Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philippine Government Peace Treaties With The Muslim Filipinos
Philippine Government Peace Treaties With The Muslim Filipinos
Abstract
The stalemate between the Philippine government and the insurgent forces of
the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), the ongoing global War on Terror, and the
government's desire for peace in the southern Philippines to help the country's economy
in the south. A change in leadership in the MILF has also provided an opportunity to re-
The most difficult issue in the peace process is not whether the parties can reach
an agreement, but whether that agreement can truly bring about long-term peace and
development in the south. The conflict's long history and failed approaches to resolution
have created deep divisions among Muslims and the general Filipino population, which
views any peace agreements with skepticism or, at best, guarded optimism.
The peace agreement must be able to provide a thorough road map that
roadmap will only significantly advance peace if it is backed by the majority of Filipinos.
The MILF and the government need to engage their own supporters in the peace
process by reaching out to them. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, the president, must actively
engage in wooing the extremists and building support across the country. To come up
with practical solutions for the issues facing the nation's Muslim minority, the
government and the MILF must look beyond their particular group interests.
The parties must consider all possibilities for a political framework that can
accommodate their divergent interests if they are to find common ground. They must
abandon the "independence-autonomy track" that has stifled prior peace efforts and
look at alternative models and political institutions that have been successful in
Previous peace processes have resulted in good agreements but were ineffective.
Introduction
The Moro Islamic Liberation Front and the Philippine government are currently in
peace negotiations. (MILF) that started in 1997 will reach its critical stage in Kuala
agreement regarding the fundamental disputes in the battle. This round marks a turning
point in a protracted peace effort. Frequently derailed by claims that the MILF has ties to
terrorist groups, two major Wars, infrequent skirmishes, and accusations and denials of
To arrive at this point, both sides had to make compromises. Despite the
MILF leaders for allegedly taking part in bombings and repositioned its troops away
from rebel strongholds. All throughout the nation. The MILF, on the other hand, sent
details to disarm groups. Engaged in kidnappings to refute claims that it has ties to
The United States was the target of terrorist strikes on September 11, 2001,
which gave the Islamic Philippines militancy, particularly on Mindanao, the second-
largest island in the nation and the scene of the MILF's fight for a sovereign Islamic
state. Reports about the links between the separatist movement and Jemaah Islamiya,
Abu Sayyaf, and al Qaeda shocked the Philippine government has entered a frenzy of
between the government and the MILF. The final key component for achieving long-
term peace in the southern Philippines is negotiations with the MILF. The Moro National
Liberation Front (MNLF), the nation's first Muslim revolutionary group, and Manila
provinces and cities that voted to be part of the Autonomous Region in Muslim
Mindanao (ARMM), puts an end to the MNLF's 25 years of armed struggle for
The MILF has reaffirmed its demand for the creation of an independent Muslim
state, while the MNLF chose to pursue its aspiration for self-determination through
autonomy. The MILF views this vehicle for limited self-rule as a complete failure. The
MILF stated prior to the talks that it would reject the same or even a more enhanced
fundamental grievances of the armed revolution. Manila, on the other hand, continues to
reject any demand for a separate state. The southern Philippines' Muslim state.
give the procedure the much-needed impetus to move forward. There are grounds for
Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) members, notably Malaysia, Brunei, and
Libya, are assisting in putting the terms of the ceasefire agreement into effect in the
southern Philippines. Second, a neutral third party is facilitating the talks. For the
Organization of the Islamic Conference, Malaysia has been driving peace efforts in the
southern Philippines since March 2001. The United States Institute of Peace is
Third, since 1997, the lectures have been much better organized. The parties are
now. Have decided to talk about their general objectives before specific political
formations. in June The framework and the 2001 Tripoli Peace Agreement between
Manila and the MILF the principles for the negotiation process and makes mention of
the incremental nature of the peace process.3 This indicates that the current round of
negotiations is to move forward in a way that the three important issues—specifically,
participate in the peace process. NGOs are mobilizing to support the implementation of
the cease-fire agreement, such as the "Bantay Cease-Fire" (Cease-Fire Watch). Once a
peace accord with the Taliban is signed, foreign countries and international aid
Philippine islands of Mindanao and Sulu, where they make up about 20% of the more
than 16 million people living there. The Maguindanaoans in the Pulangi River Basin of
central Mindanao, the Maranaos in the Lanao Lake region of central Mindanao, and the
Tausugs in the Sulu archipelago are three major (and ten minor) ethnolinguistic groups
to which they belong. Muslims predominate in the five ARMM member provinces
(Maguindanao, Lanao Del Sur, Basilan, Sulu, and Tawi-Tawi) as well as the Islamic City
of Marawi.
Spanish colonization. Local Islamic groups and settlements of foreign Muslims were
already thriving in Sulu by the later half of the thirteenth century. Around 1450, the first
sultan of Sulu came to power; around 1515, Sharif Kabunsuan arrived in Mindanao and
established their dominance over Islam was growing in the southern islands of the
Philippines, while it was thriving in the north where the sultanates of Sulu and
Maguindanao were already well-established. Muslim traders were doing well with their
trade and business both within and outside of the Malay regions.
