Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PNP Handout1
PNP Handout1
Nuclear Physics
Handout #1
Introduction
Problem Sheets
Appendices
In this section...
Course content
Practical information
Matter
Forces
Practical information
Website holds course information, notes, appendices and problem sheets
www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/~chpotter/particleandnuclearphysics/mainpage.html
Books
Introduction to High Energy Physics, Perkins
Introductory Nuclear Physics, Krane
Matter
1
In the Standard Model, all matter is made of spin 2 fundamental particles.
There are two types, each with 3 generations:
Electron e− lepton −1
Neutrino νe lepton 0
Up quark u quark + 23
Down quark d quark − 13
The proton and neutron are simply the lowest energy bound states of a system
of three quarks: essentially all an atomic or nuclear physicist needs.
Proton Neutron
(p) (n)
Leptons are fermions which do not interact via the strong interaction.
Flavour Charge [e] Mass Strong Weak EM
1st generation
Spin 12 fermions
e− −1 0.511 MeV/c 2 7 3 3
νe 0 < 2 eV/c 2 7 3 7 6 distinct flavours
2nd generation 3 charged leptons: e −, µ−, τ −.
µ− −1 105.7 MeV/c 2 7 3 3 3 neutral leptons: νe , νµ, ντ .
νµ 0 < 0.19 MeV/c 2 7 3 7 Antimatter particles e +, ν¯e etc
3rd generation e is stable,
τ− −1 1777.0 MeV/c 2 7 3 3 µ and τ are unstable.
ντ 0 < 18.2 MeV/c 2 7 3 7
Neutrinos are stable and almost massless. Only know limits on ν masses, but have
measured mass differences to be < 1 eV/c 2. Not completely true, see later...
Charged leptons experience only the electromagnetic & weak forces.
Neutrinos experience only the weak force.
Matter Quarks
Single, free quarks have never been observed. They are always confined in
bound states called hadrons.
Macroscopically, hadrons behave as almost point-like composite particles.
Hadrons have two types:
Mesons (q q̄): Bound states of a quark and an antiquark.
Mesons have integer spin 0, 1, 2... bosons.
e.g. π + ≡ (u d¯), charge = (+ 32 + + 13 )e = +1e
π − ≡ (ūd ), charge = (− 23 + − 13 )e = −1e; antiparticle of π +
√
π 0 ≡ (u ū − d d¯)/ 2, charge = 0; is its own antiparticle.
Baryons (qqq): Bound states of three quarks.
Baryons have half-integer spin 12 , 32 ... fermions.
e.g. p ≡ (udu), charge = (+ 32 + − 13 + + 23 )e = +1e
n ≡ (dud ), charge = (− 13 + + 23 + − 13 )e = 0
Antibaryons e.g. p̄ ≡ (ū d¯ū), n̄ ≡ (d¯ū d¯)
Matter Nuclei
Notation: Nuclide AZ X.
e.g. 11H or p: Z =1, N=0, A=1
2
1H or d : Z =1, N=1, A=2
4
2He or α: Z =2, N=2, A=4
208
82 Pb: Z =82, N=126, A=208
Only hydrogen, helium and lithium were formed in the Big Bang.
All other elements are formed in stars.
Natural elements, H(Z =1) to U(Z =92).
Prof. Tina Potter 1. Introduction 13
Many more
nuclides
than
elements.
Colour
coded
according
to decay
mode.
~ q1q2~r
F = 2
r
Newton: “...that one body should act upon another at a distance, through a vacuum,
without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their force may be conveyed
from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has, in
philosophical matters, a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it. Gravity must be
caused by an agent, acting constantly according to certain laws, but whether this agent be
material or immaterial, I leave to the consideration of my reader.”
∆E ∆t ∼ ~, E = mc 2
~ ~c ~
⇒ mc 2 ∼ ∼ ⇒r ∼
∆t r mc
Summary
Up next...
Section 2: Kinematics, Decays and Reactions.
In this section...
Natural units
Symmetries and conservation laws
Relativistic kinematics
Particle properties
Decays
Cross-sections
Scattering
Resonances
Atomic/nuclear masses are often quoted in unified (or atomic) mass units
1 unified mass unit (u) = (mass of a 12
6 C atom) / 12
1 u = 1 g/NA = 1.66 × 10−27kg = 931.5 MeV/c 2
Lorentz invariance: laws of physics stay the same for all frames moving with a uniform velocity.
Gauge invariance: observable quantities unchanged (charge, E , v ) when a field is transformed.
Prof. Tina Potter 2. Kinematics, Decays and Reactions 6
Relativistic Kinematics Special Relativity
Nuclear reactions
Low energy, typically K.E. O(10 MeV) nucleon rest energies.
⇒ non-relativistic formulae ok
Exception: always treat β-decay relativistically
(me ∼ 0.5 MeV < 1.3 MeV ∼ mn − mp )
Particle physics
High energy, typically K.E. O(100 GeV) rest mass energies.
⇒ relativistic formulae usually essential.
Interesting cases
when a particle is at rest, p~ = 0, E = m,
when a particle is massless, m = 0, E = |~ p |,
when a particle is ultra-relativistic E m, E ∼ |~
p |.
Kinetic energy (K.E., or T ) is the extra energy due to motion
T = E − m = (γ − 1)m
in the non-relativistic limit β 1, T = 21 mv 2
0 0 0 −1
~ B µ = (B 0, B)
Scalar product of two four-vectors Aµ = (A0, A), ~ is invariant:
Rate of decays dN
= −λN(0)e−λt = −λN(t)
dt
Assuming the nuclei only decay. More complicated if they are also being created.
dN
Activity A(t) = = λN(t)
dt
It’s rather common in nuclear physics to use the half-life (i.e. the time
over which 50% of the particles decay). In particle physics, we usually
quote the mean life. They are simply related:
N(0) ln 2
N(τ1/2) = = N(0)e−λτ1/2 ⇒ τ1/2 = = 0.693τ
2 λ
Prof. Tina Potter 2. Kinematics, Decays and Reactions 13
A decay is the transition from one quantum state (initial state) to another
(final or daughter).
