Preliminary Report of IDP

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 109

BFC 43303

INTERGRATED DESIGN PROJECT

PRELIMINARY REPORT (STRUCTURE)

FACULTY OF CIVIL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENTAL


ENGINEERING

UNIVERSITY TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA

GROUP: 5

NAME:
1. SARAROSSY SUNGKI ANAK ANTHONY CF180065
2. RAFINA RACHEL ANAK TAKA CF180019
3. YAP ZI NING AF170280
4. NUR AZMINA BINTI MOHD AMINUDDIN DF180161

SECTION: 4

LECTURER: Prof. Ir. Ts. Dr. Mohd Irwan Bin Juki


CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.0 Introduction

Structural analysis is an important aspect to consider when constructing a building as it evaluates


whether the design of the building has fulfilled the structural requirements needed to endure the
external and internal forces that are going to be loaded. It is also an important factor to study as it
can help to source the cause of the particular structural failure in the design. Therefore, civil and
structural engineers need to conduct attentive analysis in order to assure the stability, strength and
rigidity of structures, and to protect the health and safety of future users.

Integrated Design Project or IDP is conducted with aims to provide students with practical
experience in order to develop and expand their understanding of the nature of the civil engineering
design process, through a simulation of design activities of professional engineer in professional
consultancy environment. This course will help students to be able to design the building structures
and infrastructures for complex engineering based on relevant guidelines, organize a project in
team effectively as well as an individual, and propose a technical knowledge through project report
for problem solving in civil engineering works based on relevant guidelines. It will also help the
students to enhance their leadership skills and in handling project management and finance as well.
Other than that, students will be able to design and develop solutions to any problems encountered
along the way.

For the building structural design part, students are required to plan and design for a minimum 4
stories building. Throughout the designing process, students require to work in a group by establish
an imaginary consultant company. Besides, the designing work is conduct based on the
architectural drawing that students obtained.
For this project purpose, a consultancy company name as YSR Consulting Sdn Bhd is established.
The propose project conducted is a shop lots. This shop lots is located at 617 & 618, Lorong Abu
Siti, Section 16, Bandar Georgetown, D.T.L. Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. In the end of this report, a
full designation of the building together with the manual calculation and cost estimation of the
construction will be produced.

1.1 Company Background

Figure 1: Company Logo

COMPANY NAME: YSR Consulting Sdn Bhd

REGISTERED BUSINESS ADDRESS 5th floor, Persiaran Taman Dahlia,

Jalan Masai, 84700 Pasir Gudang, Johor, Malaysia.

TEL: +603-7806 3000

FAX: +603-7806 3000

E-MAIL ADDRESS: YSR@gmail.com

DATE OF INCORPORATION: 19 April 2010

COMPANY REGISTRATION NUMBER:333472-M


CIDB REGISTRATION GRED: G7 (Category B)

G7 (Category CE)

G7 (Category ME)

PRINCIPLE ACTIVITY: Civil, Structural, Design & Related Activity

BANKERS: Maybank Sdn. Bhd.

WORKING TIME: Monday-Saturday: 9:00am to 5:00pm/ Sunday: Close

YSR Consulting Sdn Bhd was established on 19 April 2010, a consultant company Grade
A, G7 that is owned 100% by Bumiputera professionals. Our company’s expertise in ground
improvement, renowned for providing technically advanced and infrastructure design.

We always focus on design and build solutions to meet each project’s requirements.
Engineering Solutions Sdn Bhd is registered with the Board of Engineers Malaysia and also
members of the Association of Consulting Engineers Malaysia (ACEM). Our company has
dedicated professionals and technical staff who are experienced and willing to face any challenge
from consulting fields.

YSR Consulting Sdn Bhd always provides quality work which satisfies every client.
Hence, we gained a good reputation from another company and our clients are convinced with our
work during these few years. As a structural engineering consultant company, we have experience
with all types of structures, including: buildings, bridges, industrial facilities & equipment, etc.
1.1.1 Organization Chart

Yap Zi Ning
Project Manager

Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Sararossy Sungki Anak


Aminuddin Anthony Rafina Rachel Anak Taka
Planning Engineer Civil and Structural Engineer
Design Engineer
1.1.2 Vision, Mission and Objectives Company
Mission

We reliably deliver innovative world-class infrastructure and premier lifestyle properties to our
customers through our core businesses in infrastructure development and consulting, operation of
infrastructure facilities and property development.

Vision

We aim to lead the region in innovative breakthrough solutions for large-scale public infrastructure
and property development.

Objectives

Deliver the project or service on time with high and desired quality within the budgeted man hours

1.1.3 Services Offered

YSR Consulting Sdn Bhd offers a full spectrum of civil and structural engineering solutions to
meet the needs of each of our clients. The services offered includes: -

1. Preliminary Study

2. Engineering Design

3. Supervision

4. Project Management

5. Management Consultancy

6. Road Safety

7. Traffic Studies

8. Computer Aided Design and Drafting


1.1.4 Product Service

YSR Consulting Sdn Bhd have served in both the public and private sectors and possess a great
amount of consulting experience at their disposal. Backed by these assets, YSR Consulting Sdn
Bhd has provided professional services in the following fields set engineering:

1. Domestic Housing Schemes and Townships

2. Industrial Building & Warehouses

3. Water Reticulations Systems

4. Sewerage System

5. Drainage, Irrigation & Spillway

6. Retaining structure

7. Roadwork
1.2 Project Background

The title of this project is “Proposed Construction and Completion of 4 storey Shop at Lot
617 & 618, Lorong Abu Siti, Section 16, Bandar Georgetown, D.T.L. Pulau Pinang.”. This project
is expected to be complete at the end of 2023. The reason for choosing this location is because this
is a new developing area. So, it will be suitable for this project to be built in this area since the
project is a shop lot. It is the main attraction for the customer to shop at this lot area as it is located
at the city center of Pulau Pinang. George Town is a city center which is surrounded by the scenic
beauty of infrastructure that makes it more comfortable. This city is a strategic path with the
existing road network. Below is the table of project description:

Project Title Proposed Construction and Completion of Lot


617 & 618, Lorong Abu Siti, Section 16, Bandar
Georgetown, D.T.L. Pulau Pinang.

Contract No. PWD/HO/B023/2021

Client Ooi Tat Yuen

Town planner Majlis perbandaran Pulau Pinang

Architect Chen Ming

Superintending Officer KTA Consultants Sdn Bhd


Representative (M&E)

Superintending Officer YSR Consulting Sdn Bhd


Representative (C&S)

Contractor Liability Engineering Sdn Bhd

Contract Sum RM4,000,000.00


Contract Duration Forty-Eight (48) Months

Date of Site Possession 20 October 2021

Date of Completion 20 October 2024

Revised Date of Completion 09June 2024

Table 1: Project Description

Figure 2: Location of proposed site on Lorong Abu Siti, Georgetown


1.2.1 Characteristics of Project Area

This project was required to design a multi-functional storey that has total 4 storey. It is included
with shopping, veranda, lobby, pump space, and court yard on the ground floor with area 136 m2,
7.40 m2, 4.75 m2, 12.20 m2, and 10.15 m2 each and office space and A/C space on the first until
third floor with area 121.40 m2 and 2.40 m2. It will include toilets on every floor that separate for
female and male and also on the ground floor, there will be toilets for specialized needed (OKU).
The area of the toilets on the ground floor are 1.73 m2 for the female, 1.85 m2 for male and 3.80
m2 for OKU. On the first until third floor, both toilets for male and female are 2.90 m2. There will
be two sets of stairs from ground floor to third floor at both end of the building with dimension
2.430 m x 4.689 m at the back of the building, 2.315 m x 5.453 m on the front of the building.
However, on the ground floor, the stair dimension is 2.315 m x 3.453 m while one lift at the front
of the building, beside the main entrance of the building with dimension 2.340 m x 2.200 m.

1.2.2 Characteristics of Project Area

The surrounding area of the proposed site is an existing business center as there were lots of shops
nearby. The project area is near to the main road and the project site is located in the high
population area. Based on the facilities available in the vicinity of our project, it can provide
facilities for residents in terms of social and living needs and easier for our group to build a new
project.
1.2.3 Project Scope

Structural engineering is a sub-discipline of civil engineering that helps to form the shapes and
structures of buildings, which includes several components such as beams, columns, slabs and
foundation. For this study, it is required to design and analyse a multi-storey (4-storey) building
that is allocated for development purposes, that is located in Lot 617 & 618, Lorong Abu Siti,
Section 16, Bandar Georgetown, D.T.L. Pulau Pinang. An illustration of the building should be
proposed, together with the plan from the elevation, side and plan view of the building. Depending
on the suitability and purposes of the design, the design parameters such as the building
specifications (eg: slabs and beams thickness and reinforcement), strength of materials (eg: fck
and fyk), exposure classes and nominal covers are set and assumed, before the loadings can be
analysis based on design considerations. The strength of the structure will be determined by
calculating and illustrating the shear and moment bending diagrams, to check if the structure is
able to serve its purposes without collapsing or failing. The calculations and design shall include
the following parts:-

i. Design of staircase.

ii. Design of slab.

iii. Design of beams.

iv. Design of columns.

v. Design of foundation (Pile Foundation)


1.3.1 Planning and Scheduling

Project Report WEEK


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Group Discussion
Preparation of Planning Proposal
Preparation of Report
Preliminary Submission
Final Submission

Design and Analysis WEEK

Foundation
Slab
Beam
Staircase
Foundation
Column
CHAPTER 2

DESIGN CODE, DATA AND SOFTWARE USED

2.0 Introduction

This section mainly consists of building codes and standards related to the reinforced
concrete design and reinforcement that will be used in the project.

2.1 Building Codes and Standards

The building code is a specific standard that is specify for constructed structures, it is a
common language and requirements to design and construct a building or structure. It is
generally applied by architects, engineers, contractors and other related regulators. The
code of practice used for the design procedures is Eurocode (EC) which published by
European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode is a basis for construction and
engineering contract specifications. It also acts as a framework for creating harmonized
technical specifications for building products. Totally, it has ten sections of Eurocode
published as a separate European Standards. The codes and standards used in this project
will mostly be referred to BS 8110/ BSEN 1992 or generally known as the Eurocode 2
(EC2).
2.1.1 Eurocode 2

BS 8110/ BSEN 1992 or EC2 is generally used in designing concrete structures. EC2
complies with principles and requirements for the safety and serviceability of structures,
the basis of their design and verification that are given in EN 1990: Basis of structural
design. Eurocode2 is only concerned with the requirements for resistance, serviceability,
durability and fire resistance of concrete structures. Other requirements, e.g. concerning
thermal or sound insulation, are not considered.

EC2, design of concrete structures is subdivided into 4 parts, which are:

1. Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings


2. Part 1.2: Structural fire design
3. Part 2: Reinforced and pre-stressed concrete bridges
4. Part 3: Liquid retaining and containing structures

Part 1-1 of Eurocode2 gives a general basis for the design of structures in plain, reinforced
and pre-stressed concrete made with normal and light weight aggregates together with
specific rules for buildings. The following subjects are dealt with in Part 1-1.

Section 1: General

Section 2: Basis of design

Section 3: Materials

Section 4: Durability and cover to reinforcement

Section 5: Structural analysis

Section 6: Ultimate limit states

Section 7: Serviceability limit states

Section 8: Detailing of reinforcement and pre stressing tendons - General

Section 9: Detailing of members and particular


Section 10: Additional rules for precast concrete elements and structures

Section 11: Lightweight aggregate concrete structures

Section 12: Plain and lightly reinforced concrete structures

Apart from that, throughout the structure designing process, Eurocode 0 and Eurocode 1
also used as the guideline. Eurocode 0 also known as BSEN 1990 is use for basis of
structural design. Then, Eurocode 1 or BSEN 1991 is used for determine the actions act on
structures.

2.2 Design Specifications and Properties

The initial sizing of members and specifications of the frame building are shown in Table
2.1. The initial sizes of member were checked against the conditions according to
serviceability limit state and ultimate limit state. The sizes were adjusted until the
conditions of serviceability limit state and ultimate limit state stated in EC2 were satisfied.
Table 2.2.1: Dimensions of structural elements
The critical structural elements were first identified in the drawing, after that manual
calculation were completed for evaluation of dimension for the structural elements.

BIL. Structural Parameter DESCRIPTION


Element
1. Slab Main dimension: (Thickness) Reinforcement
150 mm Concrete

Concrete cover:
30 mm (Esteem
and Manual)
2. Beam Main dimension: Reinforcement
300 mm x 500 mm Concrete

Concrete cover:
30 mm (Esteem
and Manual)

3. Column Main dimension: Concrete cover:


400 mm x 400 mm 30 mm (Esteem
and Manual)

4. Staircase Length, L = 2430mm Reinforcement


Height, H = 3200 mm Concrete
Raiser, R = 179 mm
Going, G = 255 mm
5. Wall Thickness, t = 230 mm Brickwall

Thickness, t = 115 mm partition for


washroom
6. Window Frame glass
window
7. Door Wood or glass
door
7. Roof Reinforced
concrete flat roof
8. Foundation Varies dimension depends on loading. Pile
Additional Specification
1. Height of each floor = 3.2 m (except ground floor to first floor, roof to upper roof
floor)
2. Height of ground floor to first floor= 3.45 m
3. Height of roof to upper roof floor = 2.8m (staircase) or 3.0m (lift motor room)
4. Height of stump = 1.5 m

2.2.2 Materials properties and specifications

The material used in the design of the structure in this research has different properties and
strength. Material properties applied in the design of the structural members are shown in
Table 2.2.

Table 2.2: Material properties of structural elements

Material Properties Specifications

Compressive strength, fck 30 N/mm2

Yield Strength, fyk 500 N/mm2 (high tensile steel, “T”) – For main bar

250N/mm2 (mild tensile steel, “R”) – For link

Density of concrete 25 kN/m3


2.2.3 Loadings

The simulation of load determination on members of the structure on three dimensional


structural frames was used; the procedure utilizes load analysis to find the dimension of
members to be used later on finding the optimal design. Dead load and live load were
applied to the structure. Loadings applied on the structural members are shown in Table
2.3.

Table 2.3: Loadings applied on the structural members

Loadings Specifications

Concrete Grade

Supersturcture 25 kN/m2

Substructure 35 kN/m2

Brick wall 2.6 kN/m2

Finishes and partition wall 1.5 kN/m2

Characteristic variable action, Qk 4.0 kN/m2


2.2.4 Exposure class, concrete cover, fire resistance and design life

2.2.4.1 Exposure class, concrete cover

As the location of building does not have much exposure to water, it can be assumed that the
corrosion may be induced by carbonation, with only a moderate amount humidity. Therefore,
according to EN 206-1, it is to be in the class of XC3 for exposure classes related to environmental
conditions.

