Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HE HE Week HE
HE HE Week HE
tiene pena de tres pessos; while a third was to the effect that no citizen was
(328)
ciri>A!< L
:
founded l>y
i
]>(>.-
n of ili ildii: I indii
it it wjis sittiatrd too 1 ar iVoin tli. incur
former petitioned lra m-w and for contribu
and assistance in erecting a n.-w com 1 1 :
(|U->t
nirt witli a lilx-ral rrspons-
.
in afh-r \ itli i
means of ,suj|M)i-
5
Uy a
jtapal l)iill is-in-d on tlic lOtli ..! Mardi I.IDS,
Ciuda 1 I! al was appointed -tlu-dral
city,
ih
cesc be Milj-ct to tin archbishopric
t S \ .ml 1
>i i
vin<^
:
. while the pri\ ii and nin-s
the bishopric \ ;il-
in
S]>ain.
The clnnvh patronage a:
he lin,
I f tll d>o lel t to 1
the einpero,
ili:
ity
1
<>!i thos.
:!!!. I
was si :
toabast filt
-<
ami a sugar- in ill.
6
Acci.nl:
i. 1-
in a cc.;
ic bu:
330 THE ECCLESIASTICS IN CHIAPAS.
<>f liis
l.islmprir ;HK! an additional sum ~>00,000
\\\<
l.y
Ladrada. and forty-five I ) Miiiniraii t iiar>. indmli
Tom . tli-ir \ i nd his BD
i
Quint ;
is ahundaiit
III their Sul>-e<|UeHt
t! them 1
on vigorous ii lirmlv
1
hail
misjudged the- character o( the
>hall Bee hereafter.
I
ll"
11 ^ 1(1
apni-oadi of Imly week lie
hui injudicious p of refusing absolution to all v. 1m
should not forthwith liherate th.-ir slav< <!
liims.-h
right of granting absolution, jmhli- i .<
I
a-; in Los Caaas
mi. I >sed
1
itin.L;
tha;
1 triiuitr. l-i;:
LVC.S h"W.
. in /
111 1.
,;
fully rnslav.
1.
334 THE ECCLESIASTICS IN CHIAPAS.
17
Las Casas y Valdivieso, Carta, Oct. 25, 1545, in Squier s MSS. t
xxii.
122-3.
18
Las Casas, ltd. , loc. cit.
ia
ln a letter dated July 20, 1545, the audiencia informed the emperor ot
Las Casas doings at Ciudad Real, and charged him with usurping the juris
diction of the crown. Carta, in Sqider^s MSS., xxii. 111-12,
R]
rition
and heedl ,f the rights of othe Thu- be made
i
aemies where tin- .f h; nanded int<
.
In I
5 17 I --mharked for Sp
ias <
Tl
ion ot the new laws of which he mu>l have heard
/.
^7. 1 am ii.
B such hostility.
336 THE ECCLESIASTICS IN CHIAPAS.
II to the IS \Vorld
Bentation to tin- ;n<-il of I ndi-s of th
ine and prejudi hd
nat ivea of ( mala l>v t!
philanthropisl
ot Iiisa^o. Lik. all vi-_
iona:
on wliicli t
ln-y d
Unflinching <-oura^
;
-
and tenacity with which 1: in-
inrd
:
1 1- lir>itati-(l not in I
can T an
<>f
. ;lid i or t:
Hairs t! Id.
I A ;
of 1
ritahli"
aiTOgai
t hat thi oahly dii
Ti
HIST, c II. 22
338 THE ECCLESIASTICS IN CHIAPAS.
denas, Col. Doc., vii. 201-4; Fr. Torre, Carta, Aug. 3, 154S, in Squier s MSS. t
.xxii. 94-6.
*6
Carta, Sept. 28, 1548, in Squier s MSS., xxii. 81-2.
