Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pena, Jeb Michael Chapter II Review of Related Literatures
Pena, Jeb Michael Chapter II Review of Related Literatures
This chapter presents and discusses a variety of journals, books, and studies relevant to
the researcher’s topic. A review of related literature is a short assessment of earlier research on a
certain issue.
The current section aims to make learning references from archived research or
experimentation to make such information available for reference and further studies, the rest of
the scholarly world is about to conduct. Citing studies that show substantial agreement and those
that present conflicting conclusions helps to sharpen and define the understanding of existing
knowledge in the problem area provides a background for the research project and makes the
The researcher logically discusses all related literature based on their themes. Synthesis
and concise explanation of the relevance of the texts to the research topic is also provided in the
latter part of chapter 2. Only those studies that are relevant, competently executed, and clearly
CIVIL SOCIETY AND THE PUBLIC POLICY PROCESS: THE CASE OF NGOS IN
BOTSWANA
Mothusi, (2019)
The spread of the democratic dispensation paved the way for independent actors from the civil
society such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to take part in the public policy. These
independent actors collaborate with governments in the governance of state affairs. The
increasing populace as well as the impact of CSOs at national local and community levels, has
resulted in NGOs becoming important actors to reckon with in issues of governance. The
involvement of both local and international NGOs public policy making processes lessened as
various constituencies. These include individuals from different sectors of the economy and
ordinary citizens , prioritizing the marginalized. They usually advocate for the betterment
and openness with the public interests they are raising such as the importance of their right to be
involved in the policy process at any level. The engagement of NGOs in the policy process in
the country depends on certain reasons such as the skills and the capacity of the NGOs to
influence the policy process as well as the opportunities afforded by public officials in the
stages of the process. The additional amendment and corrections in the development discourse
and existing laws also affect the participation of NGOs in the policy process.
A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROLES AND STRATEGIES OF CIVIL SOCIETY
JOHANNESBURG
Kapundu, A. (2017)
the communication gap between the civil society and the state government organizations and
local units. Civil society organization helps for the development of the society, by providing
access to the people in the industries that need state intervention like poverty reduction and
human rights protection. It also contributes to policy making, good governance and
accountability, by providing the voice for the community/people that they are representing, to
become involved with the process of the policies that the state is creating. In addition, It also
promotes participation and assists in education and training. Furthermore, these organizations
use forums, awareness campaigns and empowerment as strategies to promote development and
engagement of the citizens in the community. However, it has found out that the organization
faces challenges because of limited funding. It was noted that civil society organizations should
adopt a higher priority in development planning and practice and should allow the participation
of poor people in the development process. CSOs have great responsibilities within communities
and their members because they ensure that they create a space where the voices of the
vulnerable can be heard as well as advocate for change of unfavorable development policies that
can affect their members. Therefore, the role of civil society organizations in aiding development
in particular, cannot be overemphasized and has been demonstrated in what they do in the
community. Civil society organizations are vital as they create a space for the building of identity
in a society where people feel vulnerable and have little control over the things that affect them.
These organizations and their projects can only employ strong civic consciousness and social
Partnering with Civil Society Organizations. The role of volunteers and not for profit
CSOs create a bridge between the local government unit and active citizens, which is somehow
derived from political and economic nature. In a third sector lens, CSOs are contributing in
devising welfare services, by facilitating the extension of the public interest and turning it into
the accumulation and raise of social capitals. CSOs have a distinguished identity between Social
and Solidarity of the society that unleash the significance on why we need to foster the process
of effective democracy, socio-economic integration, and development. With the virtue of these
process, CSOs can instrumentalize these by pursuing goals of different nature like alleviating the
negative things of restrictive fiscal policy, aiming to make public finance more providing, that
offers a skill-enhancing workplace and job for those unemployed. Lastly, CSOs might persuade
people to engage with the activities of their local government in achieving and responding to the
needs, aspiration and goal of the public interest, by providing information and implementing
The Role of Civil Society Organisations in the Public Financial Management Process of Sub-
nationals in Nigeria
According to Kerekkum & Kingsley (2022), the structure of the CSO is one of the key things for
its inclusion and participation in the public financial management process. With this
contribution, it creates an entrenchment within the state of a country, making them more
accountable and transparent. With the information asymmetry that the CSO’s have, it can inform
the citizens within the published reports and data associated with the fiscal policy making and
lobbying of funds. Through this dissemination of information, it gains the citizen’s feedback and
engagement about the said projects, which makes it more transparent. CSO’s involvement in
these public policy making is a win-win situation for the state and the citizens as it urges the
public officials to become accountable with public funds, and being true to themselves and with
the platforms they had proposed when they were still campaigning. involvement in the public
more accountable with public funds and also ensures better execution of government projects.
