Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2020 IJEBR-Theimpactoffinancialinclusiononbank
2020 IJEBR-Theimpactoffinancialinclusiononbank
net/publication/353447118
CITATIONS READS
4 1,303
3 authors:
Amer Qasim
Al Ain University
29 PUBLICATIONS 267 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Abdul Razzak Alshehadeh on 09 December 2021.
Ghaleb A. El Refae
Department of Accounting,
College of Business,
Al Ain University,
P.O. Box: 64141, Al Ain, UAE
Email: ghalebelrefae@aau.ac.ae
Amer Qasim*
Department of Accounting,
College of Business,
Al Ain University,
P.O. Box: 112612, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Email: amer.qasim@aau.ac.ae
*Corresponding author
Abstract: This study aims to examine the impact of financial inclusion on the
financial performance of Jordanian banks listed in the Amman Stock Exchange.
The study empirically tested the impact of five main indicators of financial
inclusion on bank performance. Using a simple regression analysis, findings of
the study showed statistically significant impact of two indicators of financial
inclusion (i.e., financial access and enterprise financing) and bank financial
performance (i.e., bank profitability) of Jordanian banks. The study
recommends Jordanian financial institutions to move toward increasing
innovative access to financial services as well as enhancing IT infrastructure
and the development of financial services to raise the level of digital banking
services which is currently considered relatively low when compared to other
middle-income countries.
1 Introduction
Financial inclusion, in general, is defined as a process of engaging all social groups and
disadvantaged groups in having access to formal financial systems (Pham et al., 2019).
Similarly, Koker and Jentzsch (2012) defined financial inclusion as ensuring access to
formal financial services at an affordable cost in a fair and transparent manner. In a
broader perspective, Oz-Yalaman (2019) defined financial inclusion as “individuals and
businesses have access to useful and affordable financial products and services that meet
their needs e-transactions, payments, savings, credits and insurance delivered in a
responsible and sustainable way”. These definitions entail that financial inclusion
includes accessibility, availability and the usage of financial systems. Financial inclusion
has been extensively recognised as a major policy priority, given its significance in
fostering economic development (Pham et al., 2019). Access to credit has been identified
as one of the main obstacles to the development of private sector in developing countries
(Chauvet and Jacolin, 2017; Naumenkova et al., 2019). Prior literature indicated that
financial inclusion is linked to country economic development and sustainability. In this
regard, Grohmann et al. (2018) indicated that financial inclusion, measured as access to
and use of financial services, is an important goal of economic and, in particular,
financial development. Consequently, it has been claimed to be a significant policy
instrument that can help to achieve the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Financial
inclusion, also known as a financial exclusion, is one of the main policy tools to increase
welfare, reduce poverty and enhance macroeconomic stability (Oz-Yalaman, 2019;
Lee et al., 2019).
Notwithstanding the growing literature conducted on this area, less studies are done
to find the impact of financial inclusion on banks profitability. This study fills this gap by
understanding the effect of financial inclusion on banks profitability in a developing
country with ambitious economic reform plans (i.e., Jordan). The Jordanian government
The impact of financial inclusion on bank performance: the case of Jordan 485
has strongly committed to increasing financial inclusion in recent years, with the Central
Bank of Jordan (CBJ) playing a pioneering role in implementing this commitment
according to the CBJ vision statement, and therefore the opportunity to use financial
inclusion as a tool to promote economic development to ensure individual access to
various financial products and services (payment, savings, credit, remittances and
insurance) in a reliable and sustainable way to improve living conditions, combat poverty
and unemployment, promote equality, financial stability and integrity (CBJ, 2016).
The CBJ took several steps toward improving and activating a convenient environment
for financial inclusion in Jordan. Hence, the ‘microfinance enterprises act’ has been
issued to constitute a legal reference for the regulatory and supervisory framework of the
Central Bank over this sector; thus, enhancing the opportunities for micro and small
businesses to obtain funding. The Central Bank will also consider expanding its
supervision to include other non-banking financial institutions, in addition to enhancing
the financial consumer protection and spreading financial and banking literacy in the
community. In this regard, and in collaboration with the ministry of Education and
Injaz-institution, societal financial literacy has been included as a separate course
amongst the Ministry of Education’s curriculum form the 7th grade till the 12th grade.
Furthermore, the Central Bank has also played an important and pivotal role represented
in the development of the national payments system by developing payment systems such
as the electronic system of presenting and paying bills (eFAWATEERcom) as well as the
mobile payments system (JoMoPay). Such systems have great respect as they can be
accessed by people in remote areas and provide key financial services without incurring
the trouble and cost of accessing and using traditional financial methods, and; therefore,
effectively contributing to raising the financial efficiency, reducing costs, and providing
service for non-bank customers.
