Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.

02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638

The effect of Sea Surface Temperature and Chlorophyll-A on the Total Catches of Lift
Net Fishery in the Padang Pariaman Regency, Indonesia
1Suharyanto, 2Endang Gunaisah, 2Vicky Rizky Katili, 1Priyantini Dewi, 1Febri D.
Nugroho, 2Hendra Poltak
1
Politeknik Ahli Usaha Perikanan, Jakarta.
2
Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan, Sorong.
*Corresponding author: vickykatili14@polikpsorong.ac.id

Registered: March 29, 2022; Received after repair: November 26, 2022;
Approved issue: Desember 01, 2022

ABSTRACT
The West Sumatera Waters has the potential to be developed for capture fisheries. This
potential is utilized through the application of local knowledge for better fishing operations.
Fishermen in West Sumatera in determining fishing ground still use the traditional method,
namely using previous experience even though on vessels of > 40 GT and it has been assisted
by the fish finder. This study aims to analyze the distribution of sea surface temperature (SST)
and chlorophyll-a through Aqua Modis satellite imagery interpretation and analyze its effect
on boat lift catch from December 2019 to March 2020. The remote sensing technique via
satellite is an efficient method to determine the distribution of sea surface temperature and the
distribution of chlorophyll-a. Data from satellites is very helpful in determining temperature
and chlorophyll-a. The results obtained are in December 2019 to March 2020 SST distribution
ranged from 27 to 30.9°C with dominant SST fluctuating every month and chlorophyll-a
concentration ranging from 0.13 to 4 mg m³ with dominant chlorophyll-a concentration
fluctuating every month. Sea surface temperature (SST) and chlorophyll-a simultaneously did
not affect the catch.
Keywords: fishing ground, aqua modis, remote sensing, Katsuwonus pelamis

INTRODUCTION the primary productivity of the oceans, while

Indonesia has an important role in the
tuna fishery, especially of Thunnus sp., Auxis
rochei, and Katsuwonus pelamis (Sepri et al.,
2020). The area of fishing that supports this
position is West Sumatera Waters in the
Fisheries Management Area (FMA) – 572
which includes the western Indian Ocean,
West Sumatera, and the Sunda Strait. Based
on data from Capture Fisheries Statistics, the
total production of these fish in FMA 572 is
197,410 tons (Suman et al., 2018).
The efforts to predict fishing ground can
be done through an approach to
oceanographic physical conditions. Almost all
fish populations that live in the sea have an
optimum temperature range and chlorophyll-a
for life (Laevastu & Hela, 1970). A good
fishing ground is influenced by chlorophyll-a
which is a parameter that greatly determines
sea surface temperature (SST) can be used as
a parameter to predict the presence of
organisms in water, especially fish (Tangke et
al., 2015). one of the indicators to determine
the presence of a type of fish is SST (Nugraha
et al., 2020).
The remote sensing technique via
satellite is an efficient method to determine
the distribution of SST and the distribution of
chlorophyll-a. Satellite data is very helpful in
determining the optimum temperature and
chlorophyll-a favored by fish. The SST and
chlorophyll-a can then be implemented to
predict fishing ground (Tangke et al., 2015).
Material and Methods
Data analysis method
SST measurements are carried out
before the set begins with a digital

