Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 21

PHARMACOKINETIC-PHARMACODYNAMIC RELATIONSHIPS Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5): 353-373

0312-5963/99/0005-0353/$10.50/0

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.

Pharmacokinetics and
Pharmacodynamics of the
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials
Kenneth C. Lamp,1,2 Collin D. Freeman,2,3 Neil E. Klutman2,4 and Melinda K. Lacy2,4
1 University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
2 Kansas City Anti-Infective Research Group, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
3 Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Department of Scientific Affairs, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
4 University of Kansas Medical Center, School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, Kansas, USA

Contents
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353
1. Analytical Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354
2. Mechanisms of Action and Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355
3. Pharmacokinetics of Metronidazole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355
3.1 Absorption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355
3.2 Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
3.3 Metabolism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
3.4 Elimination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
4. Special Populations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
4.1 Renal Dysfunction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
4.2 Haemodialysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
4.3 Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
4.4 Liver Dysfunction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
4.5 Infants and Children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
4.6 Pregnancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
4.7 Enteric Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
4.8 Critically Ill Patients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
5. Pharmacodynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
5.1 Bactericidal Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
5.2 Post-Antibiotic Effect and Concentration-Dependent Killing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
5.3 Serum Bactericidal Titres . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
6. Drug Interactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
7. Other Nitroimidazoles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
7.1 Tinidazole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
7.2 Ornidazole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367
7.3 Secnidazole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369
8. Therapeutic Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370

Abstract Metronidazole, the prototype nitroimidazole antimicrobial, was originally in-


troduced to treat Trichomonas vaginalis, but is now used for the treatment of
anaerobic and protozoal infections. The nitroimidazoles are bactericidal through
354 Lamp et al.

toxic metabolites which cause DNA strand breakage. Resistance, both clinical
and microbiological, has been described only rarely.
Metronidazole given orally is absorbed almost completely, with bioavailability
>90% for tablets; absorption is unaffected by infection. Rectal and intravaginal
absorption are 67 to 82%, and 20 to 56%, of the dose, respectively.
Metronidazole is distributed widely and has low protein binding (<20%). The
volume of distribution at steady state in adults is 0.51 to 1.1 L/kg. Metronidazole
reaches 60 to 100% of plasma concentrations in most tissues studied, including the
central nervous system, but does not reach high concentrations in placental tissue.
Metronidazole is extensively metabolised by the liver to 5 metabolites. The
hydroxy metabolite has biological activity of 30 to 65% and a longer elimination
half-life than the parent compound. The majority of metronidazole and its meta-
bolites are excreted in urine and faeces, with less than 12% excreted unchanged
in urine.
The pharmacokinetics of metronidazole are unaffected by acute or chronic
renal failure, haemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, age,
pregnancy or enteric disease. Renal dysfunction reduces the elimination of met-
ronidazole metabolites; however, no toxicity has been documented and dosage
alterations are unnecessary. Liver disease leads to a decreased clearance of metro-
nidazole and dosage reduction is recommended.
Recent pharmacodynamic studies of metronidazole have demonstrated activ-
ity for 12 to 24 hours after administration of metronidazole 1g. The post-antibiotic
effect of metronidazole extends beyond 3 hours after the concentration falls below
the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The concentration-dependent
bactericidal activity, prolonged half-life and sustained activity in plasma support
the clinical evaluation of higher doses of metronidazole given less frequently.
Metronidazole-containing regimens for Helicobacter pylori in combination
with proton pump inhibitors demonstrate higher success rates than antimicrobial
regimens alone. The pharmacokinetics of metronidazole in gastric fluid appear
contradictory to these results, since omeprazole reduces peak drug concentration
and area under the concentration-time curve for metronidazole and its hydroxy
metabolite; however, concentrations remain above the MIC.
Other members of this class include tinidazole, ornidazole and secnidazole.
They are also well absorbed and distributed after oral administration. Their only
distinguishing features are prolonged half-lives compared with metronidazole.
The choice of nitroimidazole may be influenced by the longer administration
intervals possible with other members of this class; however, metronidazole re-
mains the predominant antimicrobial for anaerobic and protozoal infections.

Metronidazole [1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-methyl-5- 1. Analytical Methods


nitroimidazole] is the prototype for the nitro-
imidazole class of antimicrobials. Originally intro- Early detection methods for measuring metroni-
duced over 25 years ago for the treatment of patients dazole relied on bioassay or gas-liquid chromatog-
with Trichomonas vaginalis, it has since been eval- raphy. These methods were time consuming and
uated in the treatment of diverse anaerobic and gastro- did not allow for the determination of metabolite
intestinal tract infections. This article reviews the concentrations. Bioassay methodology was initially
pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metro- developed with T. vaginalis as the indicator organ-
nidazole and related antimicrobials. ism, but were quickly replaced with methods employ-

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 355

ing Clostridium species. These latter bioassays Bactericidal activity appears to be dependent on
were more accurate but were still only able to mea- the formation of a redox intermediate metabolite
sure total bioactivity of the specimen.[1] The chem- in the bacterium. This toxic metabolite may inter-
ical determination of the nitro group was also em- act primarily with DNA, RNA or intracellular
ployed and even proposed as an aid in determining proteins; however, its main effect is DNA strand
compliance; however, this method suffered from breakage, inhibited repair and ultimately disrupted
measuring all nitro-containing compounds and transcription and cell death.[6] Additional mecha-
was not accurate for evaluating the pharmacokinet- nisms may be present in polymicrobial infections.
ics of metronidazole and its metabolites.[2] The addition of facultative anaerobes such as Esch-
When bioassay is compared directly with high erichia coli to cultures of Bacteroides fragilis re-
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the sults in faster bactericidal activity of metronida-
detected concentrations are variable. Higher values zole. The mechanism may be the formation by E. coli
may be detected because of the measurement of the of a bactericidal intermediate metabolite.[7]
active metabolites and lower values have also been Both clinical and microbiological resistance
seen when concentrations are above the linear have been demonstrated with metronidazole; how-
range of the bioassay.[3,4] Pharmacokinetic param- ever, these are rare events. Therapeutic failures for
eters calculated from bioassay results tend to give T. vaginalis vaginal infections may occur when or-
higher elimination half-lives. HPLC has many advan- ganisms unaffected by metronidazole, such as
tages over bioassay and other methods, including E. coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus or Klebsi-
ease of use, accuracy and sensitivity. The mobile ella, are able to absorb metronidazole and decrease
phase consists of methanol/acetonitrile/5 mmol/L concentrations in vaginal fluid below those that are
potassium dihydrogen phosphate in varying ratios. effective. In these situations, T. vaginalis when tested
Detection is usually accomplished at 320nm. Sam- retains full susceptibility to metronidazole.[6] Iso-
ple preparation was improved with the use of per- lates of B. fragilis have developed metronidazole
chloric acid precipitation, although more compli- resistance in both in vivo and in vitro. The mecha-
cated extractions have also been employed.[3] nism involves decreased uptake and metabolism of
HPLC methods are able to quantify metronidazole metronidazole. Resistant strains with moderate
and its 2 major hydroxy and acetic acid metabo- levels of resistance [minimum inhibitory concen-
lites. The measurement of concentrations of the tration (MIC) 25 mg/L] may still be capable of re-
acetic acid metabolite may be hampered by degra- sponding to moderate doses of metronidazole.
dation of the standards, which should be prepared Strains with higher levels of resistance (MIC 100
new each day.[4] HPLC is widely employed as the mg/L) would be unlikely to respond to typical
method of choice for determining metronidazole doses.[8]
and metabolite concentrations.
3. Pharmacokinetics of Metronidazole
2. Mechanisms of Action and
Resistance The following is a summary of the many studies
of the pharmacokinetics of metronidazole (table I).
Metronidazole and the nitroimidazoles are thought
to produce their bactericidal activity through 4 3.1 Absorption
phases:[5]
(i) entry into the bacterial cell The absorption of metronidazole has been stud-
(ii) nitro group reduction ied in a variety of dosage forms, for example oral
(iii) action of the cytotoxic byproducts tablets, vaginal and rectal suppositories, and as a
(iv) production of inactive end products. topical gel.

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
356 Lamp et al.

Table I. Pharmacokinetics of metronidazole in adults


n Dose Schedule F Cmax Vss AUC t1⁄2β CL Reference
(mg) (%) (mg/L) (L/kg) (mg/L • h) (h) (L/h)a
10 250 PO S 6.95 ± 3.1 47.4 ± 16.7 10 ± 6.1 9
5 250 PO S 6.23 ± 1.1 8.2 ± 0.36 10
7 400 PO S 99 6.90 ± 0.9 0.96 ± 0.083 80 ± 6.73 8.4 ± 0.4 11
10 400 PO S 94 92 ± 32 8.3 ± 3.0 12
13 400 PO S 8.5 ± 2.3 82 ± 17 8.6 ± 1.2 13
5 400 PO S 100 ± 5 8.9 ± 1.3 0.65 ± 0.05 107 ± 10.3 7.3 ± 0.7 3.9 ± 0.44 14
8 500 PO S 99 100 ± 16 8.0 ± 1.6 15
10 500 PO S 13.8 ± 5.5 113 ± 35.5 9.7 ± 1.8 9
9 500 PO S 100 0.61 ± 0.15 159 ± 48 7.0 ± 1.1 16
5 500 PO S 11.5 ± 5.6 9.1 ± 0.54 10
9 500 PO S 111 9.0 ± 0.5 122 ± 10.3 8.9 ± 0.6 17
12 500 PO S 12.7 ± 2.0 133 ± 43.1 18
9 500 PO S 15.6 ± 0.92 142 ± 17.9 19
5 500 PO S 10.1 ± 0.9 0.60 ± 0.01 115 ± 7.8 7.4 ± 0.3 20
4 750 PO S 11.9 8.4 ± 1.5 21
11 800 PO S 98.5 ± 14 18.0 ± 3.9 0.56 ± 0.13 192 ± 30 6.6 ± 1.5 4.1 ± 0.50 22
10 1000 PO S 16.3 ± 2.4 214 ± 35.5 9.31 ± 2.2 9
10 1000 PO S 19.6 ± 3.8 0.76 ± 0.13 282 ± 75 7.8 ± 1.3 3.9 ± 0.96 23
8 2000 PO S 96 427 ± 53 7.6 ± 0.9 15
4 2000 PO S 40.6 ± 9.3 0.55 ± 0.04 621 ± 146 8.8 ± 1.1 2.9 ± 0.9 23
9 250 IV S 0.67 ± 0.14 48.4 ± 19.3 6.0 ± 1.3 6.4 ± 2.5 24
7 400 IV S 1.1 ± 0.15 81.6 ± 8.12 8.3 ± 0.4 5.2 ± 0.42 11
10 400 IV S 98 ± 22 8.3 ± 3.0 12
8 500 IV S 0.74 ± 0.10 101 ± 17.0 7.3 ± 0.9 5.0 ± 0.84 15
9 500 IV S 0.64 ± 0.14 151 ± 42 7.3 ± 1.0 16
6 500 IV S 9.4 ± 0.5 0.69 ± 0.016 107 ± 10.7 7.9 ± 0.6 4.8 ± 0.31 17
5 500 IV S 11.7 ± 0.6 0.65 ± 0.05 136 ± 16.6 7.7 ± 0.8 3.9 ± 0.44 14
11 800 IV S 0.66 ± 0.084 198 ± 25.2 6.6 ± 0.49 4.1 ± 0.50 22
9 1000 IV S 0.53 ± 0.05 257 ± 58.4 8.1 ± 1.2 3.6 ± 0.84 24
22 1500 IV S 0.51 ± 0.16 680 ± 282 9.4 ± 1.9 2.1 ± 0.9 25
8 1500 IV S 46.5 0.56 ± 0.044 506 ± 13.5 8.5 ± 1.1 3.3 ± 1.1 26
8 2000 IV S 0.74 ± 0.12 447 ± 67.0 7.7 ± 1.7 4.4 ± 0.72 15
9 2000 IV S 0.58 ± 0.08 532 ± 104 8.8 ± 1.2 3.5 ± 0.84 24
10 500 PR S 86.2b 7.94 ± 2.9 89.1 ± 24.2 10.5 ± 6.1 9
10 1000 PR S 88.5b 15.0 ± 4.8 188 ± 47.2 8.8 ± 2.2 9
11 1000 PR S 61.9 ± 16 10.1 ± 2.8 0.59 ± 0.23 152 ± 42.2 6.8 ± 2.5 4.1 ± 0.50 22
6 1000 PR S 53b 8.8 ± 1.1 130 ± 18.6 8.8 ± 0.4 17
10 2000 PR S 24.8 ± 11.3 281 ± 109 9.5 ± 3.7 9
12 37.5 IG S 0.24 ± 0.07 5.0 ± 2.67 18
6 500 IG S 25b 1.9 ± 0.2 31.0 ± 5.0 17
9 500 IG S 23b 1.9 ± 0.21 32.4 ± 38.4 19
5 500 IG S 19 ± 3 1.1 ± 0.02 0.65 ± 0.05 24.2 ± 2.3 3.9 ± 0.44 14
6 250 PO M 0.73 ± 0.09 70.6 ± 22.1 9.5 ± 2.1 3.9 ± 0.66 27
13 250 PO M 5.1 ± 1.7 0.62 ± 0.17 50.2 ± 30 5.9 ± 3.9 4.3 ± 0.9 23