The transition rate is given by Fermi’s Golden Rule:
Decay of Resonances
QM description of decaying states
Consider a state formed at t = 0 with energy E0 and mean lifetime τ
ψ(t) = ψ(0)e−iE0t e−t/2τ |ψ(t)|2 = |ψ(0)|2 e−t/τ
i.e. the probability density decays exponentially (as required).
The frequencies (i.e. energies, since E = ω if ~ = 1) present in the
wavefunction are given by the Fourier transform of ψ(t), i.e.
Z ∞ Z ∞
1
f (ω) = f (E ) = ψ(t)eiEt dt = ψ(0)e−t(iE0+ 2τ )eiEt dt
0 0
Z ∞
1 iψ(0)
= ψ(0)e−t(i(E0−E )+ 2τ ) dt =
0 (E0 − E ) − 2τi
P
The total decay rate is given by λ= f λf
1
This determines the average lifetime τ= λ
P
The total width of a particle state Γ=λ= f λf
σ is defined as the reaction rate per target particle Γ, per unit incident flux Φ
Γ = Φσ
where the flux Φ is the number of beam particles passing through unit area per
second.
Γ is given by Fermi’s Golden Rule (previously used λ).
Differential Cross-section
The angular distribution of the scattered
particles is not necessarily uniform
** n.b. dΩ can be considered in position space, or
momentum space **
where the σi are called partial cross-sections for different final states.
Types of interaction
Elastic scattering: a + b → a + b
only the momenta of a and b change
Inelastic scattering: a + b → c + d
final state is not the same as initial state
Scattering in QM
Consider a beam of particles scattering from a fixed potential V (r ):
q~ = p~f − p~i
“momentum transfer”
1 Normalisation
Normalise wave-functions to one particle in a box of side L:
|ψ|2 = N 2 = 1/L3
N = (1/L)3/2
Scattering in QM
2 Matrix Element
This contains the interesting physics of the interaction:
Z Z
Mfi = hψf |Ĥ|ψi i = ψf∗Ĥψi d3~r = Ne−i p~f .~r V (~r )Nei p~i .~r d3~r
Z
1
Mfi = 3 e−i~q .~r V (~r ) d3~r where q~ = p~f − p~i
L
3 Incident Flux
Consider a “target” of area A and a beam of particles travelling at velocity
vi towards the target. Any incident particle within a volume vi A will cross
the target area every second. vi A
Φ= n = vi n
A
where n is the number density of incident particles = 1 per L3
Flux = number of incident particles crossing unit area per second
Φ = vi /L3
Prof. Tina Potter 2. Kinematics, Decays and Reactions 28
Scattering in QM
4 Density of States also known as “phase space”
For a box of side L, states are given by the periodic boundary conditions:
2π
p~ = (px , py , pz ) = (nx , ny , nz )
L
Each state occupies a volume (2π/L)3 in p space (neglecting spin).
Number of states
between
p and
p + dp in solid angle dΩ
3 3
L 3 L
dN = d p~ = p 2 dp dΩ ( d3p~ = p 2 dp dΩ)
2π 2π 3
dN L
∴ ρ(p) = = p 2 dΩ
dp 2π
dE p
Density of states in energy E 2 = p 2 + m2 ⇒ 2E dE = 2p dp ⇒ dp = E
3
dN dN dp L E
ρ(E ) = = = p 2 dΩ
dE dp dE 2π p
3
L
For relativistic scattering (E ∼ p) ρ(E ) = E 2 dΩ
2π
Prof. Tina Potter 2. Kinematics, Decays and Reactions 29
Scattering in QM
Putting all the parts together:
Z 2 3
1 L3 1 L
dσ = 2π |Mfi |2 ρ(Ef ) = 2π 3 e−i~q .~r V (~r ) d3~r pf Ef dΩ
Φ vi L 2π
Z 2
dσ 1 −i~q .~r 3
= e V (~
r ) d r
~ pf Ef
dΩ (2π)2vi
q~ = p~f − p~i
|~q |2 = |~
pi |2 + |~
pf |2 − 2~
pi .~
pf
elastic scattering, |~
pi | = |~
pf | = |~
p|
θ
p |2(1 − cos θ) = 4E 2 sin2
= 2|~
2
dσ 4E 2Z 2α2 4E 2Z 2α2 Z 2 α2
= = =
dΩ q4 16E 4 sin4 θ2 4E 2 sin4 θ2
Prof. Tina Potter 2. Kinematics, Decays and Reactions 31
Resonance Cross-Section
Consider one intermediate state described by
ψ(t) = ψ(0)eiE0t e−t/2τ = ψ(0)e−i (E0−i 2 )t
Γ
Rate of decay of Z :
2 2 4πpf2
pf2 2
ΓZ →f = 2π |MZf | ρ(Ef ) = 2π |MZf | = |MZf |
(2π)3 vf πvf
Rate of formation of Z :
2 2 4πpi2
pi2 2
Γi→Z = 2π |MiZ | ρ(Ei ) = 2π |MiZ | = |MiZ |
(2π)3 vi πvi
nb. |MZi |2 = |MiZ |2.
Hence MiZ and MZf can be expressed in terms of partial widths.
Prof. Tina Potter 2. Kinematics, Decays and Reactions 34
Resonance Cross-Section
dσ pf2 2
Putting everything together: = |M fi |
dΩ (2π)2 vi vf
Resonance Cross-Section
πg ΓZ →i ΓZ →f
Breit-Wigner Cross-Section σ= .
pi2 (E − E0)2 + Γ42
The g factor takes into account the spin
2JZ + 1
a + b → Z∗ → c + d, g=
(2Ja + 1)(2Jb + 1)
and is the ratio of the number of spin states for the resonant state to the total number of spin
states for the a+b system,
i.e. the probability that a+b collide in the correct spin state to form Z∗.