253
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638
thermometer. The chlorophyll-a data was
collected by processing the Aqua MODIS
satellite image data which had been processed
using several software, namely: SeaDas 7.5.3
for cropping, Microsoft Excel for NaN data
correction, and AcrGis 10.3 for map overlay
and layout (Kurnianingsih. et al., 2017).
Remote sensing technology is one method that
has been effective in conducting surveys over
large areas and in narrow straits (Hartoko et
al., 2019; Maro et al., 2021). The composition
of fish caught can be calculated by the
following equation (A. F. P. Nelwan et al.,
2015):
ni
𝑝𝑖 = 𝑥 100%
N
Information :
pi = abundance of catch (%)
ni = number of species caught (kg)
N = total catch (kg)
In determining CPUE, the formula
used is as follows ((A. Nelwan et al., 2015):
Catch
CPUE =
𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡
Information :
CPUE = Catch per fishing effort in month t
(kg/trip)
Catch = Catch in month t (kg)
Effort = catching effort in month t (trip)
Distribution of Sea Surface Temperature
(SST) and Chlorophyll-a Concentration
SST data and chlorophyll-a
concentrations were obtained through remote
sensing using the Aqua Modis satellite data
which is a non-photo image with a thermal
infrared electromagnetic spectrum (Fauziah et
al., 2020). From the Aqua Modis satellite
image data downloaded from the website
(Www.Oceancolor.Nasa.Gfsc.Gov, 2021) for
monthly and weekly composite data from
December 2019 to March 2020 in
Hierarchical Data Format (HDF).
Image data cropping is done through
SeaDas 7.4 software. NaN data is the result of
reflection from clouds or objects that are not
detected numerically by satellite imagery, so
corrections are needed. The result of the NaN
254
data filter from Microsoft Excel is data with
the type of .xls file which is ready for further
processing in ArcGIS 10.3. (Muhsoni, 2015).
The Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW)
interpolation method was used to simplify the
data analysis process. This method assumes
that the interpolation value is similar to the
nearest sample data in the vicinity (Maulina et
al., 2019).
Correlation between catch with sea surface
temperature and chlorophyll-a
To determine the relationship between
SST and chlorophyll-a at the same position
and time, it is analyzed by presenting a
coefficient of determination table and then
looking at the Adjusted R² value. The data that
has known the correlation coefficient then
tested again using multiple linear regression
(Rukajat, 2018; Sugiyono, 2013). The use of
SPSS software is to simplify the calculation of
multiple linear regression analysis. The
multiple linear regression formula s as follow:
𝑌 = 𝑎 + 𝑏1 𝑋 + 𝑏2 𝑋2
Information :
X1 = variable sea surface temperature (SST)
X2 = variable Chlorophyll-a
Y = number of catches
a, b1, b2 = constant
SST variable data took directly during
the research (in situ) and chlorophyll-a
variable which is weekly composite data from
November 28, 2019, to May 15, 2020, a
spatial resolution of 4 km from the Aqua
MODIS satellite image (ex-situ).
Result and Discussion
Total Catch
The number of fish caught from
December 2019 to March 2020 tends to
fluctuate. The catch in February 2020
decreased more than December 2019, January
2020, and March 2020, which was 5,280 kg
with a CPUE of 1,760 kg/trip. In January 2020
it was 31,881 kg with a CPUE of 2,452.3
kg/trip. Meanwhile, in December 2019 the
catch was less than January 2020, which was
20,680 kg with a CPUE of 6893.33 kg/trip and
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638

the catch in March 2020 was 14,520 kg with a and February 2020 were dominated by
CPUE of 4,840 kg/trip (Figure 1). Decapterus, while December 2019 and March
2020 were dominated by E. affinis, K.
pelamis, and T. albacares (Table 1).
This fluctuating CPUE can be
influenced by various factors, including
differences in fishing effort, adequate fishing
vessels, and the skills of the fishermen
themselves, different weather conditions
every month, as well as the presence or
absence of food sources and the presence of
fish in the area. capture and oceanographic
Figure 1. Total Catches and CPUE for factors that affect fish life (Akoit & Nalle,
December 2019 to March 2020. 2018; Jupitar et al., 2020) where from
Catch Composition December 2019 to March 2020 the catch was
dominated by E. affinis and D. koheru.
The composition of catches in January
Different geographical conditions and
2020 and February 2020 tended to be different
locations can also cause different catches at
from the composition of catches in December
the same time of capture (Nasution, 2017).
2019 and March 2020. When January 2020
Table 1. Composition of Catches for the period December 2019 – March 2020
Total Catch(kg)
Dec 2019 Jan 2020 Feb 2020 Marc 2020
E. affinis 9,360 0 0 2,560
K. pelamis 1,080 0 0 8,000
T. albacares 40 0 0 160
A. rochei 1,560 0 4,800 3,960
D. koheru 8,640 26,360 680 0
Loligo sp 80 0 0 120
C. ignobilis 320 0 0 0
D. macarellus 0 4,600 0 0
D. tabi 0 920 120 0

Distribution of Sea Surface Temperature
The distribution of SST in West
Sumatera waters, especially on fishing
grounds around the position of 01°10'45’’S -
100°07'7’’E, 01°09'51’’ S - 099°29'47’’E,
02°01 '34” S - 099°21'13” E, and 01°06'10” S
- 100°15'35 ”E are presented in the form of
satellite imagery containing information on
the distribution of sea surface temperature
with color (pallet) and contours different SST
in each temperature range in different places.
The processed SST images show that the SST
from December 2019 to March 2020 shows
SST that varies from the lowest temperature
of 27°C to the highest temperature of 30.9°C.
Figure 2 below is the result of the SST image
for the period December 2019 – March 2020
for the West Sumatera region.
From December 2019 to March 2020
the temperature distribution tends to fluctuate
every month. SST fluctuations in waters are
influenced by patterns of movement of the
sun, wind, and air pressure (D. Simbolon &
Girsang, 2009). The SST in coastal areas is
higher, due to a decrease in the absorption of
sunlight intensity (Hutagalung, 1988). Solar
radiation that enters aquatic ecosystems is
absorbed by autotrophic organisms such as
phytoplankton and some others will
experience assimilation and are recorded by
the thermal band and accumulate into surface
temperature (Ibrahim et al., 2016).

