Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Propanediols, in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry
Propanediols, in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry
Propanediols
CARL J. SULLIVAN, ARCO Chemical Company, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073,
United States
1. 1,2- Propanediol and Higher Propylene 1.8. Derivatives . . . . . . ..... ..... .... ..... . 238
Glycols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 2. 1,3- Propanediol . . ..... ..... .... ..... . 238
1.1. Physical Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 2.1. Properties . . . . . . ..... ..... .... ..... . 238
1.2. Chemical Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 2.2. Production . . . . . . ..... ..... .... ..... . 239
1.3. Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 2.3. Uses . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ..... .... ..... . 239
1.4. Quality Specifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 3. Toxicology . . . . . . ..... ..... .... ..... . 239
1.5. Transportation and Storage. . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 References . . . . . . ..... ..... .... ..... . 240
1.6. Economic Aspects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
1.7. Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
in such nonpolar solvents as petroleum ethers, at varying water ratios are plotted in Figure 1.
benzene, aromatic hydrocarbons, and carbon The viscosities and densities of aqueous pro-
tetrachloride. pylene glycol solutions are plotted in Figures 2
Propylene glycol greatly reduces the freezing and 3 [4].
point of water and is therefore being developed Vapor pressure versus temperature curves
as an alternative to ethylene glycol in automo- for the three propylene glycol homologues are
tive antifreeze systems [10, 11] and aircraft plotted in Figure 4. Propylene glycol forms
deicers [12, 13]. The solidification temperatures azeotropes with the solvents listed in Table 2
of propylene glycol and its higher homologues [14].
in aqueous byproduct streams of polycondensa- The water – glycol mixture exits the reactor
tion reactions involving propylene glycol [20]. zone (a) at about 200 C and is stripped of water
Propylene glycol is unusual in that the com- in dehydration columns (b). Three successive
mercial product is a racemic mixture of two vacuum distillations (c – e) separate high-purity
chiral isomers. Only small quantities of chiral propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, and tripro-
material are available from specialty chemical pylene glycol. The residue represents a mixture
distributors. of higher glycols, which have some limited com-
mercial use. Waste from this process is extraor-
dinarily low. Because of the very low toxicity of
propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, and tripro-
pylene glycol, these materials represent a mini-
mal hazard to the environment. All are readily
biodegradable.
1.3. Production
Alternative Routes to propylene glycol have
The only industrial process for manufacturing been investigated. Acetoxidation of propene to
propylene glycol is direct hydrolysis of propyl- yield glycol acetates followed by hydrolysis to
ene oxide with water. Dipropylene glycol and the glycol has been reviewed [22]. This technique
tripropylene glycol are formed by sequential involves lower production costs than the propyl-
addition of propylene oxide to propylene glycol. ene oxide route, but fixed capital investment
Consequently, all three products are produced costs are much higher. Direct hydroxylation of
simultaneously and separated by distillation. propene to propylene glycol using oxygen in the
Propylene oxide and water are combined in presence of osmium catalysts has been reported
the initial stage of the process at a molar ratio of [23–25]. However, because of the ready avail-
1 : 15 at an initial temperature of 125 C and a ability of propylene oxide, the simplicity of the
pressure of approximately 2 MPa (Fig. 5). Due current process, and the extremely low level of
to the exothermic reaction [21], the reactor efflu- waste generated by the propylene oxide route, no
ent temperature will typically rise to 190 C. At alternative process has yet been commercialized.
the above ratio of water to oxide, the resulting
propylene glycol – dipropylene glycol – tripro-
pylene glycol mixture is approximately in the 1.4. Quality Specifications
ratio of 100 : 10 : 1. Higher propylene glycol
ratios are attained by increasing the water-to- At least two commercial grades of monopropy-
oxide ratio; however, such an increase also in- lene glycol exist – a high-purity industrial
creases recycle rates, lowers throughput, and grade, and a higher-purity grade called ‘‘super
raises energy costs. pure’’ or ‘‘U.S.P.’’ grade. Typical assays for the
Table 3. Typical properties of commercial propylene glycol [4, 26] can also be used to produce ethylene glycol
Property Industrial U.S.P.
depending upon market pressures. Actual pro-
grade grade duction in the United States in 1989 is estimated
to have been 3.65105 t, approximately 95 % of
Purity, % 99.5 99.5
20
d20 1.0377 1.035 – 1.037
capacity [27].