The southern Muslims successfully resisted Spanish colonial incursions for three
centuries; only the northern Christians were able to gain a firm foothold. The Spanish
referred to the Muslims in the south as "Moros," just as they did their adversaries from
Mauritania and Morocco. This term later evolved into a representation of bravery and
national pride for the Muslims in the Philippines. The Moros were the rulers of Mindanao
and Sulu, where they made up 98 percent of the population, as the unconquered people
of the South.
But by 1914, American colonialism had succeeded in taming the Muslim south. In
contrast to the Spaniards' repeated failures, Aijaz Ahmad has pinpointed the causes of
the Americans' comparatively quick success. First, the balance of forces: The
Americans had advanced weapons and the capacity to efficiently concentrate their
forces across the archipelago. Second, a fresh approach to colonial governance: the
Americans gave the city and district administrations significant administrative autonomy,
which solidified their devotion to the colonial authorities. Third, the demographic model
migrate from the Visayas and Luzon to establish Christian enclaves in predominately
Moro areas—that is, on lands the Muslims claimed as their own4—during the
geared toward integrating the Moros into the larger Philippine society.
The Moros became a minority in the territory they considered their home when
major Christian resettlement groups sprang up swiftly in Mindanao from the 1930s on;
their share of the population plummeted from 98 percent to 40 percent by 1976 to now
about 20 percent. Moros currently possess fewer than 17% of the islands' real estate,
from 1968 to 1971 calling for the recognition of the Moros' right to self-determination as
a people with a distinct history and identity. The Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF),
led by University of the Philippines professor Nur Misuari, was established as a result of
these movements. Numerous young Moros were sent to Malaysia for paramilitary
training; Sabah in Malaysia developed into the Moro rebels' supply and communication
hub. Paramilitary incidents involving Christian and Moro groups were more aggressive
at the same period. When the Philippine Constabulary sided with Christian paramilitary
organizations in offensives against the Moro rebels in 1971, these incidents took on a
President Ferdinand Marcos enacted martial law on September 21, 1972, to quell
the escalating uprising. The MNLF launched armed counteroffensives and demanded
independent state. Military and civilian fatalities totaled 120,000 from 1972 to 1976.
Around one million residents of the southern Philippines were internally displaced, and
over 100,000 people fled to adjacent Malaysia. The MNLF was acknowledged by the
government and the MNLF were aided by President Marcos' plea for peace and flurry of
A peace agreement between the Marcos administration and the MNLF was
signed in Tripoli in December 1976, and it called for the creation of autonomy in 13
provinces and 9 cities in the southern Philippines. But there were significant differences
between the two sides over how to carry out the agreement, particularly in relation to
regions that included the provinces and cities covered by the agreement. A MNLF
denied the legitimacy of the independent administrations and charged the administration
with breaking the conditions of the Tripoli Agreement. It wasn't until the 1996 peace
accord that when former General Fidel Ramos was president of the Philippines, the
MNLF and the Philippine government reached an agreement on how to implement the
Tripoli Agreement that the MNLF could accept as well as a plan for autonomy.
Due to disagreements in theory and tactics, a faction within the MNLF attempted
to seize control of the movement in 1977. This faction was led by vice-chair Salamat
Hashim. In 1984, Salamat, a charismatic cleric who attended Cairo's Al-Azhar
University, founded the Moro Islamic Liberation Front. The MILF pursued a religious
agenda under Salamat and a core group of ulamas (Islamic scholars), while MNLF chair
Nur Misuari led the MNLF toward a secular and nationalist political movement.
The MNLF received support from the government's diplomatic and peace
initiatives from 1977 until the signing of the peace agreement in 1996 as the only
officially recognized representative of Filipino Muslims in the OIC. The MILF covertly
grew its armed forces and supporter base as Manila mediated with the MNLF. The MILF
had more than 12,000 armed fighters distributed among 13 main camps and 33 satellite
enclaves by the time the Philippine government ended talks with the MNLF. The MILF
had significant influence over many Muslim grassroots communities in central Mindanao
similar negotiations with the MILF immediately after signing the peace agreement with
the MNLF. Even though the MILF disapproved of the Manila-MNLF pact, it welcomed
Ramos's approach by taking part in preliminary talks that led to formal negotiations.
The MILF offered a single talking point at the beginning of the discussions: a
solution to the Bangsamoro problem, which, in its view, involved a wide range of social,
cultural, economic, and political issues, including but not limited to the following:
Recognizing the Moros' ancestral territory, their displacement and lack of access
to land, the need for real agrarian reform, violations of their human rights, social and
cultural discrimination against Muslims, policies that corrupt the Moros' minds and moral
fiber, economic inequality and widespread poverty among Muslims, exploitation of the
president, which paved the stage for the revival of the MILF peace negotiations. She
unilaterally proclaimed a cease-fire and began preliminary negotiations with the MILF.