255
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638

Figure 2. SST Satellite Image in West Sumatera Waters. (a) December 2019, (b) January
2020, (c) February 2020 (d) March 2020. (www.oceancolor.nasa.gfsc.gov)
Table 2. Fluctuations in sea surface temperature in the waters of West Sumatera
SST (°C) Dec 2019 January 2020 Feb 2020 March 2020
Fluctuation 27 - 29 29 – 30,1 29,5 – 30,5 29,7 – 30,9
Dominant 27,4 – 28,8 29,4 – 29,9 30 – 30,3 30 – 30,3
SST min 27 – 27,6 29 – 29,4 29,5 – 29,7 29,7 – 30
Location East of Pagai throughout of Southwest of West of Sipora
Island, the coast Southern Siberut Island Island.
of Padang City, Mentawai Strait.
South Coast of
Regency.
SST max 28.8 - 29 29,8 – 30,1 30,3 – 30,5 30,3 – 30,9
Location South of Siberut Northern of the South coast of Coast of Padang
Island Mentawai Strait Regency City

On 1 to 10 December 2019 the lowest of 01°10'45 ”S - 100°07'7” E, 01°09'51” S -

SST in the waters of West Sumatera with SST
ranging from 27.9 to 28.4°C, then in the
following days the SST in West Sumatera
tends to increase until February 18 to March
12, 2020, where SST range from 29.5 to
29.8°C. The distribution of the SST can be
illustrated in Figure 3.
Distribution of Chlorophyll-a Concentration
In the waters of West Sumatera,
especially in the fishing ground at a position
099°29'47 ” E 02°01'34” S - 099°21'13” E,
and 01°06'10” S - 100°15'35” E. The
processed chlorophyll-a concentration
distribution image shows that the content of
chlorophyll-a concentration from December
2019 to March 2020, the chlorophyll-a
concentration varied from the lowest
concentration of 0.13 mg m3 to the highest
concentration of 4 mg m3 (figure 4).

256
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638

Figure 3. Distribution of SST in West Sumatera Waters in December 2019 to March 2020.

Figure 4. Satellite Image of Chlorophyll-a distribution in West Sumatera Waters.

(a) December 2019, (b) January 2020, (c)February 2020, (d) March 2020.
(www.oceancolor.nasa.gfsc.gov).
Figure 4a shows that the concentration area. The lowest concentration of chlorophyll-
of chlorophyll-a in West Sumatera Waters a ranged from 0.4 to 0.6 mg m³ which was
ranged from 0.4 to 4 mg m³. The distribution found in the west of Sipora Island.
of the dominant chlorophyll-a concentration Meanwhile, the highest concentration of
ranged from 0.8 to 1.4 mg m³ which was chlorophyll-a, 3.4 to 4 mg m³, was found in
spread almost evenly throughout the waters the east of Sipora Island.

257
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638
Figure 4b shows that the concentration
of chlorophyll-a in the waters of West
Sumatera ranged from 0.13 to 2 mg m³. The
distribution of the dominant chlorophyll-a
concentration in the waters ranges from 0.25
to 0.38 mg m³ which is almost evenly
distributed throughout the waters and is also
the lowest chlorophyll-a concentration value.
Meanwhile, the highest concentration of
chlorophyll-a ranged from 1.2 to 2 mg m³
which was found along the coast of the south
coast regency and in the east between Siberut
Island and Sipora Island.
Figure 4c shows that the concentration
of chlorophyll-a in the waters of West
Sumatera ranges from 0.15 to 1.4 mg m³. The
distribution of the dominant chlorophyll-a
concentration in the waters ranged from 0.15
- 0.2 mg m³ which was spread almost evenly
throughout the waters and was also the lowest
chlorophyll-a concentration value.
Meanwhile, the highest chlorophyll-a
concentrations ranged from 1.1 to 1.4 mg m³
along the coast of the South coast regency.
Figure 4d shows that the concentration
of chlorophyll-a in the waters of West
Sumatera ranges from 0.15 to 1.1 mg m³. The
distribution of the dominant chlorophyll-a
concentration in the waters ranged between
0.15 to 0.2 mg m³ which was evenly
distributed throughout the waters and was also
the lowest chlorophyll concentration value.
Meanwhile, the highest value of chlorophyll-
a concentration ranged from 0.75 to 1.1 mg m³
which was found along the coast of Pesisir
Selatan Regency.
The distribution of chlorophyll-a
concentration is shown in the visualization
using a green to blue color degradation where
the bluer indicates the higher chlorophyll-a
concentration. Based on Figure 4, it can be
seen that spatially, the chlorophyll-a
concentration on the coast is higher than
offshore. The concentration of chlorophyll-a
in offshore waters is lower than in coastal
waters (Ulqodry & Aryawaty, 2013). The high
concentration of chlorophyll-a in coastal areas
is thought to occur due to the accumulation of
258
nutrients carried by rivers to sea waters in
coastal areas (Putra et al., 2012).
On December 1 to 10, 2019 was the
highest concentration of chlorophyll-a in the
waters of West Sumatera with chlorophyll-a
concentrations ranging from 1.1 to 1.4 mg m³,
then on the following days t, the
concentration of chlorophyll-a in West
Sumatera tended to decrease to February 25 to
March 12, 2020, where the concentration of
chlorophyll-a ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 mg m³
(Figure 5).
Figure 5. Distribution of Chlorophyll-a
Concentration in December 2019 to
March 2020
Effect of Sea Surface Temperature and
Chlorophyll-a on Catch Results.
Figure 6 shows that the highest
production was on January 17 to 24, 2020
where the average catch was 1,783 kg with an
SST of 29.5°C and a concentration of
chlorophyll-a 0.22 mg m³, followed by March
5 to 12, 2020 average catch is 1,721 kg with
SST 29.8°C and chlorophyll-a concentration
0.16 mg m³.
While the lowest production of Scad
was from February 2 to 9, 2020 where the
average catch was 80 kg with an SST of
29.2°C and chlorophyll-a concentration of
0.24 mg m3. followed by 26 February to 4
March 2020 the average catch was 120 kg
with an SST of 29.7°C and chlorophyll-a
concentration of 0.14 mg m³.
Figures 6 and 7 show that there is an
inverse relationship between SST and
chlorophyll-a concentration on the average
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638