Distillation initial bp, C 185 185
dry point, C 190 189
Acidity, wt % as acetic acid 0.005 0.002 1.7. Uses
Chlorides, ppm as Cl (max.) 10.0 1.0
Iron, ppm (max.) 1.0 0.5
Heavy metals, ppma 5.0 Propylene Glycol. The single largest use of
Arsenic, ppm as As (max.) 3.0 propylene glycol is in the manufacture of unsat-
Sulfate, wt % (max.) 0.006 urated polyester resins. It is reacted with saturat-
Water, wt % (max.) 0.2
ed and unsaturated carboxylic diacids such as
a
All metal residues are calculated as if they were lead. isophthalic acid and maleic anhydride. The
resulting resins are dissolved in styrene or an-
two grades of propylene glycol are the same; other polymerizable monomer, then combined
however, the U.S.P. grade is used in applica- with filler, chopped glass, a peroxide polymeri-
tions such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and zation initiator, and other additives, and cured to
food additives, and entails higher quality yield a hard, cross-linked, thermoset composite
standards (see Table 3) [4]. [15, 16, 21]. The end-use applications for such
products include automotive plastics, fiberglass
boats, and construction. Roughly 45 % of the
1.5. Transportation and Storage propylene glycol produced goes to this one broad
application [5].
Propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, and tripro- Propylene glycol has many diverse applica-
pylene glycol are stable materials that require no tions in the food and pharmaceutical industries
special handling procedures. They are noncorro- because of the ‘‘Generally Regarded As Safe’’
sive and can be transported or stored in stainless (GRAS) status conferred on it by the FDA in the
steel, aluminum, and lined steel containers. United States. Propylene glycol is used as a
Carbon steel is also acceptable, although slight humectant, solvent, and preservative in food and
iron contamination may occur upon extended pet food products. In the manufacture of food
periods of storage. U.S.P.-grade propylene gly- products, propylene glycol is used as a lubricant
col is typically stored in stainless steel. The for machinery, as a solvent in food processing, in
glycols are hygroscopic, and should be protected food wraps, and as an antifreeze agent in
from unnecessary exposure to the atmosphere. machinery cooling water. Propylene glycol is
also used as an emollient, softening agent, and
humectant in skin- care products and cosmetics,
1.6. Economic Aspects and as a carrier for livestock medicinal products
[4, 7].
Worldwide capacity for propylene glycol pro- Propylene glycol is utilized in aircraft deicing
duction is summarized in Table 4. These capaci- and anti-icing fluids because of its proven per-
ty figures are flexible, because the same facilities formance, low toxicity, ready biodegradability,
and environmental acceptance [13]. It offers
freeze protection similar to that of ethylene
Table 4. Worldwide capacity for propylene glycol production in glycol, the principle component of automotive
1990 [2]
antifreeze solutions. Automotive antifreeze
Region Number of Capacity, compositions incorporating propylene glycol
manufacturers 103 t/a have been investigated [10, 11, 28].
North America 5 384 Propylene glycol is useful as a lubricant in
Western Europe 6 361 combination with di- and tripropylene glycols. It
East Asia 7 118 is commonly employed as a humectant for to-
Total 18 863
bacco. Propylene glycol is also introduced into
238 Propanediols Vol. 30
yield urethanes and esters, respectively. Unlike and 110 – 150 C in the organic phase [39]. The
1,2-propanediol, 1,3-propanediol has two prima- diol is subsequently separated from solvent and
ry hydroxyl groups with equivalent reactivity. water by distillation.
