PROJECT CHARTER

Project Name- Study on Perception of people about EVs in urban

Nagpur

Project Sponsor- Self sponsored

Rationale for project- To find out and gain new insights into the
perception and views of people about EVs

Objectives- To help in better, improved and customized production of

EVs as per customer expectations.

Deliverables- To get to know the following:

I. Insights into consumer thought process
II. Improvement areas
III. What clicks with the customer while buying an EV

Summary- Start date- Nov 2022

End date- March 2022

Budget- No requirement

Team- Rhea Kapai

Vyankatesh Marothiya
Vansh Lanjewar
Isha Rajput
Constraints- Sample size is limited to the urban area of Nagpur

Assumptions- People/households in urban Nagpur are aware about

EVs in the market.

Risks- Following can be the risk:

I. Respondents are not willing to respond
II. Respondents do not give honest replies

Approval requirements- No approval requirements

Project priority Matrix-

TIME PERFORMANCE COST

CONSTRAIN

ENHANCE

ACCEPT

PERFORMANCE as a constrain because the survey regarding the

perceptions has to be accurate enough to extract relevant and useful
findings/results.
TIME to be enhanced because the deadline is till February-March so it
should be completed in time so that there’s enough time to recheck
everything.
 COST in accept because we do not have any budget requirements as
such and hence a little cost which arises can be managed.

Work Breakdown Structure Hierarchy-

1 To study the perception of people

about EVs in urban Nagpur

How people perceive EVs in the

2
market in comparison to petrol
vehicles

3 Reasons why people are

Reasons why people are
buying EVs not buying EVs

Thought process of people

4 who have already bought EVs

5 Designing Collection Interpretations Results/

Findings
WBS Coding Sheet-
1.0 Perception of people EVs
1.1 How people perceive EVs in comparison to petrol vehicles
1.1.1 Reasons for buying EVs
1.1.2 Reasons for not buying EVs
1.1.1.1 Thought process of people who have bought EVs
1.1.2.1 Designing (we- )
1.1.2.2 Collection (we- 2)
1.1.2.3 Interpretations (we- 3 and 4)
1.1.2.4 Results/Findings (we- 5)

Responsibility Matrix-

TASKS RHEA VYANKATESH VANSH ISHA

Forming questionnaire R R S S
Mailing questionnaire R R
Data collection R R
Organizing data R R
Interpretations R S S R
Result/Findings S R S R

Network Diagram-
A- Forming/Designing questionnaire
B- Mailing the questionnaire
C- Collecting responses
D- Organizing the collected data
E- Interpreting/Analyzing the data
F- Result/Findings
 Activity Dependent activity Time(in days)
A - 2
B A
C A,B 5
D A,C 2
E D 3
F E 3

3
1 2 B 3 3 C 4 5 6 7
A 6 D E F
0 0 2 2 0 6 8 8 11 11
1 3 14 14
2 0 2 3
0 0 0 0 3 0

CRITICAL PATH-
A-B-C-D-E-F

Risk Profile-

Head Risk
1) Design Questionnaire is not coherent or
incorrect scale for measurement
2) Schedule If the questionnaire is not made in time
then further activities cannot be started
3) Management Unclear definition of roles may create
conflicts among the staff
4) Organizing data Wrong organization of data
5) Customer People not responding or not giving
honest responses
 Risk Event Likelihood Impact Detection when
Difficulty
Questionnaire is not 3 4 3 Designing
coherent or incorrect scale questionnaire
for measurement
If the questionnaire is not 3 5 2 Designing
made in time then further questionnaire
activities cannot be started
Unclear definition of roles 4 3 4
may create conflicts among Data collection
the staff
Wrong organization of data 4 4 3 Organizing
People not responding or 4 5 4 Data collection
not giving honest
responses
Risk Assessment Form-

Risk Severity Matrix-

 DESIGN SCHEDULE

MANAGE-
ORGANIZING CUSTOMER
MENT
DATA

1
2 3 4 5
IMPACT

Red Zone (major

risk)
Yellow Zone
(moderate risk)
Green Zone (minor
risk)

Risk Response Matrix-

Risk Event Response Contingency Trigger who is
Plan responsible
Questionnaire is not Mitigate: Encourage Majority
coherent or logical Revise the people to people do RHEA
sequence not respond
If the questionnaire is Mitigate: Increase the Data
not made in time increase staff support collection
then further activities the staff in has not ALL
cannot be started the activity started within
the
mentioned
time
Unclear definition of Written roles Under
roles may create Avoid risk and staffed in ISHA
conflicts among the responsibilities one activity
staff and over in
the other
Wrong organization Re-organize Difficulty in
of data Mitigate under relevant data VYANKATESH
heads interpretation
People not Re-circulate Data
responding or not Mitigate among new collected is VANSH
giving honest people invalid or
responses inaccurate