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 357

Table I. Contd
n Dose Schedule F Cmax Vss AUC t1⁄2β CL Reference
(mg) (%) (mg/L) (L/kg) (mg/L • h) (h) (L/h)a
7 400 PO M 11.2 ± 1.6 82.3 ± 12.7 8.3 ± 0.4 11
13 400 PO M 13.0 ± 2.8 13
7 500 PO M 100 ± 23 8.3 4.9 ± 1.7 28
a Normalised to a bodyweight of 70kg.
b Compared with equivalent oral doses.
AUC = area under the drug concentration-time curve; Cmax = peak plasma drug concentration; CL = total body clearance; F = bioavailability;
IG = intravaginal; IV = intravenous; M = multiple; n = number of participants; PO = oral; PR = rectal; S = single; t1⁄2β = elimination half-life;
Vss = volume of distribution at steady state.

3.1.1 Oral ministration of metronidazole were 100% of the


The oral absorption of metronidazole is excel- intravenous parameters.
lent, with bioavailability often reported as
>90%.[9,11-13,15,16,22,26] The peak plasma drug con- 3.1.2 Rectal
centration (Cmax) after a single dose of 500mg is Rectal administration of metronidazole 500mg
approximately 8 to 13 mg/L, with a corresponding produced Cmax values of approximately 4 to 5.5 mg/L,
time to Cmax (tmax) of 0.25 to 4h.[9,10,12,17] at tmax values ranging from 0.5 to 1h for a retention
enema to 4 to 12h for suppositories.[9,22,31,32] Metro-
A suspension formulation of benzoylmetro-
nidazole absorption from the rectum has been re-
nidazole, equivalent to 400mg and 2g single doses
ported as being approximately 67 to 82% based upon
of metronidazole, was administered to healthy
calculations with equivalent intravenous doses
males, yielding mean peak metronidazole serum
used as a reference.[32]
concentrations of 4.6 mg/L (400mg dose) and 17
mg/L (2g dose) with mean tmax values of 3.2 to 3.1.3 Intravaginal
5.1h. Compared with metronidazole, this formula- Intravaginal absorption of metronidazole displays
tion has a 20% lower bioavailability and approxi- substantial variation depending on which vehicle
mately 45% lower Cmax.[13] is utilised. The 0.75% metronidazole intravaginal
Single 2g oral doses given to healthy females gel at a dose of 5g produced Cmax values of 0.2 to
yielded mean Cmax values of 40 mg/L with a tmax 0.3 mg/L with tmax values of 8.3 to 8.5h.[18] Vaginal
of 1 to 2h; values varied depending on whether suppositories and inserts containing metronidazole
HPLC or bioassay was used for serum concentra- 500mg produced Cmax values of approximately 1.1
tion analysis.[29] Pregnant women in their second to 1.9 mg/L with corresponding tmax values of 7.7
trimester were administered metronidazole orally to 20h.[14,17,19]
at dosages of 250mg twice daily for 6 to 10 days Metronidazole vaginal suppositories have a bio-
or a 1g dose given only once or twice.[30] Serum availability that is approximately 20 to 25% of an oral
concentrations with these doses reached peak val- 500mg dose; the bioavailability from a vaginal gel
ues of 4.6 and 17.4 mg/L for the 250mg and 1g was reported as being 56% when compared with a
500mg intravenous dose.[17,18]
doses, respectively.
Seven patients with known or presumed mixed 3.1.4 Topical
aerobic-anaerobic infections received metronidazole Metronidazole gel 0.75% has low systemic ab-
as an initial intravenous loading dose of 1g followed sorption. The resulting serum concentrations in
by 500mg every 8 hours either intravenously or adults with rosacea after 1g of the gel was applied
orally, with or without other antimicrobial thera- ranged from undetectable to 66 μg/L in the sub-
pies.[28] Mean absorption parameters after oral ad- sequent 24 hours.[33,34]

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
358 Lamp et al.

Table II. Tissue and fluid penetration of metronidazole


Dose (mg/day) n Route Tissue/fluid Penetration (%)a Reference
120 1 IV CSF 70-103 35
1000 1 PO CSF 90-133 36
1000 1 PO CSF 18 37
500 16 IV Umbilical cord plasma 84 38
200 NR PO Placenta 0-20 39
400 8 PO Fallopian tube 93-97 40
1000 8 PR Fallopian tube 83-96 40
400 8 PO Uterus 90-94 40
1000 8 PR Uterus 82 40
500 10 IV Peritoneal fluid 74 41
500 5 IV Pancreatic juice 57 42
500 8 IV Pancreatic tissue 60 42
500 1 IV Pancreatic tissue 99 43
500 1 IV Pancreatic tissue 63 43
1000 12 IV Rectal muscle 94 44
1000 12 IV Colonic mucosa 76 44
1000 11 IV Colonic mucosa 42 45
1000 12 IV Adipose tissue 21 44
1000 11 IV Adipose tissue 13 45
1000 13 IV Alveolar bone 75 46
a Ratio of metronidazole concentration in sample to concentration in blood at the same time point.
CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; IV = intravenous; n = number of participants; NR = not reported; PO = oral; PR = rectal.

3.1.5 Hydroxy-Metronidazole dren and infants may have higher AUCs depending
Peak serum concentrations of the hydroxy meta- on the dose utilised.[13,32,50]
bolite range from 2.4 mg/L after a 500mg intrave- A study in 54 Asian patients undergoing surgery
nous dose to 7.6 mg/L after a 2g intravenous dose who received metronidazole 500mg intravenously
of metronidazole.[13,15,22,32] every 8 hours demonstrated mean peak and Vd values
that were consistent with values reported in other
3.2 Distribution studies.[51]
The pharmacologically active hydroxy metabo-
The penetration and distribution of metronidazole lite of metronidazole has AUC values of 42 to 50
into assorted tissues and body fluids has been ade- mg/L • h after an oral 400mg dose of metronidazole,
quately documented (table II). Its protein binding 40.8 mg/L • h after 250mg intravenously and up to
is <20%.[10,21,47] The reported volumes of distribu- 239 mg/L • h after 2g intravenously.[13,15,24,32]
tion (Vd) in various studies have ranged from 0.65
to 0.71 L/kg in newborn infants[48] to 0.51 to 1.1 L/kg 3.2.1 Polymorphonuclear Leucocytes
in adults.[11,15-17,20,22,24-27] The concentration of metronidazole in polymor-
Single-dose studies with oral or intravenous phonuclear leucocytes has been demonstrated to be
metronidazole 500mg have determined the area un- equal to the concentration found in extracellular
der the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) to fluid.[52]
be approximately 100 to 159 mg/L • h.[15-17] Oral
or intravenous doses of 1000mg generate AUCs of 3.2.2 Central Nervous System
214 to 257 mg/L • h, suggesting a linear relation- Metronidazole has generally been reported to
ship with dose.[9,23,49] Pregnant women tend to have good penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid
have AUCs that also fall into this range,[30] but chil- (CSF) and central nervous system (CNS). A patient

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 359

with Fusobacterium meningitis had CSF concen- reported as being relatively low (0 to 1.4 mg/L)
trations of 13.9 and 11 mg/L with concurrent serum compared with serum concentrations of 3 to 6.9
concentrations of 15.4 and 8.3 mg/L at 2 and 8 mg/L when obtained 4 to 5 hours after a single oral
hours, respectively, after administration of oral dose.[39]
500mg doses twice daily.[36] Another case report
by Soriano et al.[53] reported a CSF concentration 3.2.4 Pelvic Tissue and Peritoneal Fluid
of 23.8 mg/L on the 14th day of treatment with Elder and Kane[40] studied the concentrations of
metronidazole 500mg every 6 hours, but no con- metronidazole administered as single 400mg oral
comitant serum concentration was reported. Feld- doses, or 4 × 400mg doses given every 8 hours, in
man[54] reported an infant patient weighing 2kg 30 women who required hysterectomies for benign
with B. fragilis ventriculitis and meningitis who conditions. Serum and tissue samples from the fal-
received oral metronidazole 15 mg/kg twice daily. lopian tubes and uterus were obtained at approxi-
This patient had ventricular fluid concentrations of mately 3 to 4 hours after administration. In the sin-
15 mg/L at 2 hours and 18mg/L at 2.5 hours after gle-dose regimen, the concentrations in the uterus
the dose, but again concurrent serum concentra- and fallopian tubes were 94 and 97.3% of serum
tions were not obtained. A similar case report, by concentrations, respectively. The multiple oral
Warner et al.,[35] involved treatment of a 1.16kg doses resulted in 90.1 and 92.7% penetration into
premature infant with metronidazole 40mg intra- the uterus and fallopian tubes, respectively.
venously every 8 hours, giving ventricular CSF 30 women undergoing laparoscopy received
concentrations of 56.7 to 71.5 mg/L with serum metronidazole 500mg intravenously as part of a
concentrations ranging from 69.7 to 84.1 mg/L over prophylaxis regimen.[41] The average time elapsed
the same 4-hour time period. from infusion of metronidazole until simultaneous
Davies[37] administered metronidazole 1g orally sampling of peritoneal fluid and blood was 55 min-
every 6 hours to 3 patients with neurosyphilis. One utes. Serum concentrations at this time averaged
patient had a CSF concentration of 80.4 mg/L ob- 10.7 mg/L and the peritoneal fluid concentration
tained approximately 2.5 hours after the fifth dose, was 7.2 mg/L.
with serum concentrations that ranged from 15 to 3.2.5 Pancreas
72 mg/L. The median pancreatic tissue concentration in 8
Metronidazole penetration into CNS abscesses patients with either chronic pancreatitis or pancre-
has been reported by George and Bint.[55] They ob- atic carcinoma who received metronidazole 500mg
tained a pus concentration of 42 mg/L in a 3-year- intravenously prior to laparotomy was 5.1 mg/L.[42]
old patient receiving oral metronidazole 8 mg/kg 4 In 5 patients, the median concentration in pancre-
times daily. Ingham and colleagues[56] obtained metro- atic juice was 8.5 mg/L. 12 patients with necrotis-
nidazole concentrations of 21 to 45 mg/L from ce- ing pancreatitis had serum and necrotic tissue sam-
rebral abscesses in 3 patients who received metro- ples obtained to determine tissue penetration.[43]
nidazole 400 to 600mg orally or intravenously The penetration of metronidazole was 99%, with a
every 8 hours. concentration of 8.4 μg/g of tissue.

