Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Buy Now Pray Later Presentation
Buy Now Pray Later Presentation
Buy Now Pray Later Presentation
FEBRUARY 2022
SECTION 1
1
APAC CONSUMER FINANCE MARKET
Buoyed by years of robust economic growth and booming household consumption, the
Asia Pacific (“APAC”) consumer finance market has grown rapidly in recent years
2,000
Rising Internet Penetration
Strong internet coverage
enables delivery of credit
1,000
products in a scalable manner
0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021E New Product Development
China South Korea Japan Credit providers are developing
Australia ASEAN (ex. SG & MY) Hong Kong new products to address nuanced
Malaysia Taiwan Singapore needs of the local populace
Source: Euromonitor, Quinlan & Associates analysis 2
INCUMBENT SOLUTION PAIN POINTS
Despite strong historical demand, traditional consumer finance products have drawn
increased criticism and negative publicity from both consumers and merchants alike
Pain Points
Consumer Finance
CONSUMERS MERCHANTS
1 1
2 2
3 3
5 5
Merchant Lender Consumer Merchant Lender Consumer
4 4
1 Consumer buys goods from the Merchant’s catalogue 1 Consumer buys goods from the Merchant’s catalogue
2 Consumer applies for credit / loan from the Lender 2 Consumer applies for credit from and pays down payment to the Lender
3 Lender pays the total transaction value to the Merchant 3 Lender pays purchase amount, with MDR deducted, to the Merchant
4 Merchant confirms payment and delivers goods to the Consumer 4 Merchant confirms payment and delivers goods to the Consumer
5 Consumer repays principal plus interest to the Lender, via instalments 5 Consumer repays principal to the Lender, via instalments
Lenders monetise consumers via interest Lenders monetise merchants via an MDR for
Revenue Source
charges and / or processing / transaction fees driving additional marketing and sales
5
DISTINCT CREDIT INDUSTRY DYNAMICS
BNPL players in the region have markedly different positioning, largely reflecting the
divergent consumer credit industry dynamics across APAC
68%
65% 64%
61% 60%
60%
49%
40%
21%
20%
4%
2% 2%
0%
Japan Hong Kong South Korea New Zealand Australia Singapore China Vietnam Philippines Indonesia
APAC BNPL
Industry Landscape
Developed
Luxury
1
Developed market players operate
in countries where the population
is highly banked, with larger
disposable incomes
Merchant Focus
Supra-Regional Players
2
Supra-regional players typically
operate in more developed Asian
markets, such as Singapore, Hong
Emerging Market Kong, and Malaysia
Specialists
3
Players Emerging market specialists
operate primarily in ASEAN
Necessity
APAC BNPL
Selected Examples
Service Differentiation
Differentiation Dimensions ✓ Applicable Not Applicable
Maximum Limit USD 1,000 USD 1,000 USD 1,300 USD 1,700 USD 300 USD 210
Repayment Tenure (months) 2 3 2 2 3-15 1-12
SERVICE MODEL
Repayment Channel 1 3 2 1 3 3
Credit / Debit Card ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Bank Transfer ✓ ✓ ✓
Digital Wallet ✓ ✓
Others Cash Apple Pay
Handling Fee 1%
Interest Rate 1.5%-40% < 53.4%
Default / Late Fee < 25% 14.6% USD 13 - 40 USD 5 - 25 < 10% 4%-6%
Key Investors1
1Investors provide capital for business admin., ops., and expansion; and BNPL companies separately seek capital to fund the extension of consumer credit
Source: Crunchbase, annual reports, press releases, industry interviews, Quinlan & Associates analysis 9
INDUSTRY OUTLOOK
Presenting an attractive channel for credit access, the BNPL industry is expected to grow
rapidly, with gross merchandise value forecast to reach USD 361 billion by 2025
CAGR:
400 39.3%
361.2
300
266.8
200 191.5
133.7
100 82.8
61.3
0
2020 2021 2022E 2023E 2024E 2025E
INDUSTRY CHALLENGES
11
Consumers Merchants Finance Partners Regulators
INDUSTRY CHALLENGES
Despite strong industry growth, BNPL players are facing challenges on a number of
fronts, with pressure being felt across each of their key stakeholder groups
Industry Challenges
APAC BNPL
BNPL
TIGHTENING REGULATIONS HIGH FUNDING COSTS
• Increasing regulatory scrutiny REGULATORS FINANCE PARTNERS • Expensive source of funding, as