The Z boson
ΓZ ∼ 2.5 GeV
1
τ= = 0.4 GeV−1
ΓZ
= 0.4 × ~
= 2.5 × 10−25 s
(~ = 6.6×10−25 GeV s)
Summary
Up next...
Section 3: Colliders and Detectors
Relativistic kinematics
2. Natural Units, Tripos A-style question.
Explain what is meant by natural units and the Heaviside-Lorentz system.
(a) The reduced Compton wavelength of a particle can be written in natural units as
1
λ̄ =
m
where m is the mass of the particle. Estimate λ̄ for a pion (mπ = 139.6 MeV/c2 ). Quote
your answer in natural units and then convert to SI units.
(b) The total cross-section for e+ e− annihilation can be written in natural units as
4 πα2
σ=
3 s
1 √
where α = 137 is the fine structure constant and s is the centre-of-mass energy. Estimate
σ at a centre-of-mass energy equal to the Z mass (mZ = 91.2 GeV/c2 ). Calculate your
answer in natural units and then convert to barns.
(c) Use dimensional analysis to add the appropriate factors of ~, 0 and c in the formulae for
λ in (a) and for σ in (b), and then do the calculations directly in SI units.
[Note that ~c = 197 MeV fm; 1 barn = 10−28 m2 ]
3. Relativistic Kinematics, Tripos B-style question.
Consider the decay of a particle X into two particles a and b.
(a) Show that, in the rest frame of X, the energy of particle a can be written in natural units
as
m2 + m2a − m2b
Ea = X
2mX
where mi is the mass of particle i. What is the equivalent expression for the energy of
particle b ? What is the energy if the final state particles are the same (or antiparticles
of each other)?
1
(b) Show that the magnitude of the momentum of particle a can be written in natural units
as p
m4X + m4a + m4b − 2m2X m2a − 2m2X m2b − 2m2a m2b
pa = .
2mX
What is the equivalent expression for the momentum of particle b ? What is the value of
the momentum if the final state particles are the same (or antiparticles of each other) ?
Show that if one of the final state particles is massless, e.g. mb = 0, then the expression
for the momentum simplifies to
m2 − m2a
pa = X
2mX
√
[Note: replacing mX by the centre-of-mass energy, s, in the above gives the equivalent
expressions for collision processes.]
(c) The HERA collider at DESY provided head-on collisions between an electron beam of
27.5 GeV and a proton beam of 920 GeV. What energy of electron beam colliding with a
fixed target would be required to obtain the same centre-of-mass energy? Would HERA
have had sufficient energy to have produced a Higgs boson of mass 125 GeV?
2
(a) The two photons from the π 0 → γγ decay are both seen to convert to e+ e− pairs. Show
that the process γ → e+ e− is kinematically forbidden in vacuo. Explain why the con-
version process can take place in the presence of matter, and draw a Feynman diagram
representing photon conversion in material, as seen in the figure.
(b) The π − and Ξ0 from the Ω− decay have momenta of 281 MeV/c and 1906 MeV/c respec-
tively. Their spatial opening angle is 71◦ . Calculate the mass of the Ω− and compute its
momentum.
(c) The length of the Ω− flight path is 2.5 cm. Calculate the proper lifetime of the Ω− .
n + 197 Au → 198 Au + γ
198 198
The nuclide Au undergoes β decay to Hg with a mean lifetime of 4 days.
198
(a) How many atoms of Au will be present after 6 days of irradiation?
198
(b) How many atoms of Hg will be present after 6 days assuming that the neutron beam
has no effect on the Hg?
198
(c) What is the equilibrium number of Au nuclei?
(a) Calculate the branching fraction for the decay K+ → π + π 0 , given that the partial width
for this decay is 1.2 × 10−8 eV and the mean lifetime of the K+ meson is 1.2 × 10−8 s.
(b) A beam of K+ mesons of momentum 10 GeV is produced. What fraction of them will
remain undecayed 100 m downstream?
3
(c) When the K+ mesons decay to π + π 0 , what are the minimum and maximum laboratory
energies of the produced π + mesons?
Explain the meaning of the symbols in this equation, and outline its derivation.
The maximum value of the cross-section for radiative capture of neutrons in 123 Te (i.e. the
process n +123 Te −→124 Te + γ) is 75 kb and is reached at a neutron energy of 2.2 eV, where
the elastic width Γn is 0.0104 eV and the radiative width Γγ is 0.105 eV. The spin of 123 Te in
its ground state is J = 21 . What is the elastic cross-section at resonance and what is the spin
of the compound nucleus formed?
1
To determine the number of particles that interact one must know the density of target particles and the thickness
of the target. Instead of giving two numbers which simply have to be multiplied, it is common practice to quote the
target thickness multiplied by the target density. This gives a target “thickness” in units of mass/area.
4
Numerical answers
2. (a) 7.16 × 10−3 MeV−1 , 1.41 fm; (b) 2.68 × 10−8 GeV−2 , 0.0104 nb
√
3. (c) s = 318 GeV; 54 TeV.
4. (b) 1689 MeV/c2 , 2015 MeV/c ; (c) 70 ps
5. (a) 2.7x1015 ; (b) 2.5x1015 ; (c) 3.46x1015
6. (a) 0.087 mCi; (b) 33.5 minutes
7. (a) 21.8% (b) 0.25, [0.88, 9.18] GeV.
