Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HCD Mag
HCD Mag
HCD Mag
HEALTHCARE DESIGN
EXPO
MAGAZINE
ADVERTISE
EXPO
MAGAZINE
ADVERTISE
NEWS
TRENDS
PROJECTS
EVENTS + COMPETITIONS
PRODUCTS
R E S E A RC H A N D T H E O RY
https://healthcaredesignmagazine.com/trends/research-theory/8-considerations-benchmarking/ 1/7
28/05/2021 HCD Mag
Benchmarks can be an incredibly helpful design tool, whether sizing an entire campus or informing a
departmental study. However, when benchmarking is performed in a vacuum without a standardized
process, the results can be misleading. Both the American Institute of Architects and Building Owners
and Managers Association offer guidance on standardizing processes for calculating areas. The simple
mechanics of determining the amount of space per KPU is very important; in order to compare designs,
the process of performing the area calculations should be handled the same. Are all comparisons using
the inside face of demising walls or do some go to the mid-point of the walls? Are shafts, stairs, and
elevators included or excluded?
For example, take the traditional rule of thumb of 2,500 square feet per bed for overall sizing of a
hospital. In a nutshell, this benchmark implies that all the support spaces necessary to deliver inpatient
TRADE SHOWS
care, including food, logistics, and diagnostic and treatment areas, have been tallied and divided by the
total number of beds supported. For a 120-bed community hospital, 300,000 square feet (2,500 square Oct. 23-26, 2021
feet X 120 beds) may be the sweet spot for enough programmed area to support each bed, without being Cleveland, Ohio
https://healthcaredesignmagazine.com/trends/research-theory/8-considerations-benchmarking/ 2/7
28/05/2021 HCD Mag
oversized. A 25-bed critical access hospital, however, may need to be more efficient than a benchmark of Find Out More
62,500 square feet to meet the cost-based reimbursement models for Medicaid and Medicare. Similarly, a
380-bed teaching facility using this benchmark may not have enough space per bed to support team
rounding, consultations, and the provider work spaces necessary for both patient care and academics. So
how can we make benchmarking a less blunt, more meaningful tool for any scale?
https://healthcaredesignmagazine.com/trends/research-theory/8-considerations-benchmarking/ 3/7
28/05/2021 HCD Mag
3. Context. Are you using this square-foot-per-bed benchmark for an academic medical center or a
community hospital? Is the facility a for-profit model in a national network or an independent not-for-
profit in a community health system? Benchmarks should always be tied to comparable data sources. It
isn’t accurate to benchmark the support spaces needed for residents by comparing a teaching facility
with the needs of a community hospital. Different models will benchmark differently, and the targets for
the best practice benchmarks must adjust accordingly.
4. Apples to apples. Statistics can be manipulated (intentionally or inadvertently) and benchmarks are
no different. If multiple facilities are being compared, then the data that make up the total square
footage must be derived in the same way. If one facility’s area-per-KPU number includes a central utility
plant and the others exclude it, then the benchmark is not comparing apples to apples. If one hospital
runs semiprivate rooms and another facility is all private, the total bed complement may be the same,
but the space needed per bed would vary significantly. The detailed composition of the benchmark must
be clear to ensure you’re comparing like entities.
5. Building era. The age of the facility can also impact benchmarks. A modern facility is probably more NEWSLETTERS
efficient in utilizing space for current operations than one built long ago. Therefore, a renovation
benchmark might be scaled back from a new construction benchmark when existing facility constraints,
Sign up for HCD newsletters
6. Operations. As noted previously, a benchmark must take into account functionality and an
understanding of how a space is intended to be used from an operational perspective. For example, a
portion of the 2,500-square-foot-per-bed benchmark includes materials management. But if supplies are
stored in an off-site warehouse, this requires less space than if a hospital is planning to store all
materials on-site (though the benchmark may need to factor in space for staging and distribution).
Registration is another good example: If bedside registration is implemented, the square footage for a
centralized registration department could be reduced in the overall hospital benchmark.
7. Cultural variations. Just as a benchmark should adjust for the type of facility it represents, it should
also vary based on cultural differences. In the Middle East, gender separation and duplication of spaces
may affect the typical benchmark but could be offset somewhat by a ward arrangement. In the United
States, some areas of the country tend to experience larger familial support needs for patients in the
https://healthcaredesignmagazine.com/trends/research-theory/8-considerations-benchmarking/ 4/7
28/05/2021 HCD Mag
hospital, impacting the size of lobbies and waiting rooms to accommodate larger groups of family
members, which may increase the overall benchmark.
8. Cataloged data. To determine whether 2,500 square feet per bed is an appropriate best practice for a
project, an organization needs to collect and record numerous data points of area calculations for similar
facilities or departments. Being able to see trends in the data and identify outliers in square feet
allocated for projects requires a database of multiple projects that’s accessible and consistently
generated. Typical data collected and maintained for a full hospital may include overall area per bed,
grossing ratios, percentage of space allocated to engineering infrastructure, and total KPUs by service
line. Additional department-specific data, such as square feet per KPU as well as departmental grossing
ratios, are also helpful in understanding the amount of circulation needed for various departments. For
example, the ability to query multiple academic medical center metrics would illustrate the challenge in
planning around 2,500 square feet per bed for this facility type and help build a case for additional space
allocation in future planning. Then, department-level benchmarking would help identify the specific
units that may be undersized.
Use it wisely
Based on these considerations, a benchmark like 2,500 square feet per bed can vary significantly from
hospital to hospital. An organization’s facility should be carefully compared to hospitals of a similar size
and context, and the details around the composition of the benchmark should be known and
documented to make sure that an apples-to-apples comparison is realistic. What may first appear to be a
single, static target is actually a fluid number that adjusts within a range of square feet to reflect
operational decisions, culture, and building era. This refined benchmark can then provide a quantitative
comparison that meaningfully conveys best practice for a specific application, crafting a much better tool
for project decision-making.
Katie Fricke, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP, is a healthcare planning principal for HDR (Charlotte, N.C.). She can
be reached at katie.fricke@hdrinc.com.
https://healthcaredesignmagazine.com/trends/research-theory/8-considerations-benchmarking/ 5/7
28/05/2021 HCD Mag
L AT E S T R E S E A R C H A N D T H E O RY
Full Story
Growing Research Supports Benefits Of Healing Gardens
By Larry Beresford | August 20, 2020 | Research and Theory
Studies on the Legacy Emanuel Healing Garden is starting to bear fruit
on the importance of outdoor access for patients, staff, and family
visitors and best practices for achieving these spaces in hea
Full Story
© 2021 Emerald X, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
https://healthcaredesignmagazine.com/trends/research-theory/8-considerations-benchmarking/ 7/7