City of Port Huron ) Southside 7 Strategic |1. Participation Process : lll, Established Goals and Broad Assumptions ..... ++ Iv. Summary Issues - Public Participation V. _ Five-year Goals and Objectives ...- Vi. Appendix ..++++++ EXHIBITS: A. Existing Land Usage in the Southside 8. Proposed Zoning Map C. Demographic/Census Data D. Traffic Data TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward oc. esees cree ec enee Introduction to Land Use Plan ...-- Maps: Census Tract Data Parks & Recreational Factlities Public & Quasi-Public Facilities Commercially Developed Areas Industrial Locations Zoning Map (Existing) Zoning District Descriptions gE seeenS 17Forward In November 1998, the City of Port Huron held a unique event entitled "Southside Summit". The purpose of the summit was to share information, concerns and visions for the City's southside neighborhoods. Several issues were discussed. One important issue was the lack of a plan for the use of vacant land south of the Black River. Several related issues emerged that effect the quality of life for area residents that need to be considered when developing a land use plan: . Safe and Affordable Housing . Adequate and effective Educational Institutions * Accessible and Affordable Health Care . Economic Vitality and Liveable Jobs * Adequate and Accessible Recreational Facilities Consideration of these matters and review of the issues brought forward by the citizens of Port Huron during the public forums have resulted in the development of specific goals and objectives within a five-year Strategic Land Use Plan for the southside.SOUTHSIDE LAND USE PLAN L_ INTRODUCTION TO A LAND USE PLAN A land use plan is a short-term (5-10 years) advisory tool to guide the use or 1se of existing land within a specified area. The land use plan may then lead to a new "Zoning Map" for those affected areas. A zoning map illustrates the various zoning districts which allow for specific types of land use. The land use plan in itself is not a legal document nor an ordinance that must be followed, it is merely a guide in order to assist in decisions regarding rezoning requests or to help prioritize development plans. Itis a blueprint for consideration and ,ation of future land development proposals. The purpose of a land use planning exercise is to review existing land use and existing zoning districts, to inventory current vacant land, primarily publicly owned land, and to assess community needs and priorities regarding current and future land uses. The land use plan reflects the c's vision of future land development in the area and provides guidance when reviewing future rezoning requests, economic growth patterns and development oposals. A land use plan helps to improve compatible land uses within a specified rea and seeks to minimize negative impacts between different zoning districts. In a smaller city, like Port Huron, a land use plan may be a small component of a larger and more comprehensive master plan for the entire city and which would include other issues such as housing, transportation, infrastructure, socio-economics, Ith and education issues. Aland use plan is typically a brief narrative accompanied by a series of mapped data which illustrates current demographics, land uses and inventories, and a map that 3shows the "preferred future look" of a community regarding land use through zoned districts. The land use plan has a more defined focus than a master plan. It may address the community as a whole or a specific area that is a concern such as the city’s southside. The land use plan is commonly used as a basis for the creation of adjustments to the Zoning Ordinance and its districts. The land use plan establishes the desired amounts and locations of categories of land use such as industrial, commercial, and residential, which may be compatible with existing land uses. A land use plan’s legal basis is established from the following planning enabling acts: * Municipal Planning Act, P.A. 285 of 1931 * County Planning Act, P.A, 282 of 1945 * Regional Planning Act, P.A. 281 of 1945 The main goal of the land use plan is to review both existing and future land use relationships. The pian will identify the types of land uses described as zoning districts, their geographic location and spatial arrangement, and an inventory of vacant land (publicly owned and privately owned). Demographic information is also included and reviewed in consideration of future land uses, along with available information on school enrollments, housing needs, infrastructure plans, etc.I PARTICIPATION PROCESS |n order to gain as much insight and public participation as possible for the creation of this land use plan, the following major steps were undertaken: November 1998: Southside Summit was held. It became evident, from citizen's comments, that there was a great concern about the amount of Public-owned vacant land in the southside, the need for specific types of fand development and the lack of a plan or development goals for the future. May 1889: City Council authorized a Work Plan created by the Planning Department, which calls for an advisory group to be established from a list of recommended interest group leaders who were involved in the earlier Southside Summit. Summer 1999: City staff met with the Southside Strategie Land Use Plan Advisory Committee members and gathered demographic data on population, housing, land uses, vacant land inventories, School populations, infrastructure plans, etc. Summer 1999: Reviewed material and summary reports from the Previous Southside Summits regarding any items that might have been related to land use issues such as an expressed desire for more single- family housing opportunities, an increase in commercial development, ete, October 1999: Held four (4) public forums to allow concerned citizens to express their views and opinions on the use of land within the Southside, particularly public-owned vacant land. A summary report of findings was developed by the facilitators, representatives from McKenna Associates, Inc. Qctober 1999: Advisory committee members that represented special interest groups held a similar session with their membership and prepared @ written report of ideas and suggestions that could be considered, 5* December 1999: Draft Land Use Plan prepared and submitted to Advisory Committee for input. * January 11, 2000: Advisory Committee meets to provide comments and revisions to Draft Plan. * Januery 2000: Draft of Southside Land Use Plan is presented to City’s hearing is scheduled for February 1, Planning Commission. A pul 2000. . Februi 1 00: Public hearing on Draft Plan and revisions as necessary. . March 13, 2000: City Council holds a public hearing on the Draft Plan. . March/April, 2000: Final Southside Land Use Plan is approved by City Council. Specific summary reports, dates, notices and public comments are included as Appendix