Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 5
according to Ege hereof Was mad. Ow the intend d according to Eastern Bakery es Made before hearin on, rendiments, After all, the 'S. Casteling [Supraj:. 8 (Ook place in this case ‘And “amendments to plead : allowed, if they can pe S: so48ht before the hearin, "8 should be freely the other side: and © compensated with ca that there is: no injuenicr ae, Without injustice 19 y Other side can by injusti he injustice if the —SVAMALA GROWERS CO-OPERATIVE UNION. V. ATTORNEY GENERAL HCCS 1066/90 (23.3.97 AT KAMPALA) BEFORE: BAHIGEINE, J. Sale of goods — sale of future goods $.7(3) Sale of Goods Act —whether the sale was for future goods. Agreement to sell goods S.7(3) Sale of Goods Act — whether because it was an agreement to sell future goods there was no contract. Breach = damages - quantum. rt, { ommissioner for Veterinary Services d incealf Germany Friesians heifers. The plaintiff, in ndant asked them to pay Ugshs. This suit Scanned with CamScanner Scanned with CamScanner Scanned with CamScanner Scanned with CamScanner Scanned with CamScanner

You might also like