See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/366055205

Working Notes - Notes- Verifying the Unified Theory of Knowledge

Management's Operationalized Functions Using Macro Verb and Attribute
Concepts

Method · December 2022

CITATIONS

1 author:

Philip William Sisson

George Washington University
30 PUBLICATIONS   76 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Discovering and Verifying the Unified Theory of Knowledge Management: System Engineering Research Applying Generalizations in the Domain Literature View project

Discovering and Verifying the Unified Theory of Knowledge Management View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Philip William Sisson on 12 December 2022.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Only Working Notes: Verifying the Unified Theory of Knowledge Management's
Working Notes Operationalized Functions Using Macro Verb and Attribute Concepts
Table of Contents

=======> Table of Contents for Working Notes Only <======

The dissertation, "Verifying the Unified Theory of Knowledge Management's Operationalized

Functions Using Macro Verb and Attribute Concepts," conducted tests to verify the sufficiency and
necessity of the theory's seven functions.

( https://www.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/2746057024/D6C02163B87E4787PQ/ )

Source preparation working notes show the sources allocation to source collections and their
preparsing processing. See Sisson (2022).

For the most part, the working notes in the document are verb lists for the identified collections
used in preparing collections of verb lists to use as source verbs (requirements) or test verbs for
sufficiency and necessity testing. Text has been added for context. Some lists are now more
illustrative than definitive.

The results of some tests are also included. Each test combines test data for a particular model and
can be regarded as an experiment. Probably over 5,000 experiments were conducted to develop
tests, test data, and refine the model.

Download all notes from the Internet Archive from https://archive.org/details/working-notes-

notes-verifying-the-unified-theory-of-knowledge-managements-operat.

Section C-0 - Table of Contents

Section C - 0a - Working Notes Summary
Section C - 4.1.1 - Verbs Used as Initial Seeds
Section C - 4.3.1.1 - a - Methodology - Example test baseline
Section C - 4.3.1.1 - b - Methodology - Alternate test baseline
Section C - 4.3.3.1 - MS Access Table Relationships
Section C - 4.3.3.3 - Functionally Common Verb Types
Section C - 4.3.3.3.1 - Functionally Common Verbs
Section C - 5.1.1 - - ------------------- KM DOMAIN PREPARATION ---------------------
Section C - 5.1.1 -- - ---------------------- Source Verb Preparation -----------------------
Section C - 5.1.1.1 - Source Verb Collections (Categories)
Section C - 5.1.1.1-a - Collection Selection Approach
Section C - 5.1.1.5 - Exclusion Lists Summary
Section C - 5.1.2 - ---------------------- TEST VERB PREPARATION -----------------------
Section C - 5.1.2.1 - ----------------------------- KM Domain ---------------------------------