A, The Southside Strategic Land Use Plan will address the major issues brought forward and incorporate many of the ideas and concerns into a five-year plan that will attempt to guide the use of land in the southside, and in particular, the future use and development of publicly owned vacant land.llL_ESTABLISHED GOALS AND BROAD ASSUMPTIONS Before developing a land use plan, it is best to develop a set of goals and policies for land development. In 1974, the City’s land use plan established some general goals for the city, as a whole, to provide the optimum in quality of life for city residents when considering land use issues. Those basic goals are still important today and may be reiterated and modified (in italics) as a reference in considering a new land use plan: Update the City’s Master Plan Review and revise related ordinances and controls every five (5) years at 2 minimum. Recognize and protect the considerable environmental attractions of the City of Port Huron for the enjoyment and utilization of the population. Continue to eliminate blighting influences. Safeguard well developed areas from intrusion of uses that are not compatible in character. Provide opportunity for industrial growth and rejuvenation. The development and preservation of neighborhoods. In reviewing the U. S. Census demographic data and related research material, it became apparent that the current proposed land use plan for the southside should also be based upon these broad assumptions: Growth outside of the City’s corporate limits will continue at a rapid rate and in particular, the demand for large retail structures, and large housing subdivisions. Population projections show a slight decline in population counts for the number of residents within the city limits, but indicate a generous growth for outlying townships. This growth will affect the demand for city services, alter traffic patterns and may effect existing housing structures within established neighborhoods. 7The City's financial resources will be limited with priority given to the funding of the City’s Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Projects. Competition will remain strong for new residential growth from the adjacent townships. The amount of vacant land (privately and publicly-owned) will continue to be limited for both industrial, commercial and residential development. The Land Use Plan for the southside will be a five-year plan and will become a part of a larger, more comprehensive Master Plan which will require long-term goals to be established.IV. SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The detailed summary reports regarding issues and concerns for the development of vacant land within the City’s Southside are provided as Appendix A. Two neighborhood groups who have a representative on the Land Use Advisory Committee provided written reports which detail the land use concerns of their members. In addition, the facilitators of the four public forums, McKenna Associates, Inc., have provided a summary report from each forum which indicates not only all of the issues that were brought forth by those who participated, but also prioritized those issues as a result of the participants voting procedure. Each public forum was identical in format. The participants were first introduced to the planning process, asked to identify land uses and related issues, identify positive and negative aspects of the southside area, and identify future land uses that were desired for the area. Participants were then asked to vote for land use issues that were a priority for them. Participants were given four blue “dots” (worth one point each) and one red "dot" (worth two points) for a total of six votes. Rankings of each issue were then established after each forum. The following is a brief review of the land use issues that were identified as a priority through both of the neighborhood organizations’ reports and the McKenna Associates summary report. While the detailed summaries attached will indicate additional issues, many overlap in nature and treatment and have been combined for the purpose of this summary.No. of Create greenbelts, greater buffers between conflicting zoning districts, Points Rank Land Use Issue Received 1 | More housing opportunities, particularly single-family 50 developments and neighborhood preservation. 2__| Increase development of commercial access/corridors. 32 3 _| Improve-provide more public access to the waterfront. 32 4 _| Improve/enlarge open spaces for recreational purposes. 27 5 26 Additional concerns that were independently noted included the creation of a centrally located recreation facility, the condition of existing neighborhoods, condition of the exterior of some commercial and industrial buildings, desire for more cultural facilities, outreach facilities, size of residential lots and traffic conditions in residential areas. 10V. GOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION METHODS The Southside Land Use Plan has included nine (9) goals as the priorities for land use development within the next five (5) years based upon public input, broad assumptions, and the top five (5) identified issues. These goals will result in specitic, action-oriented objectives for a five-year time frame to facilitate their success: 9. Encourage appropriate mixed land use and development to enhance existing neighborhoods and promote positive growth and redevelopment. Regulate growth and development to minimize negative impacts on existing neighborhoods, districts, public facilities and natural resources. Promote single-family housing opportunities. within _ existing neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods as it becomes feasible Promote preservation of existing neighborhoods through redevelopment principles as feasible. Minimize blighting influences by controlling vacant land and abandoned buildings. Promote commercial development along designated corridors. Improve existing public parks and open green spaces for recreational use and to improve public access to the waterfront. To promote the development of water front property that allows public access, is compatible with neighboring land uses and with the overall enhancement of the community. Revise ordinance requirements regarding development standards. Specific objectives to undertake within the next five years to assist the City in meeting the established goals: ISSUE: MORE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES, PARTICULARLY SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION. WGoal #1: Encourage appropriate mixed land use and development to enhance existing neighborhoods and promote positive growth and redevelopment. Objectives: a Restructure definition of "Neighborhood Business District" within the Zoning Ordinance to outline criteria for consideration within older established neighborhoods. Review and modify section of