8. (a) 99,311 particles s−1 ; (b) 510 s−1 ; (c) 2.03x10−5 particles m−2 s−1
9. 7.4 kb; J = 1
Breit-Wigner resonances, production and decay rates: 2018 A1(a), 2015 3, 2005 (3) A3
5
T. Potter
Lent/Easter Terms 2022
Muon
Spectrometer magnet
HCAL
ECAL
Tracker
(a) e+ e− → µ+ µ− e+ e−
(b) e+ e− → µ+ µ− γ
(c) e+ e− → ν ν̄γ
(d) e+ e− → τ + τ − , where the taus decay as τ − → e− ν̄e ντ and τ + → π + π 0 ν̄τ
(e) e+ e− → π + np̄π 0 K + K −
(a) In an experiment, the momentum measurement accuracy of the tracking detector is 1% for
1 GeV muons. What is the momentum accuracy for 20 GeV muons in the same apparatus?
1
(b) The energy resolution for 1 GeV electrons in the electromagetic calorimeter is 0.5%. What
is the energy resolution for 10 GeV electrons?
(a) The π 0 (JP = 0− ) decays predominantly to γγ but is also seen to decay to e+ e− γ (“Dalitz
decay”), to e+ e− e+ e− and to e+ e− with branching fractions of 1.2%, 3.2×10−5 and 2×10−7
respectively. Draw the leading order Feynman diagrams for each of these decays. Based
on the coupling constants involved (ignoring propagator effects etc.), give rough estimates
of the branching fractions for each decay.
(b) The ρ0 (JP = 1− ) decays to e+ e− with a branching fraction of 4×10−5 . Draw the Feynman
diagram for this decay and comment on the difference between the π 0 → e+ e− and ρ0 →
e+ e− partial widths.
[The π 0 and ρ0 lifetimes are 8.4 × 10−17 s and 4.4 × 10−24 s respectively.]
2
occurs and destroys them. (The fact that capture normally occurs in an s-state is established
from studies of the X-rays emitted in the transitions before capture). Given that the deuteron
has spin-parity J P = 1+ and the pion has spin 0, show that these observations imply that the
pion has negative intrinsic parity.
(a) Verify the quark model predictions given in the lectures for the following meson masses:
Meson Calculated Observed
(MeV) (MeV)
π 140 138
K 484 496
η 559 549
ρ 780 776
ω 780 783
K∗ 896 892
φ 1032 1020
[Assume mu =md =310 MeV, ms =483 MeV and that the spin-spin interaction coefficient
A= 0.0615 GeV3 in this case.]
What would the model predict for the mass of the η 0 meson (measured mass 958 MeV)?
+
(b) What must be the total spin of any pair of quarks in the baryons in the JP = 32 decuplet?
Hence predict the masses of the decuplet baryons and compare your predictions with the
measured values.
[Assume in this case mu =md =360 MeV, ms =540 MeV and the spin-spin interaction coefficient
A= 0.026 GeV3 .]
(a) Assuming all the quarks are in `=0 states what must be the total spin of the two u quarks
in the proton? (Give reasons for your answer).
(b) Hence show that the wave function for a proton in the sz =+ 12 state can be written as
1
√ (2u ↑u ↑d ↓ − u ↑u ↓d ↑ − u ↓u ↑d ↑)
6
3
(e) Consider now the magnetic moments of the Σ+ (uus) and Σ− (dds) baryons, which are
also members of the spin- 21 octet. Show that
4
µΣ+ − µΣ− = [µp − µn ] .
5
Test using measured values: µΣ+ = 2.458 ± 0.010µN , µΣ− = −1.160 ± 0.025µN .
(a) ρ0 → π 0 γ
(b) ρ0 → π + π −
(c) ρ0 → π 0 π 0
(d) ρ0 → e+ e−
In each case, draw an appropriate Feynman diagram and determine whether the process is
allowed or forbidden. By considering the strength of the forces involved, list the decay modes
in order of expected rate.
The ratio of partial widths Γ(ρ0 → π 0 γ)/Γ(ω 0 → π 0 γ) is approximately 0.1 while the ratio
Γ(ρ0 → e+ e− )/Γ(ω 0 → e+ e− ) is approximately 10. Suggest an explanation for these observa-
tions.
¯ for both π 0 and ρ0 , and √1 [uū + dd]
[The quark wavefunctions for the mesons are √1 [uū − dd] ¯
2 2
for ω 0 .]
4
The observed width (a few MeV) of the J/ψ resonance peak is predominantly caused by the
energy spread inherent in the e+ , e− beams at each measured point. The relative centre-of-
mass energy between measurement points is however known very precisely (to about 1 part in
104 ). The actual J/ψ width is much smaller than the observed width, but can be extracted
from the data as follows:
(a) The Breit-Wigner formula for the scattering of two particles of spin s1 and s2 in the region
of a resonance of spin J is:
λ2 (2J + 1) Γi Γf
σ(E) =
4π (2s1 + 1)(2s2 + 1) [(E − E0 )2 + Γ2 /4]
where λ is the de Broglie wavelength of the incoming particles in the centre of mass frame,
E is the centre of mass energy, E0 is the resonance energy, Γ is the total width of the
5
resonance and Γi (Γf ) is the partial width for decay into the initial (final) state. Show
that, for the production of the J/ψ resonance in e+ e− collisions, the integrated elastic
cross-section under the resonance peak is given by
Z
3
σ 0 ≡ σel (E)dE ≈ λ2 B 2 Γ
8
1
Note that the measured cross-sections contain a significant non-resonant contribution which must be subtracted.
Note also that the scales of the graphs are logarithmic.
6
Numerical answers
11. (a)20%; (b)0.16%.