Civil society organizations and participatory local governance in Pakistan: An exploratory study
Volume12, Issue3
Pages 158-168
Rosilawati, Y. and Rafique, Z (et. al) (2018)
According to the study conducted by Rosilawati and Rafique (et.al), civil society organizations
are providing holistic and improved ways to ensure participatory governance. These CSOs have
affected the decisions, projects and policies that the state is creating, in accordance with its
citizen’s needs. Therefore, their role against the backdrop of their involvement in mobilizing
citizens involvement and influencing decision-making in Pakistan calls for commendation. But it
found out that the effectiveness of CSOs is very low due to various institutional and political
constraints. Motivations for CSOs in seeking citizen involvement have been instrumental in
Development Goals
https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419884330
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654419884330
Sénit, C. (2019)
According to Senit, C, (2019), civil society organizations have a significant impact in preventing
some issues from being negotiated and in fostering a culture of citizen participation in the
this article provides an original argument to explain influence by focusing on the role of the
participatory space, and reveals a reverse correlation between civil society influence and
inclusive, democratic global policymaking. The study found that when civil society actors
engage in informal participatory spaces, they have a greater chance of influencing others.
However, these are the most exclusive spaces, to which highly organized, professionalized civil
society actors have preferential access over the resourceless. While this research sheds light on
the conditions under which civil society's capabilities result in influence, more research is
required to provide a detailed analysis of the relationships between the format of the
participatory space, the types of influence exercised, and their differential effectiveness. Given
that civil society influence is positively correlated with elitism, what changes could be made to
benefit the inclusion of a broader sample of actors in global norm production? Using democratic
elitism theories, both democratization and influence could still be achieved by democratizing
civil society itself. This could include, for example, periodic elections to ensure elite renewal in
which both institutionalized (NGOs) and non-institutionalized actors (social movements and
citizens) could participate. Furthermore, this could include the creation and strengthening of
mechanisms to ensure accountability between civil society elites and their grassroots. Addressing
the democratic deficits that pervade civil society would improve its capacity to perform its
functions, including the coproduction of global norms, and would eventually contribute to the
other power grab abuses by the political leaders. With the use of the new digital age of
technology, CSOs have become more bolder and worldwide regulation of corruption in both
national or regional global levels. It also plays a vital position in economic, social, and
environmental issues and have an increasing influence on global governance issues. To conduct
the roles under this position, CSO operates as a democratic and heterogenous institutions that
advocates education, cultural preservation, and anti-corruption using education, monitoring,
awareness, research, advocacy, organizing and mobilization. With these activities, CSOs can
hold pressure to the government and its officials to become more accountable and transparent in
taking measures to fight corruption. However, despite that CSO as an anti-corruption driver, it
cannot be taken the fact the CSO and individuals involved in the anti-corruption campaign are
usually being threatened, harassed and harmed by the powerful oligarchs. There are also rare
cases that CSOs is the corrupted agencies themselves. This is because most civil society projects
are funded by foreign aid programs that attract donors to support their organization and its
process. By which, is the way for them to maximize the ideals and projects that these CSO is
upholding. This might also overt a corruptive act, as the donors and the recipient itself may
become liable. Moreover, some CSOs allegedly reported that they do not give citizens immediate
and concrete reasons to be involved like public utilities and services, but rather justifying their
bad behaviour in reiterating the notion of "better governance" or "a better society for all", with
the funds they are corrupting. Chayes (2015) also cited that this is a very common scenario in
transitional and third world countries that are still in the process of establishing democracy or
strengthening it. The donors of these CSO are hooked with the idea of self-promoting activism
with this CSO, whose very promising in pledging projects and outcomes that the donors are
expected them to do so, However, the goal of these CSOs might not always to strengthen
democracy, but rather to graft funds. Because of this, citizens have loosened their faith in these
CSOs as they sometime perceive it as “ghost institutions”, hunting for donations, or if not,
citizens often see the projects of these civil society as undermining their rights and interest.