Zoning Ordinance regarding the granting of permitted uses after special approvals, including impact guidelines to be established and the clarification of transfer procedures of a use permit from one owner to another. Goal #2: Regulate growth and development to minimize negative impacts on existing neighborhoods. Objectives: a. Changes to the Zoning Ordinance to require development and review of a landscape plan for green belts/buffer strips between conflicting zoning districts prior to site plan approval (new construction or expansion}, elevations for review, and infrastructure plans as part of some site plans. Require specific criteria for screening of parking lots in commercial, industrial and high-density multi-family complexes. Through the Zoning Ordinance, require new commercial development to install sidewalks as appropriate, and that all in-fill housing include sidewalks if existing at adjacent properties. Restrict curb cuts on major streets as much as possible. Encourage use of access drives and shared entrances along commercial strip developments. 12e. Discourage new development that lacks adequate parking spaces, including conversion of residential units to multi-dwelling units through site plan review and administration procedures. Review requests for alley vacations on a case by case basis. In areas that do not warrant full alley vacations, allow for minimal area within the center of the alley to be vacated to control unwanted traffic, but not to discourage use of the alley by residents instead of parking along the street. Goal #3: Promote single-family housing opportunities within existing neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods as it becomes feasible. Objectives: a Encourage appropriate “in-fill” housing construction through the use of site plan and elevation reviews. Promote private requests for rezoning of identified residential areas from medium density ("A-1") to one and two-family dwellings ("R-1") whenever feasible. Coordinate rezoning requests with the City’s Neighborhood Preservation Program and other similar projects. Continue to support the City’s Neighborhood Preservation Program and similar programs by non-profit groups Continue to financially support the P.H.N.H.C.’s Affordable Housing Program and the City Rehabilitation Programs with Community Development Block Grant {CDBG} funds. Continue to support new housing developments for the creation of single-family homes and the formation of new neighborhoods through use of acquired vacant land, grants and financial incentives. Encourage completion of Renaissance South through construction of infrastructure during the Spring of 2000 and 13encourage research into similar support for housing development within Moak Street to Nern Street; between 30th and 32nd Streets. Revise the existing Zoning Ordinance to require site plan review on new subdivisions to include landscape plans, elevations and sidewalks. Goal #4: Promote preservation of existing neighborhoods through redevelopment principles as feasibie. Objectives: a. Continue to support the City’s Neighborhood Preservation Program with allocation. of CDBG funds for a minimum of two neighborhood preservation projects within the next five years. Revise the Zoning Ordinance to include requirements for landscape plans b between conflicting zoning districts and various amendments and corrections to encourage redevelopment in existing neighborhoods and to promote private investment. c. Research incentives that may be feasible for the City to offer to investors and stakeholders in the restoration of older neighborhoods. d. Encourage development of historic residential districts and continue to support restoration work with CDBG or other federal grant funds. Goal #5: Minimize blighting influences by controlling vacant land and abandoned vacant buildings. Objectives: a. Review and strengthen City ordinances regarding the identification, process and .9" dilapidated buildings. procedure for "red-tag 14Incorporate a procedure for establishing code cases and the disposition of Property that is identified as a code case in order to eliminate long term existence of vacant, abandoned and derelict structures. Establish a policy and procedures to follow for private purchaser of City-owned, vacant land when it may be available. Establish incentives to encourage the upkeep and maintenance of the exterior of residential and commercial facilities, Develop an "Adopt your Block" program to coordinate clean-up campaigns, blight complaints, review of potential code cases, neighborhood beautification programs, etc. ISSUE: INCREASE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS. Goal #6: Promote commercial development along established corridors, particularly 24th Street, 10th Street and Conner Street. Objectives: a. Encourage rezoning of small areas that are currently used as existing, nonconforming commercial entities and that are located within established corridors. Encourage the rehabilitation of obsolete commercial buildings and the historic restoration of applicable sites through MainStreet involvement and research into available financial incentives Research areas to improve traffic circulation and services along designated commercial corridors that may encourage future development. ISSUE: IMPROVE ACCESS TO WATERFRONT AND IMPROVE OPEN SPACES FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES. 15Objectives: Review Recreation Plan and make any amendments necessary to allow City to a. continue to seek any and all State or Federal grants for improvements within existing parks. Review and inventory existing amenities at southside public parks. Report b. recommendation of additional needs. c. Review future park department budgets for allocations of funds for additional park amenities. d. Encourage the development of a recreational facility through a private for-profit or non-profit organization. @. Inventory non-buildable, vacant lots that are owned by the City. Of those with no value or use to adjacent property owners, inventory remaining green spaces and develop a plan for use as neighborhood common areas, if feasible. Goal #8: Promote development of waterfront property that allows pul access, is compatible with neighboring land uses and the overall enhancement of the community. Objectives: a Encourage public and private cooperation in developing Bridge to Bay Trail along waterfront as much as possible. Encourage private property owner requests for rezoning along water front from incompatible uses ("M-1" or similar) to zoning categories that are complimentary to surrounding land uses. ISSUE: CREATE GREENBELTS AND GREATER BUFFERS BETWEEN CONFLICTING ZONING DISTRICTS. 