1,3-Propanediol readily forms ethers. 3,30 - The yield of desired product by this route is
Dihydroxydipropyl ether forms upon continued relatively low – approximately 45 %. Alterna-
reflux of the diol. 1,3-Propanediol reacts with tive techniques for synthesizing the diol have
aldehydes and ketones, often in the presence of appeared in the patent literature. Hydroformyla-
acidic catalysts, to form 1,3-dioxanes [35, 36]: tion of ethylene oxide followed by hydrogenation
yields 1,3-propanediol in good yield (92 %), but a
high catalyst concentration and a very large ex-
cess of solvent render the process uneconomical
[40]. More recently, hydroformylation of ethyl-
ene oxide directly to 1,3-propanediol with a rho-
dium – phosphine catalyst system has been dis-
closed [41]. The reaction of ethylene with form-
aldehyde and carboxylic acids has also not been
Over aluminum oxide at temperatures above commericialized because of low selectivity [42].
250 C, 1,3-propanediol decomposes to allyl Handling of 1,3-propanediol is similar to that
alcohol, propanol, and other products. of propylene glycol. The material is noncorrosive
1,3-Propanediol reacts with diacids to form and can be transported in stainless steel, alumi-
polyesters. The polyester with terephthalic acid num, or lined steel vessels.
is reported to have a crystalline melting point of Quality analysis is readily accomplished by gas
220 C [37]. Polyurethanes can also be synthe- chromatography. A good technical grade generally
sized from 1,3-propanediol. displays a purity between 98.5 and 99.5 %.
The environmental impact of this product is
expected to be low because of its low toxicity and
2.2. Production ready biodegradability. The handling of acrolein
in the production process must be carefully
1,3-Propanediol is prepared by a two-step pro- controlled.
cess involving the hydrolysis of acrolein to 3-
hydroxypropanal followed by hydrogenation [3,
38]: 2.3. Uses
43]. The substance has such a low order of acute genic effects. In a reproductive study with rats, a
toxicity that it is considered practically nontoxic. level of 7.5 % propylene glycol in food showed
Since 1942 it has been classified as an acceptable no effects over six generations [49].
ingredient in pharmaceutical applications, and In the body, propylene glycol is metabolized
the United States FDA permits its use in food mainly to carbon dioxide via pyruvic acid, but it
products and cosmetics. Official requirements also enters into carbohydrate metabolism and pro-
for 1,2-propanediol used as an adjuvant in phar- motes glycogen formation. At higher dose levels,
maceuticals can be found in international and some propylene glycol is excreted in the urine.
national pharmacopeias. No permissible exposure levels have been
Acute oral LD50 values for rats range from established, because none appear to be necessary.
21.0 to 33.7 g/kg. For mice the values range
from 23.9 to 31.8 g/kg. Tests with other animals Dipropylene Glycol and Tripropylene
(guinea pig, rabbit, mouse, and dog) yield LD50 Glycol. These two glycols have not been
values within the same range [43]. These values studied as extensively as propylene glycol, but
correspond to ingestion of 1.5 – 2.0 L by a both are considered to possess a low order of
typical adult human. toxicity. The oral LD50 values in rats for dipro-
Administration of single, almost lethal doses pylene glycol and tripropylene glycol are 15 g/kg
to laboratory animals have caused balance dis- and 12 g/kg, respectively. In a subchronic study
orders resulting from central nervous system involving 5 wt % dipropylene glycol in drinking
depression. Significant impairment of motion was water, rats were not affected. However, at 10 %
observed in rats after oral administration of some rats died, and there was evidence of liver
19.5 g/kg. A similar level of impairment was and kidney involvement.
observed with an ethanol dosage of only 1.5 g/kg. Both di- and tripropylene glycol demonstrate
Propylene glycol is not injurious to the eye of negligible eye and skin irritation. Continuous or
rabbits, and it is not known to have caused any repetitive application of the two glycols provides
eye injuries in humans. Slight transitory stinging no indication that toxic quantities are absorbed
and tear formation may result from direct contact through the skin. Because of low vapor pressures
with the eye. and low systemic toxicity, inhalation hazards
Propylene glycol does not produce any sig- appear negligible.