This study is structured as follows: Section 2 will discuss prior literature examining
financial inclusion. Section 3 will overview the research methodology of the paper,
statistical model employed, and variables definition. Section 4 will discuss the results of
the study, and finally Section 5 will highlight the conclusion of the study.
2 Literature review
Several studies were carried out to examine the impact of financial inclusion on several
corporate aspects. Chauvet and Jacolin (2017) studied the impact of financial inclusion
and bank concentration on the performance of firms in developing and emerging
countries. The results showed that financial inclusion, measured as the distribution of
financial services across firms, has a positive impact on firm growth. In another study,
Grohmann et al. (2018) explained that financial literacy has an impact on improving
financial inclusion. Shen et al. (2020) investigated the channels through which financial
inclusion can be achieved in China. The study showed that the direct impact comes from
the use of digital financial products and the level of financial literacy. Ahmed and
Mallick (2019) found that higher levels of financial inclusion contribute to greater bank
stability.
The AFI (2019) indicated three dimensions of financial inclusion:
• access, which is the ability to use the services and products offered by formal
financial institutions
486 A.R. Al-Chahadah et al.
• usage, which is the depth or extent of financial services and product use
• quality which is a dimension that evaluates how financial services fulfil the needs of
its users from different angles, including affordability, convenience, fair treatment,
choice and other aspects related to consumer protection, financial education and
other areas.
Similarly, Pham et al. (2019) noted that financial inclusion includes a set of dimensions
represented in accessibility, usage and availability. Accessibility refers to the extent to
which financial services are penetrated and accessible among potential users. Availability
measures the extent to which the services are made available. While the usage indicates
whether those available and available services are utilised.
Several indicators have been used to assess the extent of financial inclusion. The most
commonly used indicator is the number of bank accounts (per 1000 adult persons). Some
other indicators are number of bank branches (per million people), number of ATMs (per
million people), amount of bank credit and amount of bank deposit (Sarma, 2010;
Kabakova and Plakenkov, 2018), and the amount of loans and credits granted to micro,
small, and medium enterprises. The Alliance of Financial Inclusion (AFI) introduced a
core set of financial inclusion indicators in 2019. The AFI core set addresses the two
basic dimensions of financial inclusion: access and usage of financial services (AFI,
2019).
The following provides discussion of the main indicators of financial inclusion used
in this study.
limited use of these Services, however, banks can contribute to higher utilisation rates by
adding jobs to m its online and mobile banking scripts, and its design for ease of use and
enhanced with greater power (CBJ and GIZ, 2017).
the form of public sector wages, or government transfers (government transfers include
any type of social benefit such as subsidies, unemployment benefits, educational
payments, or medical expenses). Not surprisingly, the percentage of adults receiving
government payments is nearly twice as high in high-income economies (43%) as in
developing countries and developing economies which is only (19%) (Asli et al., 2017).
According to the Global Findex survey in 2017, 52% of adults or (76%) of account
holders in the world reported making or receiving at least one digital payment last year.
The percentage is higher for individuals in high-income countries (91%) compared to
(44%) for middle income countries individuals (Asli et al., 2017). For governments, a
shift from cash to digital payments can reduce corruption and improve efficiency.
For example, in India the rate of tampering in pension funds decreased by 47% when
these payments were made through smart cards with an electronic fingerprint instead of
being delivered in cash. In Nigeria, digital payments are used to distribute social benefits
which reduced the variable cost by 20% (Asli et al., 2017).
As indicated by the World Bank report on the rates of financial inclusion for the year
2017 in terms of the percentage of adults who have accounts with financial institutions in
the Arab countries, as shown in Table 1.
Arab Country UAE Bahrain Kuwait KSA Lebanon Algeria Tunisia Jordan Egypt
Percentage of adults who 88% 83% 80% 72% 45% 42% 42% 37% 33%
have bank account
Global rank 35 42 51 59 97 101 103 114 121
Prior studies indicated that (59%) of adults do not have any bank account due to
insufficient funds or being unable to save money, indicating that financial services are not
yet accessible to low-income users, due to other obstacles that prevent them from opening
a bank account due to the distance factor and the lack of access to financial services
providers, and the lack of necessary documents for that; in addition to the lack of
confidence in financial service providers (Sarma, 2010). Globally, there are still about
(1.7) billion adults without a bank account in any financial institution, in 2014 this
number was 2 billion. In general (69%) of adults have an account in 2017, the ratio is
high in high-income economies where it reaches (94%), on the other hand only 63% of
adults have an account in developing economies as classified by the World Bank
(Asli et al., 2017). According to a survey done by (CBJ and GIZ, 2017), (21.6%) of
adults borrowed from any source in 2017, (9.9%) were borrowed from an official
financial institution and (13.3%) from unofficial sources. Among official institutions,
(4.3%) borrowed from a bank, and (4.2%) from a financing institution, and (1.4%)
borrowed using a credit card. Regarding unofficial credit sources, 11.3% borrowed from
family or friends, (1.9%) borrowed from employer, and (0.2%) got credit, and (0.6%)
borrowed from some other informal sources (CBJ and GIZ, 2017).
