Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Academic Year: 2022 – 2023

Report on
Microproject

Title: Visit the site and study the labour management for any one
activity related to RCC component & write a report.

Program: Civil Engineering


Program code: CE5I
Course: Design of Steel & RCC Structures
Course code: 22502

Submitted by:
Group No. 2

Submitted to:
Mr. Rahul Sonar
MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL
EDUCATION

VIVEKANAND EDUCATION SOCIETY


POLYTECHNIC
MICRO PROJECT

Academic year 2021-22


TITLE OF PROJECT
Title: Visit the site and study the labour management for any one
activity related to RCC component & write a report.

Program: Civil Engineering Program Code: CE5I


Course: DSR Course code: 22502
Seat No.:

Roll No. Enrollment


Name
No.

1 2000040059 Shubham Shankar Panhalkar

2 2000040060 Hiten Ramesh Ramwani

3 2000040061 Sanjeet Santosh Haldankar


INDEX

Sr. No. Contents Page

1 Part A. Micro Project 1

2 PART B. Final Micro project 3

3 Rationale. 3

4 Aim of Micro project 2

5 Course Outcome Integrated. 1

6 Actual procedure Followed 4

7 Actual Resources used. 4

8 Output of the Micro project. 5

9 Skill developed\learning out of the Micro 6


project.
10 Reference 3-4
MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF
TECHANICAL EDUCATION
CETIFICATE

This is to certify that SHUBHAM PANHALKAR, HITEN RAMWANI, SANJEET


HALDANKAR Roll No:4,5,6 Of FIFTH Semester Diploma in Civil Engineering of
Vivekanand Education Society’s Polytechnic (Code No 0004) has completed the Micro-
Project work satisfactory in Design of Steel and RCC Structure (22502) for the academic
year 2022-2023 as prescribed in the MSBTE curriculum.

Place: Chembur, Mumbai Enrolment No.: 2000040059 - 61

Date: Seat No.:

Subject Teacher Head of Department Principal


Mr. Rahul Sonar Ms. Sanskruti Dharmale Mr. Vikrant Joshi

Seal of Institution
Annexure – 1
PART A: Micro – Project Personal

Title: Visit the site and study the labour management for any one
activity related to RCC component & write a report.
1.0 Aims/Benefits of the Micro-Project

1. Select a relevant steel structure for the given condition.


2. Use steel table to identify different properties of given steel sections.
3. Explain the various type(s) of loads (Dead load, live load, impact load, seismic load,
snow load etc.) acting on the given steel structures.
4. Select the relevant factors to calculate seismic forces for given civil structure.
5. Choose the partial safety factor as per the guidelines laid in IS for the given situation.
6. Explain the Advantages and disadvantages of steel as construction material in the
given situation.
7. Describe the functions of the given steel structure. 1h. Identify the components of the
given steel structure
2.0 Course Outcome Addressed
a. Use steel table and IS code 800:2007 at work sites.
b. Design the connections for the given steel joints.
3.0 Proposed Methodology
1. Make a list of information required for report.
2. Preparation of report as directed.
3. Collecting information about the RCC components.
4. Making a list of steel used.
5. Making a report and checking it.

4.0 Action Plan

Sr. Planned Planned Name of


No. Details of the Activity Start Date Finish Date Members
1 Formation of Group & Topic Selection All members

2 Submission of Proposed Plan All members

3 Preparation of Report All members

4 Final valuation of a Working Report All members

5 Presentation: Report All members

6 Submission of Final Report All members


1
5.0 Resources Required

Sr. Name of
Specifications Quantity
No. Resource/material

1 Books Design Of Steel Structure, Dayarathnam, P. 1

Microsoft word document with internet


2 Computer / Internet 1
facility

Name of Team Members

Sr. Roll

No. No. Enrollment No Name

1. 4 2000040059 Shubham Shankar Panhalkar

2. 5 2000040060 Hiten Ramesh Ramwani

3. 6 2000040061 Sanjeet Santosh Haldankar

2
Annexure – 2
PART B: Final Micro-Project Report
Title: Visit the site and study the labour management for any one
activity related to RCC component & write a report.