13. (a) 1, 0.028, 5 × 10−5 , 5 × 10−5 (just counting powers of α); (b) 1.56 µeV, 6 keV
14. σ(pp̄) = 17σ(π + p)
16. (a) m(η 0 ) = 349 MeV/c2 ; (b) S=1, m(∆) = 1.230 GeV/c2 , m(Σ∗ ) = 1.383 GeV/c2 , m(Ξ) =
1.535 GeV/c2 , m(Ω− ) = 1.687 GeV/c2
17. (a) S=1; (d) µp /µn = −1.5, Mass of quark = 330 MeV/c2
19. (c) 50.4%; (d) using σ 0 ≈ 500 nb MeV, B ≈ 0.065 should obtain Γ ≈ 70 keV, Γee ≈ 4.6 keV
Feynman Diagrams: 2016 3(a), 2010 3, 2008 A4 2008 (3) A4, 2009 (3) A1(b), 2010 (3) A1(c)
Hadron physics and quark model: 2018 B3, 2017 4, 2016 1(b)
7
T. Potter
Lent/Easter Terms 2022
Weak Interactions
The actual ratios are approximately 1.02 : 1 : 3.5. Suggest a possible explanation.
Estimate the mean lifetime of the τ lepton, given that the branching fraction for τ − → e− ν¯e ντ
is 18%. You may assume the decay rate for X → e− ν¯e νX is given by Sargent’s Rule
G2F E05
Γ=
60π 3
.
[You may use mτ = 1.777 GeV/c2 , mµ = 0.106 GeV/c2 and take the mean µ lifetime to be
2.197 × 10−6 s. ]
(a) Draw the Feynman diagram for the simplest such production process.
(b) Calculate the minimum energy of the ν̄τ which would permit τ -lepton production.
(c) What is the energy of the produced τ -lepton when the ν̄τ has this threshold energy ?
(d) How far will the τ -lepton travel on average before decaying, given that its mean lifetime
is 290 fs ?
[The masses of τ + , proton and neutron are 1.777 GeV/c2 , 0.938 GeV/c2 and 0.940 GeV/c2
respectively.]
1
[ The strange hadrons have quark compositions and masses Ω− (sss) 1.67 GeV, Ξ0 (uss) 1.31 GeV,
¯ 498 MeV, Λ0 (uds) 1.12 GeV]
Ξ− (dss) 1.32 GeV, K0 (sd)
Electroweak Unification
(a) In lectures we deduced that the couplings of the Z boson to fermions should be of the
form:
e
gZ [I3 − Q sin2 θW ] where gZ = .
sin θW cos θW
In this expression, Q is the electric charge (in units of e), I3 is the weak isospin of the
fermion species and helicity state being considered and the weak mixing angle is given
by sin2 θW ≈ 0.23. The decay rate into f f¯ (assumed massless compared with the Z) is
proportional to (gL2 + gR2 ) where gL and gR are the couplings to left-handed and right-
handed fermions respectively. Compare the Z decay rates to pairs of charged lepton pairs
of each species, neutrino-antineutrino pairs, and to u-like and d-like quark-antiquark pairs.
Hence predict the branching fractions for Z decay to τ + τ − , to neutrinos and to hadrons.
(b) In the OPAL experiment at LEP the cross-section for e+ e− → τ + τ − was measured at
various centre-of-mass energies. Some of the results are shown below. Plot these data
and make estimates of the Z boson mass, mZ , the total width of the Z boson, ΓZ , and
the partial decay width to τ + τ − , Γτ , (assuming lepton universality of the Neutral Cur-
rent). Compare the branching fraction for Z → τ + τ − with your predictions from (a), and
comment.
Why is the measured resonance curve asymmetric? Indicate what other effects need to be
taken into account when accurately determining mZ , ΓZ and Γτ
(c) Estimate the total decay width, ΓZ , and the lifetime of the Z boson using the resonant
cross-section ratio,
σ(e+ e− → Z → hadrons)
= 20.7,
σ(e+ e− → Z → µ+ µ− )
and the measured values of the Z partial decay widths, Γ(Z → µ+ µ− ) = 83.3 MeV and
Γ(Z → νµ ν¯µ ) = 166.5 MeV. Make clear any assumptions you make.
2
24. W Width, Tripos A-style question.
The number of neutrino species can be estimated from the total width of the W boson. Using
the Standard Model prediction of the partial width for W− → e− ν̄e decays,
GF M3W
Γ(W− → e− ν̄e ) = √ ,
2 6π
the mass of the W boson, MW = 80.385 ± 0.015 GeV/c2 and the total width, ΓW = 2.085 ±
0.042 GeV, estimate the number of light neutrino species. Make clear your assumptions.
[GF = 1.2 × 10−5 GeV−2 . ]
(a) νe e− → νe e−
(b) ν̄e e− → ν̄e e−
(c) νµ e− → νµ e−
(d) ν̄µ e− → ν̄µ e−
(e) νe n → e− p
Neutrino Oscillations
(a) Show that if there are two neutrino mass eigenstates ν2 and ν3 with masses m2 and m3
and energies E2 and E3 , mixed so that
νµ = ν2 cos θ + ν3 sin θ
ντ = −ν2 sin θ + ν3 cos θ
then the number of muon neutrinos observed at a distance L from the muon source is
2 2 2 2 E3 − E2 L
|νµ (L)| = |νµ (L = 0)| × 1 − sin (2θ) sin .
2~ c
3
(b) If m2 and m3 are very much less than the neutrino momentum, p, show that
2
2 2 2 2 (m2 − m23 )L
|νµ (L)| ≈ |νµ (L = 0)| × 1 − sin (2θ) sin A
p
where A is a constant.
(c) In 2005 the MINOS experiment started to study neutrino oscillations by pointing a beam of
1-5 GeV/c muon neutrinos from Fermilab, Illinois, at the 5400 ton MINOS far dectector
in the SOUDAN mine in Minnesota, 730 km away. The experiment aimed to make a
precise measurement of m23 − m22 .
Sketch the expected energy spectrum of muon neutrinos at the MINOS far detector if
sin2 (2θ) = 0.90 and m23 − m22 = 2.5 × 10−3 (eV/c2 )2 . Assume that the energy spectum of
neutrinos produced by the beam at Fermilab is of uniform intensity in the range 1-5 GeV
and zero elsewhere (i.e. a top-hat function).