weekly catch from December 2019 to March
2020. In Figures 6 and 7, it is also clear that
SST and concentration chlorophyll-a partially
still has a significant relationship to the
average catch when observed simultaneously
there is an inverse relationship between the
SST and chlorophyll-a to the average catch,
which means that there is no significant
relationship between SST and chlorophyll-a
to the average catch.

Figure 6. Relationship between SST and Average Catch Per Week

Figure 7. Relationship of Chlorophyll-a with Average Catch Per Week.

Determining the effect of SST and multicollinearity test, heteroscedasticity test,

chlorophyll-a on catches more clearly,
multiple linear regression statistical analysis
was used. The variables analyzed covered sea
surface temperature (SST) (X1) and
Chlorophyll-a (CHL-A) (X2) which as
independent variables while the average catch
per week (Y) is used as the dependent
variable. Several classical assumption tests
have been done, including the
and normality test.
Multicollinearity Test
Testing for the presence or absence of
multicollinearity symptoms is carried out by
taking into account the value of the correlation
matrix generated during data processing and
the value of VIF (Variance Inflation Factor)
and Tolerance. Then if the VIF value is < 10
and the tolerance value is > 0.10, it is

259
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638
concluded that the regression model does not
have multicollinearity (Ghozali, 2013).
Table 3. Multicollinearity Test
Coefficients
Correlations
Model Partial Part Tolerance VIF
1 (Constant)
SST (X1) .607 .597 .207 4.824
CHL (X2) .619 .615 .207 4.824
a. Dependent Variable: Average Catch (Y)
Based on table 3 above, it can be seen
that the regression model does not experience
multicollinearity disorders. This can be seen
Table 4. Heteroscedasticity Test
Coefficients
Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients
B Std. Error
1 (Constant) -5172.335 7684.344
SST (X1) 195.023 257.470
CHL (X2) -128.419 379.066
a. Dependent Variable: abs_RES
Based on this statement, we can see in
table 4 the value of Sig. SST (X1) 0.466 > 0.05
and the value of Sig. CHL (X2) 0.742 > 0.05.
It can be concluded that there is no
heteroscedasticity in the two independent
variables. So that this regression model can be
continued on the next classic assumption test.
The normality test is one part of the
data analysis requirements test or the classical
assumption test. The purpose of the normality
test is to test whether in a regression model,
the dependent variable and the independent
variable or both have a normal distribution or
not. A good regression model is a normal or
close to normal data distribution. To
determine a variable has a normal distribution
or cannot be seen in the following way:
1. What if the value of Sig. (P Value) > (α =
0.05) then the data is normally distributed;
2. What if the value of Sig. (P Value) < (α =
0.05) then the data is not normally
distributed.
260
in the tolerance value of each variable 0.207 <
0.10 and the results of the VIF calculation also
show that the VIF value of each variable is
4.824 < 10. So it can be concluded that there
is no multicollinearity between the
independent variables in the regression model.
Heteroscedasticity Test
To conclude whether or not
heteroscedasticity occurs in the following
way:
1. What if the value of Sig. (P Value) > (α =
0.05) then there is no heteroscedasticity;
2. What if the value of Sig. (P Value) < (α =
0.05) then heteroscedasticity occurs.
Correlations
Beta t Sig. Zero-order
-.673 .516
.422 .757 .466 .590
-.189 -.339 .742 -.565
Table 5. Normality test
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-
Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Model Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
SST (X1) .211 13 .118 .878 13 .066
CHL .236 13 .046 .870 13 .052
(X2)
Average .190 13 .200* .877 13 .064
Catch
(Y)
In table 5 there are Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Tests of Normality
Shapiro-Wilk. To see the normality of all
variables, you can see one of the Sig values.
(P Value) Tests of Normality on the data. In
the Tests of Normality Shapiro-Wilk, there is
a Sig value. SST (X1) 0.066 > 0.05, the value
of Sig. CHL (X2) 0.052 > 0.05, and the value
of Sig. Average catch (Y) 0.064 > 0.05. It can
be concluded that all variables data are
normally distributed and can continue to make
regression models.
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638
Multiple Linear Regression coefficient tests
(F Test)
The purpose of the F test is to see
whether or not there is an effect that is given
simultaneously by the independent variables
of sea surface temperature (X1) and
chlorophyll-a (X2) on the dependent variable
on the average catch (Y). To be able to
determine whether or not there is an effect of
the independent variable sea surface
temperature (X1) and chlorophyll-a (X2) on
the dependent variable on the average catch
(Y). The hypothesis is made as follows:
Table 6. F test (ANOVA)
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df
1 Regression 2575944.896 2 1287972.448
Residual 3505517.487 10
Total 6081462.383 12
a. Dependent Variable: Average Catch (Y)
b. Predictors: (Constant), CHL (X2), SST
(X1)
From the results of the F test in this
study, the calculated F value was 3.674 with
the Sig number. (P-value) of 0.064. With a