nificant irritation effects in skin contact with
rabbits or humans, although skin irritation has 1,3-Propanediol. 1,3-Propanediol is mildly
been reported in some individuals when high toxic. The oral LD50 for rats is 14 – 15 g/kg,
concentrations were held in contact with skin whereas intraperitoneal LD50 values for rats and
under closed conditions [44, 45]. rabbits are 6 – 7 g/kg and 3 g/kg, respectively
Subchronic and chronic studies also indicate [50]. Prolonged administration to chickens in-
that propylene glycol has a low order of toxicity. hibits growth [51]. Unlike its isomer, propylene
A two-year study on rats demonstrated that in- glycol, 1,3-propanediol is not permitted for use in
corporation of 5 % propylene glycol into the diet food or livestock feed products.
did not increase or accelerate mortality. No tissue
damage was noted at 7.5 % of the diet for 20
weeks, but at 20 % of the diet the rats exhibited References
nonspecific minor changes in liver and kidney
cell structure [46]. 1 A. Wurtz, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 55 (1859) no. 3, 406.
Studies also indicate that propylene glycol 2 Directory of Chemical Producers, SRI International,
does not present a health risk after inhalation. 1990.
Monkeys and rats exposed to propylene-glycol- 3 Ullmann, 4th ed., 19, 425 – 432.
4 ARCO Chemical Company, Product Brochure, Propylene
saturated atmospheres for 12 – 18 months
Glycols, USA, 1983.
showed no adverse effects [47]. 5 Dow Chemical, Product Brochure, Propylene Glycol U.S.
In vivo and in vitro mutagenicity tests show no P., USA, 1979.
mutagenic behavior [48]. Reproductive studies 6 Kirk-Othmer, 3rd ed., 11, 933 – 956.
with mice, rats, hamsters, and rabbits show no 7 E. W. Flick (ed.): Industrial Solvents Handbook, Noyes
effects upon fetal development, and no terato- Data Corp., Park Ridge, NJ 1985.
Vol. 30 Propanediols 241
8 G. O. Curme, F. Johnston: Glycols, Reinhold Publ. Co., 32 Dow Product Brochure, ‘‘The Glycol Ethers Handbook,’’
New York 1952. 1981.
9 J. Mellon: Polyhydric Alcohols, Spartan Books, 33 L. R. Nudy, W. A. Johnston. Household Pers. Prod. Ind.
Washington 1962. 27 (1990) no. 4, 90.
10 F. E. Mark, W. Jetten, ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 88 (1986) 34 Aldrich Catalog Handbook of Fine Chemicals, Aldrich
61 – 77; Chem. Abstr. 105 (1986) 45 989. Chemical Company, Milwaukee, WI, 1988.
11 C. Fiaud, P. Netter, M. Tadjamoli, M. Tainmann, ASTM 35 J. L. Mateo, O. RuizMurillo, R. Sastre, An. Quim. Ser C
Spec. Tech. Publ. 887 (1986) 162 – 175; Chem. Abstr. 80 (1984) no. 2, 178.
105 (1986) 45 990 a. 36 L. F. Lapuka et al., Khim Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1981, no. 9,
12 S. H. Bloom, M. A. Bloom, US 4 585 571, 1986. 1182; Chem. Abstr. 95 (1981) 20 039 e.
13 Kilfrost, Ltd., Product Brochure, Kilfrost ABC-3, 1989. 37 R. W. Lenz: Organic Chemistry of Synthetic High Poly-
14 L. H. Horsley: ‘‘Azeotropic Data-III,’’ Adv. Chem. Ser. mers, Interscience, New York 1967, p. 93.
116 (1973). 38 R. Hall, E. S. Stern, J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 490.
15 J. Selley: ‘‘Polyesters, Unsaturated,’’ Encyclopedia of 39 Ruhrchemie AG, US 4 094 914, 1978 (W. Rottig et al.).
Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd ed., vol. 12, 40 Shell Oil Company, US 3 463 910, 1970 (C. N. Smith,
Wiley Interscience, New York 1988, pp. 156 – 290. G. N. Schrauzer, K. F. Koetitz, R. J. Windgassen).
16 Amoco Chemicals Company, Product Brochure, Proces- 41 Hoechst Celanese, US 4 873 378, 1989 (M. Murphy
sing Unsaturated Polyesters on Amoco Isophthalic Acid, et al.).