Credit cards are a method of payment, but they also serve as a short-term credit
source whenever they are used even when credit card holders pay their balance in full in
each session, as the use of credit cards affects the demand for short-term credit,
in high-income economies credit cards are more used (49%) when compared to
individuals in developing countries (8%) in 2017 (CBJ and GIZ, 2017).
The level of official financial inclusion in Jordan is low for some types of financial
products and between certain sectors of the population, for example, a poll conducted by
the World Bank (Global Findex) in 2014 found that only about 25% of Jordanians have a
bank account, and at a lower percentage for females when compared to males.
These findings prompted the Jordanian government to take measures to better understand
the reasons for lower financial inclusion in Jordan and find ways to enhance the
availability and quality of financial services (CBJ and GIZ, 2017).
International evidence shows that access to financial services enhances social
well-being, reduces income inequality, and increases real economic growth. For these
reasons, the World Bank has paid special attention to the issue of financial services,
establishing the Global Financial Inclusion Index (Global Findex) for more than
140 countries. One of the main indicators used is the percentage of individuals (aged 15
years and over) who has an account in an official financial institution (such as a bank,
credit institution, post office, or microfinance institution). Financial inclusion varies
490 A.R. Al-Chahadah et al.
greatly around the world, as the number of accounts in high-income countries is very
large, while the proportion of account acquisition in other parts of the world ranged
between (14%) in Middle East countries to (69%) in East Asian countries.
3 Research methodology
where
The dependent variable is firm performance measured as the return on assets (ROA) of
the bank
α = intercept coefficient of firm i, β = row vector of slope coefficients of regressors
X1 = Digital payments and financial services
X2 = Corporate and micro, small and medium-sized enterprise financing
X3 = Payments, transfers and remittances
X4 = Financial access
X5 = Financial literacy building and consumer financial protection
εit = residual error of firm i.
Correlation coefficients (R) and (R-square) are calculated between each independent
variable separately and the dependent variable to understand the strength and type of
relationship between these variables, on the one hand, and the degree of interpretation of
the independent variables of the dependent variable, on the other hand. The results of the
study are tested at the significance level of 5%, that is, the level of confidence of 95%.
it meets the conditions. The strength of the linear model depends on the assumption of the
independence of each of the independent variables, and if this condition is not met the
general linear model is then not valid for the application and a collinearity diagnostics
test was used by calculating the tolerance parameter for each of the independent
variables, and then finding the variance inflation factor (VIF) as this test is a measure of
the effect of correlation between the independent variables. In the event that the value of
(VIF) is greater than (5), this indicates a multicollinearity problem between variables.
Table 3 shows the results of the multicollinearity test.
From Table 3 it is clear that the value of (VIF) for all independent variables is below (5),
which means that the study model is free from the linear interference problem.
Variable B α R R² Sig-f
(X1) Digital payments and financial services 0.141 0.277 0.234 0.0690 0.271
(X2) Enterprise financing (corporate, medium and 0.724 0.255 0.565 0.320 0.002*
small businesses)
(X3) Payments, transfers and remittances 0.043 32.8 0.195 0.034 0.365
(X4) Financial access 0.852 0.3923 0.555 0.309 0.003*
(X5) Financial literacy building and consumer 0.077 0.352 0.066 0.004 0.745
financial protection
*Significant at the 0.001 level.
As shown in Table 4, two financial inclusion indicators were found to have a significant
impact on the dependent variable (firm performance), these are;
• enterprise financing
• financial access.
494 A.R. Al-Chahadah et al.
While the other indicators were found insignificant. The first financial inclusion indicator
tested in this study (digital payments and financial services) was found to be insignificant
(Sig-f = 0.271). Therefore, we accept the first hypothesis (Ho1) that states: “there is no
statistically significant effect of the index of payments and digital financial services on
the return on the performance of banks listed on the Amman Stock Exchange”. Regarding
the variable related to enterprise financing (corporate, medium, and small businesses),
the value of (B) is (0.724), indicating a positive relationship between the dependent
variable and the independent variable. As for the level of significance (Sig-f), it is 0.002,
which is less than the level of significance approved in the study (0.05). Therefore, the
second hypothesis (Ho2) is rejected. As a result, the alternative hypothesis is accepted
which will state; “there is a statistically significant impact of enterprise financing
(corporate, medium, and small businesses) on the performance of banks listed on the
Amman Stock Exchange. The third variable (payments, transfers and remittances) is also
found insignificant (Sig-f = 0.365), therefore the third hypothesis is accepted, which
states that there is no statistical significant impact of the financial inclusion indicator
relating to payments, transfers and remittances on the return on the performance of banks
listed on the Amman Stock Exchange. The fourth financial inclusion indicator is financial
access. Results showed that this indicator has a significant positive impact on bank
profitability. As shown in the table, the effect of the financial inclusion indicator relating
to ‘financial access’ on the return on the assets is significant and positive (Sig-f = 0.003,
and B = 0.852). Therefore, we reject the fourth hypothesis (Ho4) and accept the
alternative hypothesis that reflects the existence of a statistically significant effect of the
financial access index on the performance of the banks listed in the Amman Stock
Exchange. Finally, results related to the fifth financial inclusion indicator (Financial
literacy building and consumer financial protection) was found positive (B = 0.077) but
insignificant (Sig-f = 0.745). Accordingly, the fifth hypothesis (Ho5) is accepted,
which states: “there is no statistically significant effect of financial literacy and consumer
protection on bank performance”.
