Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Casestudy Mindoro&marinduque
Casestudy Mindoro&marinduque
Casestudy Mindoro&marinduque
1975-
1956 1964 1969 1991 1993 1996 1997 1999 2000 2001
1991
Placer dome Marcopper mining by Placer Dome an earthen the dam burst, On March 24, In March of On February On February On October 9,
Inc. began mining copr. Marcopper oversaw the dam was built flooding 1996, another 1997, one year16,Placer 16, 2000,On 2001, Placer
exploration, became began in dumping of in the downstream massive after the spill, Dome’s February 16, Dome Pulls
geological involved Marinduque.Pl200 million mountainous villages and tailings spill at Placer Dome Second 2000, meeting Out of
mapping and acer Dome hastons of mine headwaters of the town of the divested from Application forthe decision Philippines
drilling on owned 39.9% waste the Mogpog Mogpog so Marcopper Marcopper. STD is turned was made to and Leaves
Marinduque. of the shares (tailings) River to keep severely that Mine filled the Placer Dome down. approve Clean-Up to
in Marcopper, directly into silt from a houses were Boac River Decides on On May 25, Placer Dome’s Marcopper.
the shallow waste dump swept away, with 3-4 Submarine 1999, a STD plans. On October
waters of for the mine water million tons of Tailings Congressional Two other 11, 2001, the
Calancan Bay, out of the buffaloes and metal Disposal to Inquiry was members of DENR ordered
covering Mogpog River. other live- enriched and “Clean Up” called by the the committee Placer Dome,
corals and stock killed acid Spilled Committee on never signed its subsidiary
seagrasses and crops generating Tailings. Ecology to off on this PDTS, and
and the destroyed. tailings. On October review decision. Marcopper to
bottom of the By August 30, 1997, the complaints by In May 2000, immediately
bay with 80 1996, with the Philippine Marinduqueñ an fix the
square growing Department ofosover the independent dangerous
kilometers of realization Environment continued USGS-led dams and
tailings. that the river and Natural delay in the team spent a structures or
clean-up was Resources clean-up of week in face criminal
not going to (DENR) turned the river. Marinduque action should
be done in six down Placer and inspected a disaster
months or Dome’s first all mining- occur.
even a year, permit related December
Placer Dome application to environmental 2001, without
announced use STD. ly damaged warning or
that the areas. The consultation,P
company USGS report DTS closed its
planned to documents office in
divest from large mounds Marinduque
Marcopper, of tailings left and its office
but would in the river. in Manila and
continue to pulled out of
take the
responsibility Philippines.
for the
ongoing clean-
up of the river.
MINDORO MINING-ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES
3. You may show your analysis of the case study by agreeing or disagreeing or taking a position.
There is no good benefit of over mining or drilling especially if you can’t take the consequences and do the responsibility
like what happened in (Marinduque) after they benefit to the natural resources of the place they just suddenly disappeared.
The deterioration of the environment has now become a significant global and national problem. In the past, people were
never concerned about how they exploited the existing resources and they have just come to realize that with the current rate
of resources usage, in a few decades to come there will be nothing to exploit.