10:48 .
= Camp Hope Resolu... y Done
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-.
‘A Resolution expressing the City’s position supporting
the July 20" plan approved by the Mayor and City Council
President to rehouse the residents in the right of way and
against leading or supporting unauthorized actions to
remove unhoused individuals from Camp Hope.
WHEREAS, the Spokane City Council hes considered
the legal and policy implications of Spokane County's
threat to forcibly remove the campers and their habitation
located behind a perimeter fence on property owned by
the Washington State Department of Transportation
without first obtaining landowner consent or judicial order
issued after due process; and
WHEREAS, the State of Washington with the support
of the Governor, the Legislature, the Department of
Commerce, the Department of Transportation and the
State Patrol offered $24.5 million towards a Right of Way
(CROW) initiative to renouse individuals living within state
right of ways within Spokane County, especially Camp
Hope located within the City of Spokane; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Nadine Woodward and City
Council President Breean Beggs convened a stakeholder
group that included regional government officials and their
staff members along with consulting expertise from
homeless service providers to develop a proposal to
provide long term improved housing that Camp Hope
residents would voluntarily move to in order to facilitate the
permanent ciosing of Camp Hope: and
WHEREAS, on July 20, 2022, after providing review
and commenting opportunities to stakeholders and
‘oxperts, Mayor Woodward and Council Prosidont Beggs
signed a letter with an attached plan that would create up
to 1,447 housing units at an estimated cost of
$34,483,000; and
WHEREAS, the proposed plan would leverage
millions of additional investment dollars to permanently
provide appropriate housing and services to the individual
needs of the remaining residents of Camp Hope along
with hundreds of other houseless individuals camping
within Spokane County; and,10:48 al ee
= Camp Hope Resolu... » Done
WHEREAS, Article | Section 7 of the Washington
Siate Constitution and the Fourth Amendment of the
United States Constitution protect individuals from seizure
of their person or effects within their residential habitation
without their consent or a judicial order issued after due
process; and
WHEREAS, Washington State laws regarding
nuisance prohibit government action to abate alleged
nuisances without due process and a prior judicial order or
consent of the property owner; and
WHEREAS, the Ninth Circuit has held in Martin v, City
of Boise, 920 F.3d 584, 589 (9th Cit. 2019) that it is
unconstitutional to punish someone simply for sleeping
somewhere in public if the person has nowhere else to do
so, and the City has enacted ordinances that require
adequete low-barrier shelter beds before issuing criminal
citations to homeless individuals, except with regard to
certain time and piace restrictions; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Sheriff has
threatened to seize and remove homeless and cisabled
residents of a fenced property owned by the Stato of
Washington, potentially subjecting them to arrest and
displacement without confirming that he will first obtain
consent from the property owner and without a judicial
order authorizing such seizures and removals; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Sheriff has
requested the assistance of the City of Spokane and its
employees to accomplish his goals regarding the removal
of residents and their habitation; and
WHEREAS, the deployment of law enforcement to
sweep the camp subverts the crucial mission of
addressing homeless in Spokane and undermines months
of work by stakeholders to assist and relocate camp
residents to permanent housing in order to legally close
‘Camp Hope: and
WHEREAS, the use of law enforcement for such a
purpose jeopardizes beth the City’s July 20” commitment
to work collaboratively with the State and its continued
cofforts to secure funding to address homelessness in tho
City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has grave concerns that
participation in the Sheriff's requests could imperil City of
‘Spokane poiice officers, placing them in the dangerous10:48 al ee
Camp Hope Resolu... y Done
WHEREAS, the City Council has grave concerns that
participation in the Sheriffs requests could imperil City of
‘Spokane poiice officers, placing them in the dangerous
position of displacing homeless persons without clear legal
authority. This unnecessarily risks law enforcement
interactions with vulnerable individuals, including disabled
and/or mentally ill persons, and places those individuals
and City officers at great risk; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane socks to protect its
employees from unnecessary involvement in a non-
criminal operation that could resutt in the use of physical
force and injury upon homeless campers who have been
receiving coordinated and State-sanctioned services and
where the City’s interest in forcibly tearing down this
operation without providing an appropriate zlternative for
shelter or housing is low; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City
of Spokane strongly supports the July 20" plan signed by
its Mayor and Council President and the efforts of the
State of Washington through its State Patrol and
Departments of Commerce and Transportation and their
respective contractors to promptly and effectively
implement it so that residents of Camp Hope can be
permanently rehoused with appropriate services and the
neighborhood residents and businesses can retum to
normal
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the City of Spokane
‘expressly disapproves of any actions to undermine the
Slate's efforts to assist homeless individuals at the camp
or actions that provide material support to remove
unhoused individuals and/or their habitation from any
fenced property without the prior approval of, or
coordination with, WSDOT or absent a judicial order.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the City of Spokane
strongly condemns any efforts to entangle City employees,
in law enforcement or other operations to decommission
the camp which are unsupported by judicial authority, as
this could potentially run afoul of various rights and
interests claimed by campers at the WSDOT right-of-way
and could result in legal risk to the City and its employees.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that it is the intent of the
City of Spokane that no employee, agent or elected official
of the City acting within the scope of their duties for the
City shall act to participate in or materially support the10:48 all Fe)
Camp Hope Resolu... » Done
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that it is the intent of the
City of Spokane that no employee, agent or elected official
of the City acting within the scope of their duties for the
City shall act to participate in or materially support the
removal of the camp without a judicial order; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of
‘Spokane strongly condemns any action by, or directive to,
City of Spokane employees that would force them to take
action against a set of vulnerable individuals or to act
contrary to the City's interests by having them participate
in, or provide material support to, the County's threatened
removel operation without the landowner's consent or
judicial order; as all such actions or directives are outside
the scope of the City’s interests and mission and could
violate clearly established law.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the City of Spokane
wil not provide a legal defense or indemnification to any
city employes, agent or elected offcial who is sued in thei
personal capacity arising out of that person intentionally
directing City of Spokane employees to take any action or
provide any material support of the prohibited removals
set out above unless the City Council approves such legal
defense and indemnification for that specific individual by
majority vote. In considering authorizing legal defense and
indemnification, the City Council will consider the
knowledge and good faith of the individual directing the
actions of others, along with unanticipated public safety
emergency mutual aid needs created by the actions of
‘Spokane County or other actors.
Passed by the City Council this day of
, 2022.
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
‘Assistant City Attorney