Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Melodrama Realism
Melodrama Realism
Lexey Payne
Melodrama has maintained a strong hold on theatre lovers since the later 19th century,
audience members enjoy the heightened emotions and stakes involved in melodramatic
entertainment. There are many examples of melodrama in contemporary film and television,
including the ABC hit show Grey’s Anatomy, the show follows the lives of a group of medical
students as they finish school and begin their surgical internships. Grey’s Anatomy is best known
for its melodramatic elements of provocative emotion and high stakes scenarios. While the
drama and intrigue of the show is entertaining it is highly unlikely to ever take place in the real
Episode 10 in which one of the main character’s, Christina Yang operates on one of her
colleagues’ husband who ultimately passes away during his procedure. This situation is at first
improbable because the hospital staff worked together to keep the identity of the patient a secret
from Dr. Yang, covering his face the entire time, the patient also receives resuscitation for 20
emotions and musical enhancement. Christina is originally emotionally monotone, not caring
about the lose of her patient and simply carrying on with her day. Once she leaves the OR into
the scrub room she is told the identity of the patient and completely breaks down (got2lovemel2,
2:05, 2011) . Her crying is extremely physical and over the top. There is a score of sad music
playing rather than dialogue as we see Christina break down on the other side of the glass.
(got2lovemel2, 2011). The music playing alone rather than underscore to dialogue makes the
Payne 3
scene feel even more emotional because we cannot hear what Christina or Owen, the Dr. who
breaks the news to her, are saying we can only observe the physicality of her anguish.
In contrast to melodrama there are other types of theatre that have stood the test of time,
this can include realism. Realism is theatre that is meant to display the real world. Henrik Ibsen’s
play, A Doll’s House, is one of the best standing examples of realism in theatre. The play has a
cast of complex characters that feel real emotion and have depth to their existence. While the
main characters are a married couple Torvald and Nora, there are many other characters worth
mentioning. Krogstad, who could technically be considered an antagonist in the story has an
interesting personality and character arch. Krogstad’s objective in the play is to regain the life he
once had, he wants to prove to society that he is a ‘real man’. Krogstad originally starts to forge
signatures because his love interest left him for a man who made better money and could better
provide for a family. Krogstad wants to prove to society that he is a capable man that can sustain
Krogstad does not serve time for his crime but he is outcast by his community with the
label of being a criminal. He does not get away from this societal shame, instead he some what
embraces it as he blackmails Nora with his knowledge of her crimes. Krogstad stands within his
own way and keeps himself away from his objective with his own actions. He gives into who
society has labelled him to be and becomes continually immoral as the story developes. We
discover Krogstad’s past follies with love as the story continues and this developes a sensation of
sympathy for him. This sympathy for an immoral character is one of the staple aspects of
realism. We cannot define him as innate good or bad. In Act 2 Krogstad says, "But I tell you this.
Payne 4
If I get thrown into the gutter for a second time, I shall take you with me.”, in this scene
Krogstad is blackmailing Nora with the information he knows about her crimes. This sub-
contextual dialogue in another reason why we must see Krogstad as on the spectrum of morality.
After A Doll’s House received critique for being a femisit story written by a man Lucas
Hnath wrote A Doll’s House, Part 2 as a reaction piece. In Hnath’s continuation we find Torvald
and the children 15 years after Nora’s departure from the end of part 1. Each of the characters
from Ibsen’s play have gone through different traumas and developed different responses to
them. Torvald, for example, becomes a victim rather than an abuser. We return to Torvald to find
him a ‘widow’ raising his children with the help of Anne-Marie. Torvald was a toxically
masculine character who was the product of his society. While I do not believe that trauma and
societal pressure are an excuse to become a bad person yourself I do feel some sympathy to
Torvald’s situation.
In Hnath’s continuation Torvald is given sympathy because of the attitude that Nora takes
when she returns home to ask for a divorce. In some ways Torvald is a new man and in some he
hasn’t changed. He is still a manipulative man seeing as he convinced all of the community to
believe that Nora had fallen ill and passed away, however, we also see him as a man who was
forced the responsibility of parenthood on his own. I believe that Torvald sees marriage as an
obligation trade off of sex and stability. Man provides woman with a stable place to live and all
that comes with it and in return she sexually satisfies him and cares for the home. Torvald
believes marriage works this way simply because his focus is on what other people will think of
Payne 5
him at every step he makes. He makes up his entire elaborate lie about Nora’s death simply to
escape the societal judgement of being a man who was left by his wife.
WC 1,070
Payne 6
Works Cited
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZxmkY8-ye8.
Ibsen, Henrik. A Doll's House. Directed by Patrick Garland, 1975. Uploaded by Medi Chi,
Hnath, Lucas. A Doll's House, Part 2. Dramatists Play Service, New York, 2017.