across the globe, with heightened
consumer protection requirements
x x most BNPLs are not banks with
access to low cost deposits
4 3
Delinquency Rates
APAC Developed Markets
Adverse Selection
Min BNPL firms typically target lower income consumers who
are a higher credit risk / have weaker credit profiles
15%
15%
Impulse Purchase
BNPL drives impulse consumption, which may result in
5% purchase amounts higher than the user’s ability to repay
1.5%
Weighted Average
1.2%
1%
Delinquency Repercussions
0.7%
0% BNPL firms can only freeze accounts, and so there are no
Credit Card BNPL further consequences to deter users from defaulting
Note that e developed markets in this figure include Australia, South Korea, and Japan
Source: annual reports, illion, CNBC, Sydney Morning Herald, ASIC, Statista, Quinlan & Associates analysis 13
Consumers Merchants Finance Partners Regulators
A credit loss of 1.5% of GMV means Because of the conversion between 30% of the original GMV is needed
that for every USD 100 worth of GMV and revenue, with an MDR of to cover for the 1.5% loss in GMV,
transactions, the BNPL company fails 5%, a 1.5% credit loss in GMV resulting in an effective GMV of
to collect USD 1.5 of repayments translates to a 30% loss in revenue USD 70 per USD 100 processed
60
Max 30% 30% Max
55 75th Percentile Median
Median Min
25th Percentile
Min
40
20%
15%
20 10% 10%
5%
8
2%
1%
0 0%
%
Acquisition Cost Cash Discount Cash Rebate
BNPL BNPL Credit Card
100%
80%
60%
65%
90%
40%
20%
25%
0%
DEVELOPED APAC EMERGING APAC
BNPL Focus • Most BNPL companies have an established user base • Most BNPL companies are more nascent and compete
and focus on retaining customers through loyalty aggressively to acquire new users, typically through
programmes and repeat usage-based discounts extensive marketing campaigns and first-time discounts
User Behaviour • Customers are aware of the BNPL offering and many • Most customers are new to BNPL and use the service
have experience using it. As such, they are more willing to only for the initial discounts, reverting to traditional credit
use the BNPL solutions on a recurring basis channels if no loyalty rewards are offered
MDR PRESSURE
As a growing number of providers have entered the industry, we have seen ongoing
merchant discount rate (“MDR”) compression across the region
Max
Company Lifecycle
15% Avg
Min
11%
10%
8%
5% 5%
0%
Establishment Phase Development Phase Mature Phase
Team Set-Up
Merchant Acquisition
Merchant
BNPL Headquarter
FUNDING COSTS
BNPL companies need capital to finance credit extension, incurring financing costs and
exposing many players on-balance sheet credit risks, which is a key drag on valuation
REGULATIONS ON BNPL
While regional regulators have been slower to respond to BNPL, we anticipate regulatory
requirements across APAC to catch up to Western markets in coming years
Regulations
BNPL
MARKET REG STANCE DESCRIPTION
• BNPL is not regulated by Bank Negara Malaysia (“BNM”), as it falls under a factoring
Malaysia agreement instead of lending
• No regulatory requirements on BNPL service providers with respect to their offerings and
Vietnam data privacy
• No specific laws for the industry, but BNPL companies need to comply with certain
Indonesia requirements for credit services
MARKETS
APAC
• Stated an awareness of the industry but yet to draft any laws, given regulator is unsure if
Japan BNPL will continue to develop in the market
• Increasing concerns with regards to consumers falling under unseen debt, and therefore
Singapore exploring stricter regulatory requirements
• Stringent requirements with past cases of licence rejections and fines, along with data
US requests for further industry evaluation
• U.K. Treasury believes BNPL should no longer be exempted from consumer credit regime,
U.K. and suggested further regulatory oversight
Source: press release, regulatory announcements / newsletters, Quinlan & Associates analysis 20
Consumers Merchants Finance Partners Regulators
Financial Performance
Developed Market Players, Indexed (to Revenue)
Cost
Revenue Cost of Sales Credit Losses Marketing Funding Staff Technology Profit / Loss
100