(d) If muon neutrinos oscillate into tau neutrinos, will any τ leptons (produced by charged
current interactions) be observed in the MINOS far detector ?
Hint: You may find the result of qu.21 useful.
[A = 1.27 s−1 if m2 and m3 are measured in eV/c2 , p in GeV/c and L in km. The mass
of the τ − is 1.777 GeV/c2 .]
4
Numerical answers
20. 0.3 ps
21. (b) 3.47 GeV; (c) 2.88 GeV; (d) 110 µm; (e) ∼ 20%
23. (a) 0.034 (e± , µ± , τ ± ); 0.068 (for each neutrino flavour); 0.118 (each up-type quark); 0.152 (each
down-type quark); 0.692 (all hadrons) ; (c) 2.47 GeV, 2.66 × 10−25 s
24. 3
5
T. Potter
Lent/Easter Terms 2022
2 Z2 (A − 2Z)2
M (A, Z) = Zmp + (A − Z)mn − aV A + aS A 3 + aC 1 + aA + δ(A, Z)
A 3 A
where mp and mn are the masses of the proton and neutron respectively. Fitted values for the
coefficients are given at the end of the question.
(a) Explain the physical significance and functional form of the various terms.
(b) Treating the nucleus as a sphere of uniform charge density, show that the constant
3e2
aC = = 0.72 MeV .
20π0 R0
(c) By reference to the SEMF explain in physical terms why nuclear fission and fusion are
possible.
(d) Use the Semi-Empirical mass formula to predict that the value of Z of the most stable
isobar of mass number A is
mn − mp + 4aA
Z= 1 .
2aC A− 3 + 8aA /A
Predict the Z for the most stable nuclei with A = 101 and A = 191. Compare with
nuclear data, which you can find on the web (e.g. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/).
Predict the most stable super-heavy nucleus with mass number 300.
(e) Show that the effect of gravitational binding in the nucleus may be accounted for by adding
5
a term −aG A 3 to the SEMF (neglecting the proton-neutron mass difference). Show that
aG is given by
3Gm2n
aG = ≈ 5.8 × 10−37 MeV.
5R0
Use the SEMF, so modified, to estimate that the lightest “nucleus” consisting entirely of
neutrons (i.e. a neutron star) has a mass approximately 10% that of the sun. Amazingly
enough, this reckless extrapolation over more than 50 orders of magnitude turns out to
give more or less the right answer!
[Take the mass of the sun to be 2 ×1030 kg]
1
[Use the following data:
mp = 938.3 MeV, mn = 939.6 MeV, me = 0.511 MeV; aV = 15.8 MeV, aS = 18.0 MeV, aA =
23.5 MeV. Nuclear radius R = R0 A1/3 with R0 = 1.2 fm]
(N − Z)2 1
aA where aA = F .
A 3
Note that this underestimates the empirical value, because this model does not take account
of the potential energy, which also depends on (N − Z).
One contribution to the pairing energy can also be estimated from this model, reflecting the
stepwise increase of the kinetic energy resulting from the exclusion principle. This would be
expected to be approximately equal to the energy spacing of levels at the Fermi level, i.e.
1/g(F ). Show that this is, for the N = Z = 12 A case:
4¯F
.
3A
Evaluate and compare with the fitted value in the SEMF for a typical value of A. Note that
the Fermi Gas model again gives an underestimate because it does not take account of the
additional potential energy arising from the spatial overlap of two nucleons in the same energy
level.
2
30. Nuclear size, Tripos B-style question.
A
R spherically symmetric nucleus has a radial charge density ρ(r) which is normalised such that
ρ(r)d3 r = 1. Show that in this case the form factor is given by:
Z
2 4π ∞
F (q ) = r sin qrρ(r)dr
q 0
which can then be approximated by
1
F (q 2 ) ' 1 − q 2 R2 + . . .
6
in natural units, where R2 is the mean square radius of the charge distribution. When elastic
scattering of 200 MeV electrons from a gold foil is observed at 11◦ , it is found that the scattered
intensity is 70% of that expected for a point nucleus. Calculate the r.m.s. radius of the gold
nucleus.
For larger scattering angles (> 50◦ ) it is found that the scattered intensity, instead of falling
off monotonically with angle, exhibits definite (oscillatory) structure. What does this suggest
about the form of ρ(r) ?
where me is the mass of an electron and Emax is the maximum kinetic energy of the positron.
Calculate the radius of the (A, Z + 1) member of each of the following pairs of mirror nuclei
(a) (11
5 B,
11
6 C), Emax = 0.98 MeV;
(c) (39 39
19 K, 20 Ca); Emax = 5.49 MeV;
3
The Nuclear Shell Model
3 9 7 12 13 15 17 23 131 207
2 He 4 Be 3 Li 6C 6C 7N 8O 11 Na 54 Xe 82 Pb
1+ 3− 3− + 1− 1− 5+ 3+ 3+ 1−
2 2 2
0 2 2 2 2 2 2
1s 12 1p 32 1p 12 1d 25 1d 32 2s 21 1f 72 1f 52 2p 23 2p 12 1g 29 1g 72 2d 52 2d 32 1h 11
2
3s 12 1h 92 2f 72 3p 32 1i 13
2
3p 12 2f 25 · · ·
18 166 18 208 18
10 Ne 68 Er 9F 82 Pb 8O
The schemes are drawn to the same scale, with energies (in MeV) with respect to the ground
state and the spin and parity (J P ) values given for each level. Identify which scheme corresponds
to each nuclide and explain as fully as you can which features of the levels support your choices.
