Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pair 1 (Brief Case Tort)
Pair 1 (Brief Case Tort)
SEMESTER 2, 2021/2022
SECTION:309
TOPICS: TRESPASS
ASSIGNMENT BY:
ZAHARUDIN
LEGAL ISSUE
The area of law involved in the case is under the law of tort. This case stated that the act of
battery whereby touching another individual without their consent; such consent may be
1. Whether the officer was performing her duties in a legal manner when arresting the
woman.
2. Whether the conviction for attacking a police officer was justified, given the officer's
3. Was the action of the officer legal to grab a woman's arm and make a battery?
Two on-duty police officers came across two ladies in the street who seemed to be begging
for prostitution. One of the woman was suspected of soliciting prostitution by police officers.
A policewoman wanted to question a woman about her alleged prostitution activities. The
woman refused to speak and chose to walk away, then the policewoman grabbed her arm to
prevent her from going away. The police officer had no authority to hold the woman under
the Street Offences Act 1959 c.57. The police officer was scratched after the woman battled
with her. She was accused of attacking a police officer while she was on duty.
DECISION
The appellant’s appeal was successful, the conviction for attacking a police officer was
overturned. Because the respondent was not exercising her power of arrest when she detained
the appellant, and because the officer's conduct went beyond acceptable lawful physical
contact between two citizens in seizing the appellant's arm to detain her, the officer's act
constituted a battery on the appellant, and she was not acting in the course of her duty when
A police officer did not have the authority under the 1959 Act to stop and hold a prostitute in
order to warn her. Furthermore, just though an officer detained a lady to warn her about her
suspicious behaviour did not make the officer's actions legal if he employed a level of
physical contact with her that went above what is permissible between two ordinary citizens
in detaining her. A police officer had no more rights to restrict another person than an
ordinary citizen unless he was legitimately utilising his power of arrest or any other
legislative power.
As a result, whether a police officer's conduct was lawful when detaining a person to question
him in circumstances where the officer was not exercising his power of arrest or other
statutory power depended on whether the physical contact the officer used to detain the
person was no more than generally acceptable physical contact between two citizens for the
purpose of one of them engaging the other's attention, and thus was lawful physical contact as
between two citizens. If the officer's actions went beyond what is normally considered
permissible, such as gripping a person's arm or shoulder rather than just resting a hand on his
sleeve or tapping his shoulder, the officer's actions would be considered the application of
1. Battery
Battery is the intentional and direct use of physical force against another person and a
criminal offence that can also lead to a civil action if there is damage. Actual contact is not
required in an assault, but it is required in a battery. As a result, battery occurs when there is
touch with the person of another. Even if the injury is minor, the deliberate hitting of
2. Assault
Assault is the threat or effort to hit another person, whether successful or not, as long as the
target is aware of the danger. The attacker must be physically capable of carrying out the
attack. Assault is both a criminal offence for which one can be prosecuted and tried, and a
civil offence for which the victim can claim for damages, including emotional distress.
3. Duty
A legal obligation that can lead to liability if broken. In a lawsuit, a plaintiff must assert and
establish that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty. In a negligence case, this may be a duty
4. Arrest
A law enforcement officer's legal power to seize or detain a suspected criminal. An arrest
may be made legally based on a court warrant issued after receiving a sworn statement of
probable cause to believe a person has committed a crime for an alleged crime committed in