16Goal #9: Revise Ordinance requirements regarding development standards. Objectives: a, Require minimum size and type of greenbelts, planting strips or screening between conflicting zoning districts within the Zoning Ordinance. b. Require landscape plan for buffer strips or screening to be part of site plan review process. Upon review of the available demographic material, census data, existing land uses and inventories and public participation, the following summary remarks may be noted. This Land Use Plan for the southside is a five-year plan with an emphasis on short-term goals and objectives that can be reasonably expected to be completed. It is anticipated that the Southside’s Land Use Plan will become a part of a more comprehensive, long-term Master Plan which will require appropriate long-term objectives and will take other factors into consideration such as Census 2000 counts, transportation issues, housing market, economic trends and conditions, and similar factors beyond one entities’ control. Several areas already appear to be zoned for the highest and best use of the land and in response to comments by the public. The following is a brief review of areas to consider for changes in land use. These areas are mostly privately owned and any requests for consideration would have to be made by the property owners, It is only a recommendation for review over the next five-year period of time. . Individual, buildable vacant lots between Moak Street-Nern Street and 24th Street to 30th Street used for the purpose of single-family homes as part of an in-fill housing program. 17Area on 24th Street (west) between Cleveland and south to the Reinvestment Center (Nern Street) for consideration of rezoning to "C-1" Commercial District as appropriate. Several existing, nonconforming commercial buildings exist. An area of Connor Street/Electric Avenue, as needed, to be rezoned from "M-1" to "C-1" or "CBD" to accommodate commercial development as necessary. Also a review and possible redesign of the Connor Street intersection. Area south of Cleveland Street, north of Nern Street between 24th Street and 32nd Street to remain "R-1" at this time. Area could provide good transitional area as a combination of light industrial, commercial or multi- family residential. However, the appropriate use will depend upon market conditions in the future and support/success of Renaissance South - Phase Ill at 24th Street and Moak Street; and a proposed new single-family development at Moak Street to Nern Street, between 30th Street and 32nd Street. City Council would need to decide upon investment priorities for any new property acquisitions, infrastructure, housing developments, commercial or industrial incentives. Prior to the development of a new single-family housing subdivision at Moak/30th Streets; the acquisition of approximately 7 privately owned homes within the 3 acre site would be necessary. A proposed layout shows the possibility for 3¢ new single-family homes. If the adjacent vacant property to the south is not sold for the construction of a church facility this Spring, the City has an additional 2 acres to consider. Encourage private property owner's requests to rezone"A-1" (multi- family) zones to "R-1" (single and two-family dwellings) in the areas of White Street and Union Street; between 10th Street and 11th Street; and between 8th Street and 10th Street. Also from Gillett Street to Wall Street, between 10th Street and 11th Street. Perhaps as part of a Neighborhood Preservation Program goal. 18Depending upon future plans of the privately held land along the St. Clair River (former CNN property) accommodate requests for rezoning to eliminate current "M-1" (Light Industrial) to compatible zone(s) for housing, commercial and recreational uses (perhaps "CBD"). 19APPENDIXAppendix A Public participation is an important part to a successful and realistic future land use plan. Demographics and similar statistical data are useful in the process of putting @ plan together, however, it is the visions, concerns, and perceptions of those who reside or work in the environment that determines whether or not a plan is accepted by the community and utilized. The following illustrates the schedule for public participation: November 1998: Southside Summit May 1999: Southside Strategic Land Use Advisory Committee established. September 1999: Advisory Committee members meet with the interest group(s) they represent to obtain concerns, land use issues and needs. October 7, 1999: First public forum at Harrison School. October 12, 1989: Second public forum at Roosevelt School. October 14, 1999: Third public forum at Port Huron South School, October 19, 1999: Fourth public forum at Cleveland School. January 4, 2000: Port Huron Planning Commission sets public hearing on draft plan for February 1, 2000. January 17, 2000: Draft plan is available to public for review and written comments. Copies located at City Clerk’s Office, Planning Department and brary. Summary sheet County Building, St. Clair County available on City's website. February 1, 2000: Public hearing at City Planning Commission meeting. Merch 13, 2000: Public hearing at City Council meeting. 20From: Olde Town Neighborhood South Side Land Usage Committee The biggest theme seems to be the development of single family homes. Individuals understand the need for apartment complexes. but the concern of overcrowding exist. Marketing the waterfront with public access is also another prevailing theme. People want to continue to have access. but through business. and not necessarily parks. Individuals seem to want more facilities at the existing parks. Park benches, picnic tables and improved piayground equipment. Neighborhood revitalization has to be the emphasis which will promote the commercial development that the community at the south end longs for.5 NEIGHBORHOODS INC. OF PORT HURON CONCERNS FOR SOUTH SIDE STEERING COMMITTEE Blue Water Citizens Against Crime had some concerns regarding the placement of multipie family developmests. Multiple family developments should not be placed next to other multiple family developments in the South side. There should be single family or commercial buffers between multiple family developments. What they have found is that there has been a significant increase in drug dealing activity since the Gold Crest ‘Apartments have gone up. The group has worked very hard with the City Housing Department to reduce and in some instances, eliminate the drug activity in the City Housing. The same safeguards apparently do not exist at Gold Crest Apartments. The rug dealers are going over and selling their wares at the projects and then running home to their apartments at Gold Crest. There is nothing that the group can do because Gold Crest is privately owned. In Census tract #6240, (Olde Towne) itis very difficult in some of the smaller apartments for the children to have a quiet place to do their homework. There should be a place for students to drop in. possibly with rutors. The students then could complete their homework after school wiich they cannot do at home