The concrete cover is the distance between the mid-point of the reinforcement closest to the
nearest concrete surface and the nearest concrete surface. Nominal cover, Cnom is the sum of the
minimum cover, Cmin and the allowance in design for deviation, 𝛥cdev.
While 𝛥cdev is usually assumed to be 10, the minimum cover, Cmin, is taken from the highest value
of Cmin between the safe transmission of bond forces, factor of durability and fire resistance.

2.2.4.2 Design life

Table 2.4: Indicative design working life (Retrieved from Table NA1: MS EN 1990: 2010
National Annex)

The design life of this project is 50 years as it is classified to building structures and other common
structures category.
2.2.4.3 Fire resistance

According to Ninth Schedule in Uniform Building By-Laws 1984 (UUBL 1984), the shop lots
which consisted of more than one layer of storey, whicch total height of the building is less than
28m, their minmum fire resistance period for ground and upper storey is 1 hour. Since our
proposed building height is 13.05 m so the fire resistance period for our building is 1.5 hours,
which fulfil the requirement of 1 hour. The fire resistance class will be REI 90.
2.3 Software

Nowadays, the use of computer and software for the analysis and design of structures is a common
practice especially in designing office. This helps the exact design methods much easier to be
applied and the shorten design time. It also aids in reducing the possibility of making errors. As an
ease for the analysis, two kinds of software are used for the design which are AutoCAD 2010 and
ESTEEM 7.

2.3.1 AutoCAD 2010


AutoCAD is a universal CAD software program that applies to any drafting, design, or engineering
discipline. AutoCAD allows users to draw the objects in any size or shape. Besides, AutoCAD can
use to prepare two-dimensional (2D) drawings and three-dimensional (3D) models. 2D drawings
display object length and width, width and height, or height and length in a flat (2D) form. 3D
Models allow for advanced visualization, simulation, and analysis typically not possible with 2D
drawings. For this shop lot project, the AutoCAD 2010 has been used for the purpose of designing
and planning.

2.3.2 ESTEEM 7
Esteem is a total integrated solution computer program that offers the complete package in
reinforced concrete design. Now with esteem, engineers can create and edit a model, perform
analysis, design, produce calculations and drawings through a graphic driven interface within
Microsoft Windows platform. Thus, in order to simplify and speed up lengthy calculations and
detailing processes, Esteem 7 has been chosen as the analyzing software for this proposed project.
CHAPTER 3

PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND PLANNING

4.0 Preliminary planning and design of project

As the construction project is to be designed according to the designs prepared by the architect,
the design structure as suggested by the architect needs to be accurately visualized by the
engineer. After studying architect's plans, a design engineer can suggest necessary changes
from a structural point of view, such as additions or deletions and orientations of columns and
beams as required. The drawings should be examined to find out:

➢ The plans and location of doors and windows etc. are supplied to enable decide beam size
at these locations.

➢ Identify the dimensions of critical members and levels required in the plan to design the
lengths and sizes of different members.

➢ Identify any compulsory members sizes are given as required by architect.

➢ Identify height of floor.

➢ Identify the function and uses of the room space provided to determine the imposed load.
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark

SPECIFICATION

Slab thickness = 150mm


Beam size = 300 x 500 mm
Gk = 1.5 kN/m2
Qk = 4.0 kN/m2
Unit weight of concrete = 25 kN/m3
Char. Strength of concrete = 25N/mm2
Char. Strength of steel = 500 N/mm2
Char. Strength of link = 500 N/mm2
Nominal cover = 30mm
Фbar1 = 20 mm
Фbar2 = 12 mm
Фlink = 8 mm
EFFECTIVE FLANGE WIDTH

bw = 300 mm
h = 500 mm
hf = 150 mm
b1 = 1065 mm
b2 = 1065 mm
b = 3055 mm

beff = 0.2b1 + 0.1lo ≤ 0.2lo


beff = beff,i + bw ≤ b
FLANGE WIDTH FOR ALL SPAN
b = 3055 m

Beff =
Beff1 = 0.2b1 Beff2 = 0.2b2 + Beff1 = 0.2b1 + Beff2 = 0.2b2 + Beff1 + Beff
span L b1 b2 0.85Lo 0.7L b1 0.2Lo Beff2 + used
+ 0.1(0.85Lo) 0.1(0.85Lo) 0.1(0.7Lo) 0.1(0.7Lo)
bw
a-a1 1273 1065 1690 1082.05 321.205 446.205 254.6 809.2 809.2
a1-b 1528 1065 1690 1298.8 1069.6 319.96 444.96 305.6 911.2 911.2
b-b1 1927 1065 1690 1637.95 1348.9 347.89 472.89 385.4 1070.8 1070.8
b1-b2 2150 1065 1690 1827.5 1505 363.5 488.5 430 1160 1160
b2-b3 980 1065 1690 833 686 281.6 406.6 196 2082 2082
b3-c 1200 1065 1690 1020 840 297 422 240 780 780
c-c1/c1-d 2250 1065 1690 1912.5 1575 370.5 495.5 450 1200 1200
d-d1 1200 1065 1690 1020 315 440 240 780 780
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
ACTIONS
On Slab
Selfweight = 0.15 x 25 = 3.75 kN/m2
Finishes = 1.2 kN/m2
Gk = 1.5 + 3.75 = 5.25 kN/m2
Qk = 3.0 kN/m2

Action on beam

Ly/Lx >= Ly/Lx <


Slab,FS Ly Lx Ly/Lx 2.0 one 2.0 two Bv
way slab way slab
1 2430 1294 1.88 0.24
2 2430 1927 1.26 0.36
3 3130 2430 1.29 0.36
4 2430 1200 2.03 0.36
5 2430 1200 2.03 0.24
6 1237 1058 1.17 0.39
7 3680 3452 1.07 0.36
8 3680 1927 1.91 0.36
9 3680 2150 1.71 0.36
10 3680 2180 1.69 0.36
11 3680 2250 1.64 0.36
12 3680 2250 1.64 0.36
13 3680 1200 3.07 0.24
Ly/Lx >= Ly/Lx <
Slab 2.0 one 2.0 two
Ly Lx Ly/Lx Bv Gk Qk
Way way way
slab slab
1 2.43 1.294 1.88 0.24 4.15 1.24
2 2.43 1.927 1.26 0.36 6.02 2.77
3 3.13 2.43 1.29 0.36 6.91 3.50
4 2.43 1.2 2.03 0.5 5.57 2.40
5 2.43 1.2 2.03 0.5 5.57 2.40
6 1.237 1.058 1.17 0.39 4.65 1.65
7 3.68 3.452 1.07 0.36 8.71 4.97
8 3.68 1.927 1.91 0.36 6.02 2.77
9 3.68 2.15 1.71 0.36 6.42 3.10
10 3.68 2.18 1.69 0.36 6.47 3.14
11 3.68 2.25 1.64 0.36 6.59 3.24
12 3.68 2.25 1.64 0.36 6.59 3.24
13 3.68 1.2 3.07 0.5 5.57 2.40
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Design load, wd : 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk

span Total Gk Total Qk Design Load,wd


a-a1 4.65 1.65 8.75
a1-b 12.86 6.21 26.68
b-b1 12.05 5.55 24.59
b1-b2 13.33 6.60 27.89
b2-c 12.04 5.54 24.56
c-c1 6.59 3.24 13.76
c1-d 6.59 3.24 13.76
d-d1 5.88 4.80 15.14

span bending moment kNm


a-a1 1.20
a1-b 22.26
b-b1 6.39
b1-b2 9.02
b2-c 8.17
c-c1 4.88
c1-d 4.88
d-d1 1.96

support bending moment kNm


a1 2.02
b 17.52
b1 10.63
b2 14.28
c 10.16
c1 7.66
d 5.88
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
shear force shear force shear force 0.6 F,
support
0.45 F, kN 0.55 F, kN kN
a 4.87
a1 5.95 6.49
b 50.66 55.26
b1 26.06 28.43
b2 32.98 35.97
c 29.44 32.12
c1 17.03 18.58
d 17.03 18.58
d1 8.17
MAIN REINFORCEMENT

Span a-a1
Effective depth,d = h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 =
432 Bending moment,M = 1.2 kNm
Mf = 0.567∴fck bhf(d- 0.5hf) = 614 Nm > M = 1.2 kNm M < Mf Neutral

Axis within the flange


K = M /f ck bd²
= 1200000 / 25 x 809.2 x 432²
= 3.17 x10-4
z = d [0.5 + (0.25 - K/ 1.134)⁰΄⁵
Use 2H6
= 0.99d
56.6mm²
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz
= 11200000/ 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432
= 6.48mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd = 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Span a1-b
Effective depth,d = h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 22.26 kNm
Mf = 0.567fck bhf(d- 0.5hf) = 691 kNm > M
M < Mf Neutral Axis within the flange
K = M /f∴ck bd²

= 22260000 / 25 x 911.2 x 432²


= 5.03 x10-3
z = d [0.5 + (0.25 - K/ 1.134)⁰΄⁵
= 0.99d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz
= 2226000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432 Use 5H6
= 112.5 mm² 141 mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 119.65 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²

Span b-b1
Effective depth,d = h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 6.39 kNm
Mf = 0.567fck bhf(d- 0.5hf) = 620 kNm > M
M < Mf Neutral Axis within the flange
K = M /f∴ck bd²

= 6390000 / 25 x 1070.8 x 432²


= 1.55 x10-3
z = d [0.5 + (0.25 - K/ 1.134)⁰΄⁵
= 0.99d
Area of tension reinforcement Use 2H6
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz 56.6mm²
= 6390000/ 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432
= 34.4 mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Span b1-b2
Effective depth,d = h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 9.02 kNm
Mf = 0.567fck bhf(d- 0.5hf) = 880 Nm > M
M < Mf Neutral Axis within the flange
K = M /f∴ck bd²

= 9020000 / 25 x 1160 x 432²


= 1.61 x10-3
z = d [0.5 + (0.25 - K/ 1.134)⁰΄⁵
= 0.99d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz
= 9020000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432 Use 2H6
= 48.5 mm² 56.6 m²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²

Span b2-c
Effective depth,d= = h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 8.17 kNm
Mf = 0.567fck bhf(d- 0.5hf) = 2172 Nm > M = 7.7 kNm
M < Mf Neutral Axis within the flange
K = M /f∴ck bd²

= 8170000 / 25 x 2862 x 432²


= 0.58 x10-3
z = d [0.5 + (0.25 - K/ 1.134)⁰΄⁵
= 0.99d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz Use 2H6
=8170000/ 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432 56.6 mm²
= 26.2 mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Span c-c1 & Span c1-d
Effective depth,d = h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 4.88 kNm
Mf = 0.567fck bhf(d- 0.5hf) = 911 Nm > M = 4.58 kNm
M < Mf Neutral Axis within the flange
K = M /f∴ck bd²

= 4880000 / 25 x 1200 x 432²


= 4.2 x10-4
z = d [0.5 + (0.25 - K/ 1.134)⁰΄⁵
= 0.99d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz
= 4580000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432 Use 2H6
= 26.21 mm² 56.6mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²

Span d-d1
Effective depth,d = h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 1.96 kNm
Mf = 0.567fck bhf(d- 0.5hf) = 592 Nm > M = 1.8 kNm
M < Mf Neutral Axis within the flange
K = M /f∴ck bd²

= 1800000 / 25 x 780 x 432²


= 0.55 x10-4
z = d [0.5 + (0.25 - K/ 1.134)⁰΄⁵
= 0.99d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz Use 2H6
= 1800000/ 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432 56.6mm²
= 10.55 mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support a1
Effective depth,d= = h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 2.02kNm
K = M /f ck bd².
= 2020000 / 25 x 300 x 432²
= 1.4 x10-3
Redistribution = 0% Redistribution ratio = 1.0
Kbal = 0.454 (δ - k1)/k2 - 0.812[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.363(δ - k1)/k2 - 0.116[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.167
K < K bal Compression reinforcement is not required
+ (0.25 - K/ 1.13 4)⁰΄⁵

z = d [0.5 ∴

= 0.99 d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz
= 20200000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432
= 10.9 mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd Use 2H6
= 168.5 mm² 56.6mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support b
Effective depth,d= h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 17.52 kNm
K = M /f ck bd²
= 17520000 / 25 x 1729 x 432²
= 12.5 x10-3
Redistribution = 0% Redistribution ratio = 1.0
Kbal = 0.454 (δ - k1)/k2 - 0.812[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.363(δ - k1)/k2 - 0.116[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.167
K < K bal Compression reinforcement is not required
+ (0.25 - K/ 1.13 4)⁰΄⁵

z = d [0.5 ∴

= 0.99 d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz
= 17520000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432
= 94.16 mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd Use 2H8
= 0.0013bd 101 mm²
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support b1
Effective depth,d= h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 10.63 kNm
K = M /f ck bd²
= 10630000 / 25 x 2039 x 432²
= 7.6 x10-3
Redistribution = 0% Redistribution ratio = 1.0
Kbal = 0.454 (δ - k1)/k2 - 0.812[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.363(δ - k1)/k2 - 0.116[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.167
K < K bal Compression reinforcement is not required
+ (0.25 - K/ 1.13 4)⁰΄⁵

z = d [0.5 ∴

= 0.99 d
Area of tension reinforcement Use 3H6
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz 84.9mm²
= 10630000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432
= 57.1 mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support b2
Effective depth,d= h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 14.28 Nm
K = M /f ck bd²
= 14280000 / 25 x 2165 x 432²
= 10.2 x10-3
Redistribution = 0% Redistribution ratio = 1.0
Kbal = 0.454 (δ - k1)/k2 - 0.812[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.363(δ - k1)/k2 - 0.116[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.167
K < K bal Compression reinforcement is not required
+ (0.25 - K/ 1.13 4)⁰΄⁵

z = d [0.5 ∴

= 0.99 d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz
= 14280000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432 Use 3H6
= 76.8 mm² 84.9mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support c
Effective depth,d= h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 10.16 kNm
K = M /f ck bd².
= 10160000 / 25 x 1725 x 432²
= 7.3 x10-3
Redistribution = 0% Redistribution ratio = 1.0
Kbal = 0.454 (δ - k1)/k2 - 0.812[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.363(δ - k1)/k2 - 0.116[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.167
K < K bal Compression reinforcement is not required
+ (0.25 - K/ 1.13 4)⁰΄⁵

z = d [0.5 ∴

= 0.99 d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz Use 2H6
= 10160000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432 56.6mm²
= 54.6 mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support c1
Effective depth,d= h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 7.66 kNm
K = M /f ck bd²
= 7660000 / 25 x 2250 x 432²
= 5.5 x10-3
Redistribution = 0% Redistribution ratio = 1.0
Kbal = 0.454 (δ - k1)/k2 - 0.812[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.363(δ - k1)/k2 - 0.116[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.167
K < K bal Compression reinforcement is not required
+ (0.25 - K/ 1.13 4)⁰΄⁵

z = d [0.5 ∴

= 0.99 d
Area of tension reinforcement Use 2H6
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz 56.6 m²
= 7660000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432
= 41.19 mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support d
Effective depth,d= h-Cnom-Фlink-1.5Фbar1 = 432
Bending moment,M = 5.88 kNm
K = M /f ck bd²
= 5880000 / 25 x 1725 x 432²
= 4.2 x10-3
Redistribution = 0% Redistribution ratio = 1.0
Kbal = 0.454 (δ - k1)/k2 - 0.812[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.363(δ - k1)/k2 - 0.116[(δ-k1)/k2]²
= 0.167
K < K bal Compression reinforcement is not required
+ (0.25 - K/ 1.13 4)⁰΄⁵

z = d [0.5 ∴

= 0.99 d
Area of tension reinforcement
A s,req = M / 0.87f ykz Use 2H6
= 5880000 / 0.87 x 500 x 0.99 x 432 56.6mm²
= 31.58mm²
Minimum and maximum reinforcement area,
A s, min = 0.26(fctm / fyk)bd
= 0.0013bd
= 168.5 mm²
A s, max = 0.04A c
= 0.04bh
= 6000 mm²
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