20
80
60
80% of the revenue is
attributed to the MDR,
40 80
with the remaining
20% from late fees
20
0
-15
-20
100 (25) (20) (15) (20) (20) (15) (15)
Financial Performance
Emerging Market Specialists, Indexed (to Revenue)
Cost
Revenue Cost of Sales Credit Losses Marketing Funding Staff Technology Profit / Loss
100
75 50
-25
-50 -100
-75
-100
100 (20) (70) (30) (40) (15) (25) (100)
150
100
50
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
24
Optimisation Integration Expansion
OPTIMISATION
INTEGRATION
INTEGRATION
EXPANSION
26
Optimisation Integration Expansion
OPERATIONS OPTIMISATION
We see a number of areas for optimisation across the end-to-end user journey (i.e. from
customer targeting to user retention), as well as in the BNPL firm’s funding sources
Operations Optimisation
User Journey & Funding Source
FUNDING SOURCES
Funding Models
• Review existing funding channels and sources, and look to establish new partnerships with strategic funding partners to (1) minimise
ongoing funding costs and (2) move credit risk off-balance sheet
Merchant Positioning
Evolution
User
Merchant User Expansion
High-End
Expansion Expansion
Merchant
Expansion
2
Target Merchants
Brand
Brand
Establishment
3 Establishment
1
Low-End
Afterpay
Positioning Pivot
1
2
Target Merchants
3
4
Low-End
5
Low-Income Target Users High-Income
The top partner merchants of Afterpay gradually shifted
from low-end retailers to high-end, luxury brands
User Acquisition
Marketing
0%
Cost Per Mille (USD) 5.16 6.46 11.54 6.70 3.53 3.67
Source: Pixability, Wordstream, Heap, Social Media Examiner, Adstage, Webfx, Fat Stacks, 4C Insights, Quinlan & Associates analysis 30
Optimisation Integration Expansion
User Acquisition
Conversion
1 2 3 4
DEPLOY TRAIN INCENTIVISE ENHANCE
• BNPL firm deploys brand • Partner merchants’ staff • BNPL firm establishes • BNPL firm monitors user
ambassadors to partner receive training from BNPL incentive programmes for registration trends and
stores, directly engaging with brand ambassadors, learning employees at merchant stores collects user / merchant
customers to promote the more about the service details to promote the BNPL service feedback to enhance
service, supporting customers and relevant support to new customers, removing incentives to maintain service
in service registration / usage procedures / processes costs from the BNPLs P&L promotion and user uptake
DIRECT MODEL
Educate merchant staff on Motivate merchant staff to Implement adaptations to
INDIRECT MODEL
benefits of using BNPL encourage BNPL usage maintain engagement
USER EVALUATION
Effectively refining the credit assessment process will enable BNPL providers to operate
at risk levels that are more consistent with their tolerance / appetite, reducing NPLs
User Evaluation
Creditworthiness
New
Traditional Data
USER RETENTION
To drive user retention, BNPL firms can consider the development of a “super app”, either
from organically or via partnerships / acquisitions
User Engagement
Super App
SUPER APP
ENGAGE
1 Regular, updated content to encourage consumers to
access the application on a recurring basis
Consumer BROWSE
2 Content engagement leads consumers to browse related
products / services, driving additional consumption
1
Super App
PAY
3 BNPL is integrated and offered as an option at check-
out, minimising friction to drive consumer adoption
4
Digital Content Users
2
USERS
CREATE
eCommerce 4 Users are encouraged to create content, either via a
social media model or incentives for consumption
5 MERCHANTS
BNPL Offering Merchants
PARTNER
5 Merchants list products on the eCommerce platform and
receive payment through the BNPL offering
FUNDING SOURCES
Most BNPL firms currently bear credit risk, driving up funding costs due to NPL exposure;
we see considerable scope to explore alternative funding models via partnerships
Funding Model
Credit Extension
Direct vs. Indirect
2 2
4 3 4 1
Consumer BNPL Provider Merchant Consumer BNPL Provider Merchant
1 5 1 5 3
BNPL Provider raises capital from Funding Partner (through equity BNPL Provider establishes partnerships with Credit Institution and