because of TV, other kids, mom, boyfriend. cooking in kitchen. and there are no quict areas. The city should seriously consider re-zoning Census tract #6240 west of Military from Ari to Rel, one and two family homes. This would prevent the further cutting up of large or 5 units and would encourage one and two family homes. bomes into 3, Encourage or pian for neighborhood markets such as the Blue Water Food Center that Just closed last week. Plan uses of unused water front property, such as the Gibralter Sprocket building. KONIPH-concems ert TOTAL °.02OB Se ee ee Appendix Session I: Detailed Summary What follows is summary ofthe input received at the October 7, 1899, Southside Land Use Plan Jorn eeecorkshop. The workshop was held at Harrison Elementary School and was facilitated by John Jackson, Mario Ortega, and Amy Neary of McKenna Associates, Incorporated. The workshop 038 attended by approxmately 15 persons and was sponsored by the City of Port Huron city Council, Planning Commission and the Southside Land Use Advisory Committee, (The workshop agends called for an introduction ofthe planning process, identification of select land Ses and land use issues, group identification of positive and negative aspects of the Southside area, and group identification of future land uses envisioned for the area. Positive and Negative Characteristics of the Southside The workshop participants were frst asked to describe positive and negative characteristics of the area. The following were identified as positive or negative characteristics of the Southside. Positives Negatives Existing business conditions My home Infill development Gaps between land uses Diversity of development Lapeer Street underutilized commercial uses Historical Preservation New housing does not match existing character Access to major thoroughfares Lack of recreation areas for children Location between two nvers Size of lots [New seweriwateristreets Future Land Uses Issues The workshop partcioants were next asked to identify land uses that would be desirable for the Community. The following were identified as desired iand uses for the area, Land Use Issues Neighborhood oriented commercial uses along Conner and 10” Street 2 4 Neighborhood oriented commercial uses along Lapeer Street 2 Mixed use areas (commercialfresidential) 6 Fill vacant land south of Nern with residential and/ or church 5 Give peopie access to the waterfront for public use 17 Create butter areas between industrial and residential uses A Southside Land Use Page ‘October 7, 1999 Visioning ProjectHarrison Elementary School Workshop Summary Land Use Issues 6 Clear out vacant industrial areas and infill wth residential development 2 Provide a focal point (destination) between neighborhoods 7 Improve the appearence of industrial uses "1 No industrial uses along the water 3 Better distribution and access to community facilities 2 Additional recreation programming for parks 6 Additional recreation areas Finally, the workshop participants were asked to vote for the land use “issue” that was most important to them. The number in front of each “issue”, above, coincides to the ranking of the “issue” as determined by the participants. Each participant was allowed one (1) vote worth two (2) points and four (4) votes worth ane (1) point apiece, for a total of six (6) votes. The following were the highest ranking issues: + Create buffer between industrial and residential uses (17 votes) + No industrial uses along the water (11 votes) + Improve appearance of industrial uses (7 votes) + Fill vacant land south of Nem with residential and/ or church (6 votes) * Clear out vacant industrial areas and infill with residential development (6 votes) + Additional recreation areas (6 votes) Southside Land Use Page 2 October 7, 1999, Visioning ProjectAppendix Session Il: Detailed Summary What follows is a summary of the input received at the October 12, 1999 Southside Land Use Plan visioning workshop. The workshop was held at Roosevelt Elementary School and was facilitated by John Jackson, Mario Ortega, and Amy Neary of McKenna Associates, Incorporated. The workshop was attended by approximately 15 persons and was sponsored by the City of Port Huron City Council, Planning Commission and the Southside Land Use Advisory Committee. The workshop agenda called for an introduction of the planning process, identification of select land uses and land use issues, group identification of positive and negative aspects of the Southside area, and group identification of future land uses envisioned for the area. Positive and Negative Characteristics of the Southside ‘The workshop participants were first asked to describe positive and negative characteristics of the area. The following were identified as positive or negative characteristics of the Southside. Positives Negatives Area between 30” Street and 32" Street Lack of commercial uses along Connor Street Access to the rivers Commercial truck traffic Diversity of peopie Inadequate amount of parking along St. Clair and Black rivers for public access. History of the area ‘Too many through streets Future Land Uses Issues The workshop participants were next asked to identify land uses that would be desirable for the community. The following were identified as desired land uses for the area. Tate 7 More accessible commercial areas Make 24 St/Martin Luther King Jr. more prominent Extend residential areas Reduce proximity between industrial and residential uses Create green buffer areas between industrial and residential uses Capture historical theme Create more parks and recreational areas Create more recreational programming ni[wlrlalolaloly Southside Land Use Paget October 12, 1999 Visioning ProjectAppendix Land Use Issues 3 Create bike path system 10 No more exsansion of industrial areas = 16 Develop a water front tourist attraction 7 Create more affordable single family housing oO Spread out multiple family uses 5 Create more affordable senior housing 3 Attract technological/research developments Finally, the workshop participants were asked to vote for the land use “issue” that was most important to them. The number in front of each “issue”, above, coinci the “issue” as determined by the participants. Each participant was worth two (2) points and four (4) votes worth one (1) The following were the highest ranking issues: : Develop a water front tourist attraction (16 votes). ides to the ranking of allowed one (1) vote point apiece, for a total of six (6) votes. . No more expansion of industrial areas (10 votes), : More accessible commercial areas (7 votes). - Create more affordable single family housing (7 votes) . Create more affordable senior housing (5 votes) 7 Create green buffer areas between industrial and residential uses (5 votes). Southside Land Use Page 2 October 12, 19399 Visioning ProjectAppendix Session IV: Detailed Summary by the City of Port Huron City