′ , φ′ ) = Rmn (θ, φ; θ′ , φ′ ) Yℓn (θ, φ)
n=−ℓ
The orthonormality of Zℓm (θ′ , φ′ ) and Yℓm (θ, φ) then imply that
X
∗
Rmn Rmp = δnp
m
i.e. the matrix R is a unitary matrix and the transformation from Yℓm (θ, φ) to Zℓm (θ′ , φ′ )
is a unitary transformation.
Therefore, the sum S is invariant under the rotation of the coordinate system about the
origin. So we can evaluate this sum with any choice of the coordinate axes. We choose
our z-axis to be along the vector r1 , so that θ1 = 0. Then
r
2ℓ + 1
Yℓm (θ1 , φ1 ) = Yℓm (0, φ1 ) = δm0
4π
[This can be proved very easily, because of the property of Pℓm (cos θ)]. Then
h i∗ r
2ℓ + 1 h 0 i∗
ℓ
X
S= Yℓm (θ1 , φ1 ) Yℓm (θ2 , φ2 ) = Yℓ (θ2 , φ2 )
m=−ℓ
4π
r r
2ℓ + 1 2ℓ + 1 2ℓ + 1
=⇒ S = Pℓ (cos θ2 ) = Pℓ (cos θ2 )
4π 4π 4π
But, since θ1 = 0, θ2 = γ, the angle between r1 and r2 . So
2ℓ + 1
S= Pℓ (cos γ)
4π
This proves the addition theorem. Since the left hand side is real, the complex conjugate
sign can be on any one of the spherical harmonics. Therefore,
ℓ
X h i∗ Xℓ h i∗ 2ℓ + 1
Yℓm (θ1 , φ1 ) Yℓm (θ2 , φ2 ) = Yℓm (θ2 , φ2 ) Yℓm (θ1 , φ1 ) = Pℓ (cos γ)
m=−ℓ m=−ℓ
4π
Xℓ 2 2ℓ + 1
m
Yℓ (θ, φ) =
m=−ℓ
4π
These are the so-called Gaunt factors. The integral vanishes unless
ℓ (−1)ℓ ℓ
Pℓℓ (x) = (2ℓ − 1)!! (1 − x ) 2 2 and Pℓ−ℓ (x) = (1 − x2 ) 2
(2ℓ)!!
A-Legendre 4 Evaluate
Z 1
(1 − x2 )1/2 Pℓ1 (x) dx
−1