1.0 Rationale

For Civil Engineering technologist to understand the behaviour of various structural


components for developing insight for the design concepts and will help the student in
quality supervision on site. Design of steel and RCC structures is the core subject for the
Civil Engineering. For the design of steel structures, the properties of steel, different steel
sections, various grades and strength characteristics of steel and design of connections are
required as per IS:800-2007. In the design of RCC structures Limit State Method is to be
used as per 15:456-2000 for analysis and design and IS:875-1987 is to be used for Loading
Standards.
2.0 Aim of Micro Project
1. Select a relevant steel structure for the given condition.
2. Use steel table to identify different properties of given steel sections.
3. Explain the various type(s) of loads (Dead load, live load, impact load, seismic load,
snow load etc.) acting on the given steel structures.
4. Select the relevant factors to calculate seismic forces for given civil structure.
5. Choose the partial safety factor as per the guidelines laid in IS for the given situation.
6. Explain the Advantages and disadvantages of steel as construction material in the
given situation.
7. Describe the functions of the given steel structure. 1h. Identify the components of the
given steel structure

3.0 Course Outcomes Integrated

a. Use steel table and IS code 800:2007 at work sites.


b. Design the connections for the given steel joints.
4.0 Literature Review

The construction industry is a very dangerous industry. The performance of the industry
in occupational health and safety is very poor. The standard of occupational health and
safety is even worse in developing countries. In Indian construction industry OHS has
never been given prime importance. Even though in India construction industry is
significantly booming, there are no proper initiatives undertaken by the government to
implement OHS rules and regulations.

3
Huang and Hinze analysed accident caused due to fall of workers at construction sites and
the result showed that most fall accidents took place at elevations of less than 9.15 m,
occurring primarily on new construction projects of commercial buildings and residential
projects of relatively low construction cost [10].
Jannadi and Bu-Khamsin conducted questionnaire survey among industrial contractors in
the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia and formal interviews with the contractors and
officials responsible for construction safety were taken. 72% of the companies
participated in this survey were the general building construction companies [11]. Twenty
main factors and eighty-five subfactors and their level of importance based on the survey
results and analysis were identified. Pheng and Shiua emphasized that integration
between quality and safety should be achieved for better coordination and utilization of
resources [12]. Koehn and Datta through their study concluded that safety rules and
regulations not only overcome issues like poor quality work, unsafe working conditions,
and lack of environmental control but also reduce cost and enhance productivity [13].
Wilson Jr. and Koehn suggested that safety practices vary with construction sites, as
every site has unique safety aspects. Larger construction projects are better organized
whereas small to medium firms do not have an adequate safety program or person to
oversee safety criteria [6].
In developed countries, recent advancement in technology, on one hand, has contributed
positively to industry productivity, but, on the other hand, it has created a more
challenging and unsafe work environment [14]. Every construction worker is likely to be
temporarily unfit for work at some time as a result of a minor injury or a health problem
after working on a construction site [15]. Between 1989 and 1992, 256 people were
fatally injured in the Australian Construction Industry. Statistics revealed that the fatality
rate was 10.4 per 100,000 workers, which was similar to the fatality rate for road
accidents [16]. It is estimated that, in China, every year, 3,000 workers belonging to
construction sector were killed in work related accidents [17]. From a study conducted by
Egyptian construction industry, it was concluded that safety programs organized by Egypt
contractors were less formal and the accident insurance costs were fixed irrespective of
the contractor’s safety performance [18]. The most common cause of injuries and death in
the construction sector is falling from heights [19]. The main causes include working on a
scaffold or platform without guard rails, or without a safety harness correctly attached,
and fragile roofs and ladders that are badly maintained, positioned, and secured. Slips,
trips, and falls are the largest cause of accidents in all sectors [20].
In India, departments under the Ministry of Labour and Employment deal with OSH
issues in construction sector under the head of Chief Labour Commissioner. Directorate
General Factory Advise Service Labour Institute (DGFASLI) provides technical support
in drafting model rules, carrying out surveys, and conducting training programmes in
construction sector. A number of Labour Laws are applicable to the workers engaged at
construction sites. These are as follows:(i) Contract Labour (Regulation & Operative)
4
Act, 1970,(ii)Minimum Wages Act, 1948,(iii)Payment of Wages Act, 1936,(iv)Equal
Remuneration Act, 1976,(v)Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment
and Condition of Services) Act, 1979,(vi)The Building and Other Construction Workers
Act, 1996.
The Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and
Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, was enacted on 1.3.1996. The act is applicable to all
establishments employing 10 or more workers in any building and other construction
works. The Chief Labour Commissioner is entrusted with the task of enforcement of this
act and the central rules [21]