3.2.3 Placenta 3.2.6 Colorectal Tissue


16 pregnant women about to undergo caesarean 12 patients undergoing colorectal surgery re-
sections received a single intravenous dose of met- ceived metronidazole 1g intravenously for prophy-
ronidazole 500mg.[38] Arterial cord blood concen- laxis.[44] Tissue sampling of rectus abdominus
trations at the time of caesarean ranged from 8.9 to muscle and colonic mucosa at the time of intestinal
16.4 mg/L, although the precise time in relation resection and at abdominal wound closure revealed
to administration of the metronidazole was not ev- metronidazole median tissue : serum concentra-
ident. Placental tissue concentrations have been tion ratios of 0.94 and 0.76, respectively. Another

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
360 Lamp et al.

study involving 11 patients undergoing elective ethyl)-2-hydroxy methyl-5-nitroimidazole, is clin-


colorectal surgery also administered metronidazole ically significant with antimicrobial activity approx-
1g intravenously for prophylaxis.[45] At a mean imately 30 to 65% that of metronidazole.[59-62] The
time of 38 minutes following administration, the acid metabolite, 1-acetic acid-2-methyl-5-nitro-
abdominal wall fat-to-serum ratio was 0.1 and for imidazole, has only 5% of the activity of the parent
epiploic fat was 0.08. Anastomosis occurred at a drug and is only detectable in patients with renal
mean time of 156 minutes following administration dysfunction.[61] Glucuronide and sulphate conjugates
and resulted in a mean concentration of 8.9 mg/kg and an oxidation product of the hydroxy metabolite
in colonic wall tissue. have also been detected.[63]
17 patients undergoing colorectal surgery re-
ceived 1.5g of metronidazole intravenously and 3.4 Elimination
had serum samples taken from 0.17 to 72 hours
after infusion, and tissue samples (colon, perito- Experiments utilising 14C-labelled metronida-
neum, ileum, muscle, omentum, appendix and sub- zole demonstrate that the majority of metronida-
cutaneous fat) taken from 0.5 to 4.5 hours after zole and its metabolites is eliminated in urine. Ap-
infusion.[57] Concentrations of metronidazole and proximately 77 and 14% of the dose was collected
the hydroxy metabolite were assayed from these in urine and faeces, respectively, over 5 days.[21]
samples. The mean concentration of metronidazole Unchanged metronidazole in urine represents only
in the various tissues was in the 10 to 30 mg/g [sic] 7 to 12% of the dose.[3,9,16] The total of metronida-
range. For the hydroxy metabolite the concentra- zole and metabolites (as measured by chromato-
tions were <5 mg/g [sic], although there was consid- graphic methods) excreted in urine averages 33 to
erable variability for both the parent compound and 44% of the dose.[3,13,16] The hydroxy metabolite
the metabolite. contributes 14 to 24.1% of the total administered
dose excreted in urine, and the acid metabolite ac-
3.2.7 Alveolar Bone counts for 9.6 to 12%.[3,13] The radioactivity unac-
A series of 13 patients undergoing the removal counted for in urine probably represents metabo-
of impacted mandibular third molar teeth were lites not identified by HPLC assay techniques.
given rectal metronidazole 1g suppositories 3 hours The total clearance (CL) of metronidazole from
prior to extraction.[46] Molar tooth concentrations serum has been reported to range from 2.1 to 6.4
taken at the time of extraction were 75% of those L/h/kg bodyweight (table I).[11,14,15,17,22-28] Metro-
found in plasma. nidazole appears to exhibit dose-dependent clear-
3.2.8 Saliva and Gingival Fluid ance at doses ranging from 250 to 2000mg.[24,51]
Van Oosten et al.[58] administered metronida- The elimination half-life (t1⁄2β) for metronidazole
zole 750mg orally to 4 healthy volunteers to mea- ranges from 6 to 10h,[22,24] with most studies re-
sure concentrations in saliva and gingival crevice porting values in the 8h range (table I). On the basis
fluid. Plasma Cmax, as measured by bioassay, of the log-linear pharmacokinetic properties of
ranged from 8.7 to 18.4 mg/L, whereas Cmax for metronidazole, Loft and colleagues[64] calculated
gingival crevice fluid and saliva ranged from 10.5 the CL of metronidazole as dose divided by AUC
to 41.3 and from 11.3 to 13.8 mg/L, respectively. and also determined that the CL of metronidazole
Overall, concentrations appeared to be similar be- could be determined from a single plasma sample
tween the 3 body fluids. using the dose and an estimated Vd.
Thiercelin et al.[65] noted that metronidazole
3.3 Metabolism 500mg orally every 8 hours resulted in steady-state
AUC (AUCss) values 51% higher than the same
Metronidazole is metabolised by the liver into 5 dosage administered intravenously, even though
metabolites. The hydroxy metabolite, 1-(2-hydroxy- the t1⁄2β (6h) was virtually the same for both routes,

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 361

a phenomenon also observed in a study by Mattila A further study was conducted in 10 healthy
et al.[17] Thiercelin et al.[65] noted that, excluding volunteers and 24 patients with CLCR of 0 to 3.9
other possibilities, for AUCss,PO/AUCss,IV to be L/h (0 to 65 ml/min). They received a single intra-
greater than 1, CL must have diminished when venous dose of metronidazole 500mg over 30 min-
switching from oral to intravenous administration. utes. Half-life, Vd and total body clearance for
Two proposed hypotheses by the authors that may metronidazole were not affected by renal dysfunc-
explain this phenomenon were: (i) metronidazole tion. The metabolite : metronidazole ratios for both
inhibits its own metabolism by gut microsomal metabolites were increased with decreasing renal
mono-oxygenases; or (ii) oral administration leads function secondary to decreased renal clearance of
to excessive glucuronidation with resulting entero- metabolites. The acetic acid metabolite was more
hepatic recirculation. dependent on renal clearance than the hydroxy me-
The t1⁄2β of the hydroxy metabolite is longer than tabolite; however, clearance was not measured di-
that of metronidazole, and ranges from 8.5 to 19.2h rectly for the metabolites. The Cmax for the hydroxy
in patients with normal renal function, with most metabolite in patients with renal failure was re-
studies reporting values of 11 to 13h.[22,24-26,57,66] duced compared with healthy volunteers, 4.3 ver-
sus 6.1 mg/L. The t1⁄2β was also prolonged for the
4. Special Populations hydroxy metabolite from 18 to 32.3h. The AUC of
the acetic acid metabolite was increased with de-
4.1 Renal Dysfunction creasing renal function from 15.7 mg/L • h [CLCR
of 0.6 to 1.8 L/h (10 to 30 ml/min)] to 51 mg/L • h
Several investigations have been published on [CLCR <0.6 L/h (<10 ml/min)]. The t1⁄2β increased
the effect of reduced renal function on the disposi- from 22.3 to 28.4h for the same change in CLCR.[69]
tion of metronidazole and its metabolites. In 1 The pharmacokinetics of metronidazole are not
study, 6 patients, 23 to 75 years of age, with acute significantly affected by alterations in renal func-
renal failure [creatinine clearance (CLCR) ≤0.6 L/h tion. The accumulation of metabolites has led to
(10 ml/min)] received either metronidazole 500mg recommendations of monitoring metabolite con-
intravenously over 30 minutes as a single dose or centrations for patients with CLCR <1.8 L/h (<30
as a multiple dose twice daily for 4 days or longer. ml/min) and avoiding metronidazole when CLCR is
The Vd was 0.65 L/kg, t1⁄2β was 9.5h, and total <0.6 L/h (<10 ml/min).[69] The metabolites have
plasma clearance and nonrenal clearance were 3.3 not shown toxicity when administered in large
and 3.2 L/h, respectively. The hydroxy metabolite doses to animals.[68]
reached an average steady-state concentration
(Css) of 17.4 mg/L while the acetic acid metabolite 4.2 Haemodialysis
only reached a Css of 1.2 mg/L.[67]
A single intravenous dose of metronidazole The influence of haemodialysis has also been
500mg was given to 29 patients with CLCR values evaluated for metronidazole and its metabolites.
less than 3 L/h (50 ml/min). None of the pharmaco- Metronidazole 500mg was administered intrave-
kinetic parameters of metronidazole were changed nously to 5 volunteers with normal renal function,
when compared with a previous group of healthy 4 patients with renal failure and 5 patients requiring
volunteers except for renal clearance, which de- haemodialysis. The pharmacokinetic parameters
creased from 0.41 L/h to 0.14 to 0.16 L/h. The were not altered by the presence of renal failure.
hydroxy and acetic acid metabolites reached higher The mean t1⁄2β, Vss and CL were 6.57h, 1.29 L/kg
concentrations in the patients with reduced renal and 11.02 L/h for the normal group; 6.13h, 1.38 L/kg
function, but this would not significantly alter the and 9.10 L/h for the renal failure group not receiv-
combined biological activity of metronidazole and ing dialysis; and 6.8h, 1.44 L/kg and 11.02 L/h for
metabolites.[68] the dialysis group, respectively. Metabolite concen-

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
362 Lamp et al.

trations increased 3-fold in the group with renal as a single intravenous dose. Patients on haemo-
failure. Researchers noted that clearance through dialysis served as the control group, receiving met-
cuprophan dialyser membranes was faster than ronidazole on nondialysis days. Peritoneal dialysis
through polyacrylamide membranes for metroni- contributed less than 9% of total body clearance of
dazole (5.1 versus 2.8 L/h) and the hydroxy meta- metronidazole or its metabolites. The t1⁄2β and Vd
bolite (5.2 versus 3.3 L/h). An 8-hour dialysis ses- were not different between the 2 groups. The authors
sion was estimated to remove 50% of a dose of recommended that metronidazole dosage alter-
metronidazole; however, the resulting serum con- ations would not be required unless metabolite ac-
centration at the end of a 12-hour dose interval cumulation is shown to lead to toxicity.[73]
would still be above the MIC for many anaerobic
isolates. These investigators recommended that a 4.4 Liver Dysfunction
dosage reduction may be necessary because of the
potential accumulation of metabolites.[70] On the basis of the extensive metabolism of met-
To further study of the influence of dialyser ronidazole, liver disease would be expected to have
membrane type, regenerated cellulose and cuprophan a profound effect on its pharmacokinetics. A small
dialyser membranes were used in 9 patients with study compared 6 patients with histologically con-
renal failure. Metronidazole 500 to 750mg was firmed cirrhosis with 5 healthy individuals. After a
given either intravenously or orally to reach thera- single oral dose of 500mg, concentrations of met-
peutic concentrations. The regenerated cellulose ronidazole and the hydroxy metabolite were as-
membrane attained a higher clearance than the cupro- sessed for 24 hours. Although the t1⁄2β increased
phan membrane (6.36 versus 4.32 L/h, p < 0.001). from 7.4 to 10.8h, Vd increased from 0.6 to 0.74
A similar difference was noted for the hydroxy me- L/kg and plasma clearance increased slightly from
tabolite. Haemodialysis over 4 hours was estimated 4.45 to 4.83 L/h/70kg, no significant differences
to remove 24 to 35% of the total body stores of were found. The AUC of the hydroxy metabolite
metronidazole and supplementation might be needed was unchanged.[20]
in seriously ill patients undergoing dialysis with Another small study of 9 patients with cirrhosis
high-clearance membranes.[71] and encephalopathy compared the disposition of
metronidazole 500mg intravenously over 20 min-
4.3 Continuous Ambulatory utes with that in healthy individuals. Vd was not
Peritoneal Dialysis changed by the presence of cirrhosis and encephalo-
pathy; however, the t1⁄2β was increased from 7.3 to
5 patients receiving continuous or intermittent 20h (p < 0.001). Total body clearance of metroni-
peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) received a single intra- dazole was reduced from 4.98 to 1.74 L/h (p < 0.001)
venous dose of metronidazole 500mg. Peritoneal and the renal clearance of the hydroxy metabolite
dialysis was begun 1 hour later and concentrations was decreased from 2.68 to 0.82 L/h (p < 0.001).
were measured for 6 hours. The t1⁄2β and Vd were The tmax for the hydroxy metabolite was prolonged
5.6h and 39L, respectively, which were similar to compared with controls, but the increased AUC (65
values obtained in individuals with normal renal to 113 mg/L • h) failed to reach statistical signifi-
function. Peritoneal dialysis clearance (0.96 L/h) cance. Metronidazole 500mg intravenously every
was approximately 20% of total body clearance 24 hours for 6 days in a subgroup of 3 patients pro-
(4.8 L/h). Although no information was presented duced trough metronidazole concentrations ranging
on metabolite clearance, the authors did not recom- from 4.3 to 9.5 mg/L, which should be above the
mend a change in dosage.[72] MIC90 for most anaerobic species.[74]
A study of 5 CAPD and 5 haemodialysis patients A study of 8 patients with alcoholic liver disease
provides data on both metronidazole and its meta- with or without cirrhosis demonstrated increased
bolites. All patients received metronidazole 750mg metronidazole t1⁄2β (18.3h), Vd (0.77 L/kg) and de-

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 363

creased total body clearance (2.14 L/h/70kg) com- Although metronidazole pharmacokinetics are
pared with literature values for healthy controls. not altered in healthy children, severe malnutrition
The authors estimated that a dose of 500mg every does change these parameters. A group of 10 chil-
12 hours would produce metronidazole serum con- dren with severe protein malnutrition were com-
centrations >15 mg/L, substantially higher than the pared with 10 children recovered from severe mal-
MIC90.[75] nutrition. Metronidazole was given as a single oral
The Child-Pugh criteria for grading patients dose of 30 mg/kg. Clearance was reduced in chil-
with cirrhosis are capable of predicting the phar- dren with severe malnutrition (0.094 versus 0.187
macokinetics of metronidazole. 7 healthy volunteers L/kg/h, p < 0.01) and t1⁄2β was longer (11.73 versus
and 35 patients with cirrhosis received a single intra- 5.68h, p < 0.01).[77] The authors recommended
venous dose of metronidazole 500mg over 20 min- strict monitoring of serum concentrations and in-
utes. The t1⁄2β increased from 7.4h in the control dividualised dosage regimens, although no specific
group to 10.7, 13.5 and 21.5h in patients in Child- serum concentrations were proposed.
Pugh class A, B and C, respectively. Metronidazole
clearance was decreased from 6.43 L/h/70kg in the
control group to 3.57, 3.32 and 2.35 L/h/70kg in 4.6 Pregnancy
Child-Pugh class A, B and C, respectively. The Vd
of metronidazole and the AUC24h of the hydroxy Following the administration of either 250mg or
metabolite were not altered.[76] 1g of metronidazole to pregnant and nonpregnant
Two studies have evaluated the influence of schis- women, no significant differences in pharmacokinet-
tosomiasis and found disparate results. The larger ics have been seen and thus no dosage changes are
study[76] found that the CL of metronidazole was needed.[30]
reduced from 6.43 to 3.91 L/h/70kg and the t1⁄2β
prolonged from 7.4 to 10.2h compared with the
4.7 Enteric Disease
control group, whereas the other found no differ-
ence.[20,76] No dosage adjustment appears neces-
sary for patients with schistosomiasis. The pharmacokinetics of metronidazole were
evaluated in 12 patients with either Crohn’s disease
or ulcerative colitis. Metronidazole 400mg was given
4.5 Infants and Children orally or intravenously over 20 minutes. The bio-
availability was very good in both patient groups,
Metronidazole, at a dosage of approximately 10 90% in the patients with ulcerative colitis and 97%
to 20 mg/kg, was administered orally twice daily in those with Crohn’s disease. There were no differ-
to 20 paediatric patients being treated for tricho- ences in t1⁄2β, Vd or plasma clearance between the
monal or anaerobic infections. Serum concentra- groups and the values were consistent with those
tions were measured for 24 hours after a dose using reported in healthy volunteers.[78]
a polarographic method which does not discrimi- Another study evaluated the influence of ulcer-
nate between parent drug and metabolites. Given ative colitis, Crohn’s disease, jejunoileal shunt, ile-
these limitations, the authors found no differences ostomy and coeliac disease on metronidazole.
in any parameter between children and adults. One Only the ileostomy patients demonstrated any dif-
infant was studied at 6 weeks of age and a slightly ferences compared with healthy controls. Half-life
higher t1⁄2β (10.7 versus 8.3h) and Vd (0.87 versus was increased to 11.9h compared with 8.3h in the
0.76 L/kg) were noted, although within the range control group and clearance decreased to 1.94 L/h
seen in adults. Clearance values were similar when compared with 5.43 L/h. The authors recommended
adjusted for bodyweight, at 3.95 versus 4.49 that metronidazole be administered at two-thirds
L/h/70kg.[50] of the normal dose in ileostomy patients.[79]

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
364 Lamp et al.

4.8 Critically Ill Patients 5.2 Post-Antibiotic Effect and


Concentration-Dependent Killing
14 critically ill patients with renal or liver dys-
function received metronidazole 500mg intrave- Like aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones,
nously every 6 to 8 hours for the treatment of sus- metronidazole also appears to exhibit a concentra-
pected or proven anaerobic infections. The patients tion-dependent killing effect against anaerobes and
were divided into different groups based on renal has a post-antibiotic effect (PAE) for more than 3
and liver function. The small size of this study and hours.[85]
variability of results precluded any direct statistical Nix et al.[86] discovered that metronidazole had
comparison. In patients with normal liver function, a concentration-dependent killing effect against
those with CLCR <0.9 L/h (<15 ml/min) had longer T. vaginalis under anaerobic conditions at concen-
t1⁄2β (12.3 versus 6.73h) and decreased clearance trations that ranged from 0.1 to >8 mg/L. If this
(3.26 versus 4.54 L/h/70kg) compared with those concentration-dependent effect truly exists for
with CLCR >1.8 L/h (>30 ml/min). The presence of metronidazole it would suggest that in general the
obstructive liver disease produced longer metroni- optimal dosage strategy for metronidazole against
dazole t1⁄2β (9.15 to 20.1h) than hepatocellular liver organisms like T. vaginalis and B. fragilis would
disease (8.6 to 12.1h). The longest t1⁄2β values were be to give higher doses less frequently, rather then
seen in patients with both renal and liver dysfunc- smaller doses more frequently, similar to the use of
tion. Metabolite concentrations were predictably aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones against
higher in patients with renal dysfunction. This susceptible Gram-negative aerobic bacteria.[87]
study had a small number of patients and, there-
fore, no firm recommendations can be made on the 5.3 Serum Bactericidal Titres
proper dosage of metronidazole in this popula-
tion.[80] Serum bactericidal titres (SBTs), a susceptibil-
ity method of determining bactericidal activity of
5. Pharmacodynamics antimicrobials which uses human serum instead of
broth growth media, have been used in studies as
5.1 Bactericidal Effect an ex vivo method of assessing the effect of metro-
nidazole on anaerobes, primarily B. fragilis. Re-
Metronidazole appears to have an extremely sults from an SBT study reported a median metro-
rapid rate of killing against susceptible anaer- nidazole SBT of 1 : 2 against various Bacteroides
obes.[81,82] Time-kill kinetic studies of ciprofloxacin species at 0.5, 1 and 6 hours after administration of
alone (concentration 0.5 mg/L; MIC 0.25 mg/L) a single dose of metronidazole 500mg intrave-
compared with a combination of ciprofloxacin with nously.[88] Results with metronidazole against 2
metronidazole (10 and 40 mg/L) displayed more strains of B. fragilis at the 6-hour time-point were
rapid killing with the combined antimicrobials <1 : 2, but titres related to Fusobacterium, Pep-
against C. perfringens, with undetectable C. per- tostreptococcus and Eubacterium lentum were all
fringens colony-forming units (CFU) at 1.5 to 2 >1 : 8 at all time-points.
hours post-exposure compared with 24 hours with Fluoroquinolones have often been studied for
metronidazole alone.[83] use in combination with metronidazole for antibac-
Treatment of mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections, terial activity against Gram-negative aerobes and
such as intra-abdominal infections, has yielded anaerobes.[89,90] Boeckh et al.[90] studied the effect
excellent results in terms of bacterial eradication of fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, en-
when an anti-anaerobic agent such as metronida- oxacin and fleroxacin) in combination with anti-
zole was included as part of the therapeutic regi- anaerobic antimicrobials, including metronidazole,
men.[28,84] by determining SBTs. SBT assays were performed

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 365

from serum samples obtained at 1, 2, 6 and 8 hours, A similarly designed study was also carried out
depending upon the antimicrobial combination, in 8 volunteers receiving metronidazole 400mg
against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative intravenously both with and without omeprazole.
aerobic pathogens, as well as strains of B. fragilis Omeprazole significantly reduced the AUC and
and B. thetaiotaomicron. None of the combinations Cmax of both metronidazole and its hydroxy meta-
appeared to interfere with the antibacterial activity bolite in gastric juice.[96] These results are consis-
of the individual antimicrobials, and mean SBTs tent with the theory that low pH ionises metroni-
for the ciprofloxacin/metronidazole, ofloxacin/metro- dazole and the hydroxy metabolite, leading to high
nidazole, enoxacin/metronidazole and fleroxacin/ concentrations in gastric fluid that are reduced
metronidazole combination were all in the 1 : 2 to when gastric pH is lowered by omeprazole. How-
1 : 4 dilution range for the various strains and spe- ever, in both these studies the concentrations of the
cies of Bacteroides. Similarly, Pefanis et al.[91] es- antimicrobial remained above the MIC for H. py-
tablished the effectiveness of fleroxacin plus met- lori.
ronidazole in eradicating mixed aerobic-anaerobic
Gram-negative pathogens from experimentally in- 7. Other Nitroimidazoles
duced abscesses in a rat model based upon reduced
CFU counts. 7.1 Tinidazole
SBT studies involving the combination of met-
ronidazole 1g with extended-spectrum cephalospo- Tinidazole, 1-[2-(ethylsulphonyl)ethyl]-2-methyl-
rins have also yielded results in the 1 : 4 to 1 : 8 range 5-nitroimidazole, is another member of the 5-nitro-
for B. fragilis at the end of 12 or 24 hours for imidazole class of antimicrobial agents with
ceftizoxime or ceftriaxone, respectively.[92-94] amoebicidal, giardiacidal, trichomonicidal and an-
aerobic activity. Tinidazole is used most frequently
for giardiasis, nonspecific vaginitis and urogenital
6. Drug Interactions trichomoniasis. As with others in the class, chem-
ical substitutions at side chains result in class dif-
Metronidazole is characterised by a low incidence ferences in pharmacokinetics and antimicrobial ac-
of drug interactions. Its well-known propensity to tivity.[97] Most published studies requiring analysis
cause disulfiram-like reactions when administered have utilised HPLC or bioassay.[17,25,26,60,98-107]
with alcohol (ethanol) and other drug interaction Analysis of tinidazole concentrations in numerous
studies have been reviewed extensively.[49,63] tissues and serum by both methods have been re-
More recent studies have focused on under- ported.
standing the synergistic effect of proton pump in- Very few studies have focused on the mode of
hibitors and antimicrobial regimens, including action of tinidazole.[107] The proposed mechanism
metronidazole, in the treatment of H. pylori infec- is similar to metronidazole. Generally, the drug dif-
tions. Several studies have been undertaken to fuses into the organism, is reduced to intermediates
evaluate the effect of omeprazole on the pharmaco- which cause cytotoxicity, probably damage DNA,
kinetics of metronidazole in plasma and gastric and, therefore, prevent further DNA synthesis.
juice. 24 healthy men received metronidazole The pharmacokinetics of tinidazole were docu-
400mg intravenously as a single dose while taking mented in the early 1980s.[17,25,26,57,98-106] Other
placebo or omeprazole. Omeprazole had no influence than the initial phase I studies, most pharmaco-
on the plasma pharmacokinetics of metronidazole. kinetic studies involved either surgical prophylaxis
However, metronidazole AUC4h in gastric juice was or mixed anaerobic infections. The pharmaco-
reduced from 120.3 to 29.6 mg/L • h (p = 0.001) kinetic studies are summarised in table III.
and Cmax in gastric juice was decreased from 33.6 The absorption of tinidazole has been studied
to 8.3 mg/L (p = 0.0001).[95] using oral tablets at various doses and following

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
366 Lamp et al.

Table III. Pharmacokinetics of tinidazole


Dose n Schedule F Cmax Vss AUC t1⁄2β CL Reference
(mg) (%) (mg/L) (L/kg) (mg/L • h) (h) (L/h)
500 PO 22 S 7.5 17
2000 PO 23 S 36.7 863 HV 15.6 HV 98
50.8 RF 1370 RF 18.4 RF 4.27 HD
500 IV 22 S 10.1 57L 175.8 14.0-14.7 2.42-2.86 17
800 IV 16 S 15.3 14 98
800 IV 23 S 14.9 0.8 363 HV 17.1 HV 2.27 HV 99
25.5 RF 0.69 RF 435 RF 16.9 RF 1.85 RF
800 IV 2 S 15.9 0.74 11.6 3.15 101
1500 IV 22 S 40 41.3L 847.5 17.6 1.6 25
1600 IV 16 S 32 13.2 98
1600 IV 8 S 38.1 38.8L 810 14.2 NR 26
1600 IV 5 S 8.7-13.1 100
1000 PR 22 S 7.9 17
500 IG 22 S 1.0 17
500 PO 6 S, M 99 (80-129) 11.9 S 0.65 134.1 IV 12-13 2.34 IV 102
5 mg/kg IV 12.5 M 102
2000 PO 21 S, M 36.2 56.3L 897 17.0 2.3 (2g) 103
250 q12h
AUC = area under the concentration-time curve; CL = total body clearance; Cmax = peak plasma drug concentration; F = bioavailability;
HD = haemodialysis; HV = healthy volunteers; IG = intravaginal; IV = intravenous; M = multiple; n = number of participants; NR = not
reported; PO = oral; PR = rectal; q12h = every 12 hours; RF = renal failure; S = single; t1⁄2β = elimination half-life; Vss = volume of distribution
at steady state.

vaginal and rectal administration.[17,99,102,103] Oral tions, uterine and fallopian tube), dental bone and
absorption is excellent, with bioavailability often saliva. Most tissue site concentrations are similar
reported as >90% relative to intravenous, and has to the corresponding blood concentrations. CSF pen-
even been reported as >100% as a result of its entero- etration is excellent (30 mg/L versus blood of 38
hepatic circulation (90 to 108%).[102] Cmax after mg/L) even without inflamed meninges.[108]
oral doses of 2g occurs around 2 hours after admin- The Cmax values in blisters (36.2 versus 29.1
istration, reaching concentrations between 40 and mg/L) were comparable with serum but the tmax was
58 mg/L.[17,99,102,103] Concentrations fall to 10 mg/L longer (6 versus 2h).[103] Tinidazole was minimally
at 24 hours and to 2.5 mg/L at 48 hours. Trough detectable in breast milk in some patients at 72 hours
concentrations are 8 mg/L with repeated daily doses
following a single dose of 1600mg intravenously.[100]
of 1g. Compared with metronidazole, the concen-
A single intravenous infusion of 500mg resulted in
trations are approximately doubled and persist
detectable concentrations of 13.2 mg/L in maternal
longer because of the longer t1⁄2β of 12 to 14h. Serum
venous blood, 4.9 mg/g in placenta tissue and 7.6
Cmax values following rectal administration of 1g
and intravaginal 500mg suppositories were 7.9 and mg/g in aborted fetus tissue.[106]
1 mg/L, respectively.[17] The metabolism and elimination of tinidazole in
Tinidazole is about 12% protein bound and dif- humans is not totally clarified. In humans, around
fuses into most tissues.[107] Concentrations were 37% of an intravenous dose is recovered in the
proportionately higher with increased doses.[98] urine with 25% as unchanged drug, and 2% as the
Tissue concentrations have been determined for 2-hydroxymethyl metabolite and its glucuronide
CSF, abdominal sites (bile, intestinal mucosa and conjugate. The t1⁄2β is around 12 to 13h in healthy
peritoneal), gynaecological sites (vaginal secre- volunteers following a 2g oral dose. intravenous

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 367

doses of 800 to 1600mg in healthy individuals re- There are no studies evaluating the pharmaco-
sulted in t1⁄2β values of 12 to 14h.[108] kinetics of tinidazole in CAPD or in the elderly. There
No studies examining the concentration-depend- are no documented drug interactions, but they
ent killing activities of tinidazole have been pub- would be expected to be similar to those of metro-
lished. It is reasonable to assume that the pharmaco- nidazole. Because of a disulfiram-like reaction, al-
dynamics of tinidazole would be similar to those cohol-containing products should be avoided for
of metronidazole. Based on normal dosage re- 72 hours after discontinuing tinidazole.
gimens, concentrations at most sites of infection In summary, the pharmacokinetics of tinidazole
would exceed the MIC of susceptible organisms. have been extensively studied but there is very lim-
The active hydroxymethyl metabolite of tinidazole ited pharmacodynamic information. Tinidazole is
has insignificant antimicrobial activity because of well absorbed and has a long half-life, allowing
once daily administration with serum concentrations
very low serum concentrations.[107,109]
exceeding the MIC90 of most of the anaerobic or-
Tinidazole is bactericidal against Gram-negative
ganisms it is used to eradicate. Dosage may need
and -positive anaerobes at concentrations 1- to 2-fold
to be adjusted for patients with decreased renal
above the MIC.[107] Most mimimum bactericidal function receiving multiple doses.
concentrations (MBCs) determined for B. fragilis
are the same or 1 dilution above the MIC. Some 7.2 Ornidazole
Bacteroides sp. have MBCs 2- to 3-fold greater than
the MIC. Tinidazole is relatively more active against Ornidazole [α-(chloromethyl)-2-methyl-5-nitro-
anaerobes, on the basis of the MIC90 values for imidazole-1-ethanol] is structurally similar to met-
B. fragilis (0.5 to 3 mg/L), Fusobacterium (0.4 to ronidazole and tinidazole. This agent is not approved
4 mg/L) and C. perfringens (0.5 to 1 mg/L) than for use in the US, but is used in several European
for B. melaninogenicus (12 to 16 mg/L) and Pepto- countries including Belgium, France, Italy, Spain
streptococcus sp. (0.8 to 25 mg/L). and Switzerland.
The pharmacokinetics of tinidazole have been Owing to its similar chemical properties, ornid-
documented in patients with renal failure and in azole shares the same mechanism of action and
patients on haemodialysis (table III).[102] After spectrum of microbiological activity as other nitro-
800mg oral or intravenous doses, serum concentra- imidazole agents against anaerobes and protozoa.
tions in healthy volunteers were compared with Therefore, it is used for the treatment of a variety
of clinical conditions including intestinal amoebi-
those in male and female patients on haemodialysis
asis, amoebic liver abscesses, anaerobic infections,
or with reduced renal function. Haemodialysis pa-
Crohn’s disease, duodenal ulcers, giardiasis, surgical
tients received a dose of 2g. The t1⁄2β (17.1 versus
prophylaxis, trichomoniasis and vaginitis.[110-112]
16.9h for intravenous or 15.6 versus 18.4h for
Heizmann and colleagues[113] have described
oral), Vd (0.8 versus 0.69 L/kg) and clearance
procedures for HPLC quantification of ornidazole
(2.27 versus 1.85 L/h) did not change significantly and its major metabolites, M1 and M4, in plasma,
with either patient subset or if the drug was given urine, vaginal fluid and CSF.
orally or intravenous in healthy volunteers or in pa- The pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous
tients with renal failure. This study only evaluated ornidazole have been studied in a variety of popula-
a single oral or intravenous dose. The authors sug- tions, including healthy individuals, neonates and
gested using a normal dose following dialysis and infants, those with renal and hepatic dysfunction,
no adjustment for renal failure unless the patient is and those receiving single therapeutic doses for
expected to receive multiple doses over time. Non- various clinical conditions (table IV). Oral absorp-
renal metabolism and elimination played a impor- tion of ornidazole is almost complete, with bioavail-
tant role in both groups of patients. ability of >90% and tmax ranging between 2 and

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
368 Lamp et al.

Table IV. Pharmacokinetics of ornidazole


Dose (mg) n Schedule F (%) Cmax Vss AUC24h t1⁄2β (h) CL (L/h)a Reference
(mg/L) (L/kg) (mg/L • h)
1500 PO 50 S 23.6 (1h) 10.9 110
1000 IV 14 S 24 0.9b 14.1 2.82 111
750 PO 4 S 10.9 0.87 14.4 21
1500 PO 5 S 31.5 13.8 114
1000 IV 10 S 0.86 14.1 3.04 115
20 mg/kg IV 12 (neonates/infants) S 0.96 511 14.7 0.80 116
ml/min/kg
1000 IV or PO 8 (with variable renal function) S 102 (n = 6) 0.70 371 (PO) 12.7 2.94 117
500 IV 8 (CRF, no dialysis) S 0.73 185.0c 10.8 2.78 118
500 IV 7 (dialysis) S 3.84 118
1000 IV or PO 6 (dialysis) S 97 (n = 2) 0.78 308 11.0 3.91 117
500 IV 5 (CAPD) S 0.79 185.6c 11.8 2.87 118
500 IV 10 (cirrhosis) S 0.84 21.9 2.09 115
500 IV 10 (cirrhosis) S 0.81 19.3 2.24 119
500 IV 10 (hepatitis) S 0.90 19.3 2.01 119
500 IV 10 (CA) S 0.74 17.4 1.57 119
500 IV 11 (liver transplant) S 9.11 120
1000 IV 5 (PG) M 20.71 0.79 375c 15.22 3.4 121
a Normalised to a bodyweight of 70kg.
b Approximate value.
c AUC from zero to infinity.
AUC24 = area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours; CA = pancreatic cancer; CAPD = continuous ambulatory peritoneal
dialysis; CL = total body clearance; Cmax = peak plasma drug concentration; CRF = chronic renal failure; F = bioavailability; IV = intravenous;
M = multiple; n = number of participants; PG = pregnant; PO = oral; S = single; t1⁄2β = elimination half-life; Vss = volume of distribution at steady
state.

4h.[21,117] Protein binding is approximately 11 to laxis. Penetration rates for this study compared with
13%, which is slightly higher than that reported for plasma concentrations ranged between 50 and 70%.
metronidazole in one study.[21] Reported Vd values Ornidazole is metabolised to 5 metabolites. Two
range from 0.73 to 0.90 L/kg with AUC values for of the major active metabolites are M1 and M4,
single intravenous 500mg doses of 185 mg/L • h with M1 stemming from an oxidative pathway and
and for 1g doses of 375 mg/L • h.[111,118,119,121] Al- M4 via hydrolysis.[123] Ornidazole and its metabo-
though ornidazole concentrations in CSF have only lites are primarily excreted in the urine. Between
been assessed in animal models, it is expected that 43 and 63% of the dose was recovered from urine,
it should penetrate the CNS as well as metronida- with <4% of the dose recovered as unchanged
zole.[122] drug.[123] Biliary excretion is another elimination
Ornidazole concentrations have been measured pathway for ornidazole and its metabolites, with
in the colonic (8.7 μg/g) and abdominal (3.6 to 4.4 22% or more of the dose recovered in the faeces of
μg/g) walls and epiploic fat (3.4 to 4.7 μg/g) through- healthy volunteers.[21,123] The t1⁄2β is approximately
out colorectal surgery in those receiving a 1g intra- 1.7 times longer than that of metronidazole, with
venous dose for surgical prophylaxis.[111] In another reported values ranging between 11 and 14h in
study,[120] concentrations were measured in epiploic individuals without liver dysfunction.[21,110,117]
fat (2.48 to 4.64 μg/g) throughout liver transplan- The pharmacokinetics of ornidazole are not influ-
tation after a 500mg intravenous dose was given enced by any degree of renal dysfunction. As shown
together with ceftriaxone 1g for surgical prophy- in several studies,[117,118] the t1⁄2β of ornidazole in

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 369

patients with renal dysfunction is similar to that SBT values were 1 : 2 for both isolates at each time
observed in those with normal renal function. Or- point.
nidazole is easily removed during haemodialysis In summary, ornidazole shares many of the
because of its low molecular weight and low pro- properties of metronidazole. When not used as a
tein binding.[117,118] It is recommended that doses single dose and depending upon the clinical indi-
be administered after dialysis. In regard to patients cation, the usual dosage of ornidazole is 500mg
on peritoneal dialysis, one study showed that 6.2% every 12 hours. Adjustment of the dose for renal
of an administered dose of ornidazole is found in dysfunction is not required. Owing to its long half-
peritoneal dialysis fluids after 48 hours.[118] Vd, life, up to 14 hours, and typical MIC values for
plasma CL and t1⁄2β in patients receiving CAPD are susceptible bacteria, a 24-hour dosage interval
similar to those for patients with chronic renal fail- could be considered appropriate for this agent
ure. Thus, no dosage changes are needed for pa- when multiple doses are required.
tients with renal dysfunction or those receiving
CAPD. 7.3 Secnidazole
As with metronidazole, the elimination of ornid-
Secnidazole [1-(2-hydroxypropyl)-2-methyl-5-
azole is impaired in patients with severe liver dis-
nitromidazole] is a structural analogue of the 5-
ease.[115,119] As compared with healthy volunteers,
nitroimidazoles and has been evaluated for the
plasma clearance is reduced from 3.04 to 1.57 L/h
treatment of giardiasis, amoebiasis, trichomoniasis
in patients with pancreatic cancer, 2.01 L/h in pa-
and bacterial vaginitis. Its spectrum of activity is
tients with acute viral hepatitis, 2.09 L/h in patients
similar to that of the other nitroimidazoles, with
with severe alcoholic cirrhosis, and 2.34 L/h in pa-
comparable activity against B. fragilis, T. vaginalis,
tients with biopsy-proven liver cirrhosis.[115,119]
E. histolytica and approximately 10 times greater
The t1⁄2β is also extended in patients with liver dis- activity than metronidazole against Giardia duo-
ease, with values ranging between 19 and 21h as denalis. Secnidazole shares the same mechanism
compared with 11 to 14h in those without impair- of action as other 5-nitroimidazoles.[128]
ment.[21,115,119] Pharmacokinetic data for secnidazole are lim-
In vitro susceptibility studies have shown that, ited. It is absorbed completely after oral adminis-
compared with metronidazole, ornidazole has sim- tration of 0.5 to 2g. A 2g oral dose achieves Cmax
ilar or slightly lower MIC values against a variety values of 35.7 to 46.3 mg/L.[128,129] Protein binding
of anaerobic bacteria and protozoa.[124-127] Compared is approximately 15% and Vd is 49.2L.[128] The
with tinidazole, ornidazole MIC values are either t1⁄2β is longer than that of metronidazole and ranges
similar or slightly higher.[124,127] After 1g intrave- from 17 to 28.8h.[128,129] Excretion of secnidazole
nous doses, plasma ornidazole concentrations at 24 in females was reported to be greater than in males
hours were above the MIC values of sensitive an- (approximately 26 versus 17.5%) and consequently
aerobic organisms in a study of pregnant women the t1⁄2β was only 14h in females compared with 20h
with chorioamnionitis or pyelonephritis and in in- in males in that study.[128] After a single 2g oral
dividuals undergoing colorectal surgery.[111,121] Ad- dose, plasma concentrations are maintained above
ditionally, adequate tissue concentrations were the MIC of protozoal pathogens for longer than 48
found at almost 4 hours after the end of a 1g intra- hours.[128,129] In gingival crevicular fluid, the Cmax
venous dose in abdominal wall fat, and for the ma- was 74% of the corresponding serum Cmax.[129]
jority of patients in epiploic fat samples.[111] Secnidazole is oxidised by the liver to a hydr-
The SBT activity of ornidazole has been studied oxyethyl metabolite. Two studies have reported
in combination with fleroxacin against B. fragilis varying data on the amount of secnidazole and me-
and B. thetaiotaomicron.[90] At 2 and 8 hours after tabolites excreted in urine. Between 10% and 50%
administration of a 500mg oral dose of ornidazole, of an administered dose appears in urine over 72 to

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
370 Lamp et al.

96 hours.[128] Similarly to metronidazole, secnid- 9. Bergan T, Arnold E. Pharmacokinetics of metronidazole in


healthy volunteers after tablets and suppositories. Chemother-
azole does not induce or inhibit cytochrome P450 apy 1980; 26: 231-41
(CYP) enzymes.[130] 10. Ralph ED, Clarke JT, Libke RD, et al. Pharmacokinetics of
metronidazole as determined by bioassay. Antimicrob Agents
No information is available on the disposition Chemother 1974; 6: 691-6
of secnidazole in patients with renal or hepatic dys- 11. Jensen JC, Gugler R. Single and multiple-dose metronidazole
function, or other special populations. Secnidazole kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 34: 481-7
12. Houghton GW, Smith J, Thorne PS, et al. The pharmacokinetics
is also prone to cause a disulfiram-like reaction of oral and intravenous metronidazole in man. J Antimicrob
when administered with alcohol-containing prod- Chemother 1979; 5: 621-3
13. Houghton GW, Hundt HKL, Muller FO, et al. A comparison of
ucts.[128] the pharmacokinetics of metronidazole in man after oral ad-
In summary, secnidazole is an effective single- ministration of single doses of benzoylmetronidazole and
dose treatment for patients with amoebiasis, tricho- metronidazole. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 14: 201-6
14. Fredricsson B, Hagström B, Nord CE, et al. Systemic concen-
moniasis, giardiasis and bacterial vaginosis, with trations of metronidazole and its main metabolites after intra-
similar efficacy as multiple doses of metronidazole. venous oral and vaginal administration. Gynecol Obstet
Invest 1987; 24: 200-7
In areas where patient compliance is problematic, 15. Loft S, Døssing M, Poulsen, HE, et al. Influence of dose and
single-dose therapy with secnidazole may offer a route of administration on disposition of metronidazole and
useful alternative. its major metabolites. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1986; 30: 467-73
16. Houghton GW, Thorne PS, Smith J, et al. Comparison of phar-
macokinetics of metronidazole in healthy female volunteers
following either a single oral or intravenous dose. Br J Clin
8. Therapeutic Considerations Pharmacol 1979; 8: 337-41
17. Mattila J, Männistö PT, Mäntylä R, et al. Comparative pharma-
cokinetics of metronidazole and tinidazole as influenced by
The main distinguishing features of tinidazole, administration route. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1983;
ornidazole or secnidazole are their prolonged t1⁄2β 23: 721-5
values compared with metronidazole. The choice 18. Cunningham FE, Kraus DM, Brubaker L, et al. Pharmacokinet-
ics of intravaginal metronidazole gel. J Clin Pharmacol 1994;
of nitroimidazole may be influenced by the longer 34: 1060-5
dosage intervals with other members of this class; 19. Alper MM, Barwin N, McLean WM, et al. Systemic absorption
of metronidazole by the vaginal route. Obstet Gynecol 1985;
however, metronidazole remains the predominant 65: 781-4
antimicrobial for anaerobic and protozoal infec- 20. Daneshmend TK, Homeida M, Kaye CM, et al. Disposition of
tions. oral metronidazole in hepatic cirrhosis and in hepatosplenic
schistosomiasis. Gut 1982; 23: 807-13
21. Schwartz DE, Jeunet F. Comparative pharmacokinetic studies
of ornidazole and metronidazole in man. Chemotherapy 1976;
References 22: 19-29
1. Speck WT, Stein AB, Rosenkranz HS. Metronidazole bioassay. 22. Bergan T, Leinebø O, Blom-Hagen T, et al. Pharmacokinetics
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1976; 9: 260-1 and bioavailability of metronidazole after tablets, supposito-
2. Durel P, Couture J, Bassoullet MT. The rapid detection of met- ries and intravenous administration. Scand J Gastroenterol
ronidazole in urine. Br J Vener Dis 1967; 43: 111-3 1984; 19 Suppl. 91: 45-60
3. Nilsson-Ehle I, Ursing B, Nilsson-Ehle P. Liquid chromato- 23. Amon I, Amon K, Hüller H. Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic
graphic assay for metronidazole and tinidazole: pharmacoki- efficacy of metronidazole at different dosages. Int J Clin Phar-
netic and metabolic studies in human subjects. Antimicrob macol 1978; 16: 384-6
Agents Chemother 1981; 19: 754-60 24. Lau AH, Emmons K, Seligsohn R. Pharmacokinetics of intra-
4. Wheeler LA, DeMeo M, Halula M. et al. Use of high-pressure venous metronidazole at different dosages in healthy subjects.
liquid chromatography to determine plasma levels of metro- Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1991; 29: 386-90
nidazole and metabolites after intravenous administration. 25. Søreide O, Leinebø O, Bergan T, et al. Comparative pharmaco-
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1978; 13: 205-9 kinetics of metronidazole and tinidazole used as single dose
5. Müller M. Mode of action of metronidazole on anaerobic bac- prophylactic agents. Scand J Gastroenterol 1984; Suppl 90:
teria and protozoa. Surgery 1983; 93: 165-71 97-106
6. Edwards DI. Mechanism of antimicrobial action of metronida- 26. Solhaug JH, Bergan T, Leinebø, et al. The pharmacokinetics of
zole. J Antimicrob Chemother 1979; 5: 499-502 one single perioperative dose of metronidazole or tinidazole.
7. Chrystal EJT, Koch RL, McLafferty MA, et al. Relationship Scand J Gastroenterol 1984; Suppl. 90: 89-96
between metronidazole metabolism and bactericidal activity. 27. Eradiri O, Jamali F, Thomson ABR. Steady-state pharmacoki-
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1980; 18: 566-73 netics of metronidazole in Crohn’s disease. Biopharm Drug
8. Britz ML, Wilkinson RG. Isolation and properties of metroni- Dispos 1987; 8: 249-59
dazole-resistant mutants of Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob 28. Mattie H, Dijkmans AC, van Gulpen C. The pharmacokinetics
Agents Chemother 1979; 16: 19-27 of metronidazole and tinidazole in patients with mixed aero-

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 371

bic-anaerobic infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982; 10 and Stratton, New York. New York: Academic Press, 1979:
Suppl. A: 59-64 45-7
29. Wood BA, Monro AM. Pharmacokinetics of tinidazole and met- 47. Taylor Jr JA, Migliardi JR, Schach von Wittenau M. Tinidazole
ronidazole in women after single large oral doses. Br J Vener and metronidazole pharmacokinetics in man and mouse.
Dis 1975; 51: 51-3 Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1969: 267-70
30. Amon I, Amon K, Franke G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of metro- 48. Jager-Roman E, Doyle PE, Baird-Lambert J, et al. Pharmaco-
nidazole in pregnant women. Chemotherapy 1981; 27: 73-9 kinetics and tissue distribution of metronidazole in the new-
31. Anon. An evaluation of metronidazole in the prophylaxis and born infant. J Pediatr 1982; 100: 651-4
treatment of anaerobic infections in surgical patients. J Anti- 49. Lau AH, Lam NP, Piscitelli SC. Clinical pharmacokinetics of
microb Chemother 1975; 1: 393-401 metronidazole and other nitroimidazole anti-infectives. Clin
32. Houghton GW, Thorne PS, Smith J, et al. Plasma metronidazole Pharmacokinet 1992; 23: 328-64
concentrations after suppository administration. In: Phillips 50. Amon I, Amon K, Scharp H, et al. Disposition kinetics of met-
R, Collier J, eds. Metronidazole: proceedings of the second ronidazole in children. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1983; 24: 113-9
international symposium on anaerobic infections. Geneva, 51. Ti TY, Lee HS, Khoo YM. Disposition of intravenous metroni-
1979 April. Royal Society of Medicine, London/Grune and dazole in Asian surgical patients. Antimicrob Agents Chem-
Stratton, New York. New York: Academic Press, 1979: 41-4 other 1996; 40: 2248-51
33. Aronson IK, Rumsfield JA, West DP, et al. Evaluation of topical 52. Hand WL, King-Thompson N, Holman JW. Entry of roxi-
metronidazole gel in acne rosacea. Drug Intell Clin Pharm thromycin (RU 965), imipenem, cefotaxime, trimethoprim,
1987; 21: 346-51 and metronidazole into human polymorphonuclear leuko-
34. Schmadel LK, McEvoy GK. Topical metronidazole: a new ther- cytes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31: 1553-7
apy for rosacea. Clin Pharm 1990; 9: 94-101 53. Soriano F, Aguado JM, Tornero J, et al. Bacteroides fragilis
35. Warner JF, Perkins RL, Cordero L. Metronidazole therapy of meningitis successfully treated with metronidazole after a
anaerobic bacteremia, meningitis, and brain abscess. Arch previous failure with thiamphenicol. J Clin Microbiol 1986;
Intern Med 1979; 139: 167-9 24: 472-3
36. O’Grady LR, Ralph ED. Anaerobic meningitis and bacteremia 54. Feldman WE. Bacteroides fragilis ventriculitis and meningitis.
caused by Fusobacterium species. Am J Dis Child 1976; 130: Am J Dis Child 1976; 84: 50-1
871-3 55. George RH, Bint AJ. Treatment of a brain abscess due to Bac-
37. Davies AH. Metronidazole in human infections with syphilis. teroides fragilis with metronidazole. J Antimicrob Chemother
Br J Vener Dis 1967; 43: 197-200 1976; 2: 101-2
38. Visser AA, Hundt HKL. The pharmacokinetics of a single in- 56. Ingham HR, Selkon JB, Roxby CM. Bacteriological study of
travenous dose of metronidazole in pregnant patients. J Anti- otogenic cerebral abscesses: chemotherapeutic role of metro-
microb Chemother 1984; 13: 279-83
nidazole. BMJ 1977; 2: 991-3
39. Templeton R. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of metronida- 57. Bergan T, Solhaug JH, Søreide O, et al. Comparative pharma-
zole: a review. In: Finegold SM, McFadzean JA, Roe RJ, cokinetics of metronidazole and tinidazole and their tissue
editors. Proceedings of the International Metronidazole Con-
penetration. Scand J Gastroenterol 1985; 20: 945-50
ference; 1976 May; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Amsterdam:
58. Van Oosten MAC, Notten FJW, Mikx FHM. Metronidazole
Excerpta Medica, 1977: 28-48
concentrations in human plasma, saliva, and gingival crevice
40. Elder MG, Kane JL. The pelvic tissue levels achieved by met-
fluid after a single dose. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 1420-3
ronidazole after single or multiple dosing: oral and rectal. In:
59. O’Keefe JP, Troc KA, Thompson KA. Activity of metronida-
Phillips R, Collier J, editors. Metronidazole: proceedings of
the second international symposium on anaerobic infections. zole and its hydroxy and acid metabolites against clinical
1979 Apr; Geneva. Royal Society of Medicine, London. New isolates of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
York: Academic Press, 1979: 55-8 1982; 22: 426-30
41. Berger SA, Kupferminc M, Lessing JB, et al. Penetration of 60. Pavicic MJAMP, van Winkelhoff AJ, de Graaff J. Synergistic
clindamycin, cefoxitin, and metronidazole into pelvic perito- effects between amoxicillin, metronidazole, and the hydroxy-
neal fluid of women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy. Anti- metabolite of metronidazole against Actinobacillus actino-
microb Agents Chemother 1990; 34: 376-7 mycetemcomitans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35:
42. Büchler M, Malfertheiner P, Friess H, et al. The penetration of 961-6
antibiotics into human pancreas. Infection 1989; 17: 26-31 61. Andersson KE. Pharmacokinetics of nitroimidazoles: spectrum
43. Bassi C, Pederzoli P, Vesentini S, et al. Behavior of antibiotics of adverse reactions. Scand J Infect Dis 1981; Suppl. 26: 60-7
during human necrotizing pancreatitis. Antimicrob Agents 62. Ralph ED, Kirby WMM. Bioassay of metronidazole with either
Chemother 1994; 38: 830-6 anaerobic or aerobic incubation. J Infect Dis 1975; 132: 587-91
44. Kling PA, Burman LG. Serum and tissue pharmacokinetics of 63. Ralph ED. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metronidazole. Clin
intravenous metronidazole in surgical patients. Acta Chir Pharmacokinet 1983; 8: 43-62
Scand 1989; 155: 347-50 64. Loft S, Poulsen HE, Sonne J, Døssing M. Metronidazole clear-
45. Martin C, Sastre B, Mallet MN, et al. Pharmacokinetics and ance: a one-sample method and influencing factors. Clin
tissue penetration of a single 1,000-milligram, intravenous Pharmacol Ther 1988; 43: 420-8
dose of metronidazole for antibiotic prophylaxis of colorectal 65. Thiercelin JF, Diquet B, Levesque C, et al. Metronidazole ki-
surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 2602-5 netics and bioavailability in patients undergoing gastrointes-
46. Rood JP, Collier J. Metronidazole levels in alveolar bone. In: tinal surgery. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1984; 35: 510-9
Phillips R, Collier J, eds. Metronidazole: proceedings of the 66. Bergan T, Aase, Leinbo O, et al. Pharmacokinetics of metroni-
second international symposium on anaerobic infections. Ge- dazole and its major metabolite after a high intravenous dose.
neva, 1979 April. Royal Society of Medicine, London/Grune Scand J Gastroenterol 1984; 19 Suppl. 91: 113-23

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
372 Lamp et al.

