Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Possible Relationship Between An Increased Alpha Angle and The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Possible Relationship Between An Increased Alpha Angle and The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
net/publication/334122179
CITATIONS READS
0 159
7 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Musculoskeletal System in Exercise and Rehabilitation: From lab to clinical practice View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Albert Perez-Bellmunt on 30 June 2019.
We then considered all the titles and obtained 16 publications, of were men and 14.5% (56 patients) were women. The age range was
which 11 were removed because they were duplicated. Subse- between 17 and 60 years old (mean 33.5 years).
quently we made a complete review of the 5 remaining articles. In all studies, patients with spontaneous ACL injury were consid-
After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria described in ered and formed the “case group”, with a total of 126 patients of
(Figure 1), 3 articles were selected to perform this review. our study(55.8%).The “control” group (44.2%) consisted of 175
The exclusion of the last two articles was due to the use of FAI patients, being a more heterogeneous sample: individuals with a
healthy knee to patients with other injuries at knee level (menis-cus
clinical syndrome or the limitation in the internal hip rotation as
injury, cartilage injury…). In all studies, those patients with
a variable and possible risk factor for ACL injury, without
previous lesion or hip surgery were excluded.
taking measurements of patients’ hip alpha angle.
Table 1: Principals results of bibliography. In two of the included studies, the alpha angle greater than 60º
was considered pathologic, while in one of them, the minimum
Alpha angle Alpha angle
Authors Year Sample in ACL in- in non ACL P-value Conclusion cut was established at 70º.
jury group injury group
Patients with Lopes OV et al. [12], observed that 58.5% of the patients with
noncontact
80 Patients ACL injury an-terior cruciate ligament injury had an alpha angle >70º
OsmarValado (41 ACL 70.31o (SD 58.55o (SD presented a
Lopes Jr et al. 2017 injury; 39 13.92o) 13.95o) P < 0.001 greater alpha (±13.92), compared to the control group, in which the 25.6% of
angle when
non-ACL
compared the patients presented an alpha angle >70º (±13.95). In addition
injury) with the group
without tear. to the α angle, the presence of hip rotational limitation was
Important
evaluated, without revealing a significant difference between
preliminary
correlation
both groups (p 0.498 – p 0.685).
90 Patients between ACL
injury and In the study carried out byPhilippon M et al. [13], 94% of the
Marc Philip- 2012 (48 ACL 84o (SD 14) 59 (SD 7) P < 0.0001 diminished
pon et al. injury; 42
non-ACL
femoral head-
neck offset, as
patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury, showed an
injury) characterized
by abnormal, αangle >60º in contrast to the control group that only 35% of
elevated alpha
angle. thew pa-tients showed this increased α angle.
The patients in
ACL injured The study realized by Bagherifard A. et al. [14], demonstrated the
group showed
a significant presence of an alpha angle >60º in 31% of patients with ACL rup-
restriction in
217 Patients hip range mo- ture, compared to 11.1% of patients without injury. In addition to
tion and also
Abolfazl- (127 ACL 56.1o o a diminished the alpha angle, the presence of hip rotational limitation was also
Bagherifard 2017 49.3 (SD 9.4) P < 0.001
injury; 90 (SD10.1) femoral head-
et al. non-ACL neck offset evaluated, showing a statistically significant difference in ACL in-
injury) suggesting
a possible
role of these
jury group (p<0.001) in all rotational directions, except in exter-nal
findings in
the outcome
rotation that did not show statistically significant differences.
assessed.
Copyright ©2018 Perez-Bellmunt A et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially. 2
Volume 1 Issue 1-2019 Research Article
References 10. Philippon MJ, Ho CP, Briggs KK, Stull J, Laprade RF. Prevalence
of increased alpha angles as a measure of cam-type femoroacetabular
1. Rouviere, Henri, Andre Delmas, and Vincent Delmas. Anatomia hu-
impingement in youth ice hockey players. Am J Sports Med [Internet].
mana: descriptiva, topografica y funcional. Vol. 9. Barcelona:: Masson,
2013; 41(6): 1357–62.
1987.
11. Seijas R, Ares O, Alvarez G, Alvarez P, Sallent A. Central Bring-ing
2. Sutton KM, Bullock JM. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture:
Excellence in Open Access Association between Anterior Cruciate
Differ-ences Between Males and Females. J Am Acad Orthop Surg
Ligament and Femoroacetabular Impingement. Is There A Relationship
[Internet]. 2013; 21(1): 41–50.
Beyond Image? [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 24]. Available from:
3. Actualizacion en las Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior. https://www.jscimedcentral.com/BoneJoint/bonejoint-2-1013.pdf
Anali-sis de los Resultados Mediante TAC y Escalas Clínicas - Revista
12. Lopes OV, Tragnago G, Gatelli C, Costa RN, de Freitas Spinelli L,
de Ar-troscopia [Internet]. [cited 2018 Feb 19].
Saggin PRF, et al. Assessment of the alpha angle and mobility of the
4. D’Elia MC. Prevalencia de Lesiones Asociadas a Rotura Aguda de hip in patients with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Int
Ligamento Cruzado Anterior (LCA) - Asociación Argentina de Or-thop [Internet]. 2017; 41(8): 1601–5.
Trauma-tología del Deporte. Rev la Asoc Argentina Traumatol del
13. Philippon M, Dewing C, Briggs K, Steadman JR. Decreased
Deport [Inter-net]. 2015; 22(1).
femoral head–neck offset: a possible risk factor for ACL injury. Knee
5. Papathanasiou I, Michalitsis S, Hantes ME, Vlychou M, Anastasopou-
Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2012; 20(12): 2585–9.
lou L, Malizos KN, et al. Molecular changes indicative of cartilage degen-
14. Bagherifard A, Jabalameli M, Yahyazadeh H, Shafieesabet A,
eration and osteoarthritis development in patients with anterior cruciate
Ghara-nizadeh K, Jahansouz A, et al. Diminished femoral head–neck
ligament injury. BMC Musculoskelet Disord [Internet]. 2016; 17(1):21.
offset and the restricted hip range of motion suggesting a possible role
6. Philippon M, Dewing C, Briggs K, Steadman JR. Decreased femoral in ACL in-juries. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet].
head–neck offset: a possible risk factor for ACL injury. Knee Surgery, 2018; 26(2): 368–73.
Sport Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2012; 20(12): 2585–9.
15. Barrientos C, Barahona M, Diaz J, Brañes J, Chaparro F, Hinzpeter
7. Mast NH, Impellizzeri F, Keller S, Leunig M. Reliability and Agree- J. Is there a pathological alpha angle for hip impingement? A
ment of Measures Used in Radiographic Evaluation of the Adult Hip. diagnostic test study. J Hip Preserv Surg [Internet]. 2016; 3(3): 223–8.
Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 201; 469(1): 188–99.
16. Brotto Guillermo , Solessio Jorje , Nogueira Manuel , López Alonso
8. Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. Conrado GF. Revista de Artroscopía - Revista de Artroscopía. [cited 2018
The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of Nov 24]; Available from: https://www.revistaartroscopia.com/
anterior impingement. J Bone Jt Surg [Internet]. 2002 May 1 [cited 2018 index.php/component/content/article/103-ultima-edicion/volumen-23-
Nov24];84(4):556–60. Available from: http://www.bjj.boneand- numero-2/741-revision-de-lca-con-aumentacion-extraarticular-de-lemaire-
joint.org.uk/cgi/doi/10.1302/0301-620X.84B4.12014 en-deportistas-de-contacto-con-alta-exigencia-reporte-pre-liminar-de-