5.0 Actual Methodology Followed


1. Make a list of information required for report.
2. Preparation of report as directed.
3. Collecting information about the RCC components.
4. Making a list of steel used.
5. Making a report and checking it.

6.0 Actual Resources Used

Name of
Sr. Specifications Quantity
Resource/material
No.

1 Books Design Of Steel Structure, Dayarathnam, P. 1

Microsoft word document with internet


2 Computer / Internet 1
facility

5
7.0 Outputs of the Micro Project
Main Bar
Cutting Length = 4900+2x36x8 = 5476
Total No of Bar = (6440/200) +1 = 33 Nos.
Distribution Bar
Cutting Length = 6440+2x36x8=7016
Total No of Bar = (4900/200) + 1 = 27 Nos
Extra top Bar S1 12⌀
C.L. = 3500
Total No of Bars = (6440/200) +1 = 33 Nos

Distribution Bar S1 8⌀
C.L. = 6440+2x36x8 = 7816
Total No of Bar = (3000/250) +1= 13 Nos.

PT Beam No 3 Extra top Bar S1 120


Cutting Length = 3000 + 36x12 = 3432
total No of Bar = (4900/200) +1= 27 Nos

Distribution Bar S1 80
cutting Length = 4900+2X36X8 = 5476
Total No of Bar = (1500/250) +1 =7 Nos
Lift Colman Near Extra Bar T12
Main Bar Cutting Length =2000+36X12 = 2432
Total No of Bar = (3200/100) +1= 33 Nos

Lift Column Near Extra Bar T120


Cutting Length = 3200+36X12 = 3632
Total No of Bar = (1500/200) +1 = 9 Nos.

6
Distribution Car Lift Column Near 80
Cutting Length = 2200+2x36x8 = 2776.
Total No of Bar = 1500/250 + 1= 7 Nos.

Conventional Pannal Slab S3 80


Main Bar Cutting Length = 750+2X36X8 = 1326
total No of Bar = 1500/250 +1 = 9Nos
Distribution Bar Cutting Length = 1500+2X36X3=2076
Total No of Bars = 750/250+1 = 4 Nos

Conventional Staircase final Lift Front Slab S4 80.


Main Bar Cutting Length = 1470+2x36x8 = 2046
Total No of Bar = 1950/250 +1 = 10 Nos
Distribution Bar Cutting Length = 1950+2x36X8 = 2526
total No of Bar =1470/250 +1= 8 Nos

Bottom Bar 8 ⌀
Main Bar C.L. = 7000+2X36X8 = 7576
Total No of Bar = (7576/200) +1= 37 Nos
Distribution Bar C.L. = 7216+ 2336x8 = 7852
Total No of Bar = (7000/200) +1 = 36 Nos.

Extra Top Bar Column No 19 to 20 Z1


C.L.= 2100 + 2x 36 x 10 = 2460
Total No of Bar = (7000/200) +1= 36 Nos.