Council, Planning Commission and the Southside Land Use Advisory Committee. The workshop agenda called for an introduction of the planning process, identification of Select land uses and land use issues, group identification of positive and negative aspects of the Southside area, and group identification of future land uses envisioned for the area Positive and Negative Characteristics of the Southside The workshop participants were firstasked to describe positive and negative characteristics of the area, The following were identified as positive or negative characteristics of the Southside. Positive Negative Participation in the planning process Lack of street beautification and gateway Urban living Lack of single family housing Diversity of people Smell! Good mix of existing uses Concentration of multiple family uses Potential for railroad parks High concentration of poverty The river Age of existing structures History of the area Divided by the railroad Less traffic problems than the northside __| Low voter tumout Many infill opportunities Transient population Existing greenspaces-Lincoin Park Lack of large play areas in parks, i.e. hockey. Existing institutional facilities Lack of park programs and equipment Lack of “Habitat” homes Lack of marketplaces Lack of consistency with city signage Southside Land Use Paget ‘October 19, 1999 Visioning ProjectAppendix Future Land Uses Issues The workshop participants were next asked to identify land uses that would be desirable for the community. The following were identified as desired land uses for the area. Land Uses 6 _| More convenience commercial uses along Connor Road 7 __| More neighborhood commercial uses within walking distance from homes 0 _| Create a theme with new development 20 _ | Centrally located recreation facility 11._| infil vacant land with extension of existing residential neighborhoods 2__| Provide more outreach facilities 2 _| More senior housing 18 __| More single family housing 11_| Provide more public access to river 5__| Create a cultural facility network 2__| Create more office developments 4 _| Tree preservation 1__| Provide green buffer areas along industrial uses 8 _ | Create a sidewalk system Finally, the workshop participants were asked to vote for the land use “issue” that was most important to them. The number in front of each “issue”, above, coincides to the ranking of the “issue” as determined by the participants. Each participant was allowed one (1) vote worth two (2) points and four (4) votes worth one (1) point apiece, for a total of six (6) votes The following were the highest ranking issues: Centrally located recreation facility (20 votes) More single family housing (15 votes) Infill vacant land with extension of existing residential neighborhoods (11 votes) Provide more public access to river (11 votes) Create a sidewalk system (8 votes) More neighborhood commercial uses within walking distance from homes (7 votes) Southside Land Use Page 2 October 19, 1999 Visioning ProjectEXHIBIT A(One & Two Fam eisai Mana Famay Reser usel-Pube Pte Pain COD Pav Reseson Schools Vecerttand Blacker Canal ‘Svcd Ratond ROWEXISTING LAND USE MAP EXISTING LAND USES One & Two Family Residential Multiple Family EEE commercia rks & Recreation Vacant Land City of Port Huron SOUTH OF THE BIACK MER PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT OF PANN, 1999,EXHIBIT BAONING MAP * Possible Zoning Changes for neighborhood enhancement ZONING DISTRICTS (CEU SINGLE-FaMmLy RESIDENTIAL El & 2 Fanmy RESIDENTIAL (| MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SEX) MERISE MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IIE neicHsonnoop eusiness ([e-1 commenciat [El] m1 ici ipustmat Ei] m2 weavy inousTRiaL Comanma orstricr [S\cennat ausivess pistricr (jeommunrry coutece pistatet EE INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT JRazone form Be 10 Fe | WN ‘Rezone rom Wt to. CBD Rezor trom Pt to C-1 im } Rm City of Port Huron SOUTHOF THE BLACK FIVER. ‘This map tobe used as a guide for ure rozoring requests ‘by propery oomers cryEXHIBIT CCity of Port Huron CENSUS STATISTICS Total Population Population Estimates (Census Bureau) (SEMCOG) 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2010 35,794 33,981 33,694 33,003 32,272 31,745CITY OF PORT HURON Population Figures Percent of Percent of 1980 Total 1990 | Total/Change Total Population 33,981 33,694 | .80% decrease Male 15,775 | 46.00% | 15,717 47.00% Female 18,208 | 54.00% | 17,977 53.00% Race: White 30,940 | 91.00% | 30,342 90.00% Black 2,127 | 6.00% 2,296 7.00% ‘American Indian, Eskimo & Aleutian Persons 207 60% 286 80% Asian & Pacific Islander 129 40% 198 60% Other 578 | 2.00% 572 2.00% Hispanic Origin 1,007 | 3.00% 1,175 3.00% Housing Units 1980 1990 _| Percent Change Total 13,374 14,026 | 5.00% increase fiero 2)Census Characteristics Income Statistics Median Household Port Huron Per Capita Income Per Entire City: $ 11,210 $ 21,522 Per Census Tracts: 6200 $ 8,912 $ 19,732 6210 9,953 21,114 6220 10,610 25,237 6230 8,245 18,971 6240 8,534 10,143 6250 8,879 14,569 6260 9,803 21,500 6270 19,791 36,806 6280 12,030 28,636 6290 16,560 24,482 ] City of Port Huron Population by Age Total Population ............ +++ 33,694 Under five years 2,905 5 year olds 575 6 to 13 years 4,214 14 to 17 years 1,839 18 to 20 years... 1,611 21 to 24 years . 2,065 25 to 34 years . 5,920 35 to 44 years ... 4,358 45 to 54 years... 2,866 55 to 59 years . . 1,255 60 to 61 years . . 526 62 to 64 years ... 868 85 to 74 years . 2,480 75 to 84 years .. 1,615 85 years and over 587 % 17 and younger 28.29 13.93 % 65 and olderSELECTED POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR MICHIGAN: 1990 Michigan TOTAL POPULATION 9,295,297 GROUP QUARTERS INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS 112,903 SEX NURSING HOMES NIA MALE 4,512,781 OTHER PRSONS IN GROUP QUARTERS _98,789 FEMALE 4,782,516 EMERGENCY SHELTERS FOR HOMELESS N/A AGE TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 3,847,926 UNDER 5 702,554 OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS 2,421,472 STOW NIA RENTER OCCUPIED UNITS 991,859 127017 NiA 18 TO 24 1,004,527 TOTAL VACANT UNITS 428,595 25TO FOR RENT NIA 4 2,980,702 FOR SALE NIA 45 TO 54 948,119 55 TO 64 794,723 MEDIAN HOUSING VALUE $60,600 65 TO 74 635,838 15 TO 84 345,716 MEDIAN CONTRACT RENT $343 85 YEARS AND OVER 106,907 TENURE BY UNITS RACE OWNER OCCUPIED & RENTER OCCUPIED: WHITE 7,756,086 1, detached 2,673,184 BLACK 1,291,706 1, attached 130,583, AMERICAN INDIAN, ESKIMO OR ALEUT 55,638 2to4 267,767 AMERICAN INDIAN NiA S109 150,831 ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 104,983 10 or more 336,721 CHINESE. NIA 50 or more NIA FILIPINO. N/A Mobile home or trailer 288,840 JAPANESE NIA. ASIAN INDIAN NIA KOREAN NIA VIETNAMESE NIA CAMBODIAM NIA HMONG Nia. LAOTIAN NIA THAL NIA OTHER ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER N/A OTHER