Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

ECW 341 Water Engineering Laboratory Program: Diploma In Civil Engineering

Universiti Teknologi MARA (EC110) Academic Session: OCT 2022 – FEB 2023

Laboratory
LEVEL 0 Team Student’s ID Student’s Name Group
Level
Laboratory Title Uniform Flow For Open Channels 1. Group Leader 2020616994 Muhammad Alif Mikhail Bin Mohammed Rodzi PEC1105B1
Date 15 December 2020 2. Member 2020881522 Muhammad Saifuddin Bin Zamzuri PEC1105B1
Lecturer’s
Name Madam Zuraisah Bt Dollah 3. Member 2020852366 Amir Muqri Bin Hajjaj PEC1105B1
4. Member 202868628 Muhammad Naim Bin Abduk Rahman PEC1105B1
Verification

CO2 : Demonstrate leadership skills in task related to water engineering.


PO6 : Demonstrate knowledge of the societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to engineering technician practice and solutions to well-defined
engineering problems.

A. LABORATORY REPORT ASSESSMENT


RUBRICS/Marks Marks
NO DOMAIN ELEMENT
2 4 6 8 10
Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the
A1 (Receiving) following: following: following: following: following:
 Attend to the laboratory  Attend to the laboratory  Attend to the laboratory  Attend to the laboratory  Attend to the laboratory
The student passively
not later than 20 not later than 15 minutes not later than 10 minutes not later than 5 minutes early/on time
attends to laboratory and
Punctuality minutes  25% listen attentively  50% listen attentively  75% listen attentively  100% listen attentively
their attention is focused. 
1 (Lab Attendance & < 25% listen attentively  25% sensitivity, and  50% sensitivity, and  75% sensitivity, and focus  100% sensitivity, and focus
Intended outcomes include  < 25% sensitivity, and focus into issues arise focus into issues arise into issues arise and into issues arise and
Report Submission)
the student’s awareness, focus into issues arise and instructions given and instructions given instructions given instructions given
willingness to hear and to and instructions given  Late Submission (More  Late Submission (2 Day  Late Submission (1 Day  Submission on time
focus attention  Late Submission (More than 2 Day) Late) Late)
than 1 Week)
Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the
A2 (Responding) following: following: following: following: following:
The student actively  < 100% compliance on  100% compliance on lab  100% compliance on lab  100% compliance on lab  100% compliance on lab
lab safety rules and not safety rules and practice safety rules and practice safety rules and practice safety rules and practice
participates and reacts in
practice them them them them them
some way. Emphasis is on
 Not participate in group  < 50% participate in  50% participate in group  75% participate in group  100% participate in group
active participation on the
discussion, group discussion, discussion, discussion, discussion
part of the learners such as Participation &
 No interest in subject,  < 50% interest in  50% interest in subject,  75% interest in subject,  100% interest in subject,
2 compliance in responding, Knowledge on the open-
 Not enjoy helping subject,  50% enjoy helping  75% enjoy helping others.  100% fully enjoy helping
willingness to respond, or ended laboratory
others.  < 50% enjoy helping others.  Able to design, prepare, others.
satisfaction in responding  Not able to explain, others.  Able to design, prepare testing and explain the  Able to design, prepare,
design and prepare the  Not able to explain the and explain the experiments and the work testing, interpret and explain
experimental work in the experiment and the work experiments and the assigned in the report the experiments and the
report assigned in the report work assigned in the based on OEL work assigned in the report
report but not based on components based on OEL components
OEL components
Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the
following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving
approach: approach: approach: approach: approach:
 No acceptance of  25% acceptance of any  50% acceptance of any  75% acceptance of any  100% acceptance of any
A3 (Valuing) commitment commitment commitment commitment commitment
The worth a student  Uncommitted to carry  25% committed to carry  50% committed to carry  75% committed to carry  100% committed to carry
attaches to a particular responsibility responsibility responsibility responsibility responsibility
object, phenomenon, or  Uncommitted to provide  25% committed to  50% committed to  75% committed to provide  100% committed to provide
behavior. Ranges from Leadership skill, suggestion and/or idea provide suggestion provide suggestion suggestion and/or idea suggestion and/or idea
3 acceptance to Commitment &  Uncommitted to follow and/or idea and/or idea  75% committed to follow  100% committed to follow
commitment, carry Responsibility group decision  25% committed to follow  50% committed to follow group decision. group decision.
responsibility for the  Unable to control, lead, group decision. group decision  Able to control, lead and  Able to control, lead and
functioning of a group, fail to deliver the task to  Able to control, lead the  Able to control, lead and delivering the task to the delivering the task to the
attitudes and the group and does not group but fail to deliver delivering the task to the group efficiently and group efficiently and serves
appreciation. compromise to achieve the task and does not group members and usually does what is the as a leader in managing
the objectives of compromise towards the occasionally helps the best interest of the group individual ideas towards the
experiments (Reports) achievement objectives group to achieve the towards the achievement achievement of the