significance level of 95% (α = 0.05). Value of
Sig. (P-value) of 0.064 > 0.05. Based on this
comparison, H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected
or it means that the sea surface temperature
variable and chlorophyll-a do not have a
significant effect simultaneously on the
average catch variable.
This condition can occur because of the
possibility that the SST value and chlorophyll-
a concentration in the study area can still be
tolerated by the fish species present there and
other oceanographic factors have a greater
influence on catches in West Sumatera
Waters
Multiple Linear Regression coefficient tests
(Coefficient of Determination)
The coefficient of determination (R²)
was carried out to see whether there was a
perfect relationship or not, which was shown
in the change in the independent variable SST
261
1. HO = There is no influence between the
independent variable and the dependent
variable on the catch;
2. H1 = There is an influence between the
independent variable and the dependent
variable on the catch;
3. Determine the 95% confidence level (α =
0.05);
4. What if the value of Sig. (P Value) < 0.05
then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted;
5. What if the value of Sig. (P Value) > 0.05
then H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected;
Mean Square F Sig.
3.674 .064b
350551.749
(X1) and chlorophyll-a (X2) followed by the
dependent variable on the average catch (Y) in
the same proportion. This test is done by
looking at the value of R Square (R²). The
value of the coefficient of determination is
between 0 to 1. Furthermore, a small R² value
means that the ability of the independent
variables to explain the variation of the
dependent variable is very limited. A value
close to 1 means that the independent
variables provide almost all the information
needed to predict the dependent variable
(Yuliara, 2016).
In this case, the value used in the study
is the Adjusted R² value because this value can
increase or decrease if one independent
variable is added to the model being tested.
The adjusted R² value can be seen in Table 7
below:
Table 7. Regression Test (Coefficient of
Determination)
Model Summary
Std. The
R Adjusted error of the
Model R Square R Square Estimate
1 .651a .424 .308 592.07411
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638
a. Predictors: (Constant), CHL (X2), SST
(X1)
In Table 7 it can be seen that the
Adjusted R² value is 0.308. This means that
the independent variables (SST and
chlorophyll-a) can explain the dependent
variable (the average catch) of 30.8%, while
the remaining 69.2% is explained by other
factors not examined. Several other factors
that are thought to influence the catch include
water depth, currents, and water salinity, as
well as upwelling conditions. Increased fish
production in water can be caused by
upwelling because the movement of water
brings cooler temperatures and higher salinity
and brings rich nutrients such as phosphate
and nitrate to the surface (Nontji, 2005; D.
Simbolon & Girsang, 2009).
Multiple Linear Regression coefficient tests
(T-Test)
After performing the F test and the
determination test, the next step in the
multiple linear regression process is to
perform a T-test to be able to determine the
effect of the independent variables of SST
(X1) and chlorophyll-a (X2) individually
Table 8. T test
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Model B Std. Error
1 (Constant) -50671.849 19619.334
SST (X1) 1679.208 642.346
CHL (X2) 3903.756 1460.680
a. Dependent Variable: Average catch (Y)
In Table 8 the SST variable (X1) with a
significance level of 95% (α = 0.05). Shows
Sig. (P Value) on the direct evidence variable
is 0.026 <0.05. Based on this comparison, H0
is rejected and H1 is accepted or it means that
the SST variable (X1) has a significant
influence on the average catch variable (Y).
Variable CHL (X2) with a significance
level of 95% (α = 0.05). Shows Sig. (P Value)
on the direct evidence variable is 0.023 <0.05.
Based on this comparison, H0 is rejected and
262
(partial) on the dependent variable on the
average catch. (Y). Then the hypothesis is
made as follows:
1. H0 = There is no effect between the
independent variable and the dependent
variable on the catch;
2. H1 = There is an influence between the
independent variable and the dependent
variable on the catch;
3. Determine the degree of confidence 95%
(α = 0.05);
4. What if the value of Sig. (P Value) < 0.05
then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted;
5. What if the value of Sig. (P Value) > 0.05
then H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected;
6. Determine the regression model Y =
a+b_1 X_1+b_2 X_2 by looking at the
Unstandardized Coefficients B column in
the T-test table.
Description:
X1 = Variable SST (°C)
X2 = Variable Chlorophyll-a
(mg/m³)
Y = Total catch (kg)
a, b1, b2 = Constant
Standardized Coefficients
Beta t Sig.
-2.583 .027
1.487 2.614 .026
1.520 2.673 .023
H1 is accepted which means that the CHL
variable (X2) has a significant effect on the
average catch variable (Y).
In Table 8 it can also be seen that the
multiple linear regression model from this
study by assessing the value of
Unstandardized Coefficients B (constant) -
50671,849, SST (X1) 1679,208, and CHL (X2)
3903,756 with this regression model obtained
is Y = -50671,849 + 1679,208 X1 + 3903,756
X2.
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638