RACE 36,884 HISPANIC ORIGIN TOTAL 201,596 MEXICAN N/A PUERTO RICAN NIA CUBAN NIA OTHER HISPANIC NIA. TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 3,419,331 HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN NIA PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLDS 2.66 TOTAL FAMILIES 2,439,171 MARRIED COUPLE FAMILIES 1,883,143 PERSONS PER FAMILY 3.16 @)SELECTED POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR MICHIGAN: 1990 St. Clair County TOTAL POPULATION 145,607 GROUP QUARTERS INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS 1.036 SEX NURSING HOMES 803 MALE 70,858 OTHER PRSONS IN GROUP QUARTERS nL FEMALE 74,749 EMERGENCY SHELTERS FOR HOMELESS 3 AGE TOTAL HOUSING UNITS (57,494, UNDER 5 11,043, OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS 40,015 57011 16,129 RENTER OCCUPIED UNITS 12,367 127017 13,239 18 TO 24 14,090 TOTAL VACANT UNITS 4,612 2570 34 23,562 FOR RENT Los 35 To 44 21,884 FOR SALE 408 45. TO 54 15,333 55 TO 64 12,408 MEDIAN HOUSING VALUE $59,400 65 TO 74 10,539 75 TO 84 5.684 | MEDIAN CONTRACT RENT $329 85 YEARS AND OVER 1.696 TENURE BY UNITS RACE. OWNER OCCUPIED: WHITE 140,294 1, detached 34,534 BLACK 2.987 1, atached 472 AMERICAN INDIAN, ESKIMO OR ALEUT 745, 2 428 AMERICAN INDIAN 743 3109 324 ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 475 101049 202 CHINESE 38 $0 or more 2 FILIPINO 107 Mobile home or trailer 3,829 JAPANESE 36 Otter 224 ASIAN INDIAN 38 KOREAN 95, RENTER OCCUPIED: VIETNAMESE 3 1, detached 4,740 CAMBODIAM M4 1, stached 360 HMONG ° 2 1,896 LAOTIAN 15 3109 3.207 Tal 17 01049 1313 OTHER ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 6 50 oF more 559 OTHER RACE 1,106 Mobile Home or Trailer 563 Other 229 HISPANIC ORIGIN TOTAL 2,558 MEXICAN 1946 PUERTO RICAN 129 CUBAN 31 OTHER HISPANIC 452 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS $2,882, HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN 21,132, PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLDS 2.73 TOTAL FAMILIES 39,649 MARRIED COUPLE FAMILIES 32,285 PERSONS PER FAMILY 3.19 (4)SELECTED POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR MICHIGAN: 1990 City of Port Huron TOTAL POPULATION 33,504 GROUP QUARTERS INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS 590 SEX ‘NURSING HOMES 362 MALE 15,717 OTHER PRSONS IN GROUP QUARTERS 5 FEMALE 17,977 EMERGENCY SHELTERS FOR HOMELESS ‘3 AGE TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 14,026 UNDER 5 2,905 OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS 1an STO1 3,809 RENTER OCCUPIED UNITS 5,986 120 17 2,819 18 TO 24 3,676 TOTAL VACANT UNITS 868 25 TO 34 5,920 FOR RENT 476, 35 TO 44 4,358 FOR SALE 64 45 TO 54 2,866 55 TO 64 2.649 MEDIAN HOUSING VALUE $41,400 65 TO 74 2,490 75 TO 84 1,615 ‘MEDIAN CONTRACT RENT $316 85 YEARS AND OVER 587 : ‘TENURE BY UNITS RACE OWNER OCCUPIED: WHITE 30,342 1, detached 6,619 BLACK 2,296 1, attached 155 AMERICAN INDIAN, ESKIMO OR ALEUT 286 2 217 AMERICAN INDIAN 285, 309 101 ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 198 1010.49 B CHINESE 24 50 oF more 2 FILIPINO 33 Mobile home or trailer 10 JAPANESE 9 Other 45 ASIAN INDIAN 59 KOREAN 21 RENTER OCCUPIED: VIETNAMESE 1 1, detached 1,770 CAMBODIAM 4 1, attached 157 HMONG ° 2 1148 LAOTIAN 15 3109 1,889 THAL 1 10 to 49 503 OTHER ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 31 50 or more 357 OTHER RACE 572 Mobile Home or Trailer 59 Other 103 HISPANIC ORIGIN TOTAL 17s MEXICAN 913 PUERTO RICAN 38 CUBAN 16 OTHER HISPANIC 188 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 13,158 HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN 4970 PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLDS 3 TOTAL FAMILIES 8,752 MARRIED COUPLE FAMILIES 5,958 PERSONS PER FAMILY (6)City of Port Huron ‘SOUTH OF THE BLACK RIVER. ZN PREPERED BY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 1999 CENSUS TRACT MAP @SELECTED POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR MICHIGAN: 1990 * Tract 6200 ‘TOTAL POPULATION 4480 | GROUP QUARTERS ie INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ze ae ise? ‘NURSING HOMES 24 ae 2agg_| OTHER PERSONS IN GROUP QUARTERS 0 EMERGENCY SHELTERS FOR HOMELESS ° AGE UNDER 5 $6 | toraL Housine uNrTs 1783 STO Sak (OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS 760 12T017 3 RENTER OCCUPIED UNITS 859 18702 32 758 aoe TOTAL VACANT UNITS 164 35TO 44 509 FOR RENT 7 45TO 54 Bet FOR SALE 8 5570 64 350 TO 304 sseo00 aos 221 | MEDIAN HOUSING VALUE 536, 85 YEARS AND OVER 13 | MEDIAN CONTRACT RENT sia RACE ‘TENURE BY UNITS WHITE 3103 | OWNER OCCUPIED: BLACK 1148 1, detached, 7 AMERICAN INDIAN, ESKIMO OR ALEUT 0 1, atached a AMERICAN INDIAN of} 2. 7 ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 6 ie! CHINESE ° 101049 ° FILIPINO ° 500r more ° SAE ANESE! ‘i Mobile Home or Trailer 3 ‘ASIAN INDIAN 2 Other 1 KOREAN o RENTER OCCUPIED: VIETNAMESE 1 ae a ‘CAMBODIAN o 1 egachad: 38 HMONG 0 2 120 Lorian 7 3u 361 Mak 10049 62 OTHER ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER a seers a OTHER RACE iss Mobile Home or Trailer 39 HISPANIC ORIGIN on, a5 TOTAL 230 MEXICAN 27 PUERTO RICAN 10 ‘CUBAN 3 OTHER HISPANIC 30 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 1619 HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN 17 PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD 262 TOTAL FAMILIES 1161 | *The population counts set forth herein are subject to possible correction MARRIED COUPLE FAMILIES 614 | forundercount or overcount. The U.S. Deparment of Commerce is considering whether to correct these counts, if any, not later than PERSONS PER FAMILY 3.07 | July 15, 1991. @)SELECTED POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR MICHIGAN: 1990 * Tract 6210 TOTAL POPULATION aie | anour quanrens He INsrUONALZZED PERSONS 0 tne ow | _ NURSING HOMES ° ae 322 | conten rencons ty croup quanrens 3 EMERGENCY SHELTERS FOR HOMELESS 7 ace UNDER 5 3 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS: 1684 ston sot | NGaniek occUnED UNITS = RENTER OCCUPIED UNITS: 75 tatoo a e stom TOTAL VacaNT UNrrs 10 stout a Tos sm | FORRENT 7 SSTO 64 286 i: ero. a ' sero te | Meo House vaLue soiso0 85 YEARS AND OVER 40 | MEDIAN CONTRACT RENT a2? race TENURE By UnrTs were seer] Owes occuMED. BLACK at | lsenced 0: AMERICAN INDIAN, ESKIMO OR ALEUT a Avenuched e AMERICAN INDIAN a a Es ASLAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 3 309 6 CHINESE 3 100 49 ° ne 3 | Sere ° foe 1 | Metitone rte ° ASIAN INDIAN 6 Other 5 KOREAN 1 | genteR occUPED VIETNAMESE o a ee 28 CanBoDtan o | seated : sbioxe o} & = txorias 1 LL Gus mo ae 10049 55 OTHER ASIAN OR PACIFIC SLANDER Reem s ‘OTHERRACE - Mobile Home or Trailer o HISPANIC ORIGIN, oer u TOraL v0 esac 13 PUERTO Rican 3 cubaw < omen sespantc 2» TOTALSIOUsEHOLDs ss HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN 64 PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD 268 TorauFaymes 1070 | steppin ou tot ein a sue oon MARRIED COLPLE FaNALIES 720, | tormameai cr onzoone Tae U.S. Depmonen of Conners song whee crt ess ay, Oa 327 | July 15,1991. (9)SELECTED POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR MICHIGAN: 1990 * Tract 6220 oer eee ro a : sr, So tere : ance! Jas | OTHER PERSONS IN GROUP QUARTERS 0 paceeineeanaeel el UNDER 5 38° | TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 1765 TOU at ‘OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS 1168 aa 7 18TO 24 464 oe sre a : 45TOS4 am FOR SALE 6 a “ ern * | souuenouama viene ss 85 YEARS AND OVER 49 | MEDIAN CONTRACT RENT suis ih ceva AMERICAN INDIAN, ESKIMO OR ALEUT 32 1, attached 6 AMERICAN INDIAN 32 2 8 ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 4 309 Ww Gana ¢ | gee : nS a ; ASIAN INDIAN 0 Other 5 an eae ‘VIETNAMESE oO a occu 7 29 canBODLAN of béeashet A on : Se eee Het ened : CTHER RACE 2 ‘Mobile Home or Trailer oO HISPANIC ORIGIN Oates, 2 so z a 7 ee ; Poe ‘ Sal 2 acid ae be ey ee rapeame UE ‘Eocene ge rc ieee Saee ene eee vs R FAMILY July 15, 1991, sede (10)SELECTED POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR MICHIGAN: 1990 * Tract 6230 ‘AL POPULATION x99 | Group quarters ror ale INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS: 0 SEX, 160s ‘NURSING HOMES 0 MALE, 1794 OTHER PERSONS IN GROUP QUARTERS. o EMALE EMERGENCY SHELTERS FOR HOMELESS o AGE UNDER 5 ob TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 1354 STOIL ‘0! OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS 680 i707 pas RENTER OCCUPIED UNITS 600 187024 “0 ot Puce 432 | TOTAL VACANT UNITS ™ Breet FOR RENT 34 45 TO 54 24 FOR SALE 8 ssTOst ze 6570 74 18: ‘ ae eu 123. | MEDIAN HOUSING VALUE 85 YEARS AND OVER 30 | MEDIAN CONTRACT RENT 328 RACE ‘TENURE BY UNITS WHITE sas | owner occume: = BLACK detach a 5 AMERICAN INDIAN, ESKIMO OR ALEUT 35 | Lamas s AMERICAN INDIAN 34 no a ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER 9 ? CHINESE 7 woe 2 FILPINO ° or more JAPANESE 0 Mobile Home or Trailer : ASIAN INDIAN o Other KOREAN a RENTER OCCUPIED: VIETNAMESE o fidesanhaat 27 ‘CAMBODIAN 9 1, attached 2 HMONG ° 2 7 LAOTIAN 0 3109 168 THAL 2 10049 S2 OTHER ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER ° eo 5 OTHER RACE 56 Mobile Home or Trailer 1 HISPANIC ORIGIN Oe - TOTAL 13 MEXICAN 38 PUERTO RICAN 2 CUBAN 2 ‘OTHER HISPANIC 2 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 1280 HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN 566 PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD 2.66 ‘TOTAL FAMILIES S05 |The opto comt fo cin suet pone omen MARRIED COUPLE FAMILIES 546 | for undercount or overcount. The U.S. Department of Commerce is considering whether w core: these counts, if my, nt ler then 319 | July 15,191. PERSONS PER FAMILY qa)SELECTED POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS FOR MICHIGAN: 1990 * Tract 6240 -TOTAL POPULATION 2187 GROUP QUARTERS SEX INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS 38 Pre as NURSING HOMES 19 FEMALE 1202 OTHER PERSONS IN GROUP QUARTERS. ory EMERGENCY SHELTERS FOR HOMELESS 3 AGE UNDER 5 241 | TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 1139) S7OH be ‘OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS 190 127017 12 RENTER OCCUPIED UNITS 858 1870.24 346 49 2s ‘TOTAL VACANT UNITS a 387044 205 aa a 457054 169 fora 7 557064 142 657074 168 pena 122 | MEDIAN HOUSING VALUE 3293300 85 YEARS AND OVER “4 | MEDIAN contract RENT sn RACE ‘TENURE BY UNITS WHITE 2035 | OWNER OCCUPIED: : BLACK @ 1, detached 1s AMERICAN INDIAN, ESKIMOOOR ALEUT 30 | Samacted 7 AMERICAN INDIAN 30 a 6 ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER. 9 309 CHINESE 2 Ww49 ° HIUPINO 5 S0ormore ° JAPANESE a Mobile Home or Trailer ° ASIAN INDIAN 0 (Other 1 KOREAN 3 RENTER OCCUPIED: VIETNAMESE ° : a CAMBODIAN o ine : HMONG ° ci is a ; 3109 405 pal 1049 107 OTHER ASIAN OR PACIFIC ISLANDER ° Pa - OTHER RACE “ Mobile Home or Trailer o HISPANIC ORIGIN: bar = TOTAL no MEXICAN 86 PUERTO RICAN 3 CUBAN 3 OTHER HISPANIC 8 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 1088 HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN 321 PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD 203 TOTAL FAMILIES 467 _ | +The population counts set fonh herein are subject o possible correction ‘MARRIED COUPLE FAMILIES 229 | forundercount or overcount. The U.S. Department of Commerce is considering whether to correct these cours if any, not Iatrthan PERSONS PER FAMILY 2.94 | suly 15, 1991. a2)Port Huron Area School District Enrollment Count 1999-2000 School Year BUILDING Cleveland Elementary School 269 Crull Elementary School 692 Thomas Edison Elementary School 403 Garfield Elementary Schoo! 495 Harrison Elementary Schoo! 318 Indian Woods Elementary Schoo! 383 Keewahdin Elementary School 460 Kimball Elementary School 259 Lakeport Elementary School 315 Michigamme Elementary School 450 Roosevelt Elementary School 466 Sparlingville Elementary Schoo! 341 Woodrow Wilson Elementary School 539 Total Elementary Schools Adult Ed Pupils Adult Ed Participants Central Middle Schoo! Chippewa Middle Schoo! 7m Fort Gratiot Middle Schoo! 692 Holland Middle Schoo! 569 Total Middle Schools | 2,850 Port Huron High School Port Huron Northern High School Total High Schools | 3,489 Port Huron South School 185 Juvenile Detention 31 GRAND ToTat | 12,147EXHIBIT DTRAFFIC COUNT REQUEST 10th Street - Between Griswold & Oak Sts. 10th Street - Between Griswold & Oak Sts. 13th Street - North of Griswold St. 13th Street - Between Lapeer & Jenks Sts, 13th Street - Between Court & Wall Sts. 16th Street - South of Beard St. ‘16th Street - Between Francis & Gordon Sts. 16th Street - At The Railroad Tracks 16th Street - Between Miller & Wells Sts. ‘16th Street - Between Electric & Military Sts. 24th Street - North of Dove Road 24TH STREET - North of Dove Road 24TH STREET - Between Electric & Buena Vista Griswold Street - East of 20th St. Griswold - Between 16th & 17th Sts. ADT. 13222 ADT. 14817 ADT. 3073 AD: 3553 ADT. 3562 ADT. 777 ADT. 2116 ADT. 7935 ADT. 2346 ADT. 3044 ADT. 12718 ADT. 14247 ADT. 6197 ADT. 7311 ADT. 7322 4/90 DATE 9/96 DATE 08/87 DATE 08/98 DATE 08/98 DATE og/a7 DATE 09/91 DATE 05/97 DATE 09/98 DATE 09/98 DATE 10/89 DATE 06/98 DATE 6/98 DATE 09/96a EXHIBIT EZONING DISTRICTS (21 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (51 & 2 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CE) MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL [Ga] W-RISE MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL B NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (-1 COMMERCIAL } M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ae El 2 Heavy inpusTRIAL EB wanna oistaict EB CENTRAL Business DistRIcT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT ETRICT BOUNDARIES N00 City of Port Huron SOUTH OF THE BLACK ANER “ge oe are = eee PREPARED BY OEPARTUENT OF PLAWANG, 1999