*** PROJEC

Project Name GIBBS Chemistry

Chapter/Sub-Title OC11e/23.02/7D
Number of Algos to
be reviewed
1
Number of Algos
reviewed
1
QC (Name) Kanha
Reviewer (Name) Simran
Review Date 9-Dec-22

Defect Analysis Defect Severity Counts

High 0
Medium 0
Low 0
Quality Score 0

S.No. Review Item Defect

e.g Algo # Explain the Defect here (unlimited Free Text)
In first sentence of hint, 'focus on carbon at a
Science4816 time' can be changed to 'focus on one carbon at a
time'
* PROJECT GIBBS Chemistry FPY Sheet ***

Score Defect Density

100 0.00% Month
100 0.00%
Quality Score
100 0.00%
100 0.00%

Defect Type Defect Severity Project GIBBS Defect Classifi Review Stage
Select from Dropdown Not to be entered by Reviewer

suggestion
Suggestion Platform issues QA Spot Check
 PowerPoint Slides

Accuracy Check

9-Dec-22

100

Remarks
Defect Type Severity level ansr Defect Classification

Accessibility Issues High Guidelines

Accessibility tagging Low Guidelines

Answer Processing High Answer Processing

Calculation Errors High Concept Coverage
Conceptual error High Concept Coverage
Consistency Issues Medium Guidelines
Content Mismatch High Concept Coverage
Feedbacks Medium Concept Coverage
Formatting & Typography Low Formatting
Functionality High Functionality
Grammar Issues Low Language
Guideline Medium Guidelines
Hint Medium Guidelines
Instruction Medium Answer Processing
Localization Medium Guidelines
Loop File Medium Guidelines
Pallette Low Formatting
Platform issues Suggestion Platform issues
Randomization/Instances Medium Guidelines
Redesigning of algos High Guidelines
Style/TeacherAnsrHTML Medium Guidelines
Tolerance Low Answer Processing
Typo High Language
User Input High Functionality
Suggestion Suggestion Platform issues
Capture Stage

QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check

QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
QA Spot Check
Defect description
Incorrect way of reading the content by JAWS, incorrect alt text, inconsistency between the image and the description; descrip
the image is missing.
Not tagging accissibility.

Questions that are conceptually accurate but have an incorrect answer marked as correct. Incorrect answer is displayed when
Intermediate calculation errors in Show Me & guided Solution.
Any conceptual error in source and CMS which is not caught.
Inconsistency in section.
Mismatch between CHBA/Rewrite & CMS. Incorrect algo type.
Incorrect,incomplete,irrelevant CFs/IFs. CF/IFs not provided.
Incorrect Math Tag, Font Size, Spacing Indentation, Color. Removing the additional content in TA.
Disappearing of the read only content when clicked on the "X"/Undo button, Freezing of steps.
Missing of period or question mark in the main question stem/Language issues when changing static algo into algorithmic
Not matching CDL updates, PQA/best practice update, biweekly call updates, etc.
Error in hint or hint is not tailored to suit all instances.
Missing/incorrect rounding[hard/easy] or pest/log Pest/note statement.
Any errors with regards to Localization.
Instances are repeating in the loop within the window size.
Incorrect/Irrelevant/missing palette/menu button.
Existing issues for which tickets are created in JIRA.
Missing instances that are covered in CHBA & PDF/Incorrect Randomization.
Not redesigning of algos when required or errors in redesign.
Any platform specific formatting guidelines - Fill answer, strikethroughs, pest position, part labels not being followed.
Incorrect tolerance & Tolerance not provided.
Wrong spellings, repeated words, extra characters.
Not enabled/disabled the required features to enter the answer.