Support a
Ved = 0.45F = 4.63 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 ∴ Therefore angle θ < 22
Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 4630 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.012
Try link 1H6 Use
Spacing = 28.3/0.012 = 25.7 < 0.75d = 324 H6-275

Support a1
Ved = 0.55F = 5.95 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 ∴ Therefore angle θ < 22
Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 5660 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.014
Use
Try link 1H6 H6-300
Spacing = 28.3/0.014 = 2021 < 0.75d = 324
Support a1
Ved = 0.6F = 6.18 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 ∴ Therefore angle θ < 22
Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 61800 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.016 Use
Try link 1H6 H6-300
Spacing = 28.3/0.016 = 1769 < 0.75d = 324
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support b
Ved = 0.55F = 50.66 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5 ∴

Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 Therefore angle θ < 22


Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 50660 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.12
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.12 = 235.8 < 0.75d = 324
Use
Support b H6-250
Ved = 0.6F = 55.26 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5 ∴

Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 Therefore angle θ < 22


Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 50660/ 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.13
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.13 = 218 < 0.75d = 324
Use
H6-225
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support b1
Ved = 0.55F = 26.06 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5 ∴

Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 Therefore angle θ < 22


Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 26060 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.06
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.06 = 471.7 < 0.75d = 324 Use
H6-300
Support b1
Ved = 0.6F =28.43 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 ∴ Therefore angle θ < 22
Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 28430 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.07
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.07 = 404.3 < 0.75d = 324 Use
H6-300
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support b2
Ved = 0.55F = 32.97 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5 ∴

Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 Therefore angle θ < 22


Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 32970 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.07
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.07 = 381.8 < 0.75d = 324 Use
H6-300
Support b2
Ved = 0.6F =33.79 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 ∴ Therefore angle θ < 22
Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 33790 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.08
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.06 = 350 < 0.75d = 324 Use
H6-300
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support c
Ved = 0.55F = 29.44 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5 ∴

Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 Therefore angle θ < 22


Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 29440 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.07
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.07 = 404.3 < 0.75d = 324 Use
H6-300
Support c
Ved = 0.6F =30.26 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 ∴ Therefore angle θ < 22
Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 30260 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.08
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.08 = 353.8 < 0.75d = 324 Use
H6-300
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support c1 & d
Ved = 0.55F = 17.03 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5 ∴

Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 Therefore angle θ < 22


Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 17300 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.04
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.06 = 707.5 < 0.75d = 324 Use
H6-300
Support b1
Ved = 0.6F =17.45 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 ∴ Therefore angle θ < 22
Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 17450 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.04
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.06 = 707.5 < 0.75d = 324 Use
H6-300
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
Support d1
Ved = 0.45F = 8.17 kN
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.5
Ved < Ved, max cot θ = 2.1 ∴ Therefore angle θ < 22
Shear links:
Asw/s = Ved / 0.78 fyk d cot θ
= 8170 / 0.78 x 500 x 432 x 2.48
= 0.02
Try link 1H6
Spacing = 28.3/0.06 = 1415 < 0.75d = 324 Use
H6-300
Project

JOB: CRITICAL BEAM 2/a-d1 Date Page

By NUR AZMINA BT MOHD AMINUDDIN


Ref Calculation Remark
DEFLECTION

Check at span a1-b

Percentage of required tension reinforcement, = A s,req /


bd = 120 / (300x432)
= 9.3 x 10⁻4
Reference reinforcement ratio, ₀ = (f ck )⁰΄⁵ x
10⁻³ = 251/2 x 10⁻³
= 0.005
< ₀
Factor for structural system, K = 1.3

= 17.32
Modification factor for flange width,
b/bw = 300/3055 = 0.09 > 0.3 = 0.8
= 0.8
Modification factor for span less than 7 m
=1.0
Modification factor for steel area provided,
A s,prov / A s,req = 141 / 120 = 1. 2 < 1.5
Therefore, allowable span-effective depth ratio,
(l/d )allowable = 17.32 x 0.80 x 1.0 x 1.0
= 13.86
Actual span-effective depth,
(l/d )actual = 2158/ 432 = 5.0 < (l/d) allowable
OK
CRACKING

Limit crack width,w = 0.3mm

= 275 N/mm2
Max allowable bar spacing = 150 mm
Bar spacing, s = [ 300 - 2(30) - 2(8) - 20 ]/2 = 102mm < 150mm
OK
Page :
Ref Calculations Output
All design refer to Euro Code

Specification

Consider Column (2,b)

Mz

My

Characteristic Actions:
Permanent, Gk = 1.5 kN/m2 (excluding self weight)
Variable, Qk = 4.0 kN/m2
Design life = 50 years
Frie resistance = R90
Exposure classes = XC3
Materials
characteristics strength of concrete, fck = 30 N/mm2
characteristics strength of steel, fyk = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 25 kN/m3
Cover = 35 mm
Ø bar 1 = 20 mm
Ø link = 8 mm

DIMENSION OF BEAM AND COLUMN


Size:
Vertical Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Vertical Beam (ground) : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam (ground) : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Secondary Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Column: b x h = 400 mm x 400 mm
roof level to upper roof level
Clear height , lz = 2800 - 300 = 2500 mm
ly = 2800 - 500 = 2300 mm
3rd floor, 2nd floor and 1st floor:
Clear height , lz = 3200 - 300 = 2900 mm
ly = 3200 - 500 = 2700 mm
Ground floor:
Clear height , lz = 3450 - 300 = 3150 mm
ly = 3450 - 500 = 2950 mm

Page :
Ref Calculations Output
ACTION
Upper roof level to roof level:
2
Selfweight of flat roof = 0.15 x 25 KN/m
2
= 3.75 KN/m
2
Finishes, ceiling& services = 1.20 KN/m
2
Total permanent action of slab = 4.95 KN/m

Selfweight of beam = (0.5 x 0.3 x 0.5 x 25 x 2.43) + (0.5 x 0.3 x 0.5 x 25 x 3.452)
= 11.029 kN
Total permanent action on beam = (0.4 x4.95x 3.452 X2.43) = 16.609 kN
Selfweight of column = 0.4 x 0.4 x2.8 x 25
= 11.20 kN
Total permanent action on column = 38.84 kN

Variable action, Q k
2
Total variable action of slab = 4.00 KN/m
Total variable action on beam = (0.4 x4.x 3.452 X2.43) = 13.421 kN

Total variable action on column = 13.421 kN


Axial load of column, N Ed = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk
= 72.566 kN

Roof level to 3rd floor


Permanent action, G k
2
Selfweight of flat roof = 0.15 x 25 KN/m
2
= 3.75 KN/m
2
Finishes, ceiling& services = 1.20 KN/m
2
Total permanent action of slab = 4.95 KN/m
Selfweight of beam = 0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 2.43 +0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 4.689
0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 3.68 +0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 6.257
= 18.522 kN

Total permanent action on beam = (0.5x4.95x 6.257 X2.43) +(0.47x4.95x 3.68x4.333)+


(0.36x4.95x 3.68 X1.927) +(0.36x4.95x 3.68x3.452)
= 110kN
Selfweight of column = 0.4 x 0.4 x3.2 x 25
= 12.8 kN
Total permanent action on column = 141.32 kN

Variable action, Q k
2
Total variable action of slab = 4.00 KN/m
Total variable action on beam = (0.5x4x 6.257 X2.43) +(0.47x4x 3.68x4.333)+
(0.36x4x 3.68 X1.927) +(0.36x4x 3.68x3.452)+
= 88.89 kN
Total variable action on column = 88.89 kN
Axial load of column, N Ed = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk
= 324.117 kN
3rd floor to 2nd floor, 2nd floor to 1st floor
Permanent action, G k
2
Selfweight of slab = 0.15 x 25 KN/m
2
= 3.75 KN/m
2
Finishes, ceiling& services = 1.20 KN/m
2
Total permanent action of slab = 4.95 KN/m
Selfweight of beam = 0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 2.43 +0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 4.689 +
0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 6.257 + 0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 3.68
= 22.39 kN
Total permanent action on beam = (0.4 x 4.95 x1.237X2.43) + (0.4 x 4.95 x1.237X3.68) +(0.36 x 4.95 x3.452X3.68) +
(0.36 x 4.95 x1.927X3.68) +(0.47 x 4.95 x3.68X4.33) +
(0.5 x 4.95 x2.43X5.057) +(0.5 x 4.95 x1.2X2.43)
= 124.94 kN
Selfweight of column = 0.4 x 0.4 x3.2 x 25
= 12.8 kN
Total permanent action on column = 160.132 kN

Variable action, Q k
2
Total variable action of slab = 4.00 KN/m
Total variable action on beam = (0.4 x 4 x1.237X2.43) + (0.4 x 4 x1.237X3.68) +(0.36 x 4 x3.452X3.68) +
(0.36 x 4 x1.927X3.68) +(0.47 x 4 x3.68X4.33) +
(0.5 x 4 x2.43X5.057) +(0.5 x 4 x1.2X2.43)
= 100.96 kN
Total variable action on column = 100.96 kN
Axial load of column, N Ed = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk
= 367.618 kN

1st floor to ground floor


Permanent action, G k
2
Selfweight of slab = 0.15 x 25 KN/m
2
= 3.75 KN/m
2
Finishes, ceiling& services = 1.20 KN/m
2
Total permanent action of slab = 4.95 KN/m
Selfweight of beam = 0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 2.43 +0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 4.689 +
0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 6.257 + 0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 3.68
= 22.39 kN
Total permanent action on beam = (0.4 x 4.95 x1.237X2.43) + (0.4 x 4.95 x1.237X3.68) +(0.36 x 4.95 x3.452X3.68) +
(0.36 x 4.95 x1.927X3.68) +(0.47 x 4.95 x3.68X4.33) +
(0.5 x 4.95 x2.43X5.057) +(0.5 x 4.95 x1.2X2.43)
= 124.94 kN
Selfweight of column = 0.4 x 0.4 x3.45 x 25
= 13.8 kN
Total permanent action on column = 161.132 kN

Variable action, Q k
2
Total variable action of slab = 4.00 KN/m
Total variable action on beam = (0.4 x 4 x1.237X2.43) + (0.4 x 4 x1.237X3.68) +(0.36 x 4 x3.452X3.68) +
(0.36 x 4 x1.927X3.68) +(0.47 x 4 x3.68X4.33) +
(0.5 x 4 x2.43X5.057) +(0.5 x 4 x1.2X2.43)
= 100.96 kN
Total variable action on column = 100.96 kN
Axial load of column, N Ed = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk
= 368.966 kN
Ground floor to footing:
Permanent action, G k
2
Selfweight of slab = 0.15 x 25 KN/m
2
= 3.75 KN/m
2
Finishes, ceiling& services = 1.20 KN/m
2
Total permanent action of slab = 4.95 KN/m
Selfweight of beam = 0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 2.43 +0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 4.689 +
0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 6.257 + 0.5 x 0.3 x (0.5-0.15) x 25 x 3.68
= 22.39 kN
Total permanent action on beam = (0.6 x 4.95 x4.689X2.43) + (0.36 x 4.95 x1.927X2.43) +(0.57 x 4.95 x4.33X2.43) +
(0.52 x 4.95 x5.294X3.68) +(0.54 x 4.95 x3.68X5.652)

= 177.62 kN
Selfweight of column = 0.4 x 0.4 x1.5 x 25
=6 kN
Total permanent action on column = 206.01 kN

Variable action, Q k
2
Total variable action of slab = 4.00 KN/m
Total variable action on beam = (0.6 x 4x4.689X2.43) + (0.36 x 4 x1.927X2.43) +(0.57 x 4 x4.33X2.43) +
(0.52 x 4 x5.294X3.68) +(0.54 x 4 x3.68X5.652)

= 143.53 kN
Total variable action on column = 143.53 kN
Axial load of column, N Ed = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk
= 493 kN

Total axial load on ground floor column, N ed = 72.566+324.117 + 2(367.618) +368.966+493

= 1993.885 kN

UR W1z W2z W1y W1z


Gk 21.165 0 23.081 0
Qk 13.421 0 13.421 0
max 48.704 0 48.704 0
min 28.572 28.572

R W1z W2z W1y W1z


Gk 40.104 40.821 95.577 28.792
Qk 28.504 30.409 70.598 18.293
max 96.896 100.722 234.926 66.309
min 54.14 55.108 129.029 38.869

3F W1z W2z W1y W1z


Gk 40.104 33.603 95.552 49.91
Qk 28.504 24.577 70.577 30.386
max 96.896 82.23 234.861 112.958
min 54.14 45.364 128.995 67.379

2F W1z W2z W1y W1z


Gk 40.104 33.603 95.552 49.91
Qk 28.504 24.577 70.577 30.386
max 96.896 82.23 234.861 112.958
min 54.14 45.364 128.995 67.379

1F W1z W2z W1y W1z


Gk 40.104 33.603 95.552 49.91
Qk 28.504 24.577 70.577 30.386
max 96.896 82.23 234.861 112.958
min 54.14 45.364 128.995 67.379

GF W1z W2z W1y W1z


Gk 0 45.375 96.391 95.592
Qk 0 35.611 71.255 72.273
max 0 114.673 237.01 237.46
min 0 61.256 130.128 129.05

Page :
Ref Calculations Output
Stiffness : K=I/L
Beam,
upper roof
3
main beam Kb1 = (300)(500) /(12)(2430) = 12.86 x 10⁵ mm³
3
2ndary beam Kb2 = (500)(300) /(12)(3452) = 3.259 x 10⁵ mm³

roof floor, 3rd floor, 2nd floor, 1st floor, grnd floor
3
main beam Kb1 = (300)(500) /(12)(2430) = 12.86 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb2 = (300)(500) /(12)(3680) = 8.491x10⁵ mm³

3
2ndary beam Kb3 = (500)(300) /(12)(4689) = 2.399 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb4 = (500)(300) /(12)(6257) = 1.798 x 10⁵ mm³

Column
z-z
3
Column: 2.8m Kzz = (400)(400) /(12)(2800) = 7.619 x 10⁵ mm³
3
3.2m Kzz = (400)(400) /(12)(3200) = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
3
3.45m Kzz = (400)(400) /(12)(3450) = 6.184 x 10⁵ mm³
3
1.5 m Kzz = (400)(400) /(12)(1500) = 1.422 x 10⁵ mm³

y-y
3
Column: 2.8m Kyy = (400)(400) /(12)(2800) = 7.619 x 10⁵ mm³
3
3.2m Kyy = (400)(400) /(12)(3200) = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
3
3.45m Kyy = (400)(400) /(12)(3450) = 6.184 x 10⁵ mm³
3
1.5 m Kyy = (400)(400) /(12)(1500) = 1.422 x 10⁵ mm³

Moment
z - z axis:
upper roof floor FEM:
2
M =wL /12
Kcu 24 kN/m = (48.704)(2.43)2/12
= 23.966 kNm
∆M = 23.966 kNm
Kcl
Moment in column
roof floor M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcl + Kb3/2
= 23.966 x 7.61 / ( 7.61+ 12.86 /2 )
= 13 kNm

FEM:
2
roof floor M =wL /12
= (96.895)(3.68)2/12
Kcu = 109.35 kNm

Kb1/2 M =wL2/12
Kcl = (55.108)(2.43)2/12
= 27.117 kNm
third floor ∆M = 82.233 kNm
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2
= 77.76 x 7.619/ ( 6.667 + 7.619+ 12.86/2 + 8.941/2 )
= 23.526 kNm

Moment in lower column


M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 77.76 x 6.667 / ( 6.667 + 7.619+ 12.86/2 + 8.941/2 )
= 20.582 kNm

2
3rd floor M =wL /12
= (96.895)(3.68)2/12
Kcu = 109.35 kNm

Kb1/2 M =wL2/12
Kcl = (45.364)(2.43)2/12
= 22.322 kNm
2nd floor ∆M = 82.233 kNm
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2
= 87.028 x 6.667/ ( 6.667 + 6.667 + 12.86/2 + 8.941/2 )
= 23.942 kNm

Moment in lower column


M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 87.028 x 6.667/ ( 6.667 + 6.667 + 12.86/2 + 8.941/2 )
= 23.942 kNm

2
2nd floor M =wL /12
= (96.895)(3.68)2/12
Kcu = 109.35 kNm

Kb1/2 M =wL2/12
Kcl = (45.364)(2.43)2/12
= 22.322 kNm
1st floor ∆M = 82.233 kNm
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2
= 87.028 x 6.667/ ( 6.667 + 6.667 + 12.86/2 + 8.941/2 )
= 23.942 kNm

Moment in lower column


M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 87.028 x 6.667/ ( 6.667 + 6.667 + 12.86/2 + 8.941/2 )
= 23.942 kNm

2
1st floor M =wL /12
= (96.895)(3.68)2/12
Kcu = 109.35 kNm
13
Kb1/2 M =wL2/12
Kcl = (45.364)(2.43)2/12 23.526 20.58
= 22.322 kNm
gnd floor ∆M = 82.233 kNm
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2 23.942 23.94
= 87.028 x 6.667/ ( 6.667 + 6.184 + 12.86/2 + 8.941/2 )
= 24.429 kNm

Moment in lower column 23.942 23.94


M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 87.028 x 6.184 / ( 6.667 + 6.184 + 12.86/2 + 8.941/2 )
= 22.659 kNm

2
grnd floor M =wL /12 24.429 23.94
= (114.673)(2.43)2/12
Kcu stump = 56.428 kNm

Kcl 2.76
12
stump ∆M = 56.428 kNm
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2 1.38
= 56.428x 6.184/ ( 1.422+ 6.184 + 8.941/2 )
= 12 kNm z- z axis

Moment in lower column


M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 56.428x 1.422 / ( 1.422+ 6.184 + 8.941/2 )
= 2.76 kNm

Moment
y - y axis:
upper roof floor FEM:
2
M =wL /12
\ = (48.704)(2.43)2/12
= 23.966 kNm
∆M = 23.966 kNm
Kcl
Moment in column
roof floor M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcl + Kb3/2
= 23.966 x 7.61 / ( 7.61+ 3.259 /2 )
= 16.227 kNm

FEM:
2
roof floor M =wL /12
= (234.926)(6.257)2/12
Kcu = 766.447 kNm

Kb1/2 M =wL2/12
Kcl = (38.869)(4.689)2/12
= 71.217 kNm
third floor ∆M = 695.23 kNm
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2
= 695.23 x 7.619/ ( 6.667 + 7.619+ 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 323.29 kNm

Moment in lower column


M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 695.23 x 6.667/ ( 6.667 + 7.619+ 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 282.9 kNm

2
3rd floor M =wL /12
= (234.926)(6.257)2/12
Kcu = 766.447 kNm

Kb1/2 M =wL2/12
Kcl = (67.379)(4.689)2/12
= 71.217 kNm
2nd floor ∆M = 251.227 kNm
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2
= 252.227 x 6.667 / (6.667+ 6..667+ 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 108.965 kNm

Moment in lower column


M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 252.227 x 6.667 / (6.667+ 6..667+ 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 108.965 kNm

2
2nd floor M =wL /12
= (234.926)(6.257)2/12
Kcu = 766.447 kNm
Kb1/2 M =wL2/12
Kcl = (67.379)(4.689)2/12
= 71.217 kNm
1st floor ∆M = 251.227 kNm
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2
= 252.227 x 6.667 / (6.667+ 6..667+ 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 108.965 kNm

Moment in lower column


M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 252.227 x 6.667 / (6.667+ 6..667+ 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 108.965 kNm

2
1st floor M =wL /12
= (234.926)(6.257)2/12
Kcu = 766.447 kNm

Kb1/2 M =wL2/12
Kcl = (67.379)(4.689)2/12
= 71.217 kNm
gnd floor ∆M = 251.227 kNm
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2 16.23
= 252.227 x 6.667/ (6.667+ 6.184+ 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 112.485 kNm
323.29 282.9
Moment in lower column
M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 252.227 x 6.184 / (6.667+ 6.184+ 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 104.336 kNm 108.97 109

2
grnd floor M =wL /12
= (237)(6.257)2/12
Kcu = 773.21 kNm 108.97 109

M =wL2/12
Kcl = (129.05)(4.689)2/12
= 236.445 kNm
stump ∆M = 536.76 kNm 112.49 104.3
Moment in upper column
M = ∆M x Kcu / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2+ Kb2/2
= 536.76 x 6.184 / ( 6.184 + 1.422 + 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 342.04 kNm 78.65

Moment in lower column 343.04


M = ∆M x Kcl / Kcu + Kcl + Kb1/2 Kb2/2
= 536.76 x 1.422 / ( 6.184 + 1.422 + 1.798/2 + 2.399/2 )
= 78.65 kNm 39.325
2.4.3.2 Upper Roof Page : 110
Ref Calculations Output
All design refer to Euro Code

Specification

Consider Column (2,b) upper roof to roof level


characteristics strength of concrete, fck = 30 N/mm2
characteristics strength of steel, fyk = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 25 kN/m3
Cover = 35 mm
Ø bar 1 = 20 mm
Ø link = 8 mm
My
Moment and Axial Force
NEd = 72.566 kN
My = 323.3 kNm
Mz = 23.526 kNm

DIMENSION OF BEAM AND COLUMN


Size:
Vertical Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Vertical Beam (ground) : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam (ground) : b x h= 300 mm x 500 mm
Secondary Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Column: b x h = 400 mm x 400 mm
roof level to upper roof level
Clear height , lz = 2800 - 300 = 2500
ly = 2800 - 500 = 2300

Page : 111
Ref Calculations Output

𝐼=𝑏ℎ^3 /12
Stiffness : K=I/L
Beam, main K= (300)(500)3/(12)(2430) = 12.86 x 10⁵ mm³
2ndary K= (500)(300)3/(12)(3452) = 3.259 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Column, Kzz = (400)(400) /(12)(2500) = 8.533 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kyy = (400)(400) /(12)(2300) = 9.275 x 10⁵ mm³

Relative column stiffness, k = K col / 2(∑K beam) `


z-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 8.533 / 2( 12.86+3.259)
= 0.265 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 8.533 / 2( 12.86+3.259)
= 0.265 > 0.1
y-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 9.275 / 2( 12.86+3.259)
= 0.288 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 9.275 / 2( 12.86+3.259)
= 0.288 > 0.1

Effective length of column


Clear height , lz = 2800 - 300 = 2500
ly = 2800 - 500 = 2300
lo = 0.5l {[1 + k 1/(0.45 + k 1)][1 + k 2/(0.45 + k 2]}½
l oz = 0.5 x 2500 {[1 + 0.265/(0.45 + 0.265)][1 + 0.265/(0.45 + 0.265]}½
= 2250 mm
l oy = 0.5 x 2300 {[1 + 0.288/(0.45 + 0.288)][1 + 0.288/(0.45 + 0.288]}½
= 2135 mm

Radius of gyration, i = (I /A )½
iz = iy = [2133x106 / (400x 400)]½
= 115.47 mm

Slenderness Ratio, λ = l o/i


λz = 2250 / 115.47 λy = 2135 / 115.47
= 19.5 = 18.5
Ref Page : 112
Calculations Output
5.8.3.1 (1)

Slenderness limit, λlim = 20.A.B.C/(n)1/2


A = 0.7
B = 1.1
C = 1.7 - rm
where rm = M01/M02
z axis : rm = -0.05
Cz = 1.7+(0.05) = 1.75
y axis : rm = -0.5526
Cz = 1.7+(0.5526) = 2.2526

n = Ned / (Acfcd)
3
= 72.566 x 10 / (400x400)(0.85)(30)/1.5
= 0.027

λlim(z) = 26.95/ (√0.027) = 164


λlim(y) = 34.7/ (√0.027) = 211
λlim > λ Therefore, column is non slender about z-axis and y-axis

DESIGN MOMENT
5.2 (7) For non-slender column the design moment,
MED = max { M02, Mmin}
where, M02 = M + Ned . ei
Mz = max { Mtop, Mbottom} My = max { Mtop, Mbottom}
= 23.526 kNm = 323.29 kNm

eiz = lo / 400 eiy = lo / 400


= 2250 /400 = 2135 /400
= 5.625 mm = 5.3375 mm
6.1 (4)
M02z = 23.526 + (72.566 x 5.625x10⁻³)
= 24 kNm
M02y = 323.29 + (72.566 x 5.3375x10⁻³)
= 323.677 kNm

Mmin = Ned . e0
e0 = h/30 ≥ 20
= 400/ 30 = 13.3 < 20 Use e0 = 20 mm

Mmin = 72.566 x 20x10⁻³


= 1.45 kNm

Therefore, MED = max { M02z, M02y) Mmin}


= 323.677 kNm

CHECKING BIAXIAL BENDING


ez = MEdy / NEd ey MEdz / NEd
=
= 24 x 10^6 / 72.566 x 10^3 =323.677 x 10^6 / 72.566 x 10^3
= 331 mm =4457 mm

(ey / h) / (ez / b) = (4457 / 400) / (331 / 400) (ez / b) / (ey / h) (331


= / 400) / (4457/ 050)
= 9.2 = 9.2

λy / λ z = 211 / 164 λz / λy = 164/211 Ignore biaxial


= 1.3 <2 = 0.78 <2 bending

DURABILITY, BOND & FIRE RESISTANCE

table 4.1 Min. concrete cover regard to bond, Cmin,b = 20 mm


table 4.4 Min.concrete cover regard to durability, Cmin, dur = 25 mm
table5.2a Min. required axis distance for R90, asd = 38 mm
Min. concrete cover regard to fire mm
Cmin = asd - Ølink-Øbar/2 = 38 - 8 - 20/2 = 20 mm
Allowance in design for deviation, Cdev = 10 mm
4.4.1.1(2) Nominal cover, Cnom = Cmin+ Cdev = 20+10
= 30 mm

Page : 113
Ref Calculations Output
REINFORCEMENT
d2 = C + Фlink + Фbar/2 = 48 mm
d2/h = 48 / 400 = 0.12

(Ned/ bhfck) = ( 72.566x10³/ (400x400x30)


= 0.015
(Med/ bh2fck) = ( 323.677x10⁶/ (400x4002x30)
= 0.169

Based on design chart of d2/h = 0.12,


(Asfyk)/ (bhfck) = 0.1
As = (0.1x400x400x30) / 500 Use: 4H20 (1257 mm²)
= 3936 mm²

9.5.2 (2) As, min = 0.1NEd/fyd = 0.1NEd/(0.87fyk)


= 0.1 x 72.566 x103 / (0.87 x 500)
= 16.68 mm2
or 0.002Ac = 0.002 x 400 x400 = 320 mm2

9.5.2 (3) As, max = 0.04 Ac = 0.04 x 400 x 400 = 6400 mm2

Links
9.5.3 Minimum diameter, фmin = 1/4 x фbar
= 1/4 x 20
= 5 mm or 6 mm фmin = 6 mm

Link spacing, Sv,max = max {(20 x Фbar); lesser dimension of column; 400 mm}
20 x фbar = 20 x 20 = 400 mm
lesser dimension of column = 400 mm
or 400 mm Use: H6 -400

At section 300 mm below and above beam at lapped joints,


Sv,max = 0.6 x 400 = 240 mm Use: H6 -240
2.4.3.2 Roof Page : 110
Ref Calculations Output
All design refer to Euro Code

Specification

Consider Column (2,b) upper roof to roof level


characteristics strength of concrete, fck = 30 N/mm2
characteristics strength of steel, fyk = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 25 kN/m3
Cover = 35 mm
Ø bar 1 = 20 mm
Ø link = 8 mm
My
Moment and Axial Force
NEd = 396.683 kN
My = 282.9 kNm
Mz = 23.942 kNm

DIMENSION OF BEAM AND COLUMN


Size:
Vertical Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Vertical Beam (ground) : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam (ground) : b x h= 300 mm x 500 mm
Secondary Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Column: b x h = 400 mm x 400 mm

Clear height , lz = 3200 - 300 = 2900 mm


ly = 3200 - 500 = 2700 mm

Page : 111
Ref Calculations Output

𝐼=𝑏ℎ^3 /12
Stiffness : K=I/L
Beam, main beamKb1 = (300)(500)3/(12)(2430) = 12.86 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb2 = (300)(500) /(12)(3680) = 8.491x10⁵ mm³

2ndary beam
Kb3 = (500)(300)3/(12)(4689) = 2.399 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb4 = (500)(300) /(12)(6257) = 1.798 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Column, 3.2m Kzz =(400)(400) /(12)(3200) = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
Kyy (400)(400)3/(12)(3200)
= = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
3
2.8m Kzz = (400)(400) /(12)(2800) = 7.619 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kyy = (400)(400) /(12)(2800) = 7.619 x 10⁵ mm³
Relative column stiffness, k = K col / 2(∑K beam) `
z-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 7.619/ 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.18 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 6.667 / 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.156 > 0.1
y-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 7.619 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 0.907 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 6.667 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 0.794 > 0.1

Effective length of column


Clear height , lz = 3200 - 300 = 2900 mm
ly = 3200 - 500 = 2700 mm
lo = 0.5l {[1 + k 1/(0.45 + k 1)][1 + k 2/(0.45 + k 2]}½
l oz = 0.5 x 2900 {[1 + 0.156/(0.45 + 0.156)][1 + 0.18/(0.45 + 0.18]}½
= 1717 mm
l oy = 0.5 x 2700 {[1 + 0.794/(0.45 + 0.794)][1 + 0.907/(0.45 + 0.907]}½
= 2232 mm

Radius of gyration, i = (I /A )½
iz = iy = [2133x106 / (400x 400)]½
= 115.47 mm

Slenderness Ratio, λ = l o/i


λz = 1717 / 115.47 λy = 2232 / 115.47
= 14.86 = 19.33
Ref Page : 112
Calculations Output
5.8.3.1 (1)

Slenderness limit, λlim = 20.A.B.C/(n)1/2


A = 0.7
B = 1.1
C = 1.7 - rm
where rm = M01/M02
z axis : rm = -1.1632
Cz = 1.7+(1.1632) = 2.8632
y axis : rm = -0.385
Cz = 1.7+(0.385) = 2.085

n = Ned / (Acfcd)
3
= 396.683 x 10 / (400x400)(0.85)(30)/1.5
= 0.1458

λlim(z) = 44.09/ (√0.1458) = 115.5


λlim(y) = 32.109/ (√0.1458) = 84

λlim > λ Therefore, column is non slender about z-axis and y-axis

DESIGN MOMENT
5.2 (7) For non-slender column the design moment,
MED = max { M02, Mmin}
where, M02 = M + Ned . ei
Mz = max { Mtop, Mbottom} My = max { Mtop, Mbottom}
= 23.942 kNm = 306.842 kNm

eiz = lo / 400 eiy = lo / 400


= 1717 /400 = 2232 /400
= 4.2925 mm = 5.58 mm
6.1 (4)
M02z = 23.942 + (396.683 x 4.2925x10⁻³)
= 25.65 kNm
M02y = 306.842 + (396.683 x 5.58x10⁻³)
= 309.055 kNm

Mmin = Ned . e0
e0 = h/30 ≥ 20
= 400/ 30 = 13.3 < 20 Use e0 = 20 mm

Mmin = 396.683 x 20x10⁻³


= 7.934 kNm

Therefore, MED = max { M02z, M02y) Mmin}


= 309.055 kNm
CHECKING BIAXIAL BENDING
ez = MEdy / NEd ey = M =Edz / NEd
= 25.65 x 10^6 / 396.683 x 10^3 = 309.055
= x 10^6 / 396.683 x 10^3
= 65 mm = 779 mm

(ey / h) / (ez / b) = (779 / 400 )/ (65 / 400) (ez / b) / (ey / h) (65


= / 400) / (779/ 400)
= 12 = 0.08

λy / λ z = 115.5/ 84 λz / λy = 84/ 115.5 Ignore biaxial


= 1.375 <2 = 0.73 <2 bending

DURABILITY, BOND & FIRE RESISTANCE

table 4.1 Min. concrete cover regard to bond, Cmin,b = 20 mm


table 4.4 Min.concrete cover regard to durability, Cmin, dur = 25 mm
table5.2a Min. required axis distance for R90, asd = 38 mm
Min. concrete cover regard to fire mm
Cmin = asd - Ølink-Øbar/2 = 38 - 8 - 20/2 = 20 mm
Allowance in design for deviation, Cdev = 10 mm
4.4.1.1(2) Nominal cover, Cnom = Cmin+ Cdev = 20+10
= 30 mm

Page : 113
Ref Calculations Output
REINFORCEMENT
d2 = C + Фlink + Фbar/2 = 30 + 8 + 20/2 = 48 mm
d2/h = 48 / 400 = 0.12

(Ned/ bhfck) = ( 396.683x10³/ (400x400x30)


= 0.083

(Med/ bh2fck) = ( 309.055x10⁶/ (400x4002x30)


= 0.16

Based on design chart of d2/h = 0.12,


(Asfyk)/ (bhfck) = 0.35
As = (0.35x400x400x30) / 500 Use: 8H20
= 3360 mm² 5H16
(3519 mm²)
9.5.2 (2) As, min = 0.1NEd/fyd = 0.1NEd/(0.87fyk)
= 0.1 x 396.683 x103 / (0.87 x 500)
= 92 mm2
or 0.002Ac = 0.002 x 400 x400 = 320 mm2

9.5.2 (3) As, max = 0.04 Ac = 0.04 x 400 x 400 = 6400 mm2

Links
9.5.3 Minimum diameter, фmin = 1/4 x фbar
= 1/4 x 20
= 5 mm or 6 mm фmin = 6 mm

Link spacing, Sv,max = max {(20 x Фbar); lesser dimension of column; 400 mm}
20 x фbar = 20 x 16 = 320 mm
lesser dimension of column = 400 mm
or 400 mm Use: H6 -400

At section 300 mm below and above beam at lapped joints,


Sv,max = 0.6 x 400 = 240 mm Use: H6 -240
2.4.3.2 3rd floor Page : 110
Ref Calculations Output
All design refer to Euro Code

Specification

Consider Column (2,b) 3rd level to 2nd level


characteristics strength of concrete, fck = 30 N/mm2
characteristics strength of steel, fyk = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 25 kN/m3
Cover = 35 mm
Ø bar 1 = 20 mm
Ø link = 8 mm
My
Moment and Axial Force
NEd = 764.301 kN
My = 108.965 kNm
Mz = 23.942 kNm

DIMENSION OF BEAM AND COLUMN


Size:
Vertical Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Vertical Beam (ground) : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam (ground) : b x h= 300 mm x 500 mm
Secondary Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Column: b x h = 400 mm x 400 mm

Clear height , lz = 3200 - 300 = 2900 mm


ly = 3200 - 500 = 2700 mm

Page : 111
Ref Calculations Output

𝐼=𝑏ℎ^3 /12
Stiffness : K=I/L
Beam, main beamKb1 = (300)(500)3/(12)(2430) = 12.86 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb2 = (300)(500) /(12)(3680) = 8.491x10⁵ mm³

2ndary beam
Kb3 = (500)(300)3/(12)(4689) = 2.399 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb4 = (500)(300) /(12)(6257) = 1.798 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Column, 3.2m Kzz =(400)(400) /(12)(3200) = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
Kyy (400)(400)3/(12)(3200)
= = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
Relative column stiffness, k = K col / 2(∑K beam) `
z-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 6.667 / 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.156 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 6.667 / 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.156 > 0.1
y-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 6.667 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 0.794 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 6.667 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 0.794 > 0.1

Effective length of column


Clear height , lz = 3200 - 300 = 2900 mm
ly = 3200 - 500 = 2700 mm
lo = 0.5l {[1 + k 1/(0.45 + k 1)][1 + k 2/(0.45 + k 2]}½
l oz = 0.5 x 2900 {[1 + 0.156/(0.45 + 0.156)][1 + 0.156 /( 0.45+ 0.156]}½
= 1823mm
l oy = 0.5 x 2700 {[1 + 0.794/(0.45 + 0.794)][1 + 0.794/(0.45 + 0.794]}½
= 2212 mm

Radius of gyration, i = (I /A )½
iz = iy = [2133x106 / (400x 400)]½
= 115.47 mm

Slenderness Ratio, λ = l o/i


λz = 1823 / 115.47 λy = 2212 / 115.47
= 15.79 = 19.15
Ref Page : 112
Calculations Output
5.8.3.1 (1)

Slenderness limit, λlim = 20.A.B.C/(n)1/2


A = 0.7
B = 1.1
C = 1.7 - rm
where rm = M01/M02
z axis : rm = -
Cz = 1.7+(1) = 2.7
y axis : rm = -1
Cz = 1.7+(1) = 2.7

n = Ned / (Acfcd)
3
= 764.3 x 10 / (400x400)(0.85)(30)/1.5
= 0.28

λlim(z) = 41.58 / (√0.28) = 78


λlim(y) = 41.58 / (√0.28) = 78

λlim > λ Therefore, column is non slender about z-axis and y-axis

DESIGN MOMENT
5.2 (7) For non-slender column the design moment,
MED = max { M02, Mmin}
where, M02 = M + Ned . ei
Mz = max { Mtop, Mbottom} My = max { Mtop, Mbottom}
= 23.942 kNm = 108.965 kNm

eiz = lo / 400 eiy = lo / 400


= 1823 /400 = 2212 /400
= 4.5575 mm = 5.53 mm
6.1 (4)
M02z = 23.942 + (764.3 x 4.5575x10⁻³)
= 26.5 kNm
M02y = 108.965 + (764.3 x 5.53x10⁻³)
= 112.044 kNm

Mmin = Ned . e0
e0 = h/30 ≥ 20
= 400/ 30 = 13.3 < 20 Use e0 = 20 mm

Mmin = 556.815 x 20x10⁻³


= 11.14 kNm

Therefore, MED = max { M02z, M02y) Mmin}


= 112.044 kNm

CHECKING BIAXIAL BENDING


ez = MEdy / NEd ey = M =Edz / NEd
= 26.5 x 10^6 / 764.3 x 10^3 = 112.044
= x 10^6 / 764.3 x 10^3
= 35 mm = 147mm

(ey / h) / (ez / b) = (35 / 400 )/ (147 / 400) (ez / b) / (ey / h) (147/


= 400) / (35/ 400)
= 0.23 = 4.218

λy / λ z = 92/ 92 λz / λy = 92/ 92 Ignore biaxial


= 1 <2 = 1 <2 bending

DURABILITY, BOND & FIRE RESISTANCE


table 4.1 Min. concrete cover regard to bond, Cmin,b = 20 mm
table 4.4 Min.concrete cover regard to durability, Cmin, dur = 25 mm
table5.2a Min. required axis distance for R90, asd = 38 mm
Min. concrete cover regard to fire mm
Cmin = asd - Ølink-Øbar/2 = 38 - 8 - 20/2 = 20 mm
Allowance in design for deviation, Cdev = 10 mm
4.4.1.1(2) Nominal cover, Cnom = Cmin+ Cdev = 20+10
= 30 mm
Page : 113
Ref Calculations Output
REINFORCEMENT
d2 = C + Фlink + Фbar/2 = 30 + 8 + 20/2 = 48 mm
d2/h = 48 / 400 = 0.12

(Ned/ bhfck) = ( 764.3 x 10³/ (400x400x30)


= 0.16

(Med/ bh2fck) = ( 112.044x10⁶/ (400x4002x30)


= 0.058

Based on design chart of d2/h = 0.12,


(Asfyk)/ (bhfck) = 0.01
As = (0.01x400x400x30) / 500 Use: 4H20 (1257 mm²)
= 960 mm²

9.5.2 (2) As, min = 0.1NEd/fyd = 0.1NEd/(0.87fyk)


= 0.1 x 556.815 x103 / (0.87 x 500)
= 128 mm2
or 0.002Ac = 0.002 x 400 x400 = 320 mm2

9.5.2 (3) As, max = 0.04 Ac = 0.04 x 400 x 400 = 6400 mm2
Links
9.5.3 Minimum diameter, фmin = 1/4 x фbar
= 1/4 x 20
= 5 mm or 6 mm фmin = 6 mm

Link spacing, Sv,max = max {(20 x Фbar); lesser dimension of column; 400 mm}
20 x фbar = 20 x 20 = 400 mm
lesser dimension of column = 400 mm
or 400 mm Use: H6 -400

At section 300 mm below and above beam at lapped joints,


Sv,max = 0.6 x 400 = 240 mm Use: H6 -240
2.4.3.2 2nd floor Page : 110
Ref Calculations Output
All design refer to Euro Code

Specification

Consider Column (2,b) 2rd level to 1st level


characteristics strength of concrete, fck = 30 N/mm2
characteristics strength of steel, fyk = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 25 kN/m3
Cover = 35 mm
Ø bar 1 = 20 mm
Ø link = 8 mm
My
Moment and Axial Force
NEd = 1131.92kN
My = 112.485 kNm
Mz = 24.429 kNm

DIMENSION OF BEAM AND COLUMN


Size:
Vertical Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Vertical Beam (ground) : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam (ground) : b x h= 300 mm x 500 mm
Secondary Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Column: b x h = 400 mm x 400 mm

Clear height , lz = 3200 - 300 = 2900 mm


ly = 3200 - 500 = 2700 mm

Page : 111
Ref Calculations Output

𝐼=𝑏ℎ^3 /12
Stiffness : K=I/L
Beam, main beamKb1 = (300)(500)3/(12)(2430) = 12.86 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb2 = (300)(500) /(12)(3680) = 8.491x10⁵ mm³

2ndary beam
Kb3 = (500)(300)3/(12)(4689) = 2.399 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb4 = (500)(300) /(12)(6257) = 1.798 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Column, 3.2m Kzz =(400)(400) /(12)(3200) = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
Kyy (400)(400)3/(12)(3200)
= = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
Relative column stiffness, k = K col / 2(∑K beam) `
z-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 6.667 / 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.156 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 6.667 / 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.156 > 0.1
y-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 6.667 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 0.794 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 6.667 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 0.794 > 0.1

Effective length of column


Clear height , lz = 3200 - 300 = 2900 mm
ly = 3200 - 500 = 2700 mm
lo = 0.5l {[1 + k 1/(0.45 + k 1)][1 + k 2/(0.45 + k 2]}½
l oz = 0.5 x 2900 {[1 + 0.156/(0.45 + 0.156)][1 + 0.156 /( 0.45+ 0.156]}½
= 1823mm
l oy = 0.5 x 2700 {[1 + 0.794/(0.45 + 0.794)][1 + 0.794/(0.45 + 0.794]}½
= 2212 mm

Radius of gyration, i = (I /A )½
iz = iy = [2133x106 / (400x 400)]½
= 115.47 mm

Slenderness Ratio, λ = l o/i


λz = 1823 / 115.47 λy = 2212 / 115.47
= 15.79 = 19.15
Ref Page : 112
Calculations Output
5.8.3.1 (1)

Slenderness limit, λlim = 20.A.B.C/(n)1/2


A = 0.7
B = 1.1
C = 1.7 - rm
where rm = M01/M02
z axis : rm = -0.98
Cz = 1.7+(0.98) = 2.7
y axis : rm = -0.969
Cz = 1.7+(0.969) = 2.7

n = Ned / (Acfcd)
3
= 1131.92 x 10 / (400x400)(0.85)(30)/1.5
= 0.34

λlim(z) = 41.58 / (√0.34) = 71.31


λlim(y) = 41.58 / (√0.34) = 71.31

λlim > λ Therefore, column is non slender about z-axis and y-axis

DESIGN MOMENT
5.2 (7) For non-slender column the design moment,
MED = max { M02, Mmin}
where, M02 = M + Ned . ei
Mz = max { Mtop, Mbottom} My = max { Mtop, Mbottom}
= 24.429 kNm = 112.485 kNm

eiz = lo / 400 eiy = lo / 400


= 1823 /400 = 2212 /400
= 4.5575 mm = 5.53 mm
6.1 (4)
M02z = 24.429 + (1131.92 x 4.5575x10⁻³)
= 28.642 kNm
M02y = 112.485 + (1131.92 x 5.53x10⁻³)
= 117.6 kNm

Mmin = Ned . e0
e0 = h/30 ≥ 20
= 400/ 30 = 13.3 < 20 Use e0 = 20 mm

Mmin = 924.433 x 20x10⁻³


= 18.5 kNm

Therefore, MED = max { M02z, M02y) Mmin}


= 117.6 kNm

CHECKING BIAXIAL BENDING


ez = MEdy / NEd ey = M =Edz / NEd
= 28.462 x 10^6 / 1131.92 x 10^3 = 117.6
= x 10^6 / 1131.92 x 10^3
= 30.8 mm = 127.21 mm

(ey / h) / (ez / b) = (30.8 / 400 )/ (127.21/ 400) (ez / b) / (ey / h) (127.21/


= 400) / (30.8/ 400)
= 0.24 = 4.13

λy / λ z = 71.31/ 71.31 λz / λy = 71.31/ 71.31 Ignore biaxial


= 1 <2 = 1 <2 bending

DURABILITY, BOND & FIRE RESISTANCE


table 4.1 Min. concrete cover regard to bond, Cmin,b = 20 mm
table 4.4 Min.concrete cover regard to durability, Cmin, dur = 25 mm
table5.2a Min. required axis distance for R90, asd = 38 mm
Min. concrete cover regard to fire mm
Cmin = asd - Ølink-Øbar/2 = 38 - 8 - 20/2 = 20 mm
Allowance in design for deviation, Cdev = 10 mm
4.4.1.1(2) Nominal cover, Cnom = Cmin+ Cdev = 20+10
= 30 mm
Page : 113
Ref Calculations Output
REINFORCEMENT
d2 = C + Фlink + Фbar/2 = 30 + 8 + 20/2 = 48 mm
d2/h = 48 / 400 = 0.12

(Ned/ bhfck) = ( 1131.92 x10³/ (400x400x30)


= 0.235

(Med/ bh2fck) = ( 117.6x10⁶/ (400x4002x30)


= 0.061

Based on design chart of d2/h = 0.12,


(Asfyk)/ (bhfck) = 0.01
As = (0.01x400x400x30) / 500 Use: 4H20 (1257 mm²)
= 960 mm²

9.5.2 (2) As, min = 0.1NEd/fyd = 0.1NEd/(0.87fyk)


= 0.1 x 556.815 x103 / (0.87 x 500)
= 128 mm2
or 0.002Ac = 0.002 x 400 x400 = 320 mm2

9.5.2 (3) As, max = 0.04 Ac = 0.04 x 400 x 400 = 6400 mm2

Links
9.5.3 Minimum diameter, фmin = 1/4 x фbar
= 1/4 x 20
= 5 mm or 6 mm фmin = 6 mm

Link spacing, Sv,max = max {(20 x Фbar); lesser dimension of column; 400 mm}
20 x фbar = 20 x 20 = 400 mm
lesser dimension of column = 400 mm
or 400 mm Use: H6 -400

At section 300 mm below and above beam at lapped joints,


Sv,max = 0.6 x 400 = 240 mm Use: H6 -240
2.4.3.2 1ST FLOOR Page : 110
Ref Calculations Output
All design refer to Euro Code

Specification

Consider Column (2,b) 1ST TO GRND level


characteristics strength of concrete, fck = 30 N/mm2
characteristics strength of steel, fyk = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 25 kN/m3
Cover = 35 mm
Ø bar 1 = 20 mm
Ø link = 8 mm
My
Moment and Axial Force
NEd = 1500.885 kN
My = 112.485 kNm
Mz = 24.429 kNm

DIMENSION OF BEAM AND COLUMN


Size:
Vertical Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Vertical Beam (ground) : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam (ground) : b x h= 300 mm x 500 mm
Secondary Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Column: b x h = 400 mm x 400 mm

Clear height , lz = 3200 - 300 = 2900 mm


ly = 3200 - 500 = 2700 mm

Page : 111
Ref Calculations Output

𝐼=𝑏ℎ^3 /12
Stiffness : K=I/L
Beam, main beamKb1 = (300)(500)3/(12)(2430) = 12.86 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb2 = (300)(500) /(12)(3680) = 8.491x10⁵ mm³

2ndary beam
Kb3 = (500)(300)3/(12)(4689) = 2.399 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb4 = (500)(300) /(12)(6257) = 1.798 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Column, 3.2m Kzz =(400)(400) /(12)(3200) = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
Kyy (400)(400)3/(12)(3200)
= = 6.667 x 10⁵ mm³
3
3.45m Kzz =(400)(400) /(12)(3450) = 6.184 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kyy =(400)(400) /(12)(3450) = 6.184 x 10⁵ mm132
Relative column stiffness, k = K col / 2(∑K beam) `
z-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 6.667 / 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.156 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 6.184 / 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.145 > 0.1
y-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 6.667 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 0.794 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 6.184 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 0.737 > 0.1

Effective length of column


Clear height , lz = 3200 - 300 = 2900 mm
ly = 3200 - 500 = 2700 mm
lo = 0.5l {[1 + k 1/(0.45 + k 1)][1 + k 2/(0.45 + k 2]}½
l oz = 0.5 x 2900 {[1 + 0.156/(0.45 + 0.156)][1 + 0.145/( 0.45+ 0.145]}½
= 1813mm
l oy = 0.5 x 2700 {[1 + 0.794/(0.45 + 0.794)][1 + 0.737/(0.45 + 0.737]}½
= 2200 mm

Radius of gyration, i = (I /A )½
iz = iy = [2133x106 / (400x 400)]½
= 115.47 mm

Slenderness Ratio, λ = l o/i


λz = 1813 / 115.47 λy = 2200 / 115.47
= 15.7 = 19.05
Ref Page : 112
Calculations Output
5.8.3.1 (1)

Slenderness limit, λlim = 20.A.B.C/(n)1/2


A = 0.7
B = 1.1
C = 1.7 - rm
where rm = M01/M02
z axis : rm = -0.5
Cz = 1.7+(0.5) = 2.2
y axis : rm = -0.305
Cz = 1.7+(0.305) = 2.005

n = Ned / (Acfcd)
3
= 1500.85 x 10 / (400x400)(0.85)(30)/1.5
= 0.55

λlim(z) = 33.88 / (√0.55) = 46


λlim(y) = 30.877 / (√0.55) = 42

λlim > λ Therefore, column is non slender about z-axis and y-axis

DESIGN MOMENT
5.2 (7) For non-slender column the design moment,
MED = max { M02, Mmin}
where, M02 = M + Ned . ei
Mz = max { Mtop, Mbottom} My = max { Mtop, Mbottom}
= 23.942 kNm = 343.03 kNm

eiz = lo / 400 eiy = lo / 400


= 1813 /400 = 2200 /400
= 4.5325 mm = 5.5 mm
6.1 (4)
M02z = 23.492 + (1500.885 x 4.5325x10⁻³)
= 30.3 kNm
M02y = 343.03 + (1500.885 x 5.5x10⁻³)
= 351.3 kNm

Mmin = Ned . e0
e0 = h/30 ≥ 20
= 400/ 30 = 13.3 < 20 Use e0 = 20 mm

Mmin = 1500.885 x 20x10⁻³


= 30 kNm

Therefore, MED = max { M02z, M02y) Mmin}


= 351.3 kNm

CHECKING BIAXIAL BENDING


ez = MEdy / NEd ey = M =Edz / NEd
= 30.3 x 10^6 / 1500.885 x 10^3 = 351.3
= x 10^6 / 1500.885 x 10^3
= 20.19 mm = 234.06 mm

(ey / h) / (ez / b) = (20.19 / 400 )/ (234.06 / 400) (ez / b) / (ey / h) (234.06/


= 400) / (20.19/ 400)
= 0.86 = 11.6

λy / λ z = 46/ 42 λz / λy = 42/ 46 Ignore biaxial


= 1.1 <2 = 0.91 <2 bending

DURABILITY, BOND & FIRE RESISTANCE


table 4.1 Min. concrete cover regard to bond, Cmin,b = 20 mm
table 4.4 Min.concrete cover regard to durability, Cmin, dur = 25 mm
table5.2a Min. required axis distance for R90, asd = 38 mm
Min. concrete cover regard to fire mm
Cmin = asd - Ølink-Øbar/2 = 38 - 8 - 20/2 = 20 mm
Allowance in design for deviation, Cdev = 10 mm
4.4.1.1(2) Nominal cover, Cnom = Cmin+ Cdev = 20+10
= 30 mm
Page : 113
Ref Calculations Output
REINFORCEMENT
d2 = C + Фlink + Фbar/2 = 30 + 8 + 20/2 = 48 mm
d2/h = 48 / 400 = 0.12

(Ned/ bhfck) = ( 1500.885x10³/ (400x400x30)


= 0.31

(Med/ bh2fck) = ( 351.3x10⁶/ (400x4002x30)


= 0.183

Based on design chart of d2/h = 0.12,


(Asfyk)/ (bhfck) = 0.41
As = (0.41x400x400x30) / 500 Use: 8H20
= 3936 mm² 8H16
(4123 mm²)
9.5.2 (2) As, min = 0.1NEd/fyd = 0.1NEd/(0.87fyk)
= 0.1 x 1500.885 x103 / (0.87 x 500)
= 345 mm2
or 0.002Ac = 0.002 x 400 x400 = 320 mm2

9.5.2 (3) As, max = 0.04 Ac = 0.04 x 400 x 400 = 6400 mm2

Links
9.5.3 Minimum diameter, фmin = 1/4 x фbar
= 1/4 x 20
= 5 mm or 6 mm фmin = 6 mm

Link spacing, Sv,max = max {(20 x Фbar); lesser dimension of column; 400 mm}
20 x фbar = 20 x 16 = 320 mm
lesser dimension of column = 400 mm
or 400 mm Use: H6 -400

At section 300 mm below and above beam at lapped joints,


Sv,max = 0.6 x 400 = 240 mm Use: H6 -240
2.4.3.2 GROUND FLOOR Page : 110
Ref Calculations Output
All design refer to Euro Code

Specification

Consider Column (2,b) GRND TO STUMP level


characteristics strength of concrete, fck = 30 N/mm2
characteristics strength of steel, fyk = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of reinforced concrete = 25 kN/m3
Cover = 35 mm
Ø bar 1 = 20 mm
Ø link = 8 mm
My
Moment and Axial Force
NEd = 1993.885 kN
My = 78.65 kNm
Mz = 2.76 kNm

DIMENSION OF BEAM AND COLUMN


Size:
Vertical Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Vertical Beam (ground) : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Horizontal Beam (ground) : b x h= 300 mm x 500 mm
Secondary Beam : b x h = 300 mm x 500 mm
Column: b x h = 400 mm x 400 mm

Clear height , lz = 3450 - 300 = 3150 mm


ly = 3450 - 500 = 2950 mm

Page : 111
Ref Calculations Output

𝐼=𝑏ℎ^3 /12
Stiffness : K=I/L
Beam, main beamKb1 = (300)(500)3/(12)(2430) = 12.86 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb2 = (300)(500) /(12)(3680) = 8.491x10⁵ mm³

2ndary beam
Kb3 = (500)(300)3/(12)(4689) = 2.399 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kb4 = (500)(300) /(12)(6257) = 1.798 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Column, 1.5m Kzz =(400)(400) /(12)(1500) = 14.2x 10⁵ mm³
Kyy (400)(400)3/(12)(1500)
= = 14.2x 10⁵ mm132
3
3.45m Kzz =(400)(400) /(12)(3450) = 6.184 x 10⁵ mm³
3
Kyy =(400)(400) /(12)(3450) = 6.184 x 10⁵ mm132
Relative column stiffness, k = K col / 2(∑K beam) `
z-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 6.184 / 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.145 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 14.2 / 2( 12.86+8.491)
= 0.332 > 0.1
y-axis:
Top end : k 2 = 6.184 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 0.737 > 0.1
Bot. end : k 1 = 14.2 / 2( 2.399+1.798)
= 1.7 > 0.1

Effective length of column


Clear height , lz = 3450 - 300 = 3150 mm
ly = 3450 - 500 = 2950 mm
lo = 0.5l {[1 + k 1/(0.45 + k 1)][1 + k 2/(0.45 + k 2]}½
l oz = 0.5 x 3150 {[1 + 0.145/(0.45 + 0.145)][1 + 0.332/( 0.45+ 0.332]}½
= 2096 mm
l oy = 0.5 x 2950 {[1 + 0.737/(0.45 + 0.737)][1 + 1.7/(0.45 + 1.7]}½
= 2513 mm