4
Nuclear Decay
(a) A nucleus with A=200 can decay by the emission of α particles. The α particles are
observed with two different energies, 4.687 MeV and 4.650 MeV. Neither of these decays
populates the ground state of the daughter nucleus, but each is followed by the emission
of a γ ray, whose energies are 266 and 305 keV respectively. No other γ rays are seen.
• From this information construct an energy level diagram for the states involved, and
indicate on it the decay scheme.
• The decaying parent state has JP = 1− and the daughter has ground state JP = 0− .
Explain why there is no direct α decay to the ground state.
(b) The values of the energy release, Q, and the measured α-decay half-lives of some isotopes
of Thorium are as follows:
Isotope Q / MeV Half-life / s
220
90 Th 8.95 1.0 × 10−5
222
90 Th 8.13 2.8 × 10−3
226
90 Th 6.45 1.9 × 103
228
90 Th 5.52 6.0 × 107
230
90 Th 4.77 2.5 × 1012
232
90 Th 4.08 4.4 × 1017
Estimate the α-decay half-life of 224
90 Th, given that the Q-value for this decay is 7.31 MeV.
What is the approximate uncertainty in your estimate?
(Part II 1995)
5
(i) n→p
6 +
(ii) 2 He(0 ) → 63 Li(1+ ) (f t=830s)
(iii) 14 +
6 C(0 ) → 147 N∗ (0+ ) (f t=3300s)
35 3+ 3+
(iv) 16 S( 2 ) → 35
17 Cl( 2 ) (f t=1x105 s)
36 −
(v) 17 Cl(2 ) → 36 +
18 Ar(0 )
76 −
(vi) 35 Br(1 ) → 76 +
34 Se(0 )
137 7+ 3 +
(vii) 55 Cs( 2 ) → 137
56 Ba( 2 )
dΓ G2
= F3 (E0 − Ee )2 p2e
dpe 2π
where GF is the Fermi constant, Ee and pe are the energy and momentum of the electron and
E0 is the total energy released. You may treat the electron and neutrino as massless.
Show that the average kinetic energy carried off by the electron in β decay is E0 /2 when the
electron is highly relativistic, and E0 /3 when the electron is non-relativistic.
When the electron is highly relativistic, show that the total decay rate is given approximately
by
G2 E 5
Γ = F 30
60π
5
The E0 dependence is sometimes known as Sargent’s Rule.
6
Fission and Fusion
(a) Graphite (i.e. 12 C) is sometimes used as a moderator in nuclear reactors. Compute the
maximum fractional energy loss which a non-relativistic neutron can undergo in a single
elastic collision with a 12 C nucleus. Hence calculate the minimum number of collisions
which would be required in order to bring a 2.5 MeV fission neutron down to a thermal
energy of 0.025 eV.
(b) Experiments are being performed using a mixture of 235 U and graphite. The graphite
contains a fraction of 10−6 by weight of 10 B. The neutron absorption cross-sections for
12
C, 10 B, and 235 U at thermal energies are 0.04 b, 3800 b and 700 b respectively, where
fission accounts for 580 b of the cross-section in 235 U. What is the maximum fraction by
weight of 235 U which could be allowed in the mixture if the multiplication factor at infinite
volume is not to exceed unity? Assume that 2.5 neutrons are produced per fission, and
that all reactions take place at thermal energies.
7
Numerical answers
28. (b) 0.7 MeV; (d) 44 (101 191
44 Ru is stable); 77 (77 Ir is stable); 114 ; (e) 150 MeV.
30. 5 fm.
31. (a) 3.4 fm; (b)4.2 fm; (c)4.6 fm.
35. ∼ 10 s
36. (i) superallowed, F/GT; (ii) superallowed GT; (iii) superallowed F; (iv) allowed F/GT; (v) 1st
forbidden GT; (vi) 1st forbidden F/GT; (vii) 2nd forbidden F/GT.
7+ 9+ 9− 7−
38. From the highest level downwards: 2
, 2 , 2 or 2
.
8
APPENDIX A: PHYSICAL CONSTANTS
Summary of the physical constants and conversion factors used in this course:
Atomic masses are often given in unified (or atomic) mass units:
1 unified mass unit(u) = Mass of an atom of 12
6 C/12
1u = 1g/NA = 1.66 × 10−27 kg = 931.5 MeV/c2
APPENDIX B: PARTICLE PROPERTIES
From the Review of Particle Physics, C. Amsler et al., Phys. Lett. B667 1 (2008)
http://pdg.lbl.gov/
N.B. Numbers given in brackets correspond to the error in the last digit(s).
For example, mτ = 1776.8(2)MeV/c2 ≡ (1776.8 ± 0.2)MeV/c2 .
Gauge Bosons (J P = 1− )
Force Gauge Charge (e) Mass Full Width Decay Mode Branching
Boson (GeV/c2 ) (GeV) Fraction (%)
Strong g 0 0 stable
Pseudoscalar Mesons (J P = 0− )
a
D∗− decay modes; b
D∗0 decay modes.
Baryons (J P = 1/2+ )
Baryons (J P = 3/2+ )
g e−mr
V (~r) =
r
The matrix element is given by
Z 2
2
|Mif | = e −i~
q .~
r 3
V (~r) d ~r
In order to perform the integral, choose the z axis to lie along ~r. Then ~q.~r = −qr cos θ
and
Z Z ∞ Z 2π Z π
−i~
q .~
r 3
e V (~r) d ~r = V (r) eiqr cos θ r2 sin θ dθ dφ dr
0 0 0
Z ∞ Z +1
= 2πV (r) eiqr cos θ r2 d(cos θ) dr
0 −1
Z ∞ iqr
e − e−iqr
= 2πV (r) r2 dr
iqr
Z0 ∞
e−mr eiqr − e−iqr
= 2πg r2 dr
r iqr
Z0 ∞ iqr
−mr e − e−iqr
= 2πg e dr
iq
Z0 ∞
2πg −r(m−iq)
= e − e−r(m+iq) dr
0 iq
2πg 1 1 2πg 2iq
= − =
iq m − iq m + iq iq m2 + q 2
4πg
= 2
m + q2
The Yukawa potential is a general potential, and can be extended to other potentials, e.g.