of the experiments objectives of the of the objectives objectives (Reports)
(Reports) experiments (Reports) (Reports)
ECW 341 Water Engineering Laboratory Program: Diploma In Civil Engineering (EC110)
Universiti Teknologi MARA Academic Session: OCT 2022 – FEB 2023
Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the
following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving
approach approach approach approach approach
 <100% maintain good  100% maintain good  100% maintain good  100% maintain good  100% maintain good health
health habits, health habits, health habits, health habits, compliance habits, compliance on lab
compliance on lab compliance on lab safety compliance on lab safety on lab safety rules and safety rules and practice
safety rules and practice rules and practice them rules and practice them practice them them
them  85% display self-  90% display self-  95% display self-reliance  100% display self-reliance in
 Not display self-reliance reliance in working reliance in working in working independently, working independently, and
in working independently, and independently, and and cooperate in group cooperate in group activities,
A4 (Organization) independently, and cooperate in group cooperate in group activities,  100% display a professional
At this level, the student cooperate in group activities, activities,  95% display a commitment to ethical
has held a value system activities,  85% display a  90% display a professional commitment practice daily.
for a sufficiently long  Not display a professional professional to ethical practice daily.  100% able to objectively
time to control his/her professional commitment to ethical commitment to ethical  95% able to objectively interpret case study/problem
behavior, has developed commitment to ethical practice daily. practice daily. interpret case  100% able to revise
Character &
4 a characteristic practice daily.  85% able to objectively  90% able to objectively study/problem judgments and changes
Organization
"lifestyle." Behavior is  Not able to objectively interpret case interpret case  95% able to revise approach considering new
pervasive, consistent, interpret case study/problem study/problem judgments and changes idea or issue arise.
predictable, and most study/problem  85% able to revise  90% able to revise approach considering  Team showed great
importantly,  Not able to revise judgments and changes judgments and changes new idea or issue arise. cohesion, interaction
characteristic of the judgments and changes approach considering approach considering  Team showed great respect. Team shared the
learner. approach considering new idea or issue arise. new idea or issue arise. cohesion, interaction tasks equally and utilizes
new idea or issue arise.  Team demonstrated  Team showed good respect. Team member abilities of each team
 Team showed poor some cohesion, cohesion, interaction did not share the tasks members. Reports were
cohesion, poor interaction respect. Most respect. Team member equally and did not utilize completed on time with
interaction and poor work was done by only 1 did not share the tasks abilities of each team satisfactory compilations.
respect. Only one member team. Reports equally and did not members. Reports were
person does all the were completed on time utilize abilities of each completed on time but
reports. Reports were but with unsatisfactory team members. Reports with satisfactory
not completed compilations. were completed on time compilations.
but with unsatisfactory
compilations
B. LABORATORY REPORT ASSESSMENT
Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the Demonstrate capability on the
following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving following in a problem-solving
A4 (Organizing) approach as shown in lab approach as shown in lab approach as shown in lab approach as shown in lab report approach as shown in lab report
Brings together different report report report  75% organize, formatted  100% fully organize,
values, resolving conflicts  Not organize,  25% organize, formatted  50% organize, formatted and systematic laboratory formatted and systematic
among them, and starting to unformatted and and systematic and systematic report laboratory report
build an internally consistent unsystematic laboratory laboratory report laboratory report  75% providing solution to  100% providing solution to
5 value system. Organizes Discussion report  25% providing solution  50% providing solution the water engineering the water engineering
values into priorities by  Not providing solution to to the water engineering to the water engineering problems. problems.
contrasting different the water engineering problems. problems.  The team is able to relate  The team is able to relate all
systems. The emphasis is on problems.  The team is able to  The team is able to all findings with the findings with the problem
comparing, relating, and  The team is unable to discuss some of the relate some of the problem with good with excellent discussion
synthesizing values. discuss the findings findings findings with the discussion
problem with fair
discussion

The team is able to provide The team is able to derive fair The team is able to derive good The team is able to derive accurate
6 A5 (Characterization) Conclusion The team is unable to conclude conclusion without answering conclusion based on findings to conclusion based on findings to conclusion based on findings to
the objective answer the objective answer the objective answer the objective

TOTAL

60
OBJECTIVES

1. To obtain appropriate coefficients to satisfy the Manning formula of a corrugated and


roughened bed on the depth of water at different flow rates.

