Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pilar Bsce1b Retraction Rizal
Pilar Bsce1b Retraction Rizal
Pilar
BSCE-1B
Identify the argument and the evidence of those who are claiming that Rizal retracted against
those who are saying otherwise.
Rizal retracted
Your observation
He asserts so in his statement even though he believes Rizal relinquished his status as a
mason. The hero of the country is highly regarded by Dr. Augusto De Viana. He continued
by saying that Rizal's accomplishments will survive notwithstanding his retractions.
Additionally, Rizal broadens our viewpoint on nationalism.
Rizal retracted
Your observation
Given that they were present, the Jesuits' allegations strongly imply that Rizal's retraction is
accurate. The comments and claims made, however, are viewed as being unreliable because
they might be biased and opinionated. In addition, nobody other than the law enforcement
officials saw the actual copy of the retraction document. As a result, the Jesuits' documents
are only copies and insufficient to back up their claim.
Your observation
The account of Rizal's retraction document by Rafael Palma is in stark contrast to Fr.
Balaguer. By presenting the reasons why the retraction paper is a deception committed by the
Catholic, he confirms his claim that it does not accurately represent Rizal's traits and views.
One of the things that caught my attention was the claim that Rizal was buried in a Catholic
cemetery on the ground without a burial by Catholics. This phrase argues that Rizal should
be accepted as a Catholic if he truly repented and made amends with them.
Rizal Did Not Retracted
Your observation
By evaluating and comprehending Runes and de la Rosa's statements that Rizal "did not
retract," I can say that their analysis and research significantly add to the topic's clarification.
Since they found a number of "Inconsistencies" in the actual letter that other claimants
thought Rizal penned, it significantly altered many people's ideas, including mine. You see, a
good source must be both credible and reliable as well as consistent in order for us to obtain
it. Because of this, the contradictions (such as the date, the hired Roman Rogue, and the
additional words) had a very strong impact on the other arguments and allegations. Evidence
of this nature is sufficiently persuasive to change the subject, especially in the understandings of
many.
Rizal Did Not Retracted
Your observation
Along with the earlier contention made by Runes and de la Rosa, this assertion by Ricardo
Pascual has also contributed significantly to the debate. Since it reveals that Pascual found
that Rizal's handwriting when he was alive was different from that used in the Letter of
Retraction, this is significant. The possibility that Rizal did not create or write the letter is one
of the many "what ifs" that result from this. Therefore, I may say that this claim significantly
improved the argument that Rizal did not retract.