1 / debt financing) or from retail population (through deposits) 1 Merchant, and determine partnership terms
Consumer browses for goods at Merchant’s store or website, and Consumer browses for goods at Merchant’s store or website, and
2 chooses to pay through BNPL 2 chooses to pay through BNPL
BNPL Provider pays Merchant the purchase amount with the MDR Credit Institution pays the Merchant the purchase amount with the
3 deducted, bearing credit risk on own balance sheet 3 MDR deducted, either directly or through BNPL provider
Consumer pays BNPL Provider through instalments, based on pre- Consumer pays BNPL Provider through instalments, based on pre-
4 determined BNPL terms 4 determined BNPL terms
BNPL Provider repays capital plus returns (dividends or interests) BNPL Provider transfers amount paid by Consumer to Credit
5 to Funding Partner 5 Institution, with handling fee deducted
Source: Quinlan & Associates analysis 34
Section 4.2 Integration
35
Optimisation Integration Expansion
VERTICAL INTEGRATION
BNPL companies can consider vertically integrating along the consumer value chain by
leveraging some of their relevant capabilities
Vertical Integration
Online Consumption Value Chain eCommerce Credit Extension Payments
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
UPWARDS
Browse online for
desired goods • Partner with merchants and list products for a platform fee
SHOP
DOWNWARDS
by making payment • Partner with eCommerce platform or merchants, charging a service fee
PAY
eCommerce
Monetisation
Integration
2
BNPL Provider eCommerce Platform BNPL Provider eCommerce Platform
5 1 3 4 1 2
4 3
Consumer MSME Consumer MSME
1 Retail Sale
Merchants Consumers
1 Merchants rely on the eCommerce
platform to sell goods, receiving
revenue in the form of retail sales
Direct Direct
Ownership 2 Ownership
BNPL
Services 2
BNPL
3 eCommerce platform pays service
/ subscription fee to receive non-
core, BNPL services
Revenue Flow
PAYMENTS
Integration with different payment services enables BNPL companies to be part of the – or
remove – substitutes, driving consumer flow
Payments Services
Monetisation
Integration
2 2
Integrated Entity
4
Consumer Consumer MSME 4
(w/o Credit Needs) (w/ Credit Needs) All Consumers MSME
Consumer chooses to pay through payment services or BNPL Consumer chooses to pay through the integrated entity, regardless
1 provider, depending on their need for credit 1 of their need for credit
Payment services / BNPL provider receives payment instruction Integrated entity receives payment instruction and transfers
2 and transfers relevant sum to eCommerce platform 2 relevant sum to eCommerce platform
eCommerce platform transfers money, with fee deducted, to the eCommerce platform transfers money, with fee deducted, to the
3 MSME merchant 3 MSME merchant
MSME confirms receipt of payment, and subsequently delivers MSME confirms receipt of payment, and subsequently delivers
4 product to the consumer (independently or via fulfilment service) 4 product to the consumer (independently or via fulfilment service)
Consumer repays BNPL provider over time, based on the pre- Consumer repays integrated entity for BNPL credit extended over
5 determined repayment terms 5 time, based on the pre-determined repayment terms
Debt Collection
Integration
Debt Collection
Purchase Debt
BNPL Provider Creditor
4
Collect Debt
On-Ground Team Consumer
SaaS Solution Consumer
The BNPL provider purchases debt from a Creditor at a The BNPL provider modularises its debt collection solution
discount, and uses its own physical infrastructure and on- and sells it as a subscription service to a Creditor, who uses
the-ground team to collect overdue debts from the Consumer its functions to facilitate own debt collection process
41
Optimisation Integration Expansion
PRODUCT EXTENSION
Leveraging their experience in the consumer credit space, BNPL firms can explore other
credit products, based on the needs of their users (note: new licenses may be required)
Product Extension
Credit Products
Loan Amount
Interest Rate
Loan Duration
Credit Check
Merchant Coverage
Low High
Traditional Alternative
Risk Engine Risk Engine
Traditional eKYC
KYC Team Solution
44
