1) n

=
30, 5 301, 6: 3.8,
= x = 70.05 1.6449
=

40: M. 29

H.: M >29

assume that He is true, I follows a normal distribution by CLT for

large sample is known.

*** (Mx:Mo 29.6°x=

so h
=
1

&
test, I calc > 20.05= 1.6449

to
sad.
2 cak:
a 15055

Since a Calc <

z0.0s where 1.5655 <1.6449, therefore to
is not
rejected.
"There is enough evidence at 5% significance level to conclude
that the is
mean time
greater than 29
days.
2) n 35,
=
= 26343, 6 =3231,2,0.01: 20.0. 2.3263

↑:Mo = 24372
# : M. f 24672

* VN
(M1:M = 14672,67:
1s"
to
I

24572,
this
calc.
53.0i

Since Ecalcf2 0.01 where I calc= 5 3.0400, therefore

Ho is rejected.
~
There is enough evidence at 1% level to conclude
significance
that the
average cost of stroke rehabilitation at a
particular hospital is different from KM24672,
3 a) X 0.02
=

value =
0.014
Ho: M =
40
1: M 40 p-value 1x
8
014 c 0.02

~ Ho is rejected since pvalue < c value since there is

sufficient evidence at 2% significance level to
the manager's claim.
support store

9%confidence level, the of all number of

b) At mean
pages
a
person copies in the stone's machine was
copy
disposed in the range of (19.09, 39.43)

So the interval is consistent with the conclusion in

a) because the value 40 is not in the interval.

4) x 0.10
=

↓ value 0.106
=

H0: No.7
H. i M, 57

If the is to will be
poralie a value, the

rejected

p-valuesin 0.10
to
pvalues value, the not
rejected.
~ a
Since
 =>
n 10 0.05- 0.025
5
5)
=
=
⑮

x
= 17.7
6 =
1.6 ↑ =2,262
, 3 0.025,
=

Ho: Mo = 16.3
M
#: + 16.3

= UN (M =Mo=16.3, sc:
IorS
By using test calci

= Mo,
1oks,
an 2.460

since tcale> +
(2-460 >
2.262), therefore to

is rejected.
there is enough evidence at 5%
significance level to
conclude that the
average number of infections
different from 16.3.
per weeks at a
hospital is
6) H0:Mo = 4.
#) I: M, <
4S

* WH CMs=Mo. 46, 5:
Ia")
↑ 0.03,
11 = = 1,796

to -
+cak:5 -1

since tale > + c (-1.1642-1.796), therefore He is

↓ ot
rejected.
there
significance
is insufficient evidence 5%
at level
to conclude that the vacuum cleaners in
use
average
less than 40 hours
annually.
7) Ho:No 300
= &
alc > 20.0 (2012-20.01
1
# : M,+600 - 2,3263

FUNCM x = Mo =
200.03: You
calc:FTo,
1000
--2.3 an
6 x

since I calc 1
-

20.01 where the value are

-
2.7366 <-2,3263, so He is rejected.

=There is evidence at 2%
enough significance level
to conclude that the is
average life of lightbulbs
different from 600 hours.
8) H0:M =2.4
11 : M. f 2.4

FVM (Nx= M,00.9,

5"x6"
↓ 0.029, 10 -1.223
=

↑ calc. 5Mo, 28.4 -

=
1.026

In Css
since to calc >tc, where the value is -1,3267-2,226,
therefore he is not
rejected.
There is not enough evidence at
significance
= 5%
level conclude that the
of
to
average percentage
impurities is different from 2.4-