Radius of gyration, i = (I /A )½
iz = iy = [2133x106 / (400x 400)]½
= 115.47 mm

Slenderness Ratio, λ = l o/i


λz = 2096 / 115.47 λy = 2513/ 115.47
= 18.2 = 21.76
Ref Page : 112
Calculations Output
5.8.3.1 (1)

Slenderness limit, λlim = 20.A.B.C/(n)1/2


A = 0.7
B = 1.1
C = 1.7 - rm
where rm = M01/M02
z axis : rm = -0.5
Cz = 1.7+(0.5) = 2.2
y axis : rm = -0.5
Cz = 1.7+(0.5) = 2.2

n = Ned / (Acfcd)
3
= 1993.885 x 10 / (400x400)(0.85)(30)/1.5
= 0.73

λlim(z) = 33.88 / (√0.73) = 40


λlim(y) = 33.88 / (√0.73) = 41

λlim > λ Therefore, column is non slender about z-axis and y-axis

DESIGN MOMENT
5.2 (7) For non-slender column the design moment,
MED = max { M02, Mmin}
where, M02 = M + Ned . ei
Mz = max { Mtop, Mbottom} My = max { Mtop, Mbottom}
= 2.76 kNm = 78.65 kNm

eiz = lo / 400 eiy = lo / 400


= 2096 /400 = 2513 /400
= 5.24 mm = 6.2825 mm
6.1 (4)
M02z = 2.76 + (193.885 x 5.24 x10⁻³)
= 3.775 kNm
M02y = 78.65 + (1993.885 x 6.2825x10⁻³)
= 91.177 kNm

Mmin = Ned . e0
e0 = h/30 ≥ 20
= 400/ 30 = 13.3 < 20 Use e0 = 20 mm

Mmin = 1993.885 x 20x10⁻³


= 40 kNm

Therefore, MED = max { M02z, M02y) Mmin}


= 91.177 kNm

CHECKING BIAXIAL BENDING


ez = MEdy / NEd ey = M =Edz / NEd
= 3.775 x 10^6 / 1993.885 x 10^3 = 91.177
= x 10^6 / 1993.885 x 10^3
= 1.9 mm = 45.728 mm

(ey / h) / (ez / b) = (1.9 / 400 )/ (45.728 / 400) (ez / b) / (ey / h) (45.728/


= 400) / (1.9/ 400)
= 0.04 = 24.06

λy / λ z = 40/ 41 λz / λy = 41/ 40 Ignore biaxial


= 0.975 <2 = 1.025 <2 bending

DURABILITY, BOND & FIRE RESISTANCE


table 4.1 Min. concrete cover regard to bond, Cmin,b = 20 mm
table 4.4 Min.concrete cover regard to durability, Cmin, dur = 25 mm
table5.2a Min. required axis distance for R90, asd = 38 mm
Min. concrete cover regard to fire mm
Cmin = asd - Ølink-Øbar/2 = 38 - 8 - 20/2 = 20 mm
Allowance in design for deviation, Cdev = 10 mm
4.4.1.1(2) Nominal cover, Cnom = Cmin+ Cdev = 20+10
= 30 mm
Page : 113
Ref Calculations Output
REINFORCEMENT
d2 = C + Фlink + Фbar/2 = 30 + 8 + 20/2 = 48 mm
d2/h = 48 / 400 = 0.12

(Ned/ bhfck) = ( 1993.885x10³/ (400x400x30)


= 0.42

(Med/ bh2fck) = ( 91.177x10⁶/ (400x4002x30)


= 0.05

Based on design chart of d2/h = 0.12,


(Asfyk)/ (bhfck) = 0.01
As = (0.1x400x400x30) / 500 Use: 4H20
= 960 mm²
(1257 mm²)
9.5.2 (2) As, min = 0.1NEd/fyd = 0.1NEd/(0.87fyk)
= 0.1 x 1993.885 x103 / (0.87 x 500)
= 458 mm2
or 0.002Ac = 0.002 x 400 x400 = 320 mm2

9.5.2 (3) As, max = 0.04 Ac = 0.04 x 400 x 400 = 6400 mm2

Links
9.5.3 Minimum diameter, фmin = 1/4 x фbar
= 1/4 x 20
= 5 mm or 6 mm фmin = 6 mm

Link spacing, Sv,max = max {(20 x Фbar); lesser dimension of column; 400 mm}
20 x фbar = 20 x 20 = 400 mm
lesser dimension of column = 400 mm
or 400 mm Use: H6 -400

At section 300 mm below and above beam at lapped joints,


Sv,max = 0.6 x 400 = 240 mm Use: H6 -240
APPENDIX
MINUTE OF MEETING 1/2021
BFC 43303 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

DATE : 19th October 2021


TIME : 3.00 – 4.00 pm
PLACE : Google Meet

Members present:
1. Rafina Rachel Anak Taka (Chairperson)
2. Yap Zi Ning (Secretary)
3. Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony

Members’ apologies: -

NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK


1.0 Chairperson Address

The Chairperson called for meeting at Rafina Rachel Anak -


3.00pm – 4.00 p.m. All group members Taka
are welcomed to the meeting.

2.0 Discussion on Project

i. Discuss on the requirements All Members The issues and requirements are
of the project. identified.
ii. List out the requirements of
report.
iii. Identify the issues of the
project.

3.0 Information to Gather

i. Architectural drawing. Seconders: -


ii. Company profile Sararossy Sungki
iii. Project brief Anak Anthony
iv. Project planning and
scheduling
v. Proposed structural layout and
arrangement
4.0 Work Distribution

a. One of the members Yap Zi Ning -The drawing was examined and
responsible for finding the approved by every members.
architectural drawing.
b. One of the members is Yap Zi Ning -Professor will aid in finding
responsible to report regarding one group members during
the lack of one member to lecture time.
professor.
c. One of the members is Sararossy Sungki -Our company was named YSR
responsible to construct the Anak Anthony Co. and design of logo was
company profile approved.
d. One of the members are Rafina Rachel Anak
responsible to construct the Taka
project brief as well as project
planning and scheduling. All members
e. Every members are
responsible to sketch the
structural layout
5.0 Other Matters
Chairperson informed members about the upcoming meeting and asked every member to be alert of
notice regarding the next meeting for the time and venue. Every member is also asked to finish their
responsible part.
Action by: Rafina Rachel Anak Taka
6.0 Closing
The meeting was adjourned at 4.00 pm. Next meeting to be noticed in few days’ time.

Prepared by: Approved by:

____________________ ____________________
(YAP ZI NING) (RAFINA RACHEL ANAK TAKA)
Secretary President
Date: 19th October 2021 Date: 19th October 2021
MINUTE OF MEETING 1/2021
BFC 43303 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

DATE : 25th October 2021


TIME : 2.00 pm– 3.00 pm
PLACE : Google Meet

Members present:
1. Rafina Rachel Anak Taka (Chairperson)
2. Yap Zi Ning (Secretary)
3. Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin
4. Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony

Members’ apologies: -

NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK


1.0 Chairperson Address

The Chairperson called for meeting at Rafina Rachel Anak -


2.00p.m. – 3.00 p.m. All members are Taka
welcomed to the meeting.

2.0 Confirmation of Previous Meeting


Minutes of the previous meeting held on 20th October 2021 had been read by all group members.
It was proposed by Yap Zi Ning and seconded by Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony.

3.0 Matter Arising


All members have come out with the works of their responsible part as assigned in last meeting.
The architectural drawing was approved by professor during lectures time and new group
member, Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin was joining our group. Physical meeting with
Professor Ir. Ts. Dr. Mohd Irwan bin Juki in FKAAB was arrange on 31th November 2021
(Sunday). The architecture and engineering drawing had been drawn out and modification was
made.
4.0 Further discussion on the detail of issues

i. The work distribution for All Members -


each group members.
ii. Finalise the structural layout
before physical meeting with
professor.
5.0 Work Distribution

a. One of the members Yap Zi Ning -


responsible for drawing
modification.
b. One of the members is Nur Azmina Binti
responsible for description of Mohd Aminuddin
project scope.

6.0 Other Matters


Chairperson informed members about the upcoming meeting and asked every member to be alert
of notice regarding the next meeting for the time. Every member is also asked to finish their
responsible part before next meeting.
Action by: Rafina Rachel Anak Taka
7.0 Closing
The meeting was adjourned at 3.00 pm. Next meeting to be noticed in few days’ time.
Prepared by: Approved by:

____________________ ____________________
(YAP ZI NING) (RAFINA RACHEL ANAK TAKA)
Secretary President
Date: 14th October 2021 Date: 14th October 2021
MINUTE OF MEETING 1/2021
BFC 43303 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

DATE : 31th October 2021


TIME : 2.00 pm– 3.00 pm
PLACE : Lobby FKAAS (Physical meeting with Profesor Ir. Ts. Dr.
Mohd Irwan bin Juki)

Members present:
1. Rafina Rachel Anak Taka (Chairperson)
2. Yap Zi Ning (Secretary)
3. Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin
4. Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony

Members’ apologies: -

NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK


1.0 Chairperson Address
The Chairperson called for meeting at Rafina Rachel Anak -
2.00p.m. – 3.00 p.m. All members are Taka
welcomed to the meeting.

2.0 Confirmation of Previous Meeting


Minutes of the previous meeting held on 25th October 2021 had been read by all group members.
It was proposed by Yap Zi Ning and seconded by Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin

3.0 Matter Arising


The structural layout was required to be improved according to the suggestion from Profesor Ir.
Ts. Dr. Mohd Irwan bin Juki.

4.0 Further discussion on the detail of issues

I. Identify the code of practice All Members -


for the building designed.
II. Finalise the structural layout
before Esteem analysis and
design.
5.0 Work Distribution

a.
Structural layout Yap Zi Ning -
modification
- The column at the upper
roof layer should be
marked cross to indicate
there was no any column
further
- Structural layout should
be printed in
monochrome
-
6.0 Other Matters
Chairperson informed members about the upcoming meeting and asked every member to be alert
of notice regarding the next meeting for the time. Every member is also asked to finish their
responsible part before next meeting.
Action by: Rafina Rachel Anak Taka
7.0 Closing
The meeting was adjourned at 3.00 pm. Next meeting to be noticed in few days’ time.
Prepared by: Approved by:

____________________ ____________________
(YAP ZI NING) (RAFINA RACHEL ANAK TAKA)
Secretary President
Date: 14th October 2021 Date: 14th October 2021
MINUTE OF MEETING 1/2021
BFC 43303 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

DATE : 3rh November 2021


TIME : 4.00 – 5.00 pm
PLACE : Google Meet

Members present:
1. Rafina Rachel Anak Taka (Chairperson)
2. Yap Zi Ning (Secretary)
3. Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin
4. Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony

Members’ apologies: -
NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK
1.0 Chairperson Address

The Chairperson called for meeting at Rafina Rachel Anak -


4.00 p.m.–5.00 p.m. All members are Taka
welcomed to the meeting.

2.0 Confirmation of Previous Meeting


Minutes of the previous meeting held on 31th October 2021 had been read by all group members.
It was proposed by Yap Zi Ning and seconded by Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin

3.0 Matter Arising


Production of analysis and design for proposed structure by using software Esteem.
4.0 Esteem software analysis and design

i. Analyse and design the Sararossy Sungki Anak


proposed structure by Anthony, Rafina Rachel
using Esteem software Anak Taka

ii. Identify the design code Nur Azmina Binti Mohd


and parameters required. Aminuddin
5.0 Other Matters
Chairperson informed members about the due date of the preliminary project and asked every
member to submit the report before the due date. Besides, chairperson also informed members
about the date of interview with IAP.

Action by: Rafina Rachel Anak Taka


6.0 Closing
The meeting was adjourned at 5.00 pm.

Prepared by: Approved by:

____________________ ____________________
(YAP ZI NING) (RAFINA RACHEL ANAK TAKA)
Secretary President
Date: 3rh November 2021 Date: 3rh November 2021
MINUTE OF MEETING 1/2021
BFC 43303 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

DATE : 8th November 2021


TIME : 3.00 – 3.30 pm
PLACE : FKAAB North Tower, 5th floor

Members present:
1. Rafina Rachel Anak Taka (Chairperson)
2. Yap Zi Ning (Secretary) (joined via Google Meet)
3. Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin
4. Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony

Members’ apologies: -
NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK
1.0 Chairperson Address

The Chairperson called for meeting at Rafina Rachel Anak -


3.00 p.m.–3.30 p.m. All members are Taka
welcomed to the meeting.

2.0 Confirmation of Previous Meeting


Minutes of the previous meeting held on 3rd November 2021 had been read by all group members.
It was proposed by Yap Zi Ning and seconded by Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin

3.0 Matter Arising


Checking the analysis and design for proposed structure by using software Esteem.
4.0 Esteem software analysis and design

i. The pad footing should be Sararossy Sungki


changed to piling due to high Anak Anthony
load from 4-storey building.

ii. Identify the earthwork plan Yap Zi Ning


of proposed building

5.0 Other Matters


Chairperson informed members about the due date of the preliminary project and asked every
member to submit the report before the due date. Besides, chairperson also informed members
about the date of interview with IAP.

Action by: Rafina Rachel Anak Taka


6.0 Closing
The meeting was adjourned at 3.30 pm.

Prepared by: Approved by:

____________________ ____________________
(YAP ZI NING) (RAFINA RACHEL ANAK TAKA)
Secretary President
Date: 8th November 2021 Date: 8th November 2021
MINUTE OF MEETING 1/2021
BFC 43303 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

DATE : 8th November 2021


TIME : 3.00 – 3.30 pm
PLACE : Google Meet

Members present:
1. Rafina Rachel Anak Taka (Chairperson)
2. Yap Zi Ning (Secretary)
3. Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin
4. Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony
Members’ apologies: -

NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK


1.0 Chairperson Address

The Chairperson called for meeting at Rafina Rachel Anak -


3.00 p.m.–3.30 p.m. All members are Taka
welcomed to the meeting.