Model: 20Mar22 Working Notes

12/6/2022 Section C - 0 - Page 1 of 3
 Section C - 5.1.2.1- - Developing Test Verbs and Relationships
Section C - 5.1.2.1-a0 - Seed Verbs
Section C - 5.1.2.3 - ---------------------- Establishing Relationships ---------------------
Section C - 5.1.2.3-- - Relationships Summary
Section C - 5.1.2.3--- - Definition Statistics By Source
Section C - 5.1.2.3---- - Selected Collection Verb Sources
Section C - 5.1.2.3-a - Fair Use (Section 107 of the Copyright Act)
Section C - 5.1.2.3-b9 - Ad Hoc Relationships
Section C - 5.1.2.4 - Test Verbs
Section C - 5.1.3.1 - ---------------- KM CENTRIC VERBS PREPARATION ------------------
Section C - 5.1.3.1- - KM Centric Verbs Candidate Lists
Section C - 5.1.3.2.3 - ------------------------------- Excludes ---------------------------------
Section C - 5.1.3.2.3- - Table of Contents - Exclusions
Section C - 5.1.3.2.3.1 - KM Centric Verbs - Exclude Collections
Section C - 5.1.3.2.3.1-b - Excluded Verbs and Synonyms Count By Collection
Section C - 5.1.3.2.3.1-b - Excluded Verbs by Collection
Section C - 5.1.3.2.3.2 - --------------------------- Attributes (Out) ----------------------------
Section C - 5.1.3.2.3.2- - Attributes Overview
Section C - 5.1.3.2.3.2-? - Attribute Meanings
Section C - 5.1.3.2.4 - -------------------------- Evaluated Additions ----------------------------
Section C - 5.1.3.2.4 - - Table of Contents - Evaluated Additions
Section C - 5.1.3.2.4.a - KM Centric Verbs - Addition Collections
Section C - 5.1.3.2.4.b - KM Centric Verbs - Addition Coillections by Count
Section C - 5.1.3.2.4.b2 - KM Centric Verbs - Verbs to Add
Section C - 5.1.3.2.5 - ------------------------------- Adjusts -----------------------------------
Section C - 5.1.3.2.5 - - KM Centric Verbs - Adjustment Collections
Section C - 5.1.3.2.5.a - Adjustment Verbs Count By Collection
Section C - 5.1.3.2.5.b - Adjustments - Verbs to Remove
Section C - 5.1.3.2.5.c - Adjustments - Verbs to Add
Section C - 5.1.3.2.6 - ------------------------------- Merged -----------------------------------
Section C - 5.1.3.2.6-a - KM Centric Verbs - Merged Verbs (Unadjusted)
Section C - 5.1.3.3 x - ============ - - - - - - - Tests - - - - - - - - ============
Section C - 5.1.3.3.1.2.2 - Exclude verbs with non-KM attributes
Section C - 5.2 - ------------------------------ ANALYSIS ----------------------------------
Section C - 5.2.1.1 - Test approaches describing the KM domain in terms of organics
Section C - 5.2.1.1a - Test approaches describing the KM domain in terms of organics (All SDs
Built)
Section C - 5.2.1.2 - -------------------------- KM Centric Verbs -----------------------------
Section C - 5.2.2 - Other models compared for KMc verbs - efficiency wo/functionally
common relationships
Section C - 5.2.2-b - Other models compared for KMc verbs - uniqueness
Section C - 5.2.2-c - Other models compared for KMc verbs - exemplars wo/functionally
common relationships
Section C - 5.2.2-d - Other models compared for KMc verbs - efficiency w/functionally
common relationships
Section C - 5.2.3-x - Alternative operationalized functions considered
Section C - 5.2.4.6.8 - Model Analysis for Relationship Build Options

Model: 20Mar22 Working Notes

12/6/2022 Section C - 0 - Page 2 of 3
 Section C - 5.2.4-x -
Additional Model Analysis
Section C - 5.2.6 -
------------------------- Model Analysis ---------------------------
Section C - 5.2.6.1a -
KM Domain Source Verbs - Sufficency
Section C - 5.2.6.1b -
KM Domain Source Verbs - Component Contributions
Section C - 5.2.6.2 -
KMc Test Collections Considerations
Section C - 5.2.6.2.1.1-a -
KMc Exclude Test Individual Collection Impacts Summary (Process verbs
and synonyms)
Section C - 5.2.6.2.1.2 - KMc Addition Collection Single Collection Tests Summary
Section C - 5.2.6.2.1.3 - KMc Adjust Collections Impacts Data (Reconcilation to Visualization)
Section C - 5.2.6.2.2 - KMc Test Collections Delta Impact by Approach
Section C - 5.2.6.2.2.9.1 - Sufficiency Tests By Approach
Section C - 5.2.6.3.1.2 - Operationalized Functions By Approach (reconciled)
Section C - 5.2.6.3.2 - Testing for Necessity
Section C - 5.2.6.4 - Source Contributions Variations (Definitional Inputs)
Section C - 5.2.6.4.30 - Definition Variations - KM Domain Verbs Contribution
Not intended for publication without revision
===> ===> Navigating these documents in Adobe may be easier of the web layout or bookmark option is selected.

Model: 20Mar22 Working Notes

12/6/2022 Section C - 0 - Page 3 of 3
View publication stats