Extra Top Bar Lift Near Duck Area Z1 10⌀ Z1+Z1 = 270
C.L. = 3900+2x36x10 = 4620

7
Total No of Bar = (6900/200) +1=37 Nos.
Extra Top Bar Slab S3 Pannal Z1 10⌀
C.L. = 4775
Total No of Bars = (3850/200) +1 =20 Nos.
Extra Top Bars Z1 10⌀ Lift Column to C1
C.L. = 2100+36x10 = 2460
Total No of bar = (7276/200) +1 = 37 Nos.
Distribution Bar Z1 one Pannal total Z1 Bar 10⌀ 8⌀
Z1 Distribution = (9000/250) +1 = 36+6 = 42
Lift Column Near Extra Top Bar T16⌀
C.L. = 1850+36x16 = 2426
Total No. of Bar = (5485/100) +1 = 57 Nos

Lift Column Near Extra Top Bar T12⌀


Cutting Length = 5485+2X36X12 = 6348
Total No of Ban= (1500/200) +1 = 9 Nos

Lift Column Near Extra Distribution Bar 8⌀


C.L. = 8485+2X36X8 = 6061

Bottom Bar
Main Bar cutting length = 5460+2x36x8=6036
Total No of Bar = (14250/150) +1=96 Nos.
Distribution Bar Cutting Length = 14250+3x36x8 = 15114
Total No of Bar = (5460/150) +1= 37 Nos.

Bottom Add. Extra Bar 10⌀


C. L. = 11250
Total No of Bar = (5460/150) + 1= 37 Nos.

8
Extra Top Bar Z1. 10⌀ Column No. 20 to 21
C. L. = 2100436X10 = 2400
Total No of Bar= (4850/200) +1 = 25 Nos.

Extra Top Bar PT Beam No.8 S1 12⌀ 8⌀


Main Bar C. L. = 4500
Total No of Bar = (3000/250) +1 = 14 Nos.
Distribution Bar Column No C1 to C2 and 20to 21
C.L. = 10310 +4x36x8 = 11462
Total No of Bar = (3000/250) +1 =13 Nos.

Bottom Bar
Main Bar cutting = 6630 + 2 X36x 10 = 7410
Total No of Bar. = (13150/200) +1= 68 NOS
Distribution Bar= 13150+3X36X10= 14230
Total No of Bar = (6690/200) +1 = 35 Nos

Top Bar
Main Bar Cutting = 6609+2×36X8 = 7266
Total No of Bar = (13150/250) + 1 = 55 Nos.
Distribution Bar =13150+ 3X36X8 = 14015
Total No of Bar = (6690/250) + 1= 29 Nos.

Extra Top Bar T16⌀


Total No. of Bar = (6690/100) +1= 69
Cutting Length = 2000+ 36X16 = 2576

Extra Top Bar PT Beam No. (10) S1 12⌀


Total No. of Bar (13150/200) +1 = 68 Nos

9
Cutting Length = 4500
Extra top Bar PT Beam No (5) S1 12⌀
Total No of Bar = (6500/200) +1 = 35 NOS
Cutting length = 1500+36x12 = 1932
Extra top Bar PT Beam No (9) S1 12⌀ & 8⌀
Total No. of Bar = (6500/200) +1 = 35 Nos.
Main cutting length = 1500+36 x 12 = 1932

Extra top Bar PT Beam No (9) S1 12⌀ 8⌀


Total No. of Bar= (14250/200) +1 = 72 Nos.
Main cutting length = 4500
Total No of Bar= (1500/ 25) +1= 72 Nos.
Distribution Bar Cutting length= 1425+3X36X8=15115

Additional S1
Main bars = (6690/200) +1= 34
Cutting Length= 1500+36x12 = 1932
Distribution Bar = (1500/250) +1= 7 bar.
Cutting Length= 6690+2x36x8= 7266

Column No. 24 Duct Area Extra Bar T12⌀


No. of Bar = (1500/200) +1 = 9
Cutting Length 1800+ 36x 12 = 2232
Extra Bar 10⌀
No of Bar= 5834/100 + 1= 59 Nos.
Cutting Length = 1500+36x16= 2076

Slab Pannal 10
Bottom Bar

10
Main Bar→ Cutting Length= 6.6304+2×36x 10 = 7410
Total No. of Bar = (13075/200) +1 = 66 Nos.
Distribution Bar= 13075+3X36X10 = 14155
Total No of Bar = (6690/200) +1=34
Top Bar
Main Bar = 6690+2X 36X8 = 7266
Total No of Bars = (13075/250) +1= 53Nos.
Distribution Bar= 13075+3 x 3 x 36 x 8= 13939
Total No of Bar= (6690/250) +1= 28 Nos.