2.0 Confirmation of Previous Meeting


Minutes of the previous meeting held on 3rd November 2021 had been read by all group members.
It was proposed by Yap Zi Ning and seconded by Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin

3.0 Matter Arising


Production of analysis and design for proposed structure by using software Esteem.
4.0 Slide Preparation
i. Two of the group members Rafina Rachel Anak The slides were examined
were responsible to prepare Taka, Nur Azmina and approved by each
the slides for interview Binti Mohd member.
session with IAP, they were Aminuddin
required to extract
information from the
completed part from others.
All members
ii. Presentation parts were
assigned to each members.
5.0 Other Matters
Chairperson informed members about the due date of the preliminary project and asked every
member to submit the report before the due date. Besides, chairperson also informed members
about the date of interview with IAP.
Action by: Rafina Rachel Anak Taka
6.0 Closing
The meeting was adjourned at 3.30 pm.

Prepared by: Approved by:

____________________ ____________________
(YAP ZI NING) (RAFINA RACHEL ANAK TAKA)
Secretary President
Date: 10th November 2021 Date: 10th November 2021
MINUTE OF MEETING 1/2021
BFC 43303 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

DATE : 14th November 2021


TIME : 2.00 – 2.30 pm
PLACE : Google Meet (Meeting with IAP)

Members present:
1. Rafina Rachel Anak Taka (Chairperson)
2. Yap Zi Ning (Secretary)
3. Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin
4. Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony

Members’ apologies: -
NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK
1.0 Chairperson Address

The Chairperson called for meeting at Rafina Rachel Anak -


2.00 p.m.–2.30 p.m. All members are Taka
welcomed to the meeting.

2.0 Confirmation of Previous Meeting


Minutes of the previous meeting held on 8td November 2021 had been read by all group members.
It was proposed by Yap Zi Ning and seconded by Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin

3.0 Matter Arising


Production of analysis and design for proposed structure by using software Esteem.
4.0 Modification
i. Redesign the foundation Sararossy Sungki
of the building Anak Anthony

ii. Reedit dimension of


beam and column to Rafina Rachel Anak
fulfil the requirement of Taka
Eurocode

iii. Reedit the company Yap Zi Ning, Nur


name and do minor Azmina Binti Mohd
correction to the report Aminuddin
according to comment
from panel.

5.0 Other Matters


Chairperson informed members about the due date of the preliminary project and asked every
member to submit the report before the due date.
Action by: Rafina Rachel Anak Taka
6.0 Closing
The meeting was adjourned at 2.30 pm.
Prepared by: Approved by:

____________________ ____________________
(YAP ZI NING) (RAFINA RACHEL ANAK TAKA)
Secretary President
Date: 15th November 2021 Date: 15th November 2021
MINUTE OF MEETING 1/2021
BFC 43303 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT
FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

DATE : 22th November 2021


TIME : 9.00 – 10.00 pm
PLACE : Google Meet

Members present:
1. Rafina Rachel Anak Taka (Chairperson)
2. Yap Zi Ning (Secretary)
3. Nur Azmina Binti Mohd Aminuddin
4. Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony

Members’ apologies: -
NO SUBJECT ACTION BY FEEDBACK
1.0 Chairperson Address

The Chairperson called for meeting at Rafina Rachel Anak -


9.00 p.m.–10.00 p.m. All members are Taka
welcomed to the meeting.

2.0 Confirmation of Previous Meeting


Minutes of the previous meeting held on 14th November 2021 had been read by all group
members. It was proposed by Yap Zi Ning and seconded by Sararossy Sungki Anak Anthony.

3.0 Matter Arising


Completion of preliminary report and final report according to the requirement stated.
4.0 Preliminary Report
i. One of the members was Yap Zi Ning
responsible for
compilation of
preliminary report.
ii. Redesign the foundation Sararossy Sungki - Require to
of the building Anak Anthony, consult other
Rafina Rachel Anak professor due to
Taka, Nur Azmina the failure of
Binti Mohd previously
Aminuddin designed pile.

5.0 Other Matters


Chairperson informed members about the due date of the preliminary project and asked every
member to submit the report before the due date. A physical meeting with professor was arranged
on 30th November 2021 (Tuesday).
Action by: Rafina Rachel Anak Taka
6.0 Closing
The meeting was adjourned at 10.00 pm.
Prepared by: Approved by:

____________________ ____________________
(YAP ZI NING) (RAFINA RACHEL ANAK TAKA)
Secretary President
Date: 23th November 2021 Date: 23th November 2021
A

glass louvre glass louvre


window to detail window to detail
VOID
R.C. flat roof to engr's
detail
fixed glass panel lift
R.C. FLAT window to detail
ROOF
1HR fire door solid timber panel
to detail door to detail
timber louvre
115mm thk. brickwall plastering window to detail
on both side

115mm thk. brickwall m.s. railing with m.s.


plastering on both side alum. frame glass sliding handrail
door to detail

alum. frame glass sliding


window to detail m.s. railing with m.s.
timber louvre alum. frame glass handrail
window to detail casement window alum. frame glass casement
alum. vertical sun shading PROJECT TITLE
to detail window to detail
panel to detail
CADANGAN UNTUK MENDIRIKAN 1 UNIT
RUMAH KEDAI 4 TINGKAT , DI ATAS LOT 617 &
B B
glass louvre
alum. frame glass top hung glass louvre
618, LORONG ABU SITI , SEKSYEN 16,
window to detail alum. frame glass
VOID top hung window alum. frame glass door
window to detail window to detail BANDAR GEORGETOWN, D.T.L., PULAU
m.s. door to detail
to detail with fixed glass panel to
m.s. door to detail PINANG.
detail

UNTUK EN. OOI TAT YUEN


m.s. cable for creeper plants

FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION


SECTION B-B
MELALUI PELAN KEBENARAN MERANCANG:
JPB/KM/5676/A [ MBPP/OSC/PM2936/15 ]
YANG DILULUSKAN PADA: 01.10.2016

DRAWING TITLE

R.C. flat roof to engr's


detail

R.C. FLAT TANDATANGAN PEMILIK TANAH & BANGUNAN:

ROOF

MELALUI PA NO: 7438/2015 BERTARIKH 29, JULAI 2015


KEPADA EN. OOI TAT YUEN
glass louvre green roof on r.c. roof to m.s. door to detail
window to detail eng. detail

115mm thk. brickwall plastering


on both side
A 1HR fire door
to detail
R.C. staircase with m.s. railing OOI TAT YUEN

UPPER ROOF PLAN to engr's detail (R:179mm


T:255mm)

glass louvre
window to detail
timber flush door to detail

R.C. staircase with m.s. railing R.C. staircase with m.s.


BEE ARCHITECT
to engr's detail (R:178mm railing to engr's detail
T:255mm) (R:178mm T:255mm) 29B-17-3 Maritime Suite,
Persiaran Karpal Singh,
11600 Georgetown Penang.
timber louvre Tel: 04-3762428
window to detail 1HR fire door Email: bee.architectbee@gmail.com
to detail
m.s. railing with m.s. TANDATANGAN ARKITEK & SAKSI
KEPADA TANDATANGAN PEMILIK TANAH & BANGUNAN :
handrail

m.s. door to detail

r.c planter box


timber flush door to detail
R.C. staircase with m.s. railing R.C. staircase with m.s. railing
to engr's detail (R:179mm to engr's detail (R:173mm
T:255mm) T:255mm)

SECTION A-A
DRAWING STATUS SUBMISSION

SCALE 1:100 DRAWN FASIHA

DATE MARCH 2017 CHECKED BEE

JOB NO. SHEET NO. REV.

BEE 0025 3/3 A


glass louvre window to
detail m.s. railing with m.s. m.s. railing with m.s. m.s. railing with m.s. glass louvre
A A handrail
A handrail
A handrail
A window to detail
2 1
m.s. door to detail A/C A/C A/C
DN179 DN179 2.40 SQ.M. 2.40 SQ.M. 2.40 SQ.M. DN100
VOID alum. frame glass casement VOID alum. frame glass casement VOID alum. frame glass casement VOID

19 window to detail 19 window to detail 19 window to detail 20 DN100


3 m.s. door to detail DN100 DN100 DN100 1
1 1 1
1HR fire door to detail 1HR fire door to detail 1HR fire door to detail m.s. door to detail

alum. frame glass top


13 hung window to detail 10 10 10 11
12 9 9 9 10
suction tank 115mm thk. brickwall 115mm thk. brickwall 115mm thk.
plastering on both side plastering on both side brickwall
plastering on both

riser

riser

riser
side
115mm thk. brickwall
pump plastering on both side
12.20 SQ.M.
m.s. door to detail
riser

(F) timber flush door to detail FLAT ROOF


1.73 SQ.M.
tap mech. vent.
ft
DN75
(FOR UTILITY
tap
ft & SERVICES)
timber flush door to detail
timber flush door to detail
(M)
1.85 SQ.M.
DN75

mech. vent.
DN75
timber sliding door to detail
green roof on r.c.
3.80 SQ.M. 115mm thk. brickwall timber flush door to detail timber flush door to detail roof to eng.
(M) DN75 (M) DN75 (M) DN75
detail
ft
plastering on both side 2.90 SQ.M. 2.90 SQ.M. 2.90 SQ.M.
tap tap tap tap
ft ft ft
DN100

PROJECT TITLE
glass louvre window to glass louvre window to glass louvre window to glass louvre window to
detail detail detail detail CADANGAN UNTUK MENDIRIKAN 1 UNIT
B COURT B B B B B B COURT B B B RUMAH KEDAI 4 TINGKAT , DI ATAS LOT 617 &
YARD
DN150 VOID VOID VOID YARD VOID 618, LORONG ABU SITI , SEKSYEN 16,
timber louvre window to timber louvre window to terracotta tiles
detail detail BANDAR GEORGETOWN, D.T.L., PULAU
scupper drain
PINANG.
DN150 ft ft ft DN100

UNTUK EN. OOI TAT YUEN


tap tap tap

(F) timber flush door to detail (F) timber flush door to detail timber flush door to detail
2.90 SQ.M. DN75
DN75
(F) DN75
2.90 SQ.M. 2.40 SQ.M.

FLAT ROOF
(FOR UTILITY
OFFICE & SERVICES)
SHOP
OFFICE OFFICE MELALUI PELAN KEBENARAN MERANCANG:
JPB/KM/5676/A [ MBPP/OSC/PM2936/15 ]
YANG DILULUSKAN PADA: 01.10.2016

DRAWING TITLE

alum. frame glass double


leaf door with fixed glass
panel to detail timber louvre window to
detail
DN50 DN100
solid timber double leaf TANDATANGAN PEMILIK TANAH & BANGUNAN:
door to detail m.s. door to detail
DN50
1HR fire door to detail
LOBBY VERANDA alum. frame glass door DN100 DN256
4.75 SQ.M.
with fixed glass panel to 1HR fire door to detail 1HR fire door to detail BAL. m.s. door to detail
11.3 SQ.M.
detail alum. vertical sun
r.c wall to engr's. detail alum. frame glass sliding alum. frame glass sliding shading panel to
A/C window to detail A/C window to detail detail
MELALUI PA NO: 7438/2015 BERTARIKH 29, JULAI 2015
LIFT lift to engr's. detail LIFT alum. vertical sun shading LIFT alum. vertical sun shading LIFT KEPADA EN. OOI TAT YUEN
panel to detail panel to detail

m.s. railing with m.s. handrail


m.s. railing with m.s. handrail m.s. railing with m.s. handrail
fixed glass panel lift window to
detail

r.c. planter box

OOI TAT YUEN

BEE ARCHITECT
29B-17-3 Maritime Suite,
Persiaran Karpal Singh,
11600 Georgetown Penang.
0.9m(w) x 1.2m(d) x 1.2m(h) Tel: 04-3762428
A refuse (with roof) A A A A Email: bee.architectbee@gmail.com

FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN TANDATANGAN ARKITEK & SAKSI
alum. louvre KEPADA TANDATANGAN PEMILIK TANAH & BANGUNAN :
door to detail

r.c culvert over


drain to engr's
detail
GROUND FLOOR PLAN

DRAWING STATUS SUBMISSION

SCALE 1:100 DRAWN FASIHA

DATE MARCH 2017 CHECKED BEE

JOB NO. SHEET NO. REV.

BEE 0025 2/3 A


1) ALL CONCRETE TO BE GRADE 25 OR UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
2) ALL LEAN CONCRETE TO BE 1:3:6 MIX.
3) ALL CONCRETE TO BE COMPACTED BY USING A MECHANICAL
VIBRATOR.
4) ALL COARSE & FINE AGGREGATES SHALL COMPLY WITH B.S.882.
5) ALL REINFORCING BARS TO BE HIGH TENSILE BARS(EXCEPT FOR
LINKS & STIRRUPS) AND COMPLY WITH B.S.785. `Y' DENOTES HIGH
TENSILE & `R' DENOTES MILD STEEL BAR.
6) 125x125 OR 125x225 STIFFENER & 125x225 LINTHOL BEAM TO BE
PROVIDED AT APPROPRIATE PLACE.
7) STIFFENER = 4Y12, R6-125 c.c LINKS.
LINTHOL = 2Y12(TOP & BTM.), R6-175 c.c LINKS.
8) ALL CONCRETE CLEAR OF REINFORCEMENT:
i)SLAB = 19mm ii)BEAM = 25mm iii)COLUMN = 25mm
9) LAPPING:
i)TENSION = 50 x BAR DIA., ii)COMPRESSION = 40 x BAR DIA.
10) 50mm THK. LEAN CONCRETE TO BE PROVIDED AT THE SOFFIT OF
ALL GROUND BEAMS & SLABS.
11) ALL OPENINGS FOR PIPING SHALL BE FORMED IN POSITION
BEFORE CONCRETING.
12) THESE DRAWINGS ARE TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL
RELEVANT ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.

Rev. Date Particular Chkd.

PROJECT TITLE
CADANGAN UNTUK MENDIRIKAN 1 UNIT
RUMAH KEDAI 4 TINGKAT , DI ATAS LOT 617 &
618, LORONG ABU SITI , SEKSYEN 16,
BANDAR GEORGETOWN, D.T.L., PULAU
PINANG.

UNTUK EN. OOI TAT YUEN

DRAWING TITLE

Consulting Engineers

YSR CO.
1E (1st Floor ) Lorong Delima 5
Island Glades, 11700 Pulau Pinang
Tel & Fax No.: 04-6588682, E-mail: cswcon@yahoo.com
Engineer's Signature

IR. WOON CHAN SANG


P.ENG, BEM, MIEM, B.ENG(TECH) CIVIL ENG (HONS), UNI WALES, UK

Scale Rev.
Designed Chkd.
Drawn Date
Drg. No. Rev.

A317/2017/RC/KP
Progress report

WEEK
Project Report 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Group Discussion

Preparation of Planning Proposal

Preparation of Report

Preliminary Submission

Final Submission
Design and Analysis
WEEK

Foundation

Slab

Beam

Staircase

Column

Planning Actual

You might also like