-TOXIO I ,L. 339
condition nati?
encoui. 1
by tL in i
he i
becoming exha
their supplies soon
ih.
mpoi ary convent and proc.-cd.-d t
their 1. of .dually
OJ
their labors <.\
r the provin<
Tir d
in tin ir
way every obstacle that self ii
came to their
BUpporl th
tablished ivents including t!
I
it in (
r inriii
dili in P<> short a
.1 tl
regret t
aut!
In- a-
tliy oi - m *
340 THE ECCLESIASTICS IN CHIAPAS.
order to avoid a very long list. He was indebted to Conde de la Gomera,
president of the audiencia of Guatemala, for access to the archives and official
papers of different cities. To him he dedicates his book. The advantages
enjoyed by Remesal in this respect render the work an exceedingly valu
able contribution to Central American history. Its value, however, is less
ened by the great number of typographical and other errors which it con
tains. These are very important, especially where dates are concerned.
While a large number of them are quite obvious, very many incidents of
great importance must be verified as to time of occurrence, by reference to
other authors. In the portion of his work which relates to the conquest of
Guatemala, many inaccuracies are observed. In fact, Ramesal was hurried,
and often biassed. His style is clear and pleasing; free from the redundant
and inflated form so common a century later. He submitted his manuscript
to Tortjuemada, by whom it was highly approved and its publication advised.
This occurred in the city of Mexico. But meantime a storm was brewing else
where. The work was by no means to the liking of certain parties in Guate
mala. By means of letters addressed to different parts of Mexico, but more
particularly by a special messenger who preached a crusade against the new his
tory, these enemies raised up a tempest of indignation against Remesal and his
book, especially in Oajaca. Through the influence, however, of sensible and
powerful friends in Mexico and Guatemala all opposition \vas overcome. See
pages 747-51 of his work. The author was born in the town of Allariz in Galicia,
and on the 9th of October 1613, nearly five months after he left Spain, arrived at
Guatemala, where he was most kindly received by the Dominican order. Dur
ing the time he remained in their convent, he failed not to observe the excel
lent system of government under which the society worked, and occupied
his time in perusing the acts of the chapters held in the convent. He was so
impressed with the excellence of these laws and regulations that he proceeded
to make a kind of summary of them. While thus employed, a work on the
origin of the province, written by Friar Tomas de la Torre, fell into his hands.
This suggested to him to undertake a history that would embrace both secu
lar and ecclesiastical matters. With unconquerable diligence and ardor he
prosecuted to the end the work thus projected. On one occasion, when suf
fering from a fibrous abscess in the face, he carefully perused in a single "day
the whole of the first book of the archives of Guatemala city, after having
submitted to a severe surgical operation on his right cheek. Twice he jour
neyed over all New Spain, collecting information and, in particular, studying
the books of the cabildos of different cities and towns. The evidence he thus
obtained was in many instances at variance, he states, with printed books
and histories of his own religion. The authors of these whose names he does
not mention he would not condemn, however, but excuse on the ground
that later research will necessarily produce different accounts of events. See
his preface. Remesal was a fearless writer. Perhaps he had some leaning
to the descendants of the conquerors, yet he does not hesitate to denounce
the acts of the first colonists, to deal with Alvarado in a manner severely
condemning him, and to endorse Las Casas with regard to the cruel oppres
sion of the Indians. But his statements are to be accepted with caution,
especially where Las Casas or the Dominican order is concerned. No effort
is spared to hold them up to the gaze of an admiring posterity, and to expose
the errors and perverseness of their enemies. To this end all sorts of prob
able and improbable situations and adventures are described, wherein the
religious eventually triumph. Many important facts are glossed over, or
omitted, the true versions of which it is evident must have come within his
observation. Numerous speeches, sermons, conversations, even the thoughts
and feelings of the leading actors, are described with a minuteness of detail
that is astonishing considering the lapse of time over 75 years. The account
of the prosecution of the religious by Baltasar Guerra may be looked upon as
a fiction, while the author s inventive faculty has had much to do with that
of the opposition to Las Casas in Ciudad Real. His version of Las Casas
doings in Gracias d, Dios seems also greatly exaggerated.