Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nadu Vina Man I 2009
Nadu Vina Man I 2009
Nadu Vina Man I 2009
The manuscript was received on 5 May 2009 and was accepted after revision for publication on 20 July 2009.
DOI: 10.1243/13506501JET670
Abstract: In this article, a theoretical study of the effect of surface roughness on the squeeze
film characteristics of short porous partial journal bearing lubricated with micropolar fluids is
made. The modified averaged Reynolds equation accounting for the randomized surface rough-
ness structure is mathematically derived. The Christensen stochastic theory of hydrodynamic
lubrication of a rough surface is used to study the effect of two types of one-dimensional (1D)
surface roughness on the squeeze film characteristics of a short porous partial journal bearing
with micropolar fluid. It is assumed that the roughness asperity heights are small compared to
the film thickness. It is observed that the transverse surface roughness pattern improves the
squeeze film characteristics, whereas the squeeze film bearing performance is affected due to
the presence of 1D longitudinal surface roughness. These effects are more pronounced for the
micropolar fluids.
Keywords: porous, partial journal bearings, squeeze films, micropolar fluids, surface roughness
the past three decades to study the effects of surface In this article, the Christensen’s stochastic theory for
roughness on the bearing performance by using both rough surfaces is used to analyse the effect of surface
deterministic and stochastic methods. The stochas- roughness on the squeeze film characteristics of short
tic methods determine the gross features of a surface porous partial journal bearings with micropolar fluids.
roughness profile. For most of the practical lubrication Two types of one-dimensional (1D) surface roughness
applications, the global mean pressure distribution (longitudinal and transverse) patterns are considered.
is more important. The stochastic methods are best The modified stochastic Reynolds-type equation gov-
suited to characterize the surface roughness asperities erning the mean film pressure in the presence of
effects in tribological applications. For the randomly micropolar fluids is derived for the two types of rough-
distributed asperities, Christensen [6] developed the ness patterns. The closed-form expressions for the
stochastic models for hydrodynamic lubrication of mean film pressure, the mean load-carrying capacity,
rough surface. Prakash and Tiwari [7] developed a and squeeze film time are obtained.
stochastic model to study the effect of surface rough-
ness on porous bearings on the basis of Christensen’s 2 MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION OF THE
stochastic theory. Prakash and Tiwari [8, 9] and Guru- PROBLEM
rajan and Prakash [10, 11] have used this theory for
the study of various types of porous bearings with The physical configuration of a rough porous partial
Newtonian lubricants. journal bearing is shown in Fig. 1. A solid journal of
Several experimental studies show the betterment of radius R approaches the rough porous bearing of wall
lubricating effectiveness on blending small amounts thickness H0 at any circumferential section θ with a
of long-chained polymer additives with a Newtonian velocity V . The lubricant in the film and also in the
lubricant. In most of the industrial operating condi- porous region is taken to be Eringen’s [13] micropolar
tions, the lubricants are mainly the polymer-thickened fluid. The stochastic film thickness H is represented by
oils or lubricants blended with additives. Usually, these
lubricants become heavily contaminated with sus- H = h + hs (θ , z, ξ )
pended metal particles or dirt and they start to exhibit
= C(1 + ε cos θ ) + hs (θ , z, ξ ) (1)
non-Newtonian behaviour. An experimental study of
Henniker [12] suggests that an addition of 2 per cent where h(= C + e cos θ ) denotes the nominal smooth
aluminium naphthenate to turbine oil produces a part of the film geometry, while hs (θ, z, ξ ) is the part
many-fold increase in its effective viscosity in thin due to the surface asperities measured from the nom-
films. To predict the accurate flow behaviour of such inal level and is a randomly varying quantity of zero
fluids with additives, several microcontinuum theories mean, ξ is an index determining a definite rough-
have been developed. These microcontinuum theo- ness arrangement, and ε(= e/C) is the eccentricity
ries found applications in practical problems such ratio parameter. Further, C is the radial clearance and
as bearings operating with lubricants with additives θ = x/R with R being the radius of the journal. When
wherein the bearing clearance may be comparable to the conditions are favourable, an oil film is maintained
the average molecular size of the additives. Several between the contacting surfaces when the relative
microcontinuum theories [13] have been proposed motion is momentarily zero.
to account for the effects of additives. Eringen’s [14]
micropolar fluid theory is a subclass of microfluids
that ignores the deformation of the microelements
and allows for the particle micro-motion to take place.
