Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 9 - Netflix Submission
Group 9 - Netflix Submission
Q1. What are Reed Hastings’s biggest decisions at the end of the case?
Ans. Hastings was selfcritical, and was often quoted as admitting to having made a number of, at least in
hindsight, poor decisions in relation to the technology and home entertainment industries.
These included online advertisements on the website, starting an independent film production
company, and buying DVDs out of the Sundance Film Festival (which turned out to offer limited
profitability), in addition to the 2011 Qwikster gaffe.
Should it continue to create its own content, or revert back to being a neutral platform?
o It should continue to create its own content because it’ll have its own licensing rights,
no need to renegotiate the licensing
Should it look to form exclusive contracts with content providers and/or hardware
manufacturers to “lock in” its customers?
o They should form long-term contracts with specific content providers. They should
target customer segments including children shows and local content
What was the appropriate role for the legacy DVD division—should it continue to be operated as
a cash cow for as long as it was economically viable, or should it be sold off so as to reinvest the
funds in current operations? Or, was it finally time, as suggested by analysts who argued the
firm was over-valued, to sell the company and cash out while it had a high market
capitalization?
o No, it should not come back, internet has made streaming a more viable and
comfortable option over DVDs
Q5. What were the sources of failure at video downloading/streaming? What risks did Netflix face if it
was successful at video downloading/streaming?
Risks associated: