Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

ECON1101: Microeconomics 3 Supply and Demand Demand shifts right – equilibrium price and

University of New South Wales Market - Where buyers and sellers can facilitate quantity both rise
exchange of goods Supply shifts right – equilibrium price goes down,
1 Thinking as an Economist Demand curve – downward sloping because of quantity goes up
Economics – Study of choices under conditions of substitution effect, income effect and reservation 4 Elasticity
scarcity – how they’re made and their results
prices Price elasticity of demand/supply - % change
Micro - Individual consumers and firms; Macro -
Supply curve – upward sloping because of low in Q demanded/supplied for 1% change in P
Aggregate economy ∆ / ∆ 1
Cost benefit principle – Take action if benefit > hanging fruit and rising opportunity costs = = × = ×
∆ / ∆
cost
E < 1: Inelastic, E = 1: Unit elastic, E > 1: Elastic, E
Economic surplus – Benefit - cost
= 0: Perfectly inelastic, E = infinite: Perfectly elastic
Scarcity principle – having more of one good
means having less of another
Opportunity cost – Cost of not taking the next
best option
Pitfalls: 1. Absolute amounts vs proportions 2.
Ignoring opportunity costs 3. Sunk costs 4. Average
vs marginal costs and benefits
2 Comparative Advantage: the Basis for
Equilibrium – System at
Trade
rest, nobody wants to
Absolute advantage – Can perform task with less
change behaviour Elasticity of demand affected by – Substitutes,
resources
Demand shifts right due budget share
Comparative Advantage – Can perform task with
Elasticity of supply affected by – Number of
lower opportunity cost to drop in price of
producers, mobility of inputs, production period
Specialisation according to comparative advantage complement, rise in price length
and trade gives maximum output of substitute, increased Elasticity of demand is – 1 at mid-point of
PPC – Downward sloping because of scarcity, bow
preference by buyers, demand curve, <1 to left, >1 to right
shaped for a many person economy because of low
increased population of Cross price elasticity of demand - % change in
hanging fruit, shifts due to economic growth,
buyers and expectation of future higher prices (and Q demanded for %1 change in price of DIFFERENT
population growth, new resources and better
vice versa) good.
technology
Supply shifts right due to decrease in costs of Complement - < 0, Substitute - > 0
productive factors, improvement in technology, 5 Perfect Competition
Law of demand – Quantity demanded goes down
increase in number of suppliers and expectation of
as price goes up and vice versa
lower prices (and vice versa) Need - something that you cannot live without, e.g.
food and water
Want - something you would like to have, but don’t Consumer and Producer surplus – Difference 7 The Quest for Profit and the Invisible
need, e.g. ribs. Demand represents wants between reservation price and price paid Hand
Law of diminishing marginal utility – additional Accounting profit – Revenue - explicit costs;
Economic profit – Accounting profit – opp. costs
utility (benefit) of consuming an extra unit of a good
Normal profit – Economic profit = 0 (Normal profit
decreases with consumption is opportunity cost)
Rational spending rule – Spend until marginal Invisible Hand theory – Buyers and sellers acting
benefit = marginal cost selfishly and independently will result in socially
Law of Supply – Quantity supplied goes up as optimal allocation of resources and best outcome for
price goes up and vice versa everyone
Constructing Market demand and supply Forms of market efficiency
curves – Add HORIZONTALLY Weak Semi-strong Strong
6 Efficiency and Exchange Info reflected Private Public Both
Pareto improvement – Somebody is made better in share price
off and nobody is made worse off 8 Monopoly and other forms of Imperfect
Pareto efficiency – No more Pareto improvements Competition
can occur Price taker – Firm will lose all sales if price higher
than market price. Demand curve is perfectly elastic.
Economic surplus in a market is maximized
Price setter – Firm can change price and not lose
when exchange occurs at the equilibrium price all sales. Demand curve is downward sloping.
Causes of deadweight loss – Price floors, price Three types of imperfect competition
ceilings, price subsidies, taxes Pure Oligopoly Monopolistic
monopoly competition
Perfect competition – Profit maximizing firms, Single firm Few large Many firms with
price takers, identical products, many buyers and firms differentiated
products
sellers, no barriers to entry or exit, well informed
Sydney airport ANZ, CBA, Restaurants
buyers and sellers
Westpac, NAB
Fixed costs – Don’t change
Monopolies arise from – Exclusive access to
Variable costs – Change with production resources, government, economies of scale
Economies of scale – Average cost goes down as
Profit production goes up. Average cost = (Fixed costs +
maximization Variable costs) / Quantity; FC/Q goes down with Q,
rule – Price = VC/Q goes up (diminishing marginal returns).
Diseconomies of scale when average starts to rise
Marginal cost
9 Thinking Strategically Common resources – Resources that it is difficult
A game has – players, strategies, payoffs to exclude people from using (e.g. a lake)
Dominant strategy – Gives highest payoff no Open access – When anybody can use a common
matter what other players choose resource
Nash equilibrium – Every player has highest Tragedy of the commons – Common resources
payoff given other player choices with open access are used by more and more
Prisoner’s dilemma – Every player has dominant people until total surplus drops to zero
strategy but they are all better off if all choose Positional externalities - a change in one
dominated strategy person’s performance changes the expected reward
The oligopoly prisoner’s dilemma – Can agree of another in situations where reward depends on
to set price at monopolist profit maximizing level relative performance
(form a cartel), but each has incentive to lower price Positional arms race – Positional externalities
to gain market share. Price war leads to lower lead to series of continually offsetting investments in
Monopolist’s profit maximization rule – profits for all. performance by 2 players, e.g. use of performance
= 10 Externalities and Common Resources enhancing drugs in professional sport
Externality – Cost (negative) or benefit (positive) 11 Public Goods and their financing
to somebody not involved in activity. Causes Rivalry – Consumption of good by one person
deadweight loss (see graph) means there is less available for another
Excludability – People can be prevented from
using a good if they don’t pay
Rivalrous Non-rivalrous
Excludable Private goods Collective goods
Non-excludable Common goods Public goods
Free rider problem – people value public goods
but avoid paying for them because they know they
can’t be excluded. Public goods don’t get sufficient
funding if too many people do this. Solved by taxes.
Head tax – Everybody pays same amount
Regressive tax – Proportion of income paid in
MR NOT Price; higher production means price must
taxes declines as income rises (head tax is
be lowered to get sufficient demand; MR Coase theorem – Problems with externalities are regressive)
decreasing. solved by people negotiating prices of property Proportional income tax - all taxpayers pay the
Price discrimination – charging different prices to rights IF transaction costs are low
different buyers for same good same proportion of their incomes in taxes
Government solutions to externalities –
Perfect price discrimination – Charging Progressive tax - Proportion of income paid in
Regulations, market-based instruments (taxes,
customers their exact reservation price subsidies, cap and trade) taxes rises as income rises
12 The Economics of Information
Cost of information – Opportunity cost of time
spent searching, rises as more is gained
Benefit of information – Gains in surplus from
using it, e.g. money saved finding a better deal
The optimal amount of information – Marginal
benefit = marginal cost
Gamble inherent in search – Don’t know what
the benefits of information will be (will I find a much
cheaper deal or waste my time and find nothing?)
Asymmetric information – buyers and sellers
aren’t equally informed, e.g. sellers knows quality
better
Principal – Someone who contracts another to
perform a service on their behalf
Agent – Someone who is contracted to work on a
principal’s behalf
Principal-agent problem – Principals and agents
have different values. Agent could in self-interest
against the best interests of the principal and
monitoring an agent’s actions can be costly.
The Market for Lemons model – Asymmetric
information leads to deterioration in value of goods.
Buyers offer average price for both good and bad
(lemons) goods; sellers with above average goods
leave the market because they aren’t offered good
prices, sellers of lemons flood the market to make
surplus.
Adverse selection – Buyer exploits asymmetric
information before a transaction, e.g. terminally ill
person buying life insurance
Moral Hazard – Buyer exploits asymmetric
information after a transaction, e.g. person with car
insurance drives more dangerously knowing they’re
covered

You might also like