Extra Top Bar 16⌀


Main Bar = (3600/100) +1= 37
Cutting Length= 1500+36x16 = 2076
Distribution Bar 12⌀ = (1500/200) +1=9 Nos.
Cutting Length = 4000+36x 12 = 4432

Column No. 11 To Column No. 24 S1 12⌀


No of Bar= (8300/200) +1 = 43 nos.
Cutting Length = 1500+36x 12 =1932

11
Dia
Length Hook Cutting
Description of No of Bar Quantity Total Quantity
Of Bar (2*36d) Length
Bar

12
               
Main Bar 4900 8 2*36 5476 33 0.1991965  
Distribution
6400 8 2*36 7016 27 0.208813  
Bar
Extra Top bar 2636 12 2*36 3500 33 0.127317 0.5353265
               
Distribution
6440 8 2*36 7816 13 0.1120036  
Bar
Extra Top Bar 3000 12 2*36 3432 27 0.1021446 0.2141482
               
Distribution
4900 8 2*36 5476 7 0.0422538  
Bar S1
Lift column
2000 12 2*36 2432 33 0.0884671 0.1307209
Extra Bar T
               
Lift Column
3200 12 2*36 3632 9 0.0360324  
Extra Bar T1
Distribution
2200 8 2*36 2776 7 0.0214201 0.0574525
Car Lift Near
               
Conventional
             
Pannal Slab S3
Main Bar 750 8 2*36 1326 9 0.013155  
Distribution
1500 8 2*36 2076 4 0.0091536 0.0223086
Bar
               
Conventional
             
Staircase
Main Bar 1470 8 2*36 2076 10 0.022884  
Distribution
1950 8 2*36 2526 8 0.0222755 0.0451595
Bar
               
Bottom Bar              
Main Bar 7000 8 2*36 7576 37 0.3089911  
Distribution
7216 8 2*36 7852 36 0.3115925 0.6205836
Bar
               
Extra Top Bar
2100 10 2*36 2460 36 0.0976207  
C19
Extra Top Bar
2900 10 2*36 4620 37 0.1884291 0.2860498
near Duct
               

8.0 Skills Developed/learning out of this Micro-Project


The following skills were developed-

13
Designing: Designing of micro projects with minimum required resources and at low cost.
Teamwork: Learned to work in a team and boost individual confidence.
Time Management: Timely completion of micro project as scheduled.
Data Analysis: Interpretation of data: drawing and analysis of graphs, laboratory
calculations, etc.
Problem-solving: Develop good problem-solving habits.
Technical writing: Preparing a report of the proposed plan and final report.
Presentation: Giving a working model/ Chart presentation of the micro project.

9.0 Applications of this micro-project


The report can be used to manage labor and design RCC component.