for the Coulomb potential
Zα
V (~r) = −
r
using g = Zα and m = 0, the matrix element for Rutherford Scattering is
16π 2 Z 2 α2
|Mif |2 =
q4
Appendix D: Interaction via Particle Exchange
We need to evaluate the following integral in order to determine the energy shift when in
state i when a particle of mass m is exchanged between particle 1 and particle 2,
Z ∞
1→2 g2 p2 eipr − e−ipr
∆Ei =− dp
2(2π)2 0 p2 + m2 ipr
Start by rewriting
Z ∞
1 g2 p eipr − e−ipr
∆Ei1→2 = − dp
2 2(2π)2 −∞ p2 + m2 ir
using the fact that the integrand is even in p. The integrand has poles at p = ±im (see
the figure). The integrals with the eipr and e−ipr terms are performed separately. This is
because one chooses an infinite semi-circular contour to do the integration over, in such
a way that on the circular piece the contribution from infinity vanishes. This happens if
the integrand contains a decaying exponential in |p|. For eipr , this happens for p = +i|p|
and so one closes the contour in the upper half plane (C1 in the figure). For e−ipr , we
want p = −i|p|, and so close the contour in the lower half plane (C2 in the figure).
F = q (E + v × B)
where E and B can be written in terms of the vector and scalar potentials, A and φ:
∂A
B = ∇ × A and E = −∇φ − .
∂t
The classical Hamiltonian,
1 2
H= p − qA + qφ,
2m
can be used along with Schrödinger’s equation to obtain
1 2 ∂ψ
Hψ = (−i∇ − qA) + qφ ψ(x, t) = i (x, t). (1)
2m ∂t
where we have substituted p → −i∇. We now need to show that Schrödinger’s equation
is invariant under the local guage transformation
ψ → ψ 0 = eiqα(x,t) ψ
A → A0 = A + ∇α
∂α
φ → φ0 = φ −
∂t
Substituting for ψ 0 , A0 and φ0 in equation (1):
1 ∂α ∂
(−i∇ − q(A + ∇α))2 + q(φ − ) eiqα ψ = i (eiqα ψ)
2m ∂t ∂t
1 2 ∂α iqα iqα ∂ψ ∂α iqα
(−i∇ − qA − q∇α) + qφ − q e ψ=i e + iqψ e .
2m ∂t ∂t ∂t
or, equivalently,
2
(−i∇ − qA0 ) ψ 0 = (−i∇ − qA)2 eiqα ψ.
Now,
and
∇ eiqα ψ = eiqα (∇ + iq∇α) ψ.
Therefore,
and
Hence,
2
(−i∇ − qA0 ) ψ 0 = eiqα (−i∇ − qA)2 ψ
and Schrödinger’s equation is invariant under a local gauge transformation.
APPENDIX F: NEUTRINO SCATTERING IN
FERMI THEORY
Calculation of the cross-section for νe + n → p + e− using Fermi theory. The cross-section
is given by Fermi’s Golden Rule
Γ = 2π |Mf i |2 ρ (Ef )
where the matrix element, Mf i , is given by the 4-point interaction with a strength equal
to the Fermi constant, GF ;
|Mf i |2 ≈ G2F .
There are a total of 4 possible spin states for the spin- 21 e and ν. These correspond to
a singlet state S = 0 (Fermi transition) and three triplet states S = 1 (Gamow-Teller
transition). Therefore, the matrix element becomes
|Mf i |2 ≈ 4G2F .
Ee2
dσ = 2π4G2F dΩ
(2π)3
where Ee is the energy of the electron in the zero-momentum frame. It follows that
dσ G2 E 2
= F2 e .
dΩ π
√
The total energy in the zero-momentum frame, s = 2Ee . Hence, the total cross-section
can be written as Z
dσ 4G2F Ee2 G2 s
σ= dΩ = = F .
dΩ π π
APPENDIX G: NEUTRINO SCATTERING WITH
A MASSIVE W BOSON
From Appendix F, the differential cross-section in Fermi theory is
dσ G2 E 2
= F2 e .
dΩ π
The correct theory involves exchange of a massive vector boson of mass MW , which leads
to a propagator in the matrix element
1
2
.
q2 − MW
Fermi theory is equivalent to neglecting the q 2 term in the denominator. Hence, treating
W-boson exchange correctly, we have
2
dσ G2 E 2 MW2
= F2 e 2
.
dΩ π MW − q 2
and so
1 s
du = s sin θ dθ = dΩ .
2 4π
We can thus integrate the differential cross-section in terms of u:
Z 2
G2F s MW 2
σ = dΩ 2
4π 2 MW +u
2 4 Z s
GF MW 1
= du 2 2
π 0 (M W + u)
s
G2F MW 4
−1
=
π M2 + u 0
2 4
W
GF MW 1 1
= 2
− 2
π MW MW + s
G2F MW 2
s
= 2
π(MW + s)
2
At small values of s this reduces to the Fermi theory result, while for s MW the
cross-section tends towards the constant value
G2F MW
2
σ=
π
= R01/2 [sin 2θ − θ]
Now, using cos θ = (r/R0 )1/2 , sin θ = (1 − r/R0 )1/2 and sin 2θ = 2 sin θ cos θ, then
0
h iR 0
0 1/2 0 1/2 0 1/2
R01/2 [sin 2θ − θ]R
R = R 01/2
2 (1 − r/R ) (r/R ) − cos−1
(r/R )
R
h i
01/2 −1 0 1/2 0 0 1/2
=R cos (R/R ) − 2{(1 − R/R ) (R/R )}