Figure 8. Map of Potential Fishing Ground inWest Sumatera.

(a) December 2019, (b) January 2020, (c) February 2020, (d) December 2020.
(www.oceancolor.nasa.gfsc.gov).

Table 9. Map of potential fishing areas

Decem ber January 2020 Febr uar y March
2019 2020 2020
Hi gh pot ential of west of t he west of t he west of t he east of
f ishing gr ound coast of coast of coast of Si por a
Padang Cit y, Padang Cit y, Padang Cit y, Island
Sout h of east of t he Sout h of t he
Padang Cit y coast Sipor a coast
i sland, Regency of
south of Padang Cit y
Si ber ut
Island
SST ( o C) 28,2 t o 28,6 29,4 t o 29,9 30 t o 30,2 30 t o 30,3
chl or ophyll -a 1 t o 1,5 0,75 t o 1,5 0,2 to 0,3 0,15 t o 0,2
concent rati on (mg
m³ )
Low pot ential west of t he west coast of The west t he west
f ishing gr ound bor der Padang coast of coast of
bet ween Par iam an Padang Padang
Padang Cit y, Regency bor der City Cit y
and Padang bor der
Par iam an
Regency
East Si berut
i sland
SST ( o C) 27,6 t o 28,4 29,8 t o 30 29,8 t o 30 30,6 t o
30,9
chl or ophyll -a 0,5 to 1 1,38 t o 2 1,38 t o 2 0,2 to 0,3
concent rati on (mg
m³ )
E.aff ini s Decapt erus Auxis rochei K. pel ami s