14
Annexure – III
Sr. Characteristic to Poor Average Good Excellent
No. be assessed (Marks 1 - 3) (Marks 4 - 5) (Marks 6 - 8) (Marks 9- 10)
Relevance to the Related to very few Addressed at-least one Addressed more than
1 Related to some lo’s
course loss CO one CO
Literature Not more than two
At-least 5 relevant
2 Review sources (primary and At –least 7 relevant About 10 relevant
sources, at least 2
/Information Secondary), very old sources, latest sources, latest
Latest
collection reference
Completion of
3 the Target as Completed less than Completed 50 to 60% Completed 60 to 80% Completed more than
Per project 50% 80 %
proposal
Enough data collected
Sufficient and Sufficient and by
Sample Size small, appropriate sample, appropriate sample, Sufficient and
4 Analysis of Data data neither enough data enough data Appropriate sample
and Organized nor Generated but not Generated which is size. Proper
Representation presented well Organized and not organized and Inferences by
Presented well. No or Presented well but Organizing and
Poor inferences are Poor inferences are Presenting data
drawn drawn through tables, charts
and graphs.
Well
Well
Just Assembled/fabricated
Assembled/fabricated
Assembled/fabricated with proper
with proper
Incomplete and parts are not Functioning parts. In
Quality of Functioning parts. In
fabrication/assembly. Functioning well. Not Proper shape, within
5 Prototype/Model Proper shape, within
in proper shape, Tolerance dimensions
Tolerance dimensions
Dimensions beyond and good
and good
tolerance limit. Finish/appearance.
Finish/appearance.
Appearance/ finish is But no creativity in
Creativity in design
shabby. design and use of
and use of material
material
Nearly sufficient and
Very short, poor- Very detailed, correct,
correct details about Detailed, correct and
quality sketches, clear
Methods, material, clear description of
Details about Description of
Report precautions and Methods, materials,
6 methods, material, Methods, materials,
Preparation conclusion. But precautions and
precaution and precautions and
Clarity is not there in Conclusions.
Conclusions omitted; Conclusions. Enough
a presentation. But Sufficient Graphic
some details are tables, charts and
Not enough graphic Description.
wrong sketches
description.
Major information is Includes major Includes major Well organized,
7 Presentation not included, information but not information and well includes major
Information is not well organized and not Organized but not information, well
well organized. presented well presented well presented
Replied to a
Could not reply to a Replied properly to a
8 Viva considerable number
considerable number considerable number of Replied most of the
Of questions but not questions properly
of questions. questions.
very properly
Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project
(The marks may be allowed to the characteristics of the Micro Project by considering the suggested rubrics)

15
Annexure – IV

Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Name: GROUP NO.2 Roll No.: 4-6

Program: CE5I Semester: FOURTH

Course Title: DSR Code: 22502

Micro-project Title:Visit the site and study the labour management for any one activity
related to RCC component & write a report.

Course Outcomes Achieved:

Evaluation as per Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro Project


Sr. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent Sub
No. assessed Marks Marks Marks Marks Total
1-3 4-5 6-8 9-10
(A) Process and product assessment out of 6

1 Relevance to the course

2 Literature Survey
Information Collection
3 Completion of the Target as
per project proposal
4 Analysis of Data and
representation
5 Quality of Prototype/Model/
Content
6 Report Preparation
(B)Individual Presentation/Viva Out of 4

7 Presentation

8 Viva

16
Major learning outcomes achieved by students by doing the project

a) Practical outcomes:
Prepare reports of the given type of events/episodes/incidents.

b) Unit outcomes in Cognitive domain:


Categorize the component parts of the given type of building.

c) Outcomes in Affective Domain:


Function as team member

Comments/suggestions about team work /leadership/inter-personal communication (if


any) team work- leadership -
Inter-personal communication -

Comments/Suggestions about team work/leadership/inter-personal communication (if


any)

……………………………………………………………………………………

Any Other Comment:

……………………………………………………………………………………

Name of the Faculty Member –


Mr. Rahul Sonar

Designation of the Faculty Member-


Lecturer - Signature

17
Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet (for Group File)

Major learning outcomes achieved by students by doing the project:


a) Practical outcomes:
Prepare reports of the given type of events/episodes/incidents.
b) Unit outcomes in Cognitive domain:
Categorize the component parts of the given type of building.
c) Outcomes in Affective Domain:
Function as team member

Comments/suggestions about team work /leadership/inter-personal communication (if


any) team work- leadership -
Inter-personal communication –

ROLL Process and product Individual Total


NO. assessment Presentation/Viva (10 Marks)
(6 Marks) (4 Marks)

4.

5.

6.

Name of the Faculty Member –


Mr. Rahul Sonar

Designation of the Faculty Member-


Lecturer - Signature

18

You might also like