67. Somogyi AA, Kong CB, Gurr FW, et al. Metronidazole phar- 88. Van der Auwera P, Van Laethem Y, Defresne N, et al. Compar-
macokinetics in patients with acute renal failure. J Antimicrob ative serum bactericidal activity against test anaerobes in vol-
Chemother 1984; 13: 183-9 unteers receiving imipenem, clindamycin, latamoxef, and
68. Houghton GW, Dennis MJ, Gabriel R. Pharmacokinetics of metronidazole. J Antimicrob Chemother 1987; 19: 205-10
metronidazole in patients with varying degrees of renal fail- 89. Depperman KM, Boeckh M, Grineisen S, et al. Brief report:
ure. Br J Clin Pharm 1985; 19: 203-9 combination effects of ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, and met-
69. Bergan T, Thorsteinsson SB. Pharmacokinetics of metronida- ronidazole intravenously in volunteers. Am J Med 1989; 87
zole and its metabolites in reduced renal function. Chemother- Suppl. 5A: 46S-8S
apy 1986; 32: 305-18 90. Boeckh M, Lode H, Deppermann KM, et al. Pharmacokinetics
70. Kreeft JH, Ogilvie RI, Dufresne LR. Metronidazole kinetics in and serum bactericidal activities of quinolones in combina-
dialysis patients. Surgery 1983; 93: 149-53 tion with clindamycin, metronidazole, and ornidazole. Anti-
71. Lau AH, Chang CW, Sabatini S. Hemodialysis clearance of microb Agents Chemother 1990; 34: 2407-14
metronidazole and its metabolites. Antimicrob Agents Chem- 91. Pefanis A, Thauvin-Elipoulos C, Holden J, et al. Activity of
other 1986; 29: 235-8 fleroxacin alone and in combination with clindamycin or met-
72. Cassey JG, Clark DA, Merrick P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ronidazole in experimental intra-abdominal abscesses. Anti-
metronidazole in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. microb Agents Chemother 1994; 38: 252-5
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1983; 24: 950-1 92. Kowalsky SF, Echols RM, McCormick EM. Comparative se-
73. Guay DR, Meatherall RC, Baxter H, et al. Pharmacokinetics of rum bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime/metronidazole,
metronidazole in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory ceftizoxime, clindamycin, and imipenem against obligate an-
peritoneal dialysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1984; 25: aerobic bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 1990; 25: 767-75
306-10 93. Freeman CD, Nightingale CH, Nicolau DP, et al. Bactericidal
74. Loft S, Sonne J, Døssing M, et al. Metronidazole pharmacoki- activity of low-dose ceftizoxime plus metronidazole com-
netics in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Scand J Gas- pared with cefoxitin and ampicillin-sulbactam. Pharmaco-
troenterol 1987; 22: 117-23 therapy 1994; 14: 185-90
75. Lau AH, Evans R, Chang C-W, et al. Pharmacokinetics of met- 94. Freeman CD, Nightingale CH, Nicolau DP, et al. Serum bacte-
ronidazole in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Antimicrob ricidal activity of ceftriaxone plus metronidazole against
Agents Chemother 1987; 31: 1662-4 common intra-abdominal pathogens. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994;
76. Muscará MN, Pedrazzoli Jr J, Miranda EL, et al. Plasma 51: 1782-7
hydroxy-metronidazole/ metronidazole ratio in patients with 95. Goddard AF, Jessa MJ, Barrett DA, et al. Effect of omeprazole
liver disease and in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol on the distribution of metronidazole, amoxicillin, and clar-
1995; 40: 477-80 ithromycin in human gastric juice. Gastroenterol 1996; 111:
77. Lares-Asseff I, Cravioto J, Santiago P, et al. Pharmacokinetics 358-67
of metronidazole in severely malnourished and nutritionally 96. Jessa MJ, Goddard AF, Barrett DA, et al. The effect of om-
rehabilitated children. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 51: 42-50 eprazole on the pharmacokinetics of metronidazole and
78. Shaffer JL, Kershaw A, Houston JB. Disposition of metronida- hydroxymetronidazole in human plasma, saliva and gastric
zole and its effects on sulphasalazine metabolism in patients juice. Br J Clin Pharm 1997; 44: 245-53
with inflammatory bowel disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1986; 97. Goldman P. The development of 5-nitroimidazoles for the treat-
21: 431-5 ment and prophylaxis of anaerobic bacterial infections. J Anti-
79. Bergan T, Bjerke Per EM, Fausa O. Pharmacokinetics of met- microb Chemother 1982; 10: 23-42
ronidazole in patients with enteric disease compared to nor- 98. Charuel C, Nachbaur J, Monro AM, et al. The pharmacokinetics
mal volunteers. Chemotherapy 1981; 27: 233-8 of intravenous tinidazole in man. J Antimicrob Chemother
80. Plaisance KI, Quintiliani R, Nightingale CH. The pharmacoki- 1981; 8: 343-4
netics of metronidazole and its metabolites in critically ill 99. Robson RA. Bailey RR, Sharman JR. Tinidazole pharmacoki-
patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998; 21: 195-200 netics in severe renal failure. Clin Pharmacokinet 1984; 9:
81. Selkon JB. The need for and choice of chemotherapy for anaer- 88-94
obic infections. Scand J Infect Dis 1981; 26 Suppl.: 19-23 100. Evaldson GR, Lindgren S, Nord CE, et al. Tinidazole milk ex-
82. Spangler SK, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC. Time-kill study of cretion and pharmacokinetics in lactating women. Br J Clin
the activity of trovafloxacin compared with ciprofloxacin, Pharmacol 1985; 19: 503-7
sparfloxacin, metronidazole, cefoxitin, piperacillin, and 101. Wood SG, John BA, Chasseaud LF, et al. Pharmacokinetics and
piperacillin/tazobactam against six anaerobes. J Antimicrob metabolism of 14C-tinidazole in humans. J Antimicrob Chem-
Chemother 1997; 39 Suppl. B: 23-7 other 1986; 17: 801-9
83. Werk R, Schneider L. Ciprofloxacin in combination with met- 102. Vinge E, Anderson KE, Ando G, et al. Biological availability
ronidazole. Infection 1988; 16: 257-60 and pharmacokinetics of tinidazole after single and multiple
84. Bartlett JG, Louie TJ, Gorbach SL, et al. Therapeutic efficacy dose. Scand J Infect Dis 1983; 15 (4): 391-7
of 29 antimicrobial regimens in experimental intraabdominal 103. Klimowicz A, Nowak A, Bielecka-Grzela S. Penetration of
sepsis. Rev Infect Dis 1981; 3: 535-42 tinidazole into blister fluid following its oral administration.
85. Craig WA, Ebert SC. Killing and regrowth of bacteria in vitro: Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 43: 523-6
a review. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; 74 Suppl. 74: 63-70 104. Wood BA, Faulkner JK, Munro AM. The pharmacokinetics,
86. Nix DE, Tyrrell R, Müller M. Pharmacodynamics of metroni- metabolism, and tissue distribution of tinidazole. J Anti-
dazole determined by a time-kill assay for Trichomonas microb Chemother 1982; 10 (A); 43-57
vaginalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39: 1848-52 105. Vittanen J, Auvinen O, Tunturi T. Serum and tissue tinidazole
87. Estes L. Review of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics concentrations after intravenous infusion. Chemother 1983;
of antimicrobial agents. Mayo Clin Proc 1998; 73: 1114-22 29: 13-7

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)
Nitroimidazole Antimicrobials 373

106. Karhunen M. Placental transfer of metronidazole and tinidazole 120. Steib A, Jacoberger B, Von Bandel M et al. Concentrations in
in early human pregnancy after a single infusion. Br J Clin plasma and tissue penetration of ceftriaxone and ornidazole
Pharmacol 1984; 18: 254-7 during liver transplantation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
107. Carmine AA, Brogden RN, Heel RC, et al. Tinidazole in anaer- 1993; 37: 1873-6
obic infections. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharma- 121. Bourget P, Dechelette N, Fernandez H, et al. Disposition of
cological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 1982; 24: ornidazole and its metabolites during pregnancy. J Anti-
85-117 microb Chemother 1995; 35: 691-6
108. Jokipii AMM, Myllyla VV, Hokkanen E, et al. Penetration of 122. Jokipii AMM, Jokipii L. Metronidazole, tinidazole, ornidazole
the blood brain barrier by metronidazole and tinidazole. J and anaerobic infections of the middle ear, maxillary sinus
Antimicrob Chemother 1977; 3: 239-45 and central nervous system. Scand J Infect Dis 1981; Suppl.
109. Packard RS. Tinidazole: a review of clinical experience in an- 26: 123-9
aerobic infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982; 10 (A); 123. Schwartz DE, Jordan JC, Vetter W, et al. Metabolic studies of
65-72 ornidazole in the rat, in the dog and in man. Xenobiotica 1979;
110. Jokipii L, Jokipii AMM. Treatment of giardiasis: comparative 9: 571-81
evaluation of ornidazole and tinidazole as a single dose. Gas- 124. Jokipii L, Jokipii AMM. Comparative evaluation of the 2-
troenterology 1982; 83: 399-404 methyl-5-nitroimidazole compounds dimetridazole, metroni-
111. Martin C, Bruguerolle B, Mallet MN, et al. Pharmacokinetics and dazole, secnidazole, ornidazole, carnidazole, and panidazole
against Bacteroides fragilis and other bacteria of the Bacte-
tissue penetration of a single dose of ornidazole (1,000 milli-
roides fragilis group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1985;
grams intravenously) for antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal
surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34: 1921-4 28: 561-4
125. Olsson-Liljequist B, Nord CE. In vitro susceptibility of anaer-
112. Rossignol JF, Maisonneuve H, Cho YW. Nitroimidazoles in the
obic bacteria to nitroimidazoles. Scand J Infect Dis 1981;
treatment of trichomoniasis, giardiasis, and amebiasis. Int J
Suppl 26: 42-5
Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1984; 22: 63-72
126. Cedillo-Rivera R, Munoz O. In vitro susceptibility of Giardia
113. Heizmann P, Geschke R, Zinapold K. Determination of or- lamblia to albendazole, mebendazole and other chemothera-
nidazole and its main metabolites in biological fluids. J Chro- peutic agents. J Med Microbiol 1992; 37: 221-4
matography 1990; 534: 233-40 127. Wust J. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to metronidazole,
114. Matheson I, Johannessen KH, Bjorkvoll B. Plasma levels after ornidazole, and tinidazole and routine susceptibility testing
a single oral dose of 1.5 g ornidazole. Br J Vener Dis 1977; by standardized methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
53: 236-9 1977; 11: 631-7
115. Taburet AM, Delion F, Attali P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of or- 128. Gillis JC, Wiseman LR. Secnidazole; a review of its antimicro-
nidazole in patients with severe liver cirrhosis. Clin Phar- bial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use
macol Ther 1986; 40: 359-64 in the management of protozoal infections and bacterial
116. Turcant A, Granry JC, Allain P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of or- vaginosis. Drugs 1996; 51: 621-38
nidazole in neonates and infants after a single intravenous 129. Tenebaum H, Cuisinier FJG, Le Liboux A, et al. Secnidaozle
infusion. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 32: 111-3 conentrations in plasma and crevicular fluid after a single oral
117. Horber FF, Maurer O, Probst PJ, et al. High haemodialysis dose. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20: 505-8
clearance of ornidazole in the presence of a negligible renal 130. Maurice M, Pichard L, Daujat M, et al. Effects of imidazole
clearance. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 36: 389-93 derivatives on cytochromes P450 from human hepatocytes in
118. Merdjan H, Baumelou A, Diquet B, et al. Pharmacokinetics of primary culture. FASEB J 1992; 6: 752-8
ornidazole in patients with renal insufficiency; influence of
haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol
1985; 19: 211-7
Correspondence and reprints: Dr Kenneth Lamp, University
119. Taburet AM, Attali P, Bourget P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of
ornidazole in patients with acute viral hepatitis, alcoholic cir- of Missouri-Kansas City, M3-C19 Medical School Building,
rhosis, and extrahepatic cholestasis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2411 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MI 64108, USA.
1989; 45: 373-9 E-mail: lampk@umkc.edu

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999 May; 36 (5)

You might also like