Optimisation Integration Expansion
Financial Implications
Developed Market Players, Indexed (to Current Revenue)
140
10
120
+35
20 8
5
100 7
80
130
60 115
100 95
40
20
0
100 +0 +20 +10 130 95 (7) (5) (8) 115
Source: Quinlan & Associates analysis 45
Optimisation Integration Expansion
Financial Implications
Emerging Market Specialists, Indexed (to Current Revenue)
200
10
5
175 15
-25
150
15
125 10
20
100 200
170
75 145
50 100
25
0
100 +20 +10 +15 145 170 (15) (5) (10) 200
Source: Quinlan & Associates analysis 46
SECTION 5
NEW ENTRANTS
47
BANKS
With payment and credit distribution channels offered by banks forecast to decline in
coming years, we believe banks need to rethink their consumer credit product offerings
Banks
New Entrants
2.1%
BNPL 4.2%
+100%
3.3%
Cash on Delivery 1.7%
-48%
7.7%
Bank Transfer -31%
Offered by Banks
5.3%
12.3%
Debit Card 12.0%
-2%
22.8%
Credit Card 20.8%
-9%
44.5%
Digital Wallet 51.7%
+16%
7.3%
Others 4.2%
-42%
1,653
160 152
1,500 1,369
1,600
1,378
140 1,026
1,200 132
1,000
769
120 121
800
113
556
100 500
108 109
400 100 104
102 282
100
100 235 100
CONCLUSION
50
REVENUE OPPORTUNITY
The total APAC BNPL GMV is expected to grow from USD 61 billion to USD 361 billion,
with developed market players processing 78% of GMV in 2025
China India
350 Australia Indonesia
Japan Thailand
Singapore Philippines
200
361.2
150
100
50
61.3
0
USD 51.9 bn USD 9.4 bn USD 61.3 bn USD 280.2 bn USD 81.0 bn USD 361.2 bn
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
-5 -5
2020 2025E 2020 2025E
HISTORICAL STATUS QUO OPTIMISED HISTORICAL STATUS QUO OPTIMISED
(USD 0.3 bn) (USD 1.9 bn) USD 4.5 bn (USD 0.4 bn) (USD 3.3 bn) (USD 0.8 bn)
53
OUR SERVICES
Our consultants have extensive experience in support incumbent BNPL firms in optimising
their businesses and aspiring entrants in market entry
Our Services
BNPL Industry
1 2 3
BUSINESS OPTION GROWTH
REVIEW EVALUATION STRATEGY
Review the client’s existing strategy and Evaluate options across (1) optimisation, Prioritise options and establish strategy,
operations within the BNPL space, in order (2) integration, and (3) expansion, based based on industry opportunities and the
to determine key capability gaps and pain on industry dynamics and taking into client’s specific circumstances, to optimise
points / challenges account the challenges identified growth potential in the BNPL space
1 2 3
OPPORTUNITY COMPETITIVE ENTRY
EVALUATION ANALYSIS STRATEGY
Evaluate target markets (based on client’s Identify local / regional competitors and Prioritise markets and determine suitable
shortlist) to understand local / regional market leaders, to benchmark their market industry positioning, along with detailed
demand dynamics, determining a potential positioning / proposition and determine recommendations on service offering and
wallet opportunity in the BNPL space industry best practice operating model
All rights reserved. This presentation may not be distributed, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of
Quinlan & Associates. Quinlan & Associates accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this
respect.
The information and opinions in this presentation were prepared by Quinlan & Associates. This presentation is not
financial or investment advice and should not be relied upon for such advice or as a substitute for professional
accounting, tax, legal or financial advice. Quinlan & Associates has made every effort to use reliable, up-to-date and
comprehensive information and analysis in this presentation, but all information is provided without warranty of any kind,
express or implied.
Quinlan & Associates disclaims any responsibility to update the information or conclusions in this presentation. Quinlan
& Associates accepts no liability for any loss arising from any action taken or refrained from as a result of information
contained in this presentation or any reports or sources of information referred to herein, or for any consequential,
special or similar damages even if advised of the possibility of such damages. This presentation is not an offer to buy or
sell securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities.
55