Related Literature based on the Civil Society Organization function as to MONITORING
Book Editor(s): Ward Berenschot, Henk Schulte Nordholt and Laurens Bakker
Porio, E (2017)
According to Porio, E., (2017), the 1989 constitution gives civil societies a more lenient role in
policy development. As a result of these changes, citizens have become more vocal and involved
in the governance of the state and local government units. Some studies, however, contend that
these civil societies also strengthened the allies of traditional elites (trapos), who are mostly
known for their involvement in corruption. Many CSO leaders assess the prevalence of CSOs
and their relationship with clientelistic and predatory practices of political elites through law
reforms and active citizen engagement with these civic societies. That the mobilization and
engagement of these civil societies are pondering the trapos power in maintaining their political
dominance. That the participation of the people with these CSO does not result in the
decentralization of power, instead they are actually creating new platforms for these political
dynasties to gain local support, and cementing their powerful positions. For this reason, most of
the new breed of Filipino trapos have already connected themselves in different civil societies
through implementing their local programs and partnering with these CSOs to execute these
projects. With this function, mayors and other government officials established an accountable
look and participatory-empowering administration. This can result in this CSO to weaken. What
can be done is to create networked governance practices, by giving the civil societies a role in
the local governance, and an access to the fiscal and statutory functions of the government, in
exchange for political support for other elections. By doing so, these politicians will be pushed to
create legal and real alliances with civil societies and the private sector, so they can engage in
half of the policy making in implementing certain local projects. As seen in the above case
studies, the relationships and patterns of engagement between both government and non-
government actors have indeed become more decentralized, transparent, consultative and
participatory. Some Civil society leaders are using their local prominence to support the election
campaign of the mayor and mobilize people to attend rallies and ceremonies during these
campaigns.Thus, these collaborative arrangements and negotiations have increased the capacity
of some civil society groups to shape the implementation of government programmes by gaining
the trust of the citizens with these campaigns, to also participate with its local policies.
Obaidy, Z. (2017).
accountability. By educating citizens and helping them to exercise their rights by being engaged
in policy making with the public institutions and government agencies by providing their basic
needs and personal information about the matter. Finally, since the CSOS already established a
trust within the citizens, it will next implement the access of the people to this information and
laws in order for them to be efficient whenever they will use that project, and to also bring
convenience within the governmental process such as solicitation etc, as a sign of transparency
and accountability. This openness that the CSOs are creating with the citizens, will build a trust
for these Government institutions to provide information to the public in return, as a sign of an
active public service. public enables the public to take an active role in public affairs. Good
governance happens if public participation between both the state and the society is improved,
and people can feel that they are heard and their sentiments are being solicited by the
government in its decision and policy making process. Civil society organizations are the best
sector to inform the public by instilling awareness and motivating them to exercise their rights.
Educating citizens, mobilizing the public, and encouraging people to participate is the core
efforts of CSOs in fighting corruption. Civil society organizations can educate citizens and
mobilize them for an endless participation, and a continuous dialogue between the states. CSOs'
educational programs also help link the gap between people and government. Without educating
the public about their rights and making them understand what is happening in public
institutions, it is difficult to maintain the veil of secrecy. The experience from such initiatives
showed that similar efforts make a real change in increasing transparency and Accountability.
The more people who are aware of their rights and what is going on in public institutions, the
more opportunities they will have to participate in decision-making and the less chance of
corruption. In addition to educating people on how to exercise their rights, civil society
organizations can assist people in filing requests. Civil society intervention to educate people
and assist them in filing requests is the only way to close this gap. raise public awareness to
exercise their rights, access information from public institutions and make it easy for citizens to
understand, and assist people in filing projects or programs that they believe they are not
capable of.
