Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • ITEM ANALYSIS Grade 9

    Uploaded by

    JOHN MAYKALE FARRALES
    27 views10 pages
    This document contains an item analysis of a mathematics assessment given to 50 Grade 9 students. The students' responses were divided into an upper 27% group (14 students) and lower 27% group (14 students). An item analysis grid shows the number of students in each group who answered each item correctly, the difficulty index, discrimination index, and a decision to retain, revise, or eliminate the item. Items 5-8 were identified as very difficult with discrimination indexes below 0.20 and will be eliminated. The remaining items were determined to be good items that could be retained or revised.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    ITEM-ANALYSIS-Grade-9

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains an item analysis of a mathematics assessment given to 50 Grade 9 students. The students' responses were divided into an upper 27% group (14 students) and lower 27% group (14 students). An item analysis grid shows the number of students in each group who answered each item correctly, the difficulty index, discrimination index, and a decision to retain, revise, or eliminate the item. Items 5-8 were identified as very difficult with discrimination indexes below 0.20 and will be eliminated. The remaining items were determined to be good items that could be retained or revised.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    27 views10 pages

    ITEM ANALYSIS Grade 9

    Uploaded by

    JOHN MAYKALE FARRALES
    This document contains an item analysis of a mathematics assessment given to 50 Grade 9 students. The students' responses were divided into an upper 27% group (14 students) and lower 27% group (14 students). An item analysis grid shows the number of students in each group who answered each item correctly, the difficulty index, discrimination index, and a decision to retain, revise, or eliminate the item. Items 5-8 were identified as very difficult with discrimination indexes below 0.20 and will be eliminated. The remaining items were determined to be good items that could be retained or revised.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 10

    Republic of the Philippines

    Department of Education
    Region I
    Schools Division of Ilocos Sur
    PANTAY TAMURONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
    SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

    Mathematics
    GRADE 9

    ITEM ANALYSIS
    No. of students in the Upper 27 % Group (50*0.27 = 14)
    Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
    1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
    2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1
    3 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1
    4 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
    5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
    6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    7 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    8 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    9 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
    10 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
    11 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
    12 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0
    13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
    14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    16 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
    17 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1
    18 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0
    19 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
    20 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
    21 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
    22 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
    23 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
    24 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
    25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
    26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
    27 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1
    28 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0
    29 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
    30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
    31 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    32 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
    33 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
    34 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

    No. of students in the Lower 27 % Group (50*0.27 =14)


    Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
    1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
    2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
    3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
    4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
    5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
    9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
    11 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
    12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
    14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    16 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
    17 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
    19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
    20 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    22 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
    23 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
    24 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
    25 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
    26 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
    27 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    28 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
    29 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
    30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    31 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
    32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
    33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    35 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
    Total
    11
    6
    8
    10
    2
    2
    2
    3
    12
    5
    8
    7
    2
    1
    14
    4
    9
    5
    6
    4
    11
    6
    7
    5
    12
    4
    10
    8
    8
    2
    5
    5
    5
    2
    1

    Total
    8
    3
    8
    7
    0
    0
    0
    2
    0
    3
    4
    0
    2
    0
    14
    7
    3
    2
    1
    2
    0
    3
    3
    4
    10
    4
    3
    5
    5
    1
    4
    1
    0
    0
    2
    ITEM ANALYSIS GRID
    DISCRIMINATION INDEX
    No. of Students who
    Item No. Difficulty Interpretation Decision
    got the answer right Index
    Upper 27% Lower 27%
    1 11 8 0.68 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    2 6 3 0.32 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    3 8 8 0.57 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    4 10 7 0.61 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    5 2 0 0.07 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    6 2 0 0.07 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    7 2 0 0.07 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    8 3 2 0.18 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    9 12 0 0.43 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    10 5 3 0.29 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    11 8 4 0.43 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    12 7 0 0.25 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    13 2 2 0.14 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    14 1 0 0.04 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    15 14 14 1.00 Very Easy Item Eliminate Item
    16 4 7 0.39 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    17 9 3 0.43 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    18 5 2 0.25 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    19 6 1 0.25 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    20 4 2 0.21 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    21 11 0 0.39 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    22 6 3 0.32 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    23 7 3 0.36 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    24 5 4 0.32 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    25 12 10 0.79 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    26 4 4 0.29 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    27 10 3 0.46 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    28 8 5 0.46 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    29 8 5 0.46 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    30 2 1 0.11 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    31 5 4 0.32 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    32 5 1 0.21 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    33 5 0 0.18 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    34 2 0 0.07 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    35 1 2 0.11 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item

    Prepared by:

    EDRALYN R. PAMANI
    Subject Teacher
    70 items Interpretation Decision
    47 Good Item Retain/Revise Item
    12 Very Difficult Item Eliminate Item
    11 Very Easy Item Eliminate Item
    ITEM ANALYSIS GRID
    DISCRIMINATION INDEX

    Discrimination Interpretation Decision


    Index

    0.21 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item


    0.21 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.00 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.21 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.14 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.14 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.14 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.07 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.86 Very good item Retain item
    0.14 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.29 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.50 Very good item Retain item
    0.00 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.07 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.00 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    -0.21 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.43 Very good item Retain item
    0.21 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.36 Reasonably Good Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.14 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.79 Very good item Retain item
    0.21 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.29 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.07 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.14 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.00 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.50 Very good item Retain item
    0.21 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.21 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.07 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.07 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    0.29 Marginal Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.36 Reasonably Good Item Revise or Improve Item
    0.14 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    -0.07 Poor Item Eliminate Item

    Checked by:

    ESMERALDA S. MOLINA
    Principal I
    70 ITEMS Interpretation Decision
    11 Very Good Item Retain Item
    31 Poor Item Eliminate Item
    16 Marginal Item Revised/Improve Item
    12 Reasonably Good Item Revised/Improve Item

    You might also like