263
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638
Potential Fishing Ground
In Figure 6, it is clear that the fishing
spots are concentrated on the border waters of
Padang Pariaman Regency to the waters of the
border area of South coast Regency and
Padang City in the Mentawai Strait. The
indicators used in determining the fishing
ground by (Surbakti, 2012) are the
concentration of chlorophyll-a and catch per
unit effort (CPUE), while the indicators used
by (Mustasim et al., 2019; Z. M. Simbolon et
al., 2005) include catch, fish length, salinity,
and sea surface temperature. In this study, the
factors that indicate the potential for fishing
areas are the large number of catches and
CPUE which are influenced by sea surface
temperature and chlorophyll-a concentrations
in the waters of West Sumatera.
Optimum conditions in waters will
increase the preference of a type of fish or fish
schooling which in turn will encourage an
increase in the intensity of the fishing fleet in
the area/area because it is considered a
potential fishing area (Figure 8).
In Table 9, it can be seen that the catch
in West Sumatera Waters is dominated by
Decapterus, K. pelamis, E. affinis and Auxis
rochei. Based on the map overlay of potential
fishing areas, the optimum temperature for the
distribution of Decapterus, K. pelamis, E.
affinis, and Auxis rochei ranged from 28.2 to
29.9°C. This is in accordance with the opinion
(Fuadi et al., 2018) which states that the
optimum temperature for scad fish to be
caught is around 20 to 30°C and is not much
different from the opinion (Gunarso, 1985;
Pamungkas et al., 2020) which states that the
optimum SST for K. pelamis catching in
Indonesian waters is 28 to 29°C.
Conclusion.
Spatially the distribution of SST in West
Sumatera Waters in December 2019 to March
2020 ranged from 27 to 30°C with a dominant
range of 29°C and the concentration of
chlorophyll-a ranged from 0.13 to 4 mg m³
with a dominant range of 0.25 mg m³ and the
catch ranges between 1,000 kg to 2,500
kg/setting. The relationship between SST and
264
chlorophyll-a concentration based on
statistical analysis does not significantly
affect the average catch per week, this can be
seen from the value of Sig. (P-value) on the F
test is 0.064 > 0.05. There is also the
coefficient of determination of SST and the
concentration of chlorophyll-a on the average
catch per week in terms of the Adjusted R²
value of 0.308. This shows that SST and
chlorophyll-a concentration have a
simultaneous effect of 30.8% on the average
catch per week.
In December 2019 the SST ranged from
28.2 to 28.6°C and the concentration of
chlorophyll-a ranged from 1 to 1.5 mg m³ with
the dominant catch of E. affinis. In January
2020 the SST ranged from 29.4 to 29.9°C and
the concentration of chlorophyll-a ranged
from 0.75 to 1.5 mg m³ with the dominant
catch of Decapterus. In February 2020 the
SST ranged from 30 to 30.2°C and the
concentration of chlorophyll-a ranged from
0.2 to 0.3 mg m³ with the dominant catch of
Auxis rochei. In March 2020 the SST ranged
from 30 to 30.3°C and the concentration of
chlorophyll-a ranged from 0.15 to 0.2 mg m³
with the dominant catch of K.pelamis.
REFERENCES
Akoit, M. Y., & Nalle, M. (2018).
Pengelolaan sumberdaya perikanan
berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Timor
Tengah Utara berbasis pendekatan
bioekonomi. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia
(Journal of Indonesian Agribusiness),
6(2), 85–106.
Fauziah, A. N., Triarso, I., & Fitri, A. D. P.
(2020). Pendugaan Daerah Penangkapan
Ikan Tongkol Dengan Teknologi
Penginderaan Jauh Berdasarkan
Parameter Klorofil-A dan Suhu
Permukaan Laut Di Perairan Natuna.
Journal of Fisheries Resources
Utilization Management and
Technology, 9(1), 35–44.
Fuadi, A., Wiryawan, B., & Mustaruddin, M.
(2018). PENDUGAAN DAERAH
PENANGKAPAN IKAN LAYANG
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638
DENGAN CITRA SATELIT DI
PERAIRAN ACEH SEKITAR PIDIE
JAYA. Jurnal Teknologi Perikanan Dan
Kelautan, 9(2), 149–161.
Ghozali, I. (2013). Application of
Multivariate Analysis with IBM SPSS
25 Program. Semarang: Diponegoro
University Publisher.
Gunarso, W. (1985). Fish behvior in relation
to fishing tools, methods and
techniques. Department of Fisheries
Resource Utilization, Faculty of
Fisheries, Bogor Agricultural Institute,
Bogor, Indonesia.
Hartoko, A., Febrianto, A., Pamungkas, A.,
Fachruddin, I., & Helmi, M. (2019). The
myth and legend of Sadai and Gaspar
Strait Bangka Belitung (Banca-Billiton)
and oceanographic conditions.
GEOMATE Journal, 17(62), 212–218.
Hutagalung, H. P. (1988). The effect of water
temperature on marine organisms.
Oseana (Indonesia).
Ibrahim, F., F., A., R., W. T., D., P. M., & E,
M. (2016). Comparison of Brightness
Extraction at Landsat 8 TIRS without
Atmosphere Correction and Involving
Atmospheric Correction for Estimating
Surface Temperature. Proceedings of
the National Seminar on Geography,
University of Muhammadiyah
Surakarta, 7, 568–576.
Jupitar, J., Susiana, S., & Lestari, F. (2020).
The utilization rate of painted sweetlips
fish (Diagramma pictum) on Mapur
waters anchor in Kelong Village, Bintan