of financial inclusion and the financial performance of banks, these financial institutions
must have major trends towards increasing innovative access to financial services, and
developing financial services infrastructure in order to raise the level of digital financial
services relatively low compared to middle-income countries.
References
Ahmed, M.M. and Mallick, S.K. (2019) ‘Is financial inclusion good for bank stability?
International evidence’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 157,
pp.403–427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.027
Alliance for Financial Inclusion (AFI) (2019) Alliance for Financial Inclusion Policy Model: AFI
Core Set of Financial Inclusion Indicators, Available at: https://www.afi-global.org/
sites/default/files/publications/201912/AFI_PM_Core%20Set_FINAL_digital.pdf
Asli, D., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S. and Hess, J. (2017) Measuring Financial Inclusion: The
Global Financial Inclusion Index (Global Findex), Development Research Group, The World
Bank.
CBJ and GIZ (2017) CBJ and GIZ Study Informs about Financial Inclusion in Jordan, Available
at: http://www.cbj.gov.jo/DetailsPage/CBJEN/NewsDetails.aspx?ID=207
Central Bank of Jordan (CBJ) (2016) The National Financial Inclusion Strategy 2018–2020.
Amman-Jordan, Available at: http://www.cbj.gov.jo/EchoBusv3.0/SystemAssets/PDFs/2018/
The%20National%20Financial%20Inclusion%20Strategy%20A9.pdf
Chauvet, L. and Jacolin, L. (2017) ‘Financial inclusion, bank concentration, and firm performance’,
World Development, Vol. 97, pp.1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.018
Dabla-Norris, E., Ji, Y., Towsend, R. and Unsal, F. (2015) Identifying Constraints to Financial
Inclusion and their Impact on GDP and Inequality: A Structural Framework for Policy,
IMF Working Paper No. 22.
Grohmann, A. Kluhs, T. and Menkhoff, L. (2018) ‘Does financial literacy improve financial
inclusion? Cross country evidence’, World Development, Vol. 111, pp.84–96, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.020
Kabakova, O. and Plakenkov, E. (2018) ‘Analysis of factors affecting financial inclusion:
ecosystem view’, Journal of Business Review, Vol. 89, pp.198–205, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.066
Koker, L.D. and Jentzsch, N. (2012) ‘Financial inclusion and financial integrity: aligned
incentives?’, World Development, Vol. 44, pp.267–280, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.worlddev.2012.11.002
Lee, T. Chun, A.T. and Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2019) ‘Financial inclusion and its impact on
financial efficiency and sustainability: empirical evidence from Asia’, Borsa Istanbul Review,
Vol. 19, No. 4, pp.310–322, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2019.07.002
Naumenkova, S. Mishchenko, S. and Dorofeiev, D. (2019) ‘Digital financial inclusion: evidence
from Ukraine’, Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Vol. 16, No. 3,
pp.194–205, doi:10.21511/imfi.16(3).
Oz-Yalaman, G. (2019) ‘Financial inclusion and tax revenue’, Central Bank Review, Vol. 19,
pp.107–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2019.08.004
Pham, T. Nguyen, T. and Nguyen, K. (2019) ‘Does bank competition promote financial inclusion?
A cross-country evidence’, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 26, No. 13, pp.1133–1137,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1540833
496 A.R. Al-Chahadah et al.
Sarma, M. (2010) Index of Financial Inclusion. Centre for International Trade and Development,
School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India.
Shen, Y.C., Hueng, J. and Hu, W. (2020) ‘Using digital technology to improve financial inclusion
in China’, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.30–34, https://doi.org/
10.1080/13504851.2019.1606401
Shihadeh, F.H., Hannon, A., Guan, J., ul Haq, I. and Wang, X. (2018) ‘Does financial inclusion
improve the banks’ performance? Evidence from Jordan’, Global Tensions in Financial
Markets, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp.117–138.