Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HerzbergsTwo FactorTheory
HerzbergsTwo FactorTheory
net/publication/352465259
CITATION READS
1 4,664
1 author:
Fazilat Abdulkhamidova
American University in the Emirates (AUE)
22 PUBLICATIONS 4 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Fazilat Abdulkhamidova on 16 June 2021.
Organizational Communication
Fazilat Abdulhamidova
HERZBERG’S TWO-FACTOR THEORY
Abstract
The theory talks about the relationship between motivation and retention, which is called a
two-factor theory. These primary factors that either increase employee satisfaction or interfere with
them. According to Herzberg, people are not satisfied with meeting the needs of a lower order at work.
For example, these needs associated with minimum wage or safe and pleasant working conditions.
Instead, people seek to meet the psychological needs of a higher level related to the achievement,
recognition, responsibility, promotion, and nature of the work itself. In any case, Herzberg added
the idea that having one set of performance or incentives leads to job satisfaction. In contrast, a
different and separate set of performance leads to job dissatisfaction. Thus, satisfaction and
dissatisfaction are not in a continuous process, sometimes one increases and the other decreases, but
are independent. This theory assumes that in order to improve their attitude to work and productivity,
administrators should recognize and consider both sets of characteristics and not assume that an
increase in satisfaction leads to a decrease in dissatisfaction. So, we are going to explain this theory
concerning employee and job satisfaction and apply this theory for the organization.
Research Objectives
The current research is considered on five following objects, which are mentioned below.
5. To determine communicate the theory and the plan in the context of the organization
HERZBERG’S TWO-FACTOR THEORY
First of all, we must determine the meaning of the organizational structure. Organizational
structure is a systematic arrangement of people who work together for an organization to achieve
specific goals. There are different levels of how people work, what their authority is and what their
responsibilities are, and how to organize different people in the organization, which is the structure of
the organization.
organizations, which is all communication activities, such as sending emails, holding meetings,
talking on the phone, video conferences, speeches and so on. Therefore, these messages are all about
transferring information through an organization. A communication process can help ensure the
creation and delivery of a message. The communication process consists of several stages, such as the
“sender,” and a sender is a person who wants to communicate. Then there is a “message,” that is,
information that the sender wants to communicate. Also, “encoding” is, how the message should be
transmitted, for example, it can be verbal or written encoding, after which we have a “channel,” and
this is how the message should be sent, for example, face-to-face or electronic mail or text. "Recipient"
is the individual to whom the sender sends the message and decrypts it in the way the receiver
understands or how they interpreted the message. “Feedback” is the receiver’s response to the
message, and finally, “noise” that can interfere with communication or reduce the chance of successful
communication.
The two-factor theory was developed by the American psychologist and theorist Frederick
Herzberg in 1959. He specifically looked for two different things and found out which work-related
factors lead to job satisfaction, and which work-related factors are associated with job dissatisfaction.
HERZBERG’S TWO-FACTOR THEORY
He determined that several different factors lead to apparent satisfaction, meaning that a person will
be delighted with his specific position, which will increase his motivation in the work that he performs.
On the other hand, certain factors ensured the level of dissatisfaction, at least when they were removed,
which meant that the person did not have those that exist in the organizational environment. Therefore,
these factors must have been present in order to provide a specific type of reasonable level of
satisfaction. Satisfactions describe a person’s relationship with what he or she does, many of which
are related to the tasks performed. On the other hand, dissatisfaction is associated with a person’s
Hygiene factors that are part of a person’s work that must be present to ensure at least a
reasonable level of satisfaction. Moreover, this means that these specific factors will not satisfy the
person, but if they are not present, they can become a source of dissatisfaction. Thus, some of these
specific factors included things such as benefits, such as remuneration, job security, and also included
friends in the workplace (social needs). According to Herzberg, if you do not have good benefits,
reasonable wages, any guarantees of security in the workplace, or some level of interaction in the
On the other hand, motivation factors as these factors make a big contribution to job
satisfaction if these factors are not present, they do not necessarily cause a level of dissatisfaction.
However, if they are present, they can become a source of great satisfaction in the workplace and
motivation in a particular workplace. Examples of motives can be recognition, being recognized for a
job well done, especially among employees, individual achievements, career opportunities, and
additional promotions. Thus, Herzberg stated that factors such as recognition, achievement, career
advancement, if they are not present, will not lead to a level of dissatisfaction, however, if they are
Herzberg simply applied to the organizational environment, which meant that we could satisfy
any specific need that we want to do. However, they led to varying degrees of motivation, and these
hygienic factors would not be a source of levels of satisfaction. However, if they are not there,
We had applied Herzberg’s two factors theory for the organization, which is called American
University in the Emirates. Typically, we focused on the employees’ relationship with their job and
their attitudes, behaviors as well as their satisfaction and dissatisfaction in their workplace. During
our research about the organization, we tried to know more about organizational performances as well
as their actions that an organization takes for its employees. We may build up the idea that the
fulfillment of individual behavior depends on two kinds of components. Variables for performance
(motivate factors – satisfiers) and elements for disappointment (hygiene factors – dissatisfiers).