Various actors in the society such as CSOs, has the right to hold participation in public policy
creation. However, the absence of proactive civil society organizations, combined with passive
legislatures that are only signing laws, reduces the citizen’s duty in the policy making. This is
because, they are hurdled by legal and political constraints, as well as lack of funds to support
and the cheer of the government itself in carrying out those projects. As a result, government and
political party-supplemented CSOs have dominated the participation in public policy process in
the country. With this being said, the state of Ethiopia must include the interest of its constituents
even without the CSO, because the quality of the decision they will implement will only be
effective if it consists of diversity of ideas coming from different disposition of its citizens. In
order for them to promote equal right to access public resources. And with these CSOs, the state
can finally see the diversity and the various opinions of their citizens, without being selective,
rather be inclusive.
The Role of Civil Society Organizations in the Public Financial Management of Ghana.
CSOs role in the public financial process are narrowed into five themes. These are clustered into
two types of roles, which are the non-auditing and auditing. On auditing roles, civil society
organizations monitor government expenses, creates, and follow up reports and analysis. They
participate by persuading citizens to share their thoughts in controlling over these priority
setting, resource distribution, policy-making and access to public products and services.
Meanwhile, the non-auditing roles, makes CSOs involved in the strategic planning stage and in
the budgeting stage of the public procurement management process. These civil society
organizations represent their group of citizens to be represented, in making a stand into the
public policy process that will reflect and respond to their needs and ideas. They interact with
their people by conducting research on the local units, which consist of the questions or topics
associated with the citizen’s needs, in order for them to feel relevant and persuade them in
participating with the process and proposing reports people's directives and presenting it to the
government agencies that can respond to their needs. It also contends that the participation of
CSO’s engagement in the policy process is for the benefit of the common good, as being a
democratic country, citizens and civil society organizations have the right to participate directly
in fiscal policy and nation-building. Civil society organizations participate in the formulation by
proposing projects, setting priorities, and helping to decide which projects should be funded and
which stakeholders must be the beneficiary of the project. Civil society organizations are also
publishing contract analysis in the monitoring and evaluation of public finances. In conclusion,
CSOs should be lauded and integrated for their involvement with the policy process.. By doing
so, they will take their duty more of an obligation, rather than responsibility. Moreso, it will
empower them to work freely without any form of compensation, interference discrimination and
CSOs role in policy making is focused on the participative public decision making, and
and responsiveness that are vital to improve governance and public service. CSO also power
such as sound and fiscal managements. The effectiveness of the social accountability steps and
official in the government are heavily influenced by the local and political decision-making
systems and structures. As being inherently less powerful than the government, CSOs gain
influence by partnering with other stakeholders and sectors in executing certain decision-makers
in their campaigns; There are concerted efforts to build CSOs’ capacities to play these social
accountability roles. Most of the time, these projects are building CSOs’ function to research,
scrutinize, create networks, and advocate on sectoral or national issues from health, general
budgetary policies, health, and even environmental protection. By this, the citizens awareness
within this issues has been relive, promoting direct and constructive conversation of this issues
between citizens and local administration officials, and enabled them to raise this concern to the
attention of higher administration officials for an action. Because of CSOs, the improvements of
The role of civil society organizations is about contributing towards more transparent,
accountable, and equitable administration of taxes. It has been identified that CSOs have 4 roles
participation, and engaging with state actors. CSOs could play a key role in increasing taxpayer
awareness on taxation and the link between taxes and expenditure, by creating projects and
seminars that have the same goal. CSOs' successes in building coalitions with a diverse set of
actors to mobilize taxpayers on tax administration issues. Civil society organizations require
higher than traditional levels of flexibility to be able to react effectively to narrow windows of
political opportunity, and make it more visible and reachable with the citizens itself. CSOs may
be inhibited from engaging in accountability activities due to the inherent political risks involved
Enhancing the Role of Civil Society Organizations in Public Education Sector Monitoring
and Accountability.
The study of Kobia, D and Sikoyo, L. (2021) states that CSO are efficiently monitor during the
implementation and formulation of the policies and programs for the public, and sets a standard
for its accountability and transparency. This is being done in response to the issues that the
marginalized and vulnerable sectors are experiencing, in accessing basic human rights such as
access to education. The study also discovered that the resources, access to data and
information, government policy, capacity, civic space, and regulatory frameworks are the factors
that stabilize the relationship between the influencing government policy and civil society
actions.