The lubrication theory of micropolar fluids was first
presented by Allen and Kline [15] by using the order
of magnitude analysis for the simplification of govern-
ing equations to a system of coupled, linear, ordinary
differential equations. The micropolar fluids theory
has been used by several investigators for the study
of different bearing systems such as journal bearings
[16–18], slider bearings [19, 20], squeeze film bearings
[21–25], and porous bearings [26, 27]. These studies
revealed some of the advantages of micropolar flu-
ids over the Newtonian lubricants, such as increased
load-carrying capacity and delayed time of approach
for squeeze film bearings. The antioxidant additives
are often used for sintered matrix, and these additives
will have a big effect on the permeability of the porous Fig. 1 Physical configuration of the rough porous partial
matrix. journal bearing
The constitutive equations for micropolar fluids (b) at the journal surface (y = H )
proposed by Eringen [13] simplify considerably under
∂H
the usual assumptions of hydrodynamic lubrication. u = 0, v= , w=0 (11a)
The resulting equations under steady-state conditions ∂t
are v1 = 0, v3 = 0 (11b)
Conservation of linear momentum
χ ∂ 2u ∂v3 ∂p 3 SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM
μ+ +χ − =0 (2)
2 ∂y 2 ∂y ∂x
The solution of equations (2) to (5) subject to the
χ ∂ 2w ∂v1 ∂p corresponding boundary conditions given in equa-
μ+ −χ − =0 (3)
2 ∂y 2 ∂y ∂y tions (10a), (10b), and (11a), (11b) is obtained in the
form
Conservation of angular momentum
1 y 2 ∂p 2N 2
∂ 2 v1 ∂w u= + A11 y −
γ − 2χv1 + χ =0 (4) μ 2 ∂x m
∂y 2 ∂y
× [A21 sinh(my) + A31 cosh(my)] + A41 (12)
∂ 2 v3 ∂u
γ − 2χv3 − χ =0 (5) 1 y 2 ∂p 2N 2
∂y 2 ∂y w= + A12 y −
μ 2 ∂z m
Conservation of mass × [A22 sinh(my) + A32 cosh(my)] + A42 (13)
∂u ∂v ∂w
+ + =0 (6) 1 ∂p
∂x ∂y ∂z v1 = y + A12 + A22 cosh(my)
2μ ∂z
where (u, v, w) are the velocity components of the + A32 sinh(my) (14)
lubricant in the film region in the x, y, and z directions, v3 = A21 cosh(my) + A31 sinh(my)
respectively, (v1 , v2 , v3 ) are micro-rotational velocity
components, χ is the spin viscosity, γ is the vis- 1 ∂p
− y + A11 (15)
cosity coefficient for micropolar fluids, and μ is the 2μ ∂x
Newtonian viscosity coefficient.
where
The flow of a micropolar lubricants in a porous
matrix governed by the modified form of the Darcy law, A11 = 2μA21
which account for the polar effects, is given by [27]
A31 sinh(mH ) − (H /2μ)(∂p/∂x)
A21 =
−k 1 − cosh(mH )
q∗ = ∇p∗ (7)
(μ + χ ) H ∂p
A12 =− H sinh(mH )
where q ∗ = (u∗ , v ∗ , w ∗ ) is the modified Darcy velocity 2μ ∂z
vector, with 2N 2 1
+ [1 − cosh(mH )] ×
−k ∂p∗ −k ∂p∗ m A5
u∗ = , v∗ = A12
(μ + χ ) ∂x (μ + χ ) ∂y A22 =
−k ∂p∗ 2μ
w∗ =
(μ + χ ) ∂z H ∂p H
A31 = [cosh(mH ) − 1]
(8) 2μ ∂x 2
N2 1
where k is the permeability of the porous matrix and +H − sinh(mH ) ×
m A5
p∗ is the pressure in the porous region, which due to
1 ∂p H
continuity of fluid in the porous matrix satisfies the A32 = [cosh(mH ) − 1]
Laplace equation μ ∂z 2
N2 1
∂ 2 p∗ ∂ 2 p∗ ∂ 2 p∗ +H − sinh(mH ) ×
+ + =0 (9) m A5
∂x 2 ∂y 2 ∂z 2
2N 2
The relevant boundary conditions are: A41 = A31
m
(a) at the bearing surface ( y = 0) 2N 2
A42 = A32
m
u = 0, v = v∗, w=0 (10a)
H 2N 2
A5 = sinh(mH ) − [cosh(mH ) − 1]
v1 = 0, v3 = 0 (10b) μ mH
Fig. 2 Variation of non-dimensional pressure P̄ with θ Fig. 3 Variation of non-dimensional pressure P̄ with θ
for different values of l̄ with N = 0.6, β = 0.48, for different values of N with l̄ = 0.2, β = 0.48,
c̄ = 0.2, ε = 0.2, and ψ = 0.01 c̄ = 0.2, ε = 0.2, and ψ = 0.01
Fig. 5 Variation of non-dimensional load W̄ with ε Fig. 7 Variation of non-dimensional load W̄ with ε for
for different values of l̄ with N = 0.6, β = 0.48, different values of c̄ with N = 0.7, l̄ = 0.2, and
c̄ = 0.2, and ψ = 0.01 β = 0.48
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
© Authors 2010
REFERENCES