Execution, acknowledgment, the status of the job, obligation, and open doors for growth all come
under the responsibility of the helpers/satisfiers. Hygiene factors/dissatisfiers are about pay, ancillary
working conditions, relationship with staff, the position of physical work, and interaction between
manager and worker. In his hypothesis, Herzberg guarantees these variables work on a similar plane.
In the end, fulfillment and disappointment are not total inverses. Removing a representative's
disappointment – for instance, by offering a more significant pay – does not indicate that perhaps the
employee would be happy at a certain level. The demonstrative is only not, at this point, dissatisfied.
Also, there are two factors in the hypothesis that can be applied; the initial one is the fulfillment
that has had an impact on the inspiration factors such as duties, achievements and recognition,
progress, work itself, and self-awareness. Furthermore, this to improve and expand the performance
of the activity. Combined with the various components of cleanliness and this by having a connection
HERZBERG’S TWO-FACTOR THEORY
to the partner, guidelines and regulations, fair working conditions, pay levels, and management
characteristics.
Associations and their managers need the most suitable exhibition classes. In any case, how
will it be able to convince the group? There is a minimal point in empowering staff if the causes of
cleanliness not considered. Propelling individuals only works when the things that bother them – the
Avoid the frustration In order to provide it, it is necessary above all to create some meaning
of all the important factors. What are the complaints, what is going on? How do the staff respond to
- Ensure that all members carry out useful work in order to improve the status of their power.
1- High cleanliness and high inspiration: this is the ideal situation. Staff are highly motivated and
2- High cleanliness and low inspiration: the members have scarcely any complaints, but they are
3- Low cleanliness and high inspiration: the delegates roused, their behavior is being checked,
4- Poor cleanliness and unfortunate inspiration: this is the most horrible possible situation, staff
As per Herzberg, the variables prompting work fulfillment are "independent and particular
from those that lead to work disappointment." Therefore, on the off chance that the American
University in the Emirates sets about wiping out disappointing occupation factors, it may make
harmony yet not upgrade execution. Thus this pacifies the university workforce rather than
encouraging them to improve execution. The attributes related to work disappointment are called
cleanliness factors. When these have sufficiently tended to, individuals will not be disappointed, nor
will they be fulfilled. If they need to encourage the group, at that point, they should concentrate on
This theory has its depreciators, despite its broad acceptance. Some say the theory will not
tackle the notion that members would usually take a closer look at the actual things they believe
about their behavior since people work positively. When things go deeply, as it may be, they would
usually blame external variables. Another fundamental research is the way the theory recognizes a
strong relationship between the execution of the task and the efficacy. Herzberg's methodology did
not resolve this interaction, so this assumption would be right for his findings to matter down to
earth.
University ought to use a two-stage method to allow people to apply the hypothesis right
away, and they have got to get rid of the disappointment they are encountering. Besides, they got to
Eliminate Job Dissatisfaction: Herzberg called the reasons for disappointment "cleanness
- Make and cultivate a culture of appreciation and dignity for all colleagues.
disappointment. What is more, there is no point in trying to provoke people until they are off the
beaten track! Nevertheless, they cannot stop there. Keep in mind that since someone is not
disappointed, that does not mean that the person in question is not satisfied either! At present, they
Here we move towards the subject of inspiration inclusively. In actuality, they are going to need
"various strokes for different people" – at the end of the day, different individuals will see different
issues, and different things come up. Ensure that they talk with the public one-to-one routinely to
find out what makes a difference to them. This hypothesis is, to no small extent, liable for the act of
allowing individuals to have a more significant obligation to arrange as well as influence the tasks as
Conclusion
In conclusion, we would like to say that Herzberg's two-factor theory plays a large role in the
behavior in the workplace and in the behavior of people, as well as in the fact that it affects the
motivation of individuals / employees. Hygiene and motivation factors helps to challenging with
HERZBERG’S TWO-FACTOR THEORY
difficulties in order to improve people's job profile. To achieve this, as we mentioned above,
recognition, achievement, growth, and responsibility really play a big role. On the other hand,
hygiene factors are also the main things that affect the workplace. Hygienic factors affect the
organization’s policies, working conditions, salaries and employees, which also affects the decrease
in employee motivation. In genrally, these factors are really important and create the opportunity to