Bulletin IP-430, USA, 1989. 42 National Distillers and Chemical Corp., US 4 322 355,
17 S. D. Gagnon: ‘‘1,2-Epoxide Polymers,’’ Encyclopedia of 1980 (D. Horvitz, W. D. Bargh).
Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd ed., vol. 6, Wiley 43 J. A. Ruddick, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 21 (1972) 102.
Interscience, New York 1986, pp. 275 – 307. 44 K. Motoyoshi et al.: ‘‘The Safety of Propylene Glycol and
18 G. Woods: The ICI Polyurethane Book, 1987. Other Humectants, ’’ Cosmet. Toiletries 99 (1984) 83 – 91.
19 F. A. Meskens, Synthesis 7 (1981) 501. 45 R. J. Trancik, H. I. Maibach: ‘‘Propylene Glycol: Irritation
20 E. E. Parker, Ind. Eng. Chem. 58 (1966) no. 4, 54. or Sensitization, ’’ Contact Dermatitis 8 (1982) 185 –
21 T. McMilland (ed.): Process Economics Program 189.
Yearbook International, SRI International, 1990. 46 F. Gaunt et al., Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 10 (1972) 151.
22 H. W. Scheeline, H. Naka: ‘‘Propylene Glycol,’’ Process 47 O. H. Robertson et al., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 91 (1947)
Economics Review, Report No. PEP77–3, SRI Interna- 52.
tional, 1978. 48 FDA report PB-245 450 (1974).
23 Exxon, US 4 533 772, 1985 (R. C. Michaelson, R. G. 49 Fed. Regist. 42 (1977) June 17, 30 865.
Austin). 50 W. Van Winkle, J. Pharmacol. 72 (1941) 227.
24 Exxon, EP 77 201, 1981 (R. C. Michaelson, R. G. 51 R. D. Creek, Poult. Sci. 49 (1970) no. 6, 1686; Chem.
Austin). Abstr. 74 (1971) 74 453.
25 Gulf Research & Developmemt, US 4 308 409 (C. Y.
Wu, T. P. Kobylinski, J. E. Bozik)T. P. Kobylinski, J. E.
Bozik).
26 The United States Pharmacopeia, 21st Revision, Official
January 1, 1985, United States Pharmacopeial Conven- Further Reading
tion, Inc., Rockville, MD, 1984.
27 Synthetic Organic Chemicals, United States Production G. Centi, R. A. van Santen (eds.): Catalysis for Renewables,
and Sales, 1989, United States International Trade Com- Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2007.
mission Publication no. 2338, 1990. G. P. Chiusoli, P. M. Maitlis (eds.): Metal-Catalysis in
28 R. D. Hercamp, R. D. Hudgens, G. E. Coughenour: Industrial Organic Processes, Royal Society of Chemis-
‘‘Aqueous Propylene Glycol Coolant for Heavy Duty try, Cambridge, UK 2006.
Engines,’’ SAE Technical Paper Ser. no. 900 434, SAE B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber, M. Kamm (eds.): Biorefineries -
International, 1990. Industrial Processes and Products, Wiley-VCH, Wein-
29 VEB Petrochemisches Kombinat Schwedt, DD 208 478, heim 2006.
1984 (R. Steinhauer, et al.); Chem. Abstr. 101 (1984) A. E. Martin, F. H. Murphy: ‘‘Glycols, Polypropylene Gly-
P 194 972 q. col’’, Kirk Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,
30 Meiji Seika Kaisha, Ltd., JP-Kokai 61 149 064, 1986 5th edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, online DOI:
(Y. Takahashi, T. Yoshida); Chem. Abstr. 105 (1986) 10.1002/0471238961.1618151613011820.a01.
P 189 731 q. M. Pagliaro, M. Rossi: The Future of Glycerol, Royal Society
31 Institut Francais du Petrole, FR 2 560 884, 1985 (A. Bre, of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK 2008.
M. Mollard, M. Osgan); Chem. Abstr. 104 (1986) H. K. Phlegm: The Role of the Chemist in Automotive Design,
P 150 114 v. CRC Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL 2009.