Regency, Indonesia. Akuatikisle: Jurnal
Akuakultur, Pesisir Dan Pulau-Pulau
Kecil, 4(1), 1–6.
Kurnianingsih., N., B., S., Y., P., &
Wirasatriya A. (2017). Analysis of the
Distribution of Sea Surface Temperature,
Chlorophyll-A, and Wind on the
Upwelling Phenomenon in the Waters of
Buru and Seram Islands. Journal of
Geodesy Undip, 6(1), 238–248.
265
Laevastu, T., & Hela, I. (1970). Fishery
Oceanography. (15th ed.). Fishing
News,Ltd.
Maro, J. F., Hartoko, A., Anggoro, S.,
Muskananfola, M. R., & Nugraha, E.
(2021). Sea surface temperature and
chlorophyll-a concentrations from
MODIS satellite data and presence of
cetaceans in Savu, Indonesia.
Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation &
Legislation, 14(3), 1190–1200.
Maulina, I. D., Triarso, I., & Prihantoko, K. E.
(2019). DAERAH POTENSI
PENANGKAPAN IKAN TEMBANG
(Sardinella fimbriata) DI LAUT JAWA
BERDASARKAN SATELIT AQUA
MODIS (Potential Fishing Ground of
Fringe Scale Sardine (Sardinella
fimbriata) in the Java Sea based on Aqua
Modis Satellite). Saintek Perikanan:
Indonesian Journal of Fisheries Science
and Technology, 15(1), 32–40.
Muhsoni, F. (2015). Remote Sensing.
UTMPress, Trunojoyo University
Madura.
Mustasim, M., Zainuddin, M., Safruddin, S.,
& Sutono, D. (2019). Preferensi
Parameter Oseanografi (SPL dan
klorofil-a) Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan
Ikan Cakalang di Perairan Pulau Misool
dan Fakfak. Jurnalairaha.Org, 08(1),
016–023.
Nasution, S. H. (2017). Karakteristik
Reproduksi Ikan Endemik Rainbow
Selebensis (Telmatherina cerebensis
Boulenger) dl Danau Towuti. Jurnal
Penelitian Perikanan Indonesia, 11(2),
29–37.
Nelwan, A. F. P., Sudirman, N. M., & Yunus,
M. A. (2015). Fishing productivity of
pelagic fishes in the waters of Sinjai
Regency on East-West monsoon
transition. Journal of Fisheries Science,
17(1), 18–26.
Nelwan, A., Hasanuddin, U., Sudirman, S., &
Hasanuddin, U. (2015).
PRODUKTIVITAS PENANGKAPAN
Jurnal Airaha, Vol.11, No.02 (Dec 2022):253 – 266, p-ISSN 2301-7163, e-ISSN 2621-9638
IKAN PELAGIS DI PERAIRAN
KABUPATEN SINJAI PADA MUSIM
PERALIHAN BARAT-TIMUR. Jurnal
Penelitian Perikanan Indonesia, 17(1),
17–25.
Nontji, A. (2005). Nusantara Sea. (Revised).
DJambatan Jakarta.
Nugraha, E., Gunawan, R., Danapraja, S.,
Kusdinar, A., Waluyo, A. S., Hutajulu,
J., Prayitno, H., Halim, S., & Sutisna, D.
H. (2020). The sea surface temperature
effect on the length and size of skipjack
tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) catches in
the Banda Sea, Indonesia. Aquaculture,
Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation,
13(1), 1–18.
Pamungkas, P. A., Kusdinar, A., & Halim, S.
(2020). Hubungan SPL dan Salinitas
Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan Cakalang
pada KM. Samudra Jaya di Laut Maluku.
Jurnal Penyuluhan Perikanan Dan
Kelautan, 14(1), 13–26.
Putra, E., Gaol, J. L., & Siregar, V. P. (2012).
Relationship chlorophyll-a concentration
and sea surface temperature with primary
pelagic fish catches in Java Sea from
Modis satellite images. Biology Journal
of Sumatera, 3, 1–10.
Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan penelitian
kualitatif (Qualitative research
approach). Deepublish.
Sepri, S., Hartoko, A., Hutajulu, J., Prayitno,
H., Husen, E. S., Santoso, H., Nugraha,
E., Danapraja, S., & Syam, M. Y. (2020).
The relationship between sea surface
temperature and catching time of
skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in
FMA-715, Seram Sea, Indonesia.
Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation &
Legislation, 13(6), 3430–3439.
Simbolon, D., & Girsang, S. (2009). The
Relationship Between Chlorophyll-A
Content and Tuna Catches in the Fishing
Area of Pelabuhanratu Water.
Indonesian Journal of Fisheries
Research, 15(4), 297–305.
266
Simbolon, Z. M., . G. J. L., & Hartojo, W.
(2005). Assessment of Potential Fishing
Zones for pufferfish (Rastrelliger spp.) in
Asahan Regency, North Sumatera.
National Seminar on Capture Fisheries,
303–314.
Sugiyono, S. (2013). Qualitative Research
Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suman, A., Satria, F., Nugraha, B., Priatna,
A., Amri, K., & Mahiswara, M. (2018).
Status of Fish Resource Stocks in 2016
in the Fisheries Management Area of the
Republic of Indonesia (FMA-RI) and
Alternative Management. Indonesian
Fisheries Policy Journal, 10(2), 31–47.
Surbakti, C. N. (2012). Season and Regional
Analysis of Anchovies Fishing
(Stolephorus spp.) based on the Content
of Chlorophyll-a in the Sibolga Waters,
North Sumatera. Bogor Agricultural
Institute, Bogor.
Tangke, U., Karuwal, J. C., Zainuddin, M., &
Mallawa, A. (2015). Sebaran suhu
permukaan laut dan klorofil-a
pengaruhnya terhadap hasil tangkapan
yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) di
Perairan Laut Halmahera bagian selatan.
PERENNIAL, 2(3).
Ulqodry, T. Z., & Aryawaty, R. (2013). Pola
Sebaran Konsentrasi Klorofil-a di Selat
Bangka dengan Menggunakan Citra
Aqua-Modis. Maspari Journal: Marine
Science Research, 5(1), 22–33.
www.oceancolor.nasa.gfsc.gov. (2021).
Yuliara, I. M. (2016). Multiple Linear
Regression. Faculty of Mathematics and
Natural Sciences, Udayana University.