LEARNING OUTCOMES

At the end of the lesson, students should be able to:

1. Conduct the determination of hydraulic parameters in uniform flow for open channels
laboratory experiment. (CO1 – PO4)

2. Analyze and interpret the data based on obtained data. (CO2 – PO6)

THEORITICAL BACKGROUND

For uniform flow in an open channel, the Manning formula states that:

where

n = Coefficient of roughness (Dimensionless)

v = Mean fluid velocity (m/s)

R = Hydraulic mean radius (m)

= Flow area A / Wetted perimeter P


Where:

Where

B= channel width (m)

S= Slope of energy line

= sin θ = (d0 – d1)/x

with

x = Distance between level of measurements (m)

d0 = Upstream depth of flow (m)

d1 = Downstream depth of flow (m)

The actual fluid velocity can be calculated as:

� = �/�

where:

v = Mean fluid velocity (m)

Q = volume of flow rate (m3 )

A = Area of flow (m2 )

= (Breadth of channel, b) x (depth of flow, h)

h = Average depth of flow above gravel bed (m)

(d0 + d1) / 2
PROBLEM STATEMENTS

The group is required to obtain the coefficient of roughness, n based on the laboratory test
on the two (2) type of different bed surface. Then need to compare to the actual Manning
coefficient publishes base on the two (2) types of different bed flow rates.

APPARATUS

i) i.
ii) Self-contained glass sided tilting flume
iii) ii.
iv) Rulers
v) iii.
vi) Paper
vii) iv.
viii) Corrugated bed
ix) v.
x) Gravel bed
xi) vi.
xii) Point gauge
PROCEDURE/METHOD

1. Install the corrugated bed section at the bottom of the flume.


2. Position the hook and point level gauge on the instrument rails.
3. Use the top of the corrugations in the bed as a datum and measure
4. the datum height.
5. 2)
6. Ensure the downstream tilting overshot weir is at the bottom of its
7. water flow, open the flow control valve and admit the water into the
8. flume. Once a small head of flowing water has been achieved do
9. not adjust the flow control valve again, in order to maintain a
10. constant flow rate throughout the experiment.
11. 3)
12. Measure the volume flow rate, Q, and the depth of flow d0 and d1
13. above the roughened bed at each end.
14. 4)
15. Raise the downstream tilting overshot weir in small stages,
16. repeating the measurements at each stage.
17. 5)
18. Further sets of readings can be obtained by repeating the above
19. measurement with different flow rates but increasing the slope of
20. the flume.
21. 6)
22. Repeat the whole procedures with gravel bed section.

where ,
n = Coefficient of roughness (Dimensionless)
v = Mean fluid velocity (m/s)
R = Hydraulic mean radius (m) = Flow area A / Wetted perimeter P
Where B= channel width (m)
S= Slope of energy line = sin θ = (d0 – d1)/x with x = Distance between level of
measurements (m)
d0 = Upstream depth of flow (m)
d1 = Downstream depth of flow (m)
DATA AND ANALYSIS

CORRUGATED BED

Length(cm) 83.2
Height(cm) 4.5
Width(cm) 29.7

No Flow rate (m3/s) upstream depth of downstream depth of


flow, d0 flow, d1(m)
1 0.00118 0.431 0.213
2 0.00187 0.541 0.296
3 0.00236 0.643 0.356
4 0.00306 0.797 0.467

R = A/P
A = 0.3 + 2[(0.431 + 0.213)/2]
=0.097
P = 0.3 + 2[(0.43 + 0.21)/2]
=0.944
S = (d0 – d1)/x
= (0.431 – 0.213)/0.8
=0.273
Q=AV
0.0118 = (0.3) (0.43) V
0.0118 = 0.129 V
V = 0.0091
0.0091 = (1/n) (0.219) (0.522)
n = 12.56
GRAVEL BED
Length(cm) 83.4
Height(cm) 7
Width(cm) 29.7

No. Flow rate (m3/s) upstream depth of flow, Downstream depth of flow,
d0 (m) d1 (m)
1 0.00144 0.495 0.221
2 0.00172 0.556 0.288
3 0.00208 0.635 0.325
4 0.00348 0.859 0.519

R = A/P
A = 0.3[(0.495 + 0.221)/2]
=0.107
P = 0.3 + 2[(0.495 + 022)/2]
= 1.016
S = (d0 – d1)/x
= (0.495 – 0.221)/0.8
= 0.343
Q = AV
0.00144 = (0.3) (0.495) V
0.00144 = 0.149 V
V = 0.0097
0.0097 = (1/n) (0.223) (0.586)
n = 13.47
DISCUSSION

Using the Manning equation, the coefficient of roughness for gravel beds and corrugated beds
was computed. According to online research, the roughness coefficient for gravel beds should
be higher than that for corrugated beds. Perhaps there were some mistakes when takin
the measurement of flow depth.

CONCLUSION

When both the flow depth and average flow velocity are consistent, the flow in a channel is
said to be in uniform flow. Uniform flow conditions are typically observed in long straight
lengths of channels with constant slope, constant cross section, and constant surface lining.
The coefficient of roughness can be calculated using Manning's roughness equation.

You might also like