Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

The classical school of criminology was established during the 17th century and centred on

five crucial principles. 


 Five critical principles of the classical school of criminology. 

 1. Rationality: The classical school assumes that people command free will and opt to
commit crimes. For instance, if I decide to steal some clothes at the store, I'm not forced to,
rested on some pre-destiny. I choose to steal those clothes. Not only that, I plan about it
beforehand and say to myself,' I want clothes, and I do not have enough money, so I'll steal
them. 'This is the reasoning thinking that goes into my planning to execute a crime. 

 2. Hedonism: The classical school also assumes that people seek pleasure and avoid pain.
For instance, when I look at the clothes in the store, I calculate how they will please me, so I
steal them.

3. Punishment: Remember how we said that a crucial idea was the idea of hedonism,
where people seek pleasure and try to escape pain? Well, that informs punishment, By the
classical school. For instance, if I think about stealing those clothes and realise that I could
go to jail for them, I might not steal them because I’ll be trying to dodge the pain of jail. In
this way, the classical school of criminology believes that punishment works as a hindrance
to crime. 

 4. Human rights:  I've got that punishments could be jarring indeed before the classical
school of criminology. It wasn't unusual to torture someone who was only presumed of a
crime, and the corrections once convicted could be frightening. 
According to the classical school of criminology, all people have rights, and society needs to
admire beings’ rights. That means that they shouldn't torture or establish unreasonably
harsh punishment. For instance, if I get caught stealing the clothes, nobody wouldn't expect
my punishment to involve cutting my handoff. That seems a little extreme.

A school of thought rested upon utilitarian notions of free will and the utmost good for the
maximum number. The verdict to commit a crime is rational and is best countered through
a deterrence-rested system. 

 The operation of the current criminal justice system relies on the classical criminological
viewpoint. The Classical School is reflected in the Protestation of Independence and the
United States Constitution. 

 Classical school theories run from an angle of choice. The presumption is that individuals
can either follow the law or violate it. A system of punishments is compulsory to inhibit
beings from committing felonious acts. Committing felonious acts brings a certain quantum
of pleasure to the individual. To offset this pleasure, corrections must be handed that carry
with them enough pain to overweigh the pleasure entered by committing a deviant or
felonious act. 

 Various programs have been tried using deterrence and choice as primary basics. Programs
similar to frightened Straight have tried to use fear and deterrence to keep juvenile
criminals from committing new crimes. Boot camps have sought to use fear, discipline, and
brief confinement to keep criminals from committing more crimes. These programs are
argumentative and have yielded mixed results at best. 

While deterrence is a factor in precluding human beings from committing unlawful acts, it
most probably isn't the deciding factor. Utmost people won't commit felonious acts because
they believe it's wrong to do so and because they've been socialised to follow the morals of
society. 

You might also like