This time, Manila agreed to the three demands made by the MILF: that the negotiations
be mediated by the OIC or by a nation that is a member of the OIC, that the parties
uphold the terms of prior agreements, and that the negotiations take place in a foreign
location. Malaysia actively participated in the exploratory phases, which were held in
Kuala Lumpur, as a third-party facilitator. In Tripoli, the parties reached the following
The discussions will center on the three major issues of security, rehabilitation,
The Bangsamoro people and other indigenous peoples are recognized by both
sides.
The Bangsamoro people will be consulted, and new formulas will be that will
The 2001 Tripoli Peace Agreement, the Implementing Guidelines of the Security
Aspect of the Tripoli Peace Agreement, the Manual of Instructions for the Coordinating
Committee on the Cessation of Hostilities and the Local Monitoring Teams, the Joint
were all produced as a result of the negotiations that took place from November 2000 to
February 2003.
Deserving of Resolution
The conflict in Mindanao has matured to the point where both sides see more
benefits to ending it than to continuing the warfare, which lends "ripeness" to the
resolution of the conflict. In the Philippines, people are beginning to understand that
fighting it out on the battlefield is ineffective. Manila did not benefit from the major wars
in 2000 and 2003. Or any tactical edge for the MILF. In fact, the offensives not only cost
lives and caused chaos among civilians, but they also encouraged the MILF to engage
in guerilla warfare, which was more challenging for the government to contain.
However, occupying rural communities, attacking military installations, and being
evasive about its affiliations to terrorist organizations made the MILF's cause appear
less legitimate and encouraged the government to employ more force. The offensives
also hindered efforts to improve relations between Christians and Muslims. The
by government propaganda, raising the possibility of the separatist conflict turning into a
religious clash.
Last is, the country's economy, which has been languishing behind those of its
neighbors for years, needs to be revived by a negotiated solution with the MILF. Global
governments' advice banning travel to the islands and international media reports on the
conflict in Mindanao provide the idea that the southern Philippines is a refuge for
terrorists and insurgents, which is harming the country's reputation with foreign
investors. The expensive conflict with the MILF depletes the country's resources and
Even if there is hope surrounding the government and MILF's negotiations, there
is no assurance that they will be successful. There are undoubtedly some significant
government and the MILF must first be able to craft a practical and effective agreement.
The question of whether an agreement will actually address the root causes of the
conflict is becoming more and more important than whether the parties will reach an
agreement. The Philippines' history of peace negotiations is rife with agreements that
look good on paper but fall woefully short when it comes to implementation. The MILF
will undoubtedly use the government's alleged inability to uphold its half of the bargain
The parties will also need to compromise their opposing views on the subject of
political structures. The parties will need to address the difficult question of political
structures sooner rather than later, despite the fact that the talks are intended to avoid
discussions on it. Negotiated agreements are, after all, essentially political agreements,
and problems like ancestral domain, security, and rehabilitation cannot be solved
successfully.
Conclusion
term stability and development in the southern Philippines, it is in no way a quick fix for
all of the region's issues with instability and underdevelopment. The residents of the
southern Philippines are so profoundly divided as a result of the conflict's lengthy history
and several failed attempts to resolve it that any roadmap is likely to be regarded with
skepticism or, at the very least, cautious hope. The ability and desire of the parties to go
beyond their group interests will determine whether the MILF peace process is any
There is no doubt that every effort possible was made throughout the current
negotiations to guarantee that the parties could come to a consensus; the government
and the MILF's resolve appears to be unquestionable. Many are more worried about
whether or not the Filipino people would accept the peace agreement as their shared
road map for peace and development in Mindanao than they are about the parties
signing a peace agreement. The terms of the peace treaty can only be carried out in a
fashion that directly allays the problems of the Moro people when there is genuine
national agreement on this roadmap. As a result, the following peace process elements
need to be strengthened:
and local leaders. The MNLF and traditional Muslim leaders must be
Religious leaders from the Christian and Muslim faiths must take the
The MILF and the government must establish reliable and efficient
mechanisms for putting the peace accord into action. To directly monitor
Manila and the MILF's adherence to the agreement's terms, a neutral third
interests.
References
Operations in
Southeast Asia (New York: The Free Press, 2003), CNN correspondent Maria Ressa
cites numerous classified police and military intelligence reports of the MILF’s links with
Similar claims are made in the International Crisis Group’s report, Southern Philippines
Backgrounder:
2. “Autonomy not answer, say Moro rebs,” Philippine Daily Inquirer Philippine Daily
quoting MILF vice-chair for political affairs Ghadzali Jaafar. Online. Available:
http://news.inq7.net/
regions/index.php?index=1&story_id=14799.
3. This interim pact is referred to as the Government of the Republic of the Philippines-
MILF Tripoli
Agreement on Peace of 2001, which should not be confused with the Tripoli Agreement
between the
government and the Moro National Liberation Front signed on December 23, 1976.
4. Ahmad Aijaz, “Class and Colony in Mindanao,” in Rebels, Warlords and Ulama: A
Reader on Muslim
Separatism and the War in Southern Philippines, ed. Eric Gutierrez et al. (Quezon